CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00462683Updated Jan 6, 2012

Bone Loss, Fractures, and Management of Bone Health in People With Stroke in Managed Rehabilitation Settings

An observational study in Stroke, Anoxia and Brain Injury, sponsored by Northwestern University. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-01-06.

Sponsored by Northwestern University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
87
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the state of bone health of brain injury patients being seen within a rehabilitation setting. Osteopenia is a condition of bone in which decreased calcification, decreased density, or reduced mass occurs. Osteoporosis is a disease in which the bones become extremely porous, are subject to fracture, and heal slowly. More specifically, the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis at specific anatomic locations (e.g., forearms, hips, spine) will be determined as will specific interventions (e.g., use of vitamins, nutritional supplements, specific prescription medications) that people with brain injury may be applying, or have applied, to manage their bone health. An attempt will also be made to evaluate severity of brain injury, based on loss of muscle strength/function, and to compare this data with bone-focused information such as bone mineral density (BMD), falls, and history.

Read the detailed description

Primary Outcomes: As this study has no control or comparator group, the goal will be to provide descriptive data regarding the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis at each of the anatomic sites evaluated by DEXA in this specialized population (BMD outcome measures). Additionally, the use of bone-specific interventions (vitamins, nutritional supplements, medications), previous diagnostic testing (DEXA) and history of falls and fractures will be assessed to determine the extent to which bone health has been considered and evaluated in this population of individuals at increased risk of fracture.

Secondary Outcomes: Functional status measures will also be obtained to enable correlation with bone data.

This study involves a cross-sectional, descriptive evaluation of a cohort of 225 patients with brain injury who are being managed at the out-patient clinics by physicians from RIC. The goal of the study is to provide representative data of both the general bone health of this population of patients (degree, extent and localization of bone loss) as well as interventions that may have been implemented to manage their bone health (vitamins, nutritional supplements, prescription medications). After obtaining informed consent, those patients who wish to be involved will be asked to complete a medical history questionnaire that focuses on bone health and will then undergo measurement of bone density by DEXA (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry). At the time of the DEXA examination, muscle strength will be evaluated by a trained research coordinator. A dietary history and a blood sample will also be obtained, the latter for storage in order to later measure vitamin D levels and/or other bone markers. All subjects will then be given the opportunity to continue in the longitudinal arm of the study (second phase). Those who do will sign the informed consent and will then be re-evaluated at yearly intervals with the same set of data being obtained.

Descriptive Data to be Obtained:

  1. Demographics: date of birth, sex, race, ethnicity
  2. Detailed and complete medical history, with particular focus on:

    • Information regarding brain injury: time of occurrence, motor/sensory, etc.
    • Bone specific information: history of falls, fractures, use of medications, smoking, alcohol, family history of osteoporosis and fractures, previous DEXA, etc.
    • Questionnaire of functional status: use of affected arm, ambulation, assistive device, orthotic, frequency of spasms.
    • Evaluation of motor status using the Motor Components of the NIH Stroke Scale (items 4 - 7)
  3. Dietary history

Study procedures:

  1. DEXA evaluation. Specific measurements will be made for lumbar spine, hip and distal radius; lateral vertebral assessment will be obtained if possible.

Biological Samples:

  1. Two 10ml tubes of blood will be obtained from each participant. Serum will be separated and frozen in two aliquots to be saved for possible measurement of vitamin D levels (25OH vitamin D) and/or bone markers.
02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Anoxia
  • Brain Injury

Keywords

  • Stroke
  • Anoxia
  • Brain Injury
  • Rehabilitation
  • Osteoporosis
  • Osteopenia
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 87 is below the median of 160 across 1,692 observational studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University is the lead sponsor of 1,396 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 102 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Subjects who have experienced brain injury.

Inclusion criteria

  • History of brain injury at some defined time in the past (include stroke, traumatic brain injury, anoxia)
  • Age 16 years and older (no upper age limit)
  • Male and females
  • Able to undergo a DEXA examination (able to lie on the DEXA table for 20-30 minutes)
  • Able to provide answers to the questionnaires regarding medical and dietary history and demographics
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of spinal cord injury
  • History of traumatic brain damage
  • Inability to lie down appropriately to obtain DEXA measurements
  • Inability to communicate
  • Anything condition that in the judgment of the physician would prevent the person from participating
05

Study design

Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
87 participants (actual)
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna
06

Study locations

2 sites
  • Northwestern University
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
07

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 6, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00462683
Lead sponsor
Northwestern University
Collaborators
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Responsible party
Thomas J. Schnitzer (professor, Northwestern University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 19, 2007
Start date
Jul 2007
Primary completion
Dec 2010
Completion
Dec 2010
Last update
Jan 6, 2012

Study contacts

Thomas J Schnitzer, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Northwestern Univesity & Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
Richard Harvey, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Elliot Roth, MD
principal investigator · Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion