CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00433459Updated Mar 26, 2020

Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Young Patients With Hodgkin's Lymphoma

A Phase 3 interventional study of cyclophosphamide and dacarbazine in Lymphoma, sponsored by Christine Mauz-Körholz. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged Up to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-26.

Sponsored by Christine Mauz-Körholz · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,134
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying different combination chemotherapy regimens to compare how well they work in treating young patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Determine whether the 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rate in pediatric patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma with an adequate response after 2 courses of vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, and doxorubicin hydrochloride (OEPA) (without radiotherapy) are consistent with an estimated target EFS rate of 90%.
  • Compare the EFS (without a deterioration) of patients treated with procarbazine hydrochloride vs dacarbazine (treatment groups 2 and 3).
  • Determine the treatment outcome of a standardized risk-adapted relapse strategy in these patients.

Secondary

  • Determine whether the 5-year EFS rate in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma with an inadequate response after 2 OEPA courses and standard involved-field radiotherapy are consistent with an estimated target EFS rate of 90%.
  • Determine whether a positive positron emission tomography scan before planned high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation has a negative prognostic significance.
  • Compare the effect of dacarbazine vs procarbazine on the rate of infertility in males and premature menopause in females (treatment groups 2 and 3).

Tertiary

  • Determine the impact of real-time central staging and response assessment on treatment outcome in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, controlled, parallel-group, open-label, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to staging and response assessment (central vs local) and disease stage (IA/B or IIA [first-line treatment group 1] vs I_EA/B, II_EA, IIB, or IIIA [first-line treatment group 2] vs II_EB, III_E A/B, IIIB, or IVA/B [first-line treatment group 3]).

  • First-line treatment group 1: Patients receive oral prednisone (or prednisolone) 3 times daily on days 1-15, vincristine IV on days 1, 8, and 15, doxorubicin hydrochloride IV over 1-6 hours on days 1 and 15, and etoposide (or etoposide phosphate) IV over 1-2 hours on days 1-5 (OEPA).

Treatment repeats every 28 days for 2 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Patients are assessed by fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography (\^18FDG-PET) scan. Patients with inadequate response undergo radiotherapy within 35 days after completion of OEPA.

  • First-line treatment group 2: Patients receive OEPA as in group 1. After completion of OEPA, patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

    • Arm I: Patients receive oral prednisone (or prednisolone) 3 times daily and oral procarbazine hydrochloride 2-3 times a day on days 1-15 and vincristine IV and cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 8 (COPP).
    • Arm II: Patients receive oral prednisone (or prednisolone) 3 times daily on days 1-15, dacarbazine IV over 15-30 minutes on days 1-3, and vincristine IV and cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 8 (COPDAC).

In both arms, treatment repeats every 28 days for 2 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Patients are assessed by \^18FDG-PET scan. Patients with an inadequate response undergo radiotherapy within 35 days after completion of COPP or COPDAC.

  • First-line treatment group 3: Patients receive OEPA as in group 1. After completion of OEPA, patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

    • Arm I: Patients receive COPP as in arm I of group 2.
    • Arm II: Patients receive COPDAC as in arm II of group 2. In both arms, treatment repeats every 28 days for 4 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Patients are assessed by \^18FDG-PET scan. Patients with an inadequate response undergo radiotherapy within 35 days after completion of COPP or COPDAC.

Patients with biopsy-confirmed disease progression OR relapse after first-line treatment on this study or on protocols DAL-HD 90, GPOH-HD 95, GPOHHD 2002 Pilot, or similar treatment proceed to second-line therapy. Patients are stratified according to relapse/progression status (late relapse from first-line treatment group 1 [second-line treatment group 1] vs early relapse from first-line treatment groups 1, 2, or 3 or late relapse from first-line treatment groups 2 or 3 [second-line treatment group 2] vs disease progression [second-line treatment group 3]). Patients undergo a \^18FDG-PET scan prior to beginning second-line therapy.

  • Second-line treatment group 1: Patients receive ifosfamide IV over 22 hours and etoposide IV over 1-2 hours and oral prednisone three times daily on days 1-5 (IEP). Patients then receive doxorubicin hydrochloride IV over 1-6 hours, bleomycin IV, vinblastine IV, and dacarbazine IV over 15-30 minutes on days 22 and 36 (ABVD). Treatment repeats every 50 days for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

After chemotherapy treatment, patients undergo radiotherapy.

  • Second-line treatment group 2: Patients receive IEP and ABVD as in group 1. Autologous stem cells are collected after course 1 or 2 of IEP/ABVD.

After chemotherapy, patients with an adequate response undergo radiotherapy. Patients with an inadequate response undergo high-dose chemotherapy comprising carmustine IV over 1-2 hours on day -7, etoposide IV and cytarabine IV over 30 minutes twice daily on days -6 to -3, and melphalan IV over 1½ hours on day -2. Patients then undergo autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Patients undergo a \^18FDG-PET scan on day 50-54. Patients with \^18FDG-PET scan positive disease undergo radiotherapy.

  • Second-line treatment group 3: Patients receive IEP and ABVD as in group 1. All patients then undergo high-dose chemotherapy and HSCT as in group 2.

Patients undergo a \^18FDG-PET scan on day 50-54. Patients with \^18FDG-PET scan positive disease undergo radiotherapy.

After completion of study therapy, patients are followed periodically for 5 years.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 2,150 patients will be accrued for this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lymphoma

Keywords

  • childhood lymphocyte depletion Hodgkin lymphoma
  • childhood mixed cellularity Hodgkin lymphoma
  • childhood nodular sclerosis Hodgkin lymphoma
  • stage I childhood Hodgkin lymphoma
  • stage II childhood Hodgkin lymphoma
  • stage III childhood Hodgkin lymphoma
  • stage IV childhood Hodgkin lymphoma
03

In context

Lymphoma

5,578 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphoma; 825 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,134 is above the median of 40 across 4,508 interventional studies indexed under Lymphoma.

Browse Lymphoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Christine Mauz-Körholz is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed classical Hodgkin's lymphoma

    • No lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin's lymphoma
    • Fine-needle biopsy not sufficient
  • No prior treatment for Hodgkin's lymphoma except for recommended pre-phase therapy for a large mediastinal tumor

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • No known hypersensitivity or contraindication to study drugs
  • No other current malignancy
  • No severe concurrent disease (e.g., immune deficiency syndrome)
  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for up to 1 year after completion of study treatment
  • No known HIV positivity

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • No prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy
  • At least 30 days since prior and no other concurrent investigational drugs or participation in another investigational trial
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,134 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    COPP

    procarbazine-containing consolidation chemotherapy arm

    Drug: cyclophosphamide · Drug: prednisolone · Drug: prednisone · Drug: procarbazine hydrochloride · Drug: vincristine sulfate · Radiation: fludeoxyglucose F 18 · Radiation: radiation therapy

  • Experimental
    COPDAC

    procarbazine-free consolidation chemotherapy arm

    Drug: cyclophosphamide · Drug: dacarbazine · Drug: prednisolone · Drug: prednisone · Drug: vincristine sulfate · Radiation: fludeoxyglucose F 18 · Radiation: radiation therapy

Interventions

  • Drugcyclophosphamide

    drug is used in first line treatment in combination (COPP or COPDAC)

    Also known as: CYC

  • Drugdacarbazine

    drug is used in first line treatment in combination (COPDAC)

    Also known as: DTIC

  • Drugprednisolone

    drug is used in first line treatment in combination (OEPA, COPP or COPDAC)

  • Drugprednisone

    drug is used in first line treatment in combination (OEPA, COPP or COPDAC)

  • Drugprocarbazine hydrochloride

    drug is used in first line treatment in combination (COPP)

  • Drugvincristine sulfate

    drug is used in first line treatment in combination (OEPA, COPP or COPDAC)

    Also known as: VCR

  • Radiationfludeoxyglucose F 18

    used as a diagnostic marker for metabolically active tumour at staging and response assessment

  • Radiationradiation therapy

    part of combination treatment (combined modality between chemo- and radiotherapy)

    Also known as: IFRT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Event-free survival

    Time frame: 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall survival

    Time frame: 5 years

  2. Progression-free survival

    Time frame: 5 years

  3. CTC (Common toxicity criteria) toxicity levels of therapy elements

    Time frame: 5 years

  4. Evidence of male infertility score

    Time frame: 5 years

  5. Evidence of female infertility score

    Time frame: 5 years

  6. Long-term consequences (e.g., premature menopause, secondary cancer)

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Universitaetsklinikum Giessen-Marburg
    Giessen, D-35385, Germany
  • Royal Hospital for Sick Children
    Edinburgh, Scotland EH9 1LF, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mauz-Korholz C, Landman-Parker J, Balwierz W, Ammann RA, Anderson RA, Attarbaschi A, Bartelt JM, Beishuizen A, Boudjemaa S, Cepelova M, Claviez A, Daw S, Dieckmann K, Fernandez-Teijeiro A, Fossa A, Gattenlohner S, Georgi T, Hjalgrim LL, Hraskova A, Karlen J, Kluge R, Kurch L, Leblanc T, Mann G, Montravers F, Pears J, Pelz T, Rajic V, Ramsay AD, Stoevesandt D, Uyttebroeck A, Vordermark D, Korholz D, Hasenclever D, Wallace WH. Response-adapted omission of radiotherapy and comparison of consolidation chemotherapy in children and adolescents with intermediate-stage and advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (EuroNet-PHL-C1): a titration study with an open-label, embedded, multinational, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):125-137. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00470-8. Epub 2021 Dec 9. Erratum In: Lancet Oncol. 2022 Feb;23(2):e59. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00029-8. PubMed 34895479 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 26, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00433459
Lead sponsor
Christine Mauz-Körholz
Collaborators
Deutsche Krebshilfe e.V., Bonn (Germany), Euronet Worldwide
Responsible party
Christine Mauz-Körholz (Prof. Dr. med. Christine Mauz-Körholz, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Feb 12, 2007
Start date
Jan 2007
Primary completion
Jan 2013
Completion
Jan 2013
Last update
Mar 26, 2020

Study contacts

Dieter Koerholz, MD
study chair · Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg
W. Hamish Wallace, MD
principal investigator · Royal Hospital for Sick Children
Judith Landman-Parker, MD
principal investigator · Hopital d'Enfants Trousseau

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion