CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00392223Updated Jan 12, 2010Results posted

Efficacy And Safety Of Azithromycin SR Compared With Minocycline In Acne

A Phase 3 interventional study of Azithromycin microspheres and minocycline-placebo capsules in Acne Vulgaris, sponsored by Pfizer. Terminated at 17 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-01-12.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
See Detailed Description
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
118
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of azithromycin microspheres treatment in outpatients with moderate to severe inflammatory acne compared with first line treatment minocycline after 8 weeks of therapy

Read the detailed description

The study prematurely discontinued on the February 1, 2008 due to slow enrollment.It should be noted that safety concerns have not been seen in this study and have not factored into this decision.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acne Vulgaris

Browse trials for

03

In context

Acne Vulgaris

730 studies on the registry are indexed under Acne Vulgaris; 86 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 118 is above the median of 69 across 628 interventional studies indexed under Acne Vulgaris.

Browse Acne Vulgaris studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,244 studies on the registry; 139 are open to participants now.

Of its 582 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 381 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • male and female, > 16 years of age, with diagnosis of acne papulo-pustular, moderate (19-30 GAGS score) to severe (31-33 GAGS score)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy, gastrointestinal and endocrinological disease, specific systemic disease, hormonal contraceptives, isotretinoin, topic drugs for acne (except detergent allowed)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double
Enrollment
118 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment Group A

    Drug: Azithromycin microspheres · Drug: minocycline-placebo capsules

  • Experimental
    Treatment Group B

    Drug: Azithromycin microspheres-placebo · Drug: Minocycline capsules,

Interventions

  • DrugAzithromycin microspheres

    Azithromycin microspheres, powder for oral suspension, 2 g a week, in unique administration PO, repeated weekly for 8 weeks and minocycline-placebo capsules daily for 8 weeks plus minocycline placebo

  • Drugminocycline-placebo capsules

    minocycline-placebo capsules daily for 8 weeks plus minocycline placebo

  • DrugAzithromycin microspheres-placebo

    Minocycline capsules, PO, 100 mg daily for 8 weeks and Azithromycin microspheres-placebo once a week for 8 weeks plus azithromycin placebo.

  • DrugMinocycline capsules,

    Capsules, PO, 100 mg daily for 8 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score

    GAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi). Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: (Global) score at observation minus (global) score at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT)

  2. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT) in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score - Per Protocol Population

    GAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi). Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: (Global) score at observation minus (global) score at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 EOT

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score

    GAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi. Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: mean at observation minus baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT), 8 weeks after EOT

  2. Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score

    Number of subjects by improvement category of GAGS score: Best improvement = reduction of GAGS score \>75% (pre-post evaluation); Good improvement = reduction score \> 50 - 75%; Moderate improvement : reduction score \> 25 - 50%; Light improvement : reduction score \> 0 - 25%; No change = reduction score = 0%; Worsening = increase score \> 0 %.

    Time frame: Week 4, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT), 8 weeks after EOT

  3. Change From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds Technique

    Leeds Grading technique: evaluates three sites (face, back, chest) on a 0 to 10 grading scale where 0 equals to no acne and 10 equals to most severe acne.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT), 8 weeks after EOT

07

Results

Posted Aug 3, 2009

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAzithromycinMinocycline
Started5860
Completed4947
Not completed913
Withdrew: Adverse event54
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up14
Withdrew: Protocol violation03
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject32

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score

GAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi). Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: (Global) score at observation minus (global) score at baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
score on scaleAzithromycinMinocycline
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score-8.69 (-10.33 to -7.05)-9.16 (-10.62 to -7.71)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin vs Minocycline · Mean difference (final values): -0.47 · 95% CI -2.48 to 1.54Comparison between treatment groups was performed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) method, with treatment, center, and baseline value GAGS global score included as covariates.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score

GAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi. Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: mean at observation minus baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT), 8 weeks after EOT
Reported as:
Mean · score on scale
Change From Baseline in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
score on scaleAzithromycinMinocycline
Week 4 (n=50,56)-7.0 ± 7.05-6.5 ± 6.45
Week 8 EOT (End of Treatment) (n=52,56)-9.7 (-11.66 to -7.77)-10.2 (-11.86 to -8.57)
Week 8 EOT (LOCF) (n=53,59)-9.5 (-11.47 to -7.59)-9.8 (-11.48 to -8.12)
8 weeks after EOT (n=49,49)-11.1 (-13.42 to -8.82)-12.9 (-14.79 to -11.01)
Post-hocNumber of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Acne

Global Acne Grading System score used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each based on area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi). Global score factored based on sum of local scores and se verity: 0=no acne, 1-18=mild, 19-30=moderate, 31-38=severe, \>39=very severe.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Acne
participantsAzithromycinMinocycline
Baseline Mild acne01
Baseline Moderate acne4952
Baseline Severe acne35
Baseline Very severe acne11
Baseline Missing00
Week 8 EOT (LOCF) Mild acne3141
Week 8 EOT (LOCF) Moderate acne1916
Week 8 EOT (LOCF) Severe acne10
Week 8 EOT (LOCF) Very severe acne01
Week 8 EOT (LOCF) Missing21
SecondaryImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score

Number of subjects by improvement category of GAGS score: Best improvement = reduction of GAGS score \>75% (pre-post evaluation); Good improvement = reduction score \> 50 - 75%; Moderate improvement : reduction score \> 25 - 50%; Light improvement : reduction score \> 0 - 25%; No change = reduction score = 0%; Worsening = increase score \> 0 %.

Time frame:
Week 4, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT), 8 weeks after EOT
Reported as:
Number · participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
participantsAzithromycinMinocycline
Week 4 Best Improvement11
Week 4 Good Improvement42
Week 4 Moderate Improvement1925
Week 4 Light Improvement2324
Week 4 No Change22
Week 4 Worsening12
Week 4 Missing33
Week 8 EOT Best Improvement43
Week 8 EOT Good Improvement1116
Week 8 EOT Moderate Improvement2120
Week 8 EOT Light Improvement1115
Week 8 EOT No Change22
Week 8 EOT Worsening30
Week 8 EOT Missing13
Week 8 EOT LOCF Best Improvement43
Week 8 EOT LOCF Good Improvement1116
Week 8 EOT LOCF Moderate Improvement2120
Week 8 EOT LOCF Light Improvement1117
Week 8 EOT LOCF No Change32
Week 8 EOT LOCF Worsening31
Week 8 EOT LOCF Missing00
8 weeks after EOT Best Improvement76
8 weeks after EOT Good Improvement1517
8 weeks after EOT Moderate Improvement1318
8 weeks after EOT Light Improvement68
8 weeks after EOT No Change30
8 weeks after EOT Worsening50
8 weeks after EOT Missing410
PrimaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT) in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score - Per Protocol Population

GAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi). Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: (Global) score at observation minus (global) score at baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8 EOT
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT) in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score - Per Protocol Population
score on scaleAzithromycinMinocycline
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT) in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score - Per Protocol Population-9.35 (-10.75 to -7.94)-10.22 (-11.54 to -8.90)
Statistical analysis
  • Azithromycin vs Minocycline · Mean difference (final values): -0.87 · 95% CI -2.58 to 0.84ANCOVA adjusted for baseline, center and treatment.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds Technique

Leeds Grading technique: evaluates three sites (face, back, chest) on a 0 to 10 grading scale where 0 equals to no acne and 10 equals to most severe acne.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT), 8 weeks after EOT
Reported as:
Mean · score on scale
Change From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds Technique
score on scaleAzithromycinMinocycline
Face Week 4 (n=50, 56)-1.5 (-1.82 to -1.14)-1.3 (-1.60 to -1.05)
Face Week 8 EOT (n=52, 56)-2.5 (-3.06 to -2.01)-2.4 (-2.84 to -2.02)
Face Week 8 EOT (LOCF) (n=53,59)-2.5 (-3.01 to -1.97)-2.3 (-2.74 to -1.91)
Face 8 weeks after EOT (n=49,49)-3.0 (-3.65 to -2.35)-2.9 (-3.44 to -2.39)
Back Week 4 (n=50,56)-1.1 (-1.58 to -0.70)-0.9 (-1.21 to -0.61)
Back Week 8 EOT (n=52,56)-1.5 (-1.98 to -1.02)-1.4 (-1.83 to -1.06)
Back Week 8 EOT (LOCF) (n=53,59)-1.5 (-1.96 to -1.02)-1.4 (-1.76 to -0.99)
Back 8 weeks after EOT (n=49,49)-1.5 (-2.03 to -0.95)-2.0 (-2.52 to -1.40)
Chest Week 4 (n=50,56)-0.8 (-1.12 to -0.48)-0.7 (-0.99 to -0.40)
Chest Week 8 EOT (n=52,56)-1.5 (-2.04 to -0.92)-1.2 (-1.57 to -0.75)
Chest Week 8 EOT (LOCF) (n=53,59)-1.5 (-2.00 to -0.90)-1.1 (-1.51 to -0.73)
Chest 8 weeks after EOT (n=49,49)-1.5 (-2.10 to -0.92)-1.8 (-2.32 to -1.23)

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Azithromycin—0/58 (0%)—
Minocycline—0/60 (0%)—
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 28
Most frequent other events
EventAzithromycinMinocycline
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders10/582/60
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders7/583/60
Abdominal pain, upperGastrointestinal disorders5/582/60
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders5/581/60
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders5/582/60
PyrexiaGeneral disorders2/584/60
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/583/60
GastritisGastrointestinal disorders2/581/60
MalaiseGeneral disorders2/580/60
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations2/582/60

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)AzithromycinMinocyclineTotal
<18 years101727
Between 18 and 44 years484391
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)AzithromycinMinocyclineTotal
Female353671
Male232447
08

Study locations

17 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Germona Del Friuli, Udine 33013, Italy
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Bologna, 40121, Italy
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Catania, 95124, Italy
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Catanzaro, 88100, Italy
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Ferrara, 44100, Italy
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Genova, 16132, Italy
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Lucca, 55100, Italy
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Messina, 98100, Italy
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Milano, 20100, Italy
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Napoli, 80131, Italy
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Pisa, 56126, Italy
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Pordenone, 33170, Italy
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Roma, 00161, Italy
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Roma, 00167, Italy
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Siena, 53100, Italy
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Terni, 05100, Italy
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Trieste, 34100, Italy
09

References and documents

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 12, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00392223
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
First posted
Oct 25, 2006
Start date
Oct 2007
Primary completion
Jun 2008
Completion
Jun 2008
Results posted
Aug 3, 2009
Last update
Jan 12, 2010

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jan 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion