ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00438191Updated Jun 20, 2017Results posted

A Clinical Trial of Splinting for DeQuervain's Tenosynovitis

An observational study in DeQuervain's Tenosynovitis, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-06-20.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
83
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

DeQuervain's tenosynovitis is characterized by pain on the pain on the radial (thumb) side of the wrist problems with thumb function. At this point, the standard care is to change daily activities, use a thumb brace, and the possible use of painkillers. There is a difference in opinion among physical therapists about how to use the splint in the treatment of DeQuervain tenosynovitis. Some physicians tell patients to wear the brace at all times while other therapists encourage patients to exercise and use the brace as needed. Both approaches to using the splint are accepted as standard. The purpose of this study is to test and evaluate these two ways of splinting and assess which one is better for patients with DeQuervain tenosynovitis.

Read the detailed description

De Quervain's tenosynovitis (stenosing tenosynovitis of the first dorsal extensor compartment) is characterized by pain on the radial (thumb) side of the wrist and impairment of thumb and wrist function. Histological evaluation is consistent with a chronic rather than an acute tenosynovitis consistent with the often prolonged course of this disease.

Nonoperative treatments include modification of activities, splint immobilization, icing and anti-inflammatory medication, and corticosteroid injections. Long opponens splinting (or short arm thumb spica splinting; a splint that immobilizes the wrist and the thumb) is standard and well accepted. There is no consensus on the best protocol for use of the splint. Some authors advocate full time splinting for 4 - 6 weeks, with the rationale that tendonitis will resolve with strict rest. Other authors, perhaps aware of histological evidence that De quervain's is a chronic rather than acute inflammatory condition, feel that the splint serves merely to relieve symptoms and is best used as best suits each individual patient. To our knowledge, there are not data available regarding these disparate views.

The ultimate prognosis for recovery in the condition seems satisfying, regardless of the treatment, and spontaneous recovery is the rule. Psychological and personality factors, such as pain anxiety, catastrophizing, and depression are strongly related to upper extremity specific health status and may also influence recovery.

The primary goal of this study is to determine which protocol of splinting leads to better outcome in non-surgical treatment of DeQuervain's tenosynovitis. As a secondary goal and to generate hypotheses for later studies we would like to evaluate the influence of psychosocial factors on both objective (grip strength) and subjective (DASH questionnaire) measures of outcome.

02

Conditions studied

  • DeQuervain's Tenosynovitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • DeQuervain's tenosynovitis
  • splinting
  • grip strength
  • satisfaction
  • DASH questionnaire
03

In context

Personal Satisfaction

541 studies on the registry are indexed under Personal Satisfaction; 93 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 83 is below the median of 180 across 115 observational studies indexed under Personal Satisfaction.

Browse Personal Satisfaction studies →

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,586 studies on the registry; 447 are open to participants now.

Of its 222 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 168 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients from the MGH Hand and Upper Extremity Service.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patient (age 18 years or greater)
  • Physician very confident about the diagnosis of DeQuervain's tenosynovitis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with previous history of surgical treatment for De Quervain's.
  • Skin conditions making splint wear problematic.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
83 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • 1

    Subjects who wear the splint whenever the feel the need.

  • 2

    Subjects who wear the splint whenever possible.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire

    The DASH questionnaire measures upper extremity disability on a scale from 0-100, where 0 is no disability and 100 is severe disability.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Grip Strength

    Grip strength is measured as a percentage of the non-affected or least affected side.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Treatment Satisfaction

    Treatment satisfaction was measured on a scale from 0-10, where 0 is complete dissatisfaction and 10 is complete satisfaction

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  3. Pain Intensity

    Pain intensity was measured using the Numeric Rating Scale, on a scale from 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the most pain.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jun 20, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAs-Desired SplintingFull Time Splinting
Started4340
Completed3226
Not completed1114

Outcome measures

PrimaryDisabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire

The DASH questionnaire measures upper extremity disability on a scale from 0-100, where 0 is no disability and 100 is severe disability.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire
units on a scaleAs-Desired SplintingFull Time Splinting
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire28 ± 1529 ± 20
SecondaryGrip Strength

Grip strength is measured as a percentage of the non-affected or least affected side.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of non-affected hand
Grip Strength
percentage of non-affected handAs-Desired SplintingFull Time Splinting
Grip Strength86 ± 2587 ± 18
SecondaryTreatment Satisfaction

Treatment satisfaction was measured on a scale from 0-10, where 0 is complete dissatisfaction and 10 is complete satisfaction

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Treatment Satisfaction
units on a scaleAs-Desired SplintingFull Time Splinting
Treatment Satisfaction6.3 ± 2.66.4 ± 2.9
SecondaryPain Intensity

Pain intensity was measured using the Numeric Rating Scale, on a scale from 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the most pain.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pain Intensity
units on a scaleAs-Desired SplintingFull Time Splinting
Pain Intensity3.8 ± 2.04.4 ± 2.9

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
As-Desired Splinting0/43 (0%)0/43 (0%)0/43 (0%)
Full Time Splinting0/40 (0%)0/40 (0%)0/40 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)As-Desired SplintingFull Time SplintingTotal
Mean49.93 ± 14.5848.74 ± 13.9049.26 ± 14.55
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)As-Desired SplintingFull Time SplintingTotal
Female363571
Male7512
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)As-Desired SplintingFull Time SplintingTotal
United States434083
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire(units on a scale)As-Desired SplintingFull Time SplintingTotal
Mean36.5 ± 19.033.3 ± 17.834.96 ± 18.40
Pain Intensity
Pain Intensity(units on a scale)As-Desired SplintingFull Time SplintingTotal
Mean5.5 ± 2.35.8 ± 2.45.6 ± 2.4
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Revised (CES-D)
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Revised (CES-D)(units on a scale)As-Desired SplintingFull Time SplintingTotal
Mean16.3 ± 6.516.3 ± 8.716.3 ± 7.6
Pain Catastrophizing scale (PCS)
Pain Catastrophizing scale (PCS)(units on a scale)As-Desired SplintingFull Time SplintingTotal
Mean20.9 ± 8.717.5 ± 9.519.3 ± 9.2
Grip Strength
Grip Strength(percentage of non-affected hand)As-Desired SplintingFull Time SplintingTotal
Mean54.1 ± 22.958.6 ± 18.756.3 ± 21.0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Dec 2005, a primary completion of Dec 2015 and a completion of Dec 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jun 2017, 1 year 6 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 20, 2007
First posted
Feb 22, 2007
Start
Dec 2005
Primary completionActual
Dec 2015
CompletionActual
Dec 2015
Results first posted
Jun 20, 2017
Last update
Jun 20, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 20, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00438191
Responsible party
David C. Ring, MD (Principal Investigator; Director of Research, Hand Service, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 22, 2007
Start date
Dec 2005
Primary completion
Dec 2015
Completion
Dec 2015
Results posted
Jun 20, 2017
Last update
Jun 20, 2017

Study contacts

David Ring, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion