CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00420004Updated Apr 27, 2018Results posted

A Study for Participants With Major Depression

A Phase 2 interventional study of LY2216684 and Placebo in Major Depressive Disorder, sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company. Completed at 7 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-04-27.

Sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
469
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a study to assess the safety and effectiveness of LY2216684 compared to placebo in treating adults with major depressive disorder.

02

Conditions studied

  • Major Depressive Disorder
03

In context

Depressive Disorder

4,845 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder; 514 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 469 is above the median of 80 across 3,999 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder.

Browse Depressive Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Eli Lilly and Company is the lead sponsor of 2,048 studies on the registry; 140 are open to participants now.

Of its 521 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 341 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Meet criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) without psychotic features.
  • Have education level and a degree of understanding such that the participant can communicate with the site study personnel.
  • Judged to be reliable and agree to keep all appointments for clinic visits, tests, and procedures, including venipuncture, and examinations required by the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have had any additional, ongoing psychiatric condition other than major depression or dysthymia that was considered the primary diagnosis within 6 months of the first study visit.
  • Have a lifetime history of Bipolar I or II Disorder, psychotic disorder, or a factitious disorder.
  • Are judged to be at high risk for imminently harming themselves or others.
  • Have a serious medical illness, including any cardiovascular, hepatic, respiratory, hematologic, endocrinologic, neurologic disease, or clinically significant laboratory or electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormality. Clinically significant lab abnormalities are those which, in the judgment of the investigator, indicate a serious medical problem or require intervention.
  • Have any diagnosed medical condition which could be exacerbated by treatment with LY2216684, including hypertension, increased heart rate, arrhythmias, heart disease, narrow angle glaucoma, or urinary hesitancy.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
469 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    LY2216684

    LY2216684: flexible dose of 3, 6, 9, or 12 milligrams (mg), tablets, administered orally, once daily for 8 weeks. For the first week of treatment, participants received a starting dose of 3 mg/day. Then, based on tolerability, for the next 7 weeks, the dose could remain at 3 mg/day; it could be increased 3 mg at a time (scheduled visit) to a maximum dose of 12 mg/day; or it could be decreased 3 mg at any time (scheduled or unscheduled visits) to a minimum dose of 3 mg/day. All participants were required to take an equal number of tablets (2) and capsules (2) per day. Therefore, participants on 3 mg/day and 6 mg/day of LY2216684 also received 1 LY2216684-matching placebo tablet + 2 escitalopram-matching placebo capsules. Participants on 9 mg/day and 12 mg/day of LY2216684 also received 2 escitalopram-matching placebo capsules.

    Drug: LY2216684 · Drug: Placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo: tablet and capsule equivalents to LY2216684 and escitalopram, respectively, administered orally, once daily for 8 weeks.

    Drug: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Escitalopram

    Escitalopram: flexible dose of 10 or 20 milligram (mg), capsules, administered orally, once daily for 8 weeks. For the first week of treatment, participants received a starting dose of 10 mg/day. Then, based on tolerability, for the next 7 weeks, the dose could remain at 10 mg/day; it could be increased up to a maximum dose of 20 mg/day; or it could be decreased back to 10 mg/day. All participants were required to take an equal number of tablets (2) and capsules (2) per day. Therefore, participants on 10 mg/day of escitalopram also received 1 escitalopram-matching placebo capsule + 2 LY2216684-matching placebo tablets. Participants on 20 mg/day of escitalopram also received 2 LY2216684-matching placebo tablets.

    Drug: Placebo · Drug: Escitalopram

Interventions

  • DrugLY2216684

    3-mg and 6-mg tablets

    Also known as: Edivoxetine

  • DrugPlacebo
  • DrugEscitalopram

    10-mg capsules

    Also known as: Lexapro®, Cipralex®

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Total Score

    The HAMD-17 is a 17-item assessment used to assess the severity of depression and its improvement during the course of therapy. Each item was evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 4 (very severe) or a 3-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 2 (marked). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. The total score was the sum of the scores from HAMD-17 Items 1 through 17 and ranged from 0 (not at all depressed) to 52 (severely depressed). Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) adjusting for treatment, investigator, visit, baseline score, treatment-by-visit, and baseline score-by-visit.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Maier-Philipp Subscale of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)

    The HAMD-17 is a 17-item assessment used to assess the severity of depression and its improvement during the course of therapy. Each item was evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 4 (very severe) or a 3-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 2 (marked). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. The Maier-Phillip subscale of the HAMD-17 represents the 6 "core" symptoms of depression (items: 1=depressed mood, 2=feelings of guilt, 7=work and activities, 8=retardation, 9=agitation, 10=anxiety/psychic). The subscale scores range from 0 (normal) to 24 (severe). Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) adjusting for treatment, investigator, visit, baseline score, treatment-by-visit, and baseline score-by-visit.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

  2. Response and Remission Rates

    A participant meets response criteria if there is at least a 50% reduction in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) total score from baseline to the last observation carried forward (LOCF) endpoint visit. A participant meets remission criteria if the HAMD-17 total score is less than or equal to 7 at the LOCF endpoint visit. The percent of participants meeting criteria is summarized. HAMD-17 is a 17-item assessment used to assess the severity of depression and its improvement during the course of therapy. Each item was evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 4 (very severe) or a 3-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 2 (marked). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. The total score was the sum of the scores from HAMD-17 Items 1 through 17 and ranged from 0 (not at all depressed) to 52 (severely depressed).

    Time frame: Baseline, up to Week 8

  3. Clinical Global Impression of Improvement Score at Week 8

    The Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale measures the clinician's perception of participant improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. Scores range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) adjusting for treatment, investigator, visit, and treatment-by-visit.

    Time frame: Week 8

  4. Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) Total Score up to Week 8 Endpoint

    The HAMA is a 14-item assessment used to assess the severity of anxiety. The investigator talked to the participant about the symptoms he or she experienced during the previous week. Each item was scored using a 5-point scale (0=not present to 4=very severe). The total score of HAMA ranged from 0 (normal) to 56 (severe). Least Squares (LS) means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to Week 8

  5. Change From Baseline on the 36-item Short-Form (SF-36) Health Status Survey Mental and Physical Components up to Week 8 Endpoint

    The SF-36 Health Status Survey is a generic, health-related scale assessing a participant's quality of life on 8 domains: general health (GH), physical functioning (PF), role-physical, role-emotional, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, and mental health. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items (GH \[range: 5-25\]; PF \[range: 10-30\]; role-physical \[range: 4-8\]; role-emotional \[range: 3-6\]; social functioning \[range: 2-10\]; bodily pain \[range: 2-11\]; vitality \[range: 4-24\]; mental health \[range: 5-30\]) and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status or functioning. Two summary scores (mental component and physical component scores) were constructed based on the 8 SF-36 domains. Mental component summary and physical component summary scores range from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicate better health status).

    Time frame: Baseline, up to Week 8

  6. Change From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Total Score up to Week 8 Endpoint

    The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology is a 16-item participant-rated measure of depressive symptomatology. There were 4 possible answers per question that are specific to the question; each question (Q) was scored 0 (no problems) to 3 (increased symptoms). The total score was the sum of the highest number from Q1-4, number from Q5, highest number from Q6-9, total for Q10-14, and the highest number from Q15-16. The total score ranges from 0 to 27 with higher scores indicative of greater severity of depression. Least Squares (LS) means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to Week 8

  7. Change From Baseline in Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation up to Week 8 Endpoint

    Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSI) is a 21-item participant-completed questionnaire designed to assess severity of suicidal ideation in adults and adolescents. The BSI total score is calculated as the sum of the responses (rated from 0 to 2 in terms of severity) to the first 19 items of the BSI scale. The BSI total score ranges from 0 to 38, with a higher score indicating a higher degree of suicide ideation.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to Week 8

  8. Change From Baseline in Modified Overt Aggression (OAS-M) Scale up to Week 8 Endpoint

    OAS-M is a clinician-administered semistructured interview designed to assess various manifestations of aggressive behavior. Final scores are rated on 3 scales: Aggression (Agg), Irritability (Irrt), Suicidality (Suic). Agg scale has 4 subscales: Verbal Assault (Aslt), Aslt Against Objects, Aslt Against Others, Aslt Against Self; each item is scored 0-5, multiplied by the frequency of the behavior, then summed together. Agg total score is the weighted sum of the subscale scores (weights: 1=Verbal Aslt, 2=Aslt Against Objects, 3=Aslt Against Others, 4=Aslt Against Self). The Irrt scale has 2 subscales: Global Irrt, Subjective Irrt. Suic scale has 3 subscales: Suicidal Tendencies, Intent of Attempt, Lethality of Attempt. The 2 Irrt and 3 Suic subscales are rated on 6 or 7 point scales from 0=none/not at all to 6/7=very extreme. The total score ranges from 0-10 for the Irrt scale and 0-16 on the Suic scale. Least Squares means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline s

    Time frame: Baseline, up to Week 8

  9. Change From Baseline in Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale up to Week 8 Endpoint

    The Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX) is used to assess sexual functioning in both males and females. The ASEX total score for the male and female version is calculated as the sum of the responses (rated from 1 \[extremely\] to 6 \[no/never\]) to the 5 items of the ASEX scale. Total scores ranged from 5 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater sexual dysfunction.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to Week 8

  10. Change From Baseline in Insomnia Severity Index up to Week 8 Endpoint

    The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) is a brief self-report instrument measuring the participant's perception of his or her insomnia. The ISI score is calculated as the sum of the responses to the 7 items of the ISI scale. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 scale and the total score ranges from 0 to 28 with a higher score suggesting more severe insomnia.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to Week 8

  11. Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fatigue Severity Scale

    Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is a 9-item measure of fatigue severity. Each item is scored by the participant on a scale of 1 ("Disagree") to 7 ("Agree"), with a higher score indicating a stronger agreement with the item statement regarding the participant's fatigue symptoms. The FSS total score ranges from 1 to 7, and is obtained by averaging the responses to the 9 items. Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) adjusting for treatment, investigator, visit, baseline score, treatment-by-visit, and baseline score-by-visit.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

  12. Pharmacokinetics: Predicted Maximal Concentration of LY2216684 at Steady State (Cmax,ss) at Week 8 Endpoint

    Predicted maximal LY2216684 plasma concentrations at steady state (Cmax,ss) are reported, using the dose at the last visit in the study for participants included in the primary efficacy analysis.

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

  13. Number of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (Safety and Tolerability)

    The number of participants with at least one serious adverse event, regardless of causality is reported cumulatively through Week 8. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Event module.

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 8

  14. Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-21) Total Score

    The HAMD-21 is a 21-item assessment used to measure depression severity. Items were rated on a scale from 0 (symptoms not present) to a maximum of 2 to 4 (symptom extremely severe) for a total score ranging from 0 (not at all depressed) to 60 (severely depressed). Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) adjusting for treatment, investigator, visit, baseline score, treatment-by-visit, and baseline score-by-visit.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

  15. Cognitive Assessment Battery: Change From Baseline in Word List Learning and Delayed Recall Test (WLDRT) up to Week 8 Endpoint

    The WLDRT is a test of visual learning and recall. Participants are shown a series of words (commonly used nouns) and asked to say each of the words aloud, then are asked to recall the words and the total number of correct words recalled is recorded (possible score ranged from 0 to 15 words). The process is repeated 3 times. The Word List Learning Test score is calculated as the average number of words recalled during the first 3 trials. After a 30-minute delay, participants are again asked to recall the words, and the total number of correct words remembered after the delay is recorded as the Delayed Recall Test score. The baseline value was the last non-missing value before the first randomized double-blind study drug administration. Least Squares (LS) means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to week 8

  16. Cognitive Assessment Battery: Change From Baseline in Symbol Digit Substitution Test (SDST) up to Week 8 Endpoint

    The SDST is an attention-demanding psychomotor component based on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. The participant is given a symbol/digit code in which each of the digits 1 through 9 is paired with a different symbol. Below the code, a series of symbols selected from those in the code are presented in an irregular order. The participant is instructed to write the number that is appropriate for each symbol in the space below each symbol and to complete as many correct digits as possible within a 90-second test period. For this test, the number of attempts and number of correct digits is collected. The percentage of correct digits is presented based on the number of correct digits divided by the number of attempts, multiplied by 100 (score ranged from 0 to 100% correct). Least squares (LS) means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to Week 8

  17. Cognitive Assessment Battery: Change From Baseline in Two Digit Cancellation Test up to Week 8 Endpoint

    The Two Digit Cancellation Test (2DCT) is a clinical adaptation of the visual search tasks that have been used to investigate cognitive processes involved in attention and visual information processing. For this test, the participant is presented with a piece of paper containing rows of digits. At the top of the page are two target digits. The participant is instructed to examine each row of digits working from top to bottom and left to right crossing off each number that matches either of the two numbers at the top of the page. The number of targets hit, number of errors, and number of times the participant had to be reminded of the task are recorded for the 45-second test. The 2DCT composite cognitive score is calculated as the number of targets hit - number of errors - number of reminders. 2DCT score ranges 0-40 with higher score indicating better cognition. Least squares (LS) means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to Week 8

  18. Cognitive Assessment Battery: Change From Baseline in Trail Making A up to Week 8 Endpoint

    Trail Making A is a neurocognitive test associated with general brain function. While being timed, the participant is instructed to connect 25 randomly placed circled numbers on a page in numerical sequence without lifting their pencil. If a participant makes a mistake, the mistake is pointed out and the participant must start again from the last correct circle. The total time to complete the task (up to 300 seconds, with a lower value indicating better brain function) is recorded. Least squares (LS) means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to Week 8

07

Results

Posted Apr 27, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLY2216684PlaceboEscitalopram
Started26913862
Received at least 1 dose of study drug24912254
Completed1406730
Not completed1297132
Withdrew: Adverse event411
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy541
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up311210
Withdrew: Entry criteria not met010
Withdrew: Physician decision1442
Withdrew: Protocol violation543
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject674214
Withdrew: Sponsor decision331

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Total Score

The HAMD-17 is a 17-item assessment used to assess the severity of depression and its improvement during the course of therapy. Each item was evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 4 (very severe) or a 3-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 2 (marked). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. The total score was the sum of the scores from HAMD-17 Items 1 through 17 and ranged from 0 (not at all depressed) to 52 (severely depressed). Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) adjusting for treatment, investigator, visit, baseline score, treatment-by-visit, and baseline score-by-visit.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Total Score
units on a scaleLY2216684PlaceboEscitalopram
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Total Score-13.2 ± 0.53-12.6 ± 0.74-14.7 ± 1.14
Statistical analysis
  • LY2216684 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.494
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in Maier-Philipp Subscale of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)

The HAMD-17 is a 17-item assessment used to assess the severity of depression and its improvement during the course of therapy. Each item was evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 4 (very severe) or a 3-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 2 (marked). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. The Maier-Phillip subscale of the HAMD-17 represents the 6 "core" symptoms of depression (items: 1=depressed mood, 2=feelings of guilt, 7=work and activities, 8=retardation, 9=agitation, 10=anxiety/psychic). The subscale scores range from 0 (normal) to 24 (severe). Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) adjusting for treatment, investigator, visit, baseline score, treatment-by-visit, and baseline score-by-visit.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Maier-Philipp Subscale of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)
units on a scaleLY2216684PlaceboEscitalopram
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Maier-Philipp Subscale of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)-6.7 ± 0.26-6.2 ± 0.36-7.6 ± 0.55
SecondaryResponse and Remission Rates

A participant meets response criteria if there is at least a 50% reduction in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) total score from baseline to the last observation carried forward (LOCF) endpoint visit. A participant meets remission criteria if the HAMD-17 total score is less than or equal to 7 at the LOCF endpoint visit. The percent of participants meeting criteria is summarized. HAMD-17 is a 17-item assessment used to assess the severity of depression and its improvement during the course of therapy. Each item was evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 4 (very severe) or a 3-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 2 (marked). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. The total score was the sum of the scores from HAMD-17 Items 1 through 17 and ranged from 0 (not at all depressed) to 52 (severely depressed).

Time frame:
Baseline, up to Week 8
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Response and Remission Rates
percentage of participantsLY2216684PlaceboEscitalopram
Response54.048.453.7
Remission38.731.142.6
SecondaryClinical Global Impression of Improvement Score at Week 8

The Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale measures the clinician's perception of participant improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. Scores range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) adjusting for treatment, investigator, visit, and treatment-by-visit.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement Score at Week 8
units on a scaleLY2216684PlaceboEscitalopram
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement Score at Week 82.2 ± 0.092.3 ± 0.122.0 ± 0.19
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) Total Score up to Week 8 Endpoint

The HAMA is a 14-item assessment used to assess the severity of anxiety. The investigator talked to the participant about the symptoms he or she experienced during the previous week. Each item was scored using a 5-point scale (0=not present to 4=very severe). The total score of HAMA ranged from 0 (normal) to 56 (severe). Least Squares (LS) means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score.

Time frame:
Baseline, up to Week 8
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) Total Score up to Week 8 Endpoint
units on a scaleLY2216684PlaceboEscitalopram
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) Total Score up to Week 8 Endpoint-9.7 ± 0.62-9.6 ± 0.82-11.6 ± 1.19
SecondaryChange From Baseline on the 36-item Short-Form (SF-36) Health Status Survey Mental and Physical Components up to Week 8 Endpoint

The SF-36 Health Status Survey is a generic, health-related scale assessing a participant's quality of life on 8 domains: general health (GH), physical functioning (PF), role-physical, role-emotional, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, and mental health. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items (GH \[range: 5-25\]; PF \[range: 10-30\]; role-physical \[range: 4-8\]; role-emotional \[range: 3-6\]; social functioning \[range: 2-10\]; bodily pain \[range: 2-11\]; vitality \[range: 4-24\]; mental health \[range: 5-30\]) and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status or functioning. Two summary scores (mental component and physical component scores) were constructed based on the 8 SF-36 domains. Mental component summary and physical component summary scores range from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicate better health status).

Time frame:
Baseline, up to Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline on the 36-item Short-Form (SF-36) Health Status Survey Mental and Physical Components up to Week 8 Endpoint
units on a scaleLY2216684PlaceboEscitalopram
Mental Component Summary13.4 ± 13.112.6 ± 13.912.4 ± 12.4
Physical Component Summary4.17 ± 9.002.37 ± 8.262.74 ± 7.65
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Total Score up to Week 8 Endpoint

The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology is a 16-item participant-rated measure of depressive symptomatology. There were 4 possible answers per question that are specific to the question; each question (Q) was scored 0 (no problems) to 3 (increased symptoms). The total score was the sum of the highest number from Q1-4, number from Q5, highest number from Q6-9, total for Q10-14, and the highest number from Q15-16. The total score ranges from 0 to 27 with higher scores indicative of greater severity of depression. Least Squares (LS) means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score.

Time frame:
Baseline, up to Week 8
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Total Score up to Week 8 Endpoint
units on a scaleLY2216684PlaceboEscitalopram
Change From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Total Score up to Week 8 Endpoint-10.2 ± 0.54-8.3 ± 0.71-11.6 ± 1.04
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation up to Week 8 Endpoint

Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSI) is a 21-item participant-completed questionnaire designed to assess severity of suicidal ideation in adults and adolescents. The BSI total score is calculated as the sum of the responses (rated from 0 to 2 in terms of severity) to the first 19 items of the BSI scale. The BSI total score ranges from 0 to 38, with a higher score indicating a higher degree of suicide ideation.

Time frame:
Baseline, up to Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation up to Week 8 Endpoint
units on a scaleLY2216684PlaceboEscitalopram
Change From Baseline in Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation up to Week 8 Endpoint-0.90 ± 3.39-0.54 ± 2.14-0.78 ± 2.16
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Modified Overt Aggression (OAS-M) Scale up to Week 8 Endpoint

OAS-M is a clinician-administered semistructured interview designed to assess various manifestations of aggressive behavior. Final scores are rated on 3 scales: Aggression (Agg), Irritability (Irrt), Suicidality (Suic). Agg scale has 4 subscales: Verbal Assault (Aslt), Aslt Against Objects, Aslt Against Others, Aslt Against Self; each item is scored 0-5, multiplied by the frequency of the behavior, then summed together. Agg total score is the weighted sum of the subscale scores (weights: 1=Verbal Aslt, 2=Aslt Against Objects, 3=Aslt Against Others, 4=Aslt Against Self). The Irrt scale has 2 subscales: Global Irrt, Subjective Irrt. Suic scale has 3 subscales: Suicidal Tendencies, Intent of Attempt, Lethality of Attempt. The 2 Irrt and 3 Suic subscales are rated on 6 or 7 point scales from 0=none/not at all to 6/7=very extreme. The total score ranges from 0-10 for the Irrt scale and 0-16 on the Suic scale. Least Squares means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline s

Time frame:
Baseline, up to Week 8
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Modified Overt Aggression (OAS-M) Scale up to Week 8 Endpoint
units on a scaleLY2216684PlaceboEscitalopram
Aggression total score-4.1 ± 0.52-4.2 ± 0.71-3.9 ± 1.06
Irritability total score-1.0 ± 0.10-0.9 ± 0.14-1.0 ± 0.20
Suicidality total score-0.2 ± 0.04-0.2 ± 0.05-0.2 ± 0.08
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale up to Week 8 Endpoint

The Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX) is used to assess sexual functioning in both males and females. The ASEX total score for the male and female version is calculated as the sum of the responses (rated from 1 \[extremely\] to 6 \[no/never\]) to the 5 items of the ASEX scale. Total scores ranged from 5 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater sexual dysfunction.

Time frame:
Baseline, up to Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale up to Week 8 Endpoint
units on a scaleLY2216684PlaceboEscitalopram
Change From Baseline in Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale up to Week 8 Endpoint-2.68 ± 6.65-1.69 ± 6.35-1.65 ± 7.43
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Insomnia Severity Index up to Week 8 Endpoint

The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) is a brief self-report instrument measuring the participant's perception of his or her insomnia. The ISI score is calculated as the sum of the responses to the 7 items of the ISI scale. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 scale and the total score ranges from 0 to 28 with a higher score suggesting more severe insomnia.

Time frame:
Baseline, up to Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Insomnia Severity Index up to Week 8 Endpoint
units on a scaleLY2216684PlaceboEscitalopram
Change From Baseline in Insomnia Severity Index up to Week 8 Endpoint-7.53 ± 7.57-7.44 ± 7.73-8.02 ± 7.72
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in Fatigue Severity Scale

Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is a 9-item measure of fatigue severity. Each item is scored by the participant on a scale of 1 ("Disagree") to 7 ("Agree"), with a higher score indicating a stronger agreement with the item statement regarding the participant's fatigue symptoms. The FSS total score ranges from 1 to 7, and is obtained by averaging the responses to the 9 items. Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) adjusting for treatment, investigator, visit, baseline score, treatment-by-visit, and baseline score-by-visit.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fatigue Severity Scale
units on a scaleLY2216684PlaceboEscitalopram
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fatigue Severity Scale-2.0 ± 0.14-1.8 ± 0.19-2.2 ± 0.29
SecondaryPharmacokinetics: Predicted Maximal Concentration of LY2216684 at Steady State (Cmax,ss) at Week 8 Endpoint

Predicted maximal LY2216684 plasma concentrations at steady state (Cmax,ss) are reported, using the dose at the last visit in the study for participants included in the primary efficacy analysis.

Time frame:
Up to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Pharmacokinetics: Predicted Maximal Concentration of LY2216684 at Steady State (Cmax,ss) at Week 8 Endpoint
nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)LY2216684
3 mg dose10.5 ± 2.0
6 mg dose22.6 ± 5.4
9 mg dose32 ± 6.4
12 mg dose40.6 ± 9.9
SecondaryNumber of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (Safety and Tolerability)

The number of participants with at least one serious adverse event, regardless of causality is reported cumulatively through Week 8. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Event module.

Time frame:
Baseline through Week 8
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (Safety and Tolerability)
ParticipantsLY2216684PlaceboEscitalopram
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (Safety and Tolerability)212
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-21) Total Score

The HAMD-21 is a 21-item assessment used to measure depression severity. Items were rated on a scale from 0 (symptoms not present) to a maximum of 2 to 4 (symptom extremely severe) for a total score ranging from 0 (not at all depressed) to 60 (severely depressed). Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) adjusting for treatment, investigator, visit, baseline score, treatment-by-visit, and baseline score-by-visit.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-21) Total Score
units on a scaleLY2216684PlaceboEscitalopram
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-21) Total Score-13.6 ± 0.57-13.0 ± 0.79-15.0 ± 1.24
SecondaryCognitive Assessment Battery: Change From Baseline in Word List Learning and Delayed Recall Test (WLDRT) up to Week 8 Endpoint

The WLDRT is a test of visual learning and recall. Participants are shown a series of words (commonly used nouns) and asked to say each of the words aloud, then are asked to recall the words and the total number of correct words recalled is recorded (possible score ranged from 0 to 15 words). The process is repeated 3 times. The Word List Learning Test score is calculated as the average number of words recalled during the first 3 trials. After a 30-minute delay, participants are again asked to recall the words, and the total number of correct words remembered after the delay is recorded as the Delayed Recall Test score. The baseline value was the last non-missing value before the first randomized double-blind study drug administration. Least Squares (LS) means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score.

Time frame:
Baseline, up to week 8
Reported as:
Least squares mean · number of correct words
Cognitive Assessment Battery: Change From Baseline in Word List Learning and Delayed Recall Test (WLDRT) up to Week 8 Endpoint
number of correct wordsLY2216684PlaceboEscitalopram
Word List Learning Test0.5 ± 0.150.3 ± 0.190.3 ± 0.28
Delayed Recall Test0.4 ± 0.190.2 ± 0.250.0 ± 0.37
SecondaryCognitive Assessment Battery: Change From Baseline in Symbol Digit Substitution Test (SDST) up to Week 8 Endpoint

The SDST is an attention-demanding psychomotor component based on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. The participant is given a symbol/digit code in which each of the digits 1 through 9 is paired with a different symbol. Below the code, a series of symbols selected from those in the code are presented in an irregular order. The participant is instructed to write the number that is appropriate for each symbol in the space below each symbol and to complete as many correct digits as possible within a 90-second test period. For this test, the number of attempts and number of correct digits is collected. The percentage of correct digits is presented based on the number of correct digits divided by the number of attempts, multiplied by 100 (score ranged from 0 to 100% correct). Least squares (LS) means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score.

Time frame:
Baseline, up to Week 8
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage of correct digits
Cognitive Assessment Battery: Change From Baseline in Symbol Digit Substitution Test (SDST) up to Week 8 Endpoint
percentage of correct digitsLY2216684PlaceboEscitalopram
Cognitive Assessment Battery: Change From Baseline in Symbol Digit Substitution Test (SDST) up to Week 8 Endpoint3.2 ± 1.122.5 ± 1.422.2 ± 2.10
SecondaryCognitive Assessment Battery: Change From Baseline in Two Digit Cancellation Test up to Week 8 Endpoint

The Two Digit Cancellation Test (2DCT) is a clinical adaptation of the visual search tasks that have been used to investigate cognitive processes involved in attention and visual information processing. For this test, the participant is presented with a piece of paper containing rows of digits. At the top of the page are two target digits. The participant is instructed to examine each row of digits working from top to bottom and left to right crossing off each number that matches either of the two numbers at the top of the page. The number of targets hit, number of errors, and number of times the participant had to be reminded of the task are recorded for the 45-second test. The 2DCT composite cognitive score is calculated as the number of targets hit - number of errors - number of reminders. 2DCT score ranges 0-40 with higher score indicating better cognition. Least squares (LS) means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score.

Time frame:
Baseline, up to Week 8
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Cognitive Assessment Battery: Change From Baseline in Two Digit Cancellation Test up to Week 8 Endpoint
units on a scaleLY2216684PlaceboEscitalopram
Cognitive Assessment Battery: Change From Baseline in Two Digit Cancellation Test up to Week 8 Endpoint0.8 ± 0.621.2 ± 0.831.0 ± 1.26
SecondaryCognitive Assessment Battery: Change From Baseline in Trail Making A up to Week 8 Endpoint

Trail Making A is a neurocognitive test associated with general brain function. While being timed, the participant is instructed to connect 25 randomly placed circled numbers on a page in numerical sequence without lifting their pencil. If a participant makes a mistake, the mistake is pointed out and the participant must start again from the last correct circle. The total time to complete the task (up to 300 seconds, with a lower value indicating better brain function) is recorded. Least squares (LS) means were adjusted for treatment, investigator, and baseline score.

Time frame:
Baseline, up to Week 8
Reported as:
Least squares mean · seconds
Cognitive Assessment Battery: Change From Baseline in Trail Making A up to Week 8 Endpoint
secondsLY2216684PlaceboEscitalopram
Cognitive Assessment Battery: Change From Baseline in Trail Making A up to Week 8 Endpoint-9.9 ± 2.97-11.1 ± 3.85-5.6 ± 5.68

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
LY2216684 Double Blind Phase—2/269 (0.7%)70/269 (26%)
Placebo Double Blind Phase—1/138 (0.7%)26/138 (18.8%)
Escitalopram Double Blind Phase—2/62 (3.2%)19/62 (30.6%)
LY2216684 Discontinuation Phase—0/269 (0%)3/269 (1.1%)
Placebo Discontinuation Phase—1/138 (0.7%)2/138 (1.4%)
Escitalopram Discontinuation Phase—0/62 (0%)2/62 (3.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventLY2216684 Double Blind PhasePlacebo Double Blind PhaseEscitalopram Double Blind PhaseLY2216684 Discontinuation PhasePlacebo Discontinuation PhaseEscitalopram Discontinuation Phase
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations0/2691/1381/620/2690/1380/62
MalariaInfections and infestations0/2690/1381/620/2690/1380/62
Suicide attemptPsychiatric disorders0/2690/1381/620/2690/1380/62
Near drowningInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/2690/1380/620/2691/1380/62
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/2690/1380/620/2690/1380/62
DepressionPsychiatric disorders1/2690/1380/620/2690/1380/62
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventLY2216684 Double Blind PhasePlacebo Double Blind PhaseEscitalopram Double Blind PhaseLY2216684 Discontinuation PhasePlacebo Discontinuation PhaseEscitalopram Discontinuation Phase
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders24/2695/1387/620/2690/1381/62
HeadacheNervous system disorders26/2699/1387/622/2691/1381/62
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders18/2697/1381/620/2690/1380/62
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders17/2696/1384/620/2691/1380/62
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders14/2694/1382/622/2690/1380/62

Baseline characteristics

All randomized participants.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)LY2216684PlaceboEscitalopramTotal
Mean36.64 ± 10.2137.54 ± 10.9734.32 ± 9.6636.60 ± 10.40
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)LY2216684PlaceboEscitalopramTotal
Female1306522217
Male1397340252
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)LY2216684PlaceboEscitalopramTotal
Caucasian3021859
African65011
Hispanic237434
Native American1001
West Asian (Indian subcontinent)20910550364
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)LY2216684PlaceboEscitalopramTotal
United States3923870
Romania74112
India20810550363
Mexico156324
08

Study locations

7 sites
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.
    Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.
    Prairie Village, Kansas 66206, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.
    Allentown, Pennsylvania 18104, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.
    Media, Pennsylvania 19063, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.
    Bucharest, 73120, Romania
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.
    Cluj-Napoca, Romania
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.
    Lasi, 6600, Romania
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00420004
Lead sponsor
Eli Lilly and Company
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 9, 2007
Start date
Dec 2006
Primary completion
Mar 2008
Completion
Mar 2008
Results posted
Apr 27, 2018
Last update
Apr 27, 2018

Study contacts

Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST)
study director · Eli Lilly and Company

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion