CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00453765montelukastUpdated Apr 8, 2013

The Effect of Montelukast in Patients With Chronic Cough and Bronchial Hyperreactivity

A Phase 4 interventional study of montelukast and placebo in Cough and Bronchial Hyperreactivity, sponsored by Isala. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-04-08.

Sponsored by Isala · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
89
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose is to determine whether montelukast during 6 weeks has superior antitussive effects (measured with the LCQ) compared with placebo in patients with cough lasting > 8 weeks and enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity.

Read the detailed description

Chronic cough is a frequent problem in general practice and one of the most common reasons for referral to a respiratory clinic. Prospective studies have shown that the vast majority of cases of chronic cough are due to one or more of three conditions: rhinitis/postnasal drip syndrome, asthma and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Other significant causes of chronic cough include postviral (post-infectious) cough, and eosinophilic bronchitis. In only a minority of the patients with a chronic cough no cause can be found. This is called idiopathic cough.

Analysis and treatment of patients with chronic cough often proved to be difficult and disappointing. Nevertheless, centers in which a comprehensive diagnostic and therapeutic protocol was implemented reported excellent results. Therefore the first cough clinic is started in The Isala Klinieken, Zwolle/The Netherlands in 2004.

Asthmatic cough is often accompanied by the more typical symptoms of dyspnoea and wheezing. In a subgroup of asthmatics, however, cough is the sole or predominant symptom. This condition is termed cough-variant asthma (CVA). Cough due to CVA usually improves within the first week of inhaled bronchodilator therapy, however, complete resolution of cough may require up to 8 weeks of combination therapy with inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids. A subgroup of CVA patients with severe, refractory cough may require systemic (oral) steroids, alone or followed by inhaled therapy.

Leukotrienes are contributing significantly to the pathobiology of asthma. These 'pathways of asthma' could be suppressed by leukotriene inhibitors. Multiple clinical trials have demonstrated the ability of the leukotriene modifiers to improve symptoms, pulmonary function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in chronic asthma, as well as in exercise-induced and aspirin-induced asthma. Until recently, the antitussive effects of this drug class had not been investigated properly. Spector and Tan concluded in a pilot trial with only 14 patients that 10 mg montelukast seems to be effective in CVA. However, nowadays in care of asthma, montelukast is widely used in a dosage of 10 mg. Therefore we intend to study the effects of montelukast on chronic cough (VAS-cough-score) on a wider patient population; is montelukast superior to placebo in the treatment of patients with chronic cough and a demonstrated bronchial hyperreactivity?

Aim of the study:

The purpose is to determine whether montelukast during 6 weeks has superior antitussive effects (measured with the VAS cough) compared with placebo in patients with cough lasting > 8 weeks and enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity.

Study design:

Montelukast trial: prospective single-centre, double blind randomised trial.

In the montelukast study 84 patients between 18 and 90 years old, referred to the cough outpatient clinic with chronic cough and enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity will be recruited after informed consent is obtained.

Patients will be randomised (for gender, age, smoking, duration of symptoms and the use of inhaled corticosteroids) to 6- week treatment with 10 mg daily montelukast or placebo. Before randomisation all patients have to fill in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for detection of the degree of cough in the last 24 hours and the dutch version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) for the detection of illness specific quality of life. Adverse events will be noted in this period. Finally, both groups will be compared.

Inhaled corticosteroids may be continued during the study at a constant dose. Nasal, ophthalmologic and dermatological steroids are allowed according to individual needs, but their dose should be kept constant throughout the trial.

H1 blockers, nasal anticholinergics as well as nasal or ophthalmologic preparations of nedocromil or cromoglycate are permitted for treatment of allergic rhinitis.

Study population:

Patients between 18 and 90 years old, referred to the cough outpatient clinic with chronic cough and enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity.

Intervention:

Patients between 16 and 90 years old, referred to the cough outpatient clinic with chronic cough and enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity will receive daily montelukast 10 mg or placebo during 6 weeks.

Main study endpoint :

  1. Difference in cough VAS scores; montelukast vs placebo.

Secondary study endpoints:

  1. Difference in average score on the Leicester Cough Questionaire (LCQ) between the two treatment groups; montelukast vs placebo.
  2. Comparison of the adverse events of montelukast vs placebo.

Randomisation:

Patients will be randomised by a computer minimisation program for the following factors: gender, age, smoking, duration of symptoms and the use of inhaled corticosteroids.

Statistical analysis:

The primary analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis. The mean change in the primary endpoint (LCQ total and domain scores) after 6 weeks between the groups will be analysed using an unpaired t-test. This test will also be used to analyse differences after 6 weeks in secondary endpoints (VAS cough score).

Since both the primary and secondary endpoints in the study will be measured more than two times (repeatedly measured) the course of these scores over time will be tested using MANOVA-analysis. To test for differences in proportions (proportion of patients with adverse events) the Chi2 -test will be used. Data analyses will be performed using SPSS version 12.

Burden, risks and advantages associated with participation:

Side effects have been reported in 10 % of the cases; mostly of headache and abdominal pain. Also gastrointestinal problems, allergic reactions, psychiatric disorders, liver, and haematological disorders could occur.

Interactions: Montelukast is metabolised by CYP3A4. Concomitant use of CYP3A4 inducing medication like fenytoïne, phenobarbital, or rifampicin must be prevented.

Medication metabolised by CYP2C8 must also be avoided, because in vitro studies have shown that montelukast is an powerful CYP2C8 inhibitor.

Benefits: superior resolution of cough compared to placebo.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cough
  • Bronchial Hyperreactivity

Keywords

  • cough
  • hyperreactivity
  • montelukast
03

In context

Cough

346 studies on the registry are indexed under Cough; 71 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 89 is above the median of 70 across 263 interventional studies indexed under Cough.

Browse Cough studies →

Lead sponsor

Isala is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • patients between 18 and 90 years old, referred to the cough outpatient clinic with chronic cough and enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity.
  • chronic cough is defined as a cough > 8 weeks duration.
  • enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity is a PD20 \< 2.5 mg methacholine.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • concomitant severe disease; lung cancer and diseases with a short life expectancy (\< 1 year).
  • patients suffering from COPD and/or other relevant lung diseases.
  • clinically relevant abnormal laboratory values suggesting an unknown disease requiring further clinical evaluation.
  • use of systemic steroids 4 weeks (injectable depot steroids 6 weeks) before entry into the baseline period, or more than 3 courses during the last 6 months.
  • pregnancy.
  • abnormal chest X-ray.
  • use of medication inducing CYP3A4 (for example; fenytoïne, phenobarbital or rifampicin.
  • use of medication metabolised by CYP2C8.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
89 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    A

    montelukast

    Drug: montelukast

  • Placebo comparator
    B

    placebo

    Drug: placebo

Interventions

  • Drugmontelukast

    montelukast, 8 weeks, once daily, 10 milligrams

    Also known as: singulair

  • Drugplacebo

    placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in average score on the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) between the two treatment groups; montelukast vs placebo.

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in cough VAS scores; montelukast vs placebo.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Comparison of the adverse events of montelukast vs placebo.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Isala Klinieken
    Zwolle, 8011 JW, Netherlands
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00453765
Lead sponsor
Isala
Responsible party
Jan W.K. van den Berg (Dr., Isala) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 29, 2007
Start date
Dec 2007
Primary completion
Sep 2010
Completion
Sep 2010
Last update
Apr 8, 2013

Study contacts

Jan Willem Van Den Berg, MD
study director · Departement of Pulmonology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion