ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00385086Updated Mar 4, 2026

Lumbar Spinal Fibrosis and TNF Alpha Inhibition

A Phase 3 interventional study of TNF blocker and Placebo in Post Operative Sciatica by Lumbar Spinal Fibrosis, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-04.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
38
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

TNF-alpha is the main cytokine implicated in the formation of lumbar spinal fibrosis. Inhibiting TNF-alpha could significantly decrease spinal fibrosis after lumbar discectomy.

Read the detailed description

OBJECT:

Failed back surgery syndrome is still a challenging therapeutic problem. Clinical studies have demonstrated a significant association between lumbar spinal fibrosis after lumbar discectomy and the recurrence of radicular pain in 25% of cases. Forceful epidural infiltrations, radiotherapy, therapy with D-penicillamine or surgical procedures have had unfavourable results in terms of pain and cost. Magnetic resonance imaging reveals lumbar spinal fibrosis by a hyposignal in the T1 sequence and a hypersignal in T2 sequence around the spinal tissue. Tumor necrosis factor a (TNF-a) is the main cytokine implicated in the formation of tissue fibrosis. In animal models of fibrosis, TNF-a inhibition has been shown to prevent and treat tissue fibrosis.

HYPOTHESIS:

Inhibiting TNF-a could significantly decrease sciatica pain because of lumbar spinal fibrosis after lumbar discectomy by decreasing spinal fibrosis.

METHODS:

We propose a 2-year pilot prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study of TNF-a inhibitor (infliximab) in patients with sciatica as a result of postoperative lumbar spinal fibrosis. The infliximab group will receive one intravenous injection of 3 mg/kg infliximab. The control group will receive one physiological serum injection. Patients will be evaluated at day 0, 10, 30, 90, and 180. The main evaluation criterion will be sciatica pain as measured on a visual analog scale, with the objective of a 50% decrease in pain at day 10. This objective leads to a size of 20 patients per group. The other evaluation criteria will be clinical, functional, social, and professional. Patients will be recruited from the rehabilitation unit at Cochin teaching hospital.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post Operative Sciatica by Lumbar Spinal Fibrosis

Keywords

  • Sciatica
  • Pain
  • TNF-alpha
  • Discectomy
  • Fibrosis
  • Spine
03

In context

Sciatica

149 studies on the registry are indexed under Sciatica; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 38 is below the median of 68 across 122 interventional studies indexed under Sciatica.

Browse Sciatica studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,592 studies on the registry; 1,033 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • age over 18 years old
  • sciatica post discectomy
  • Pain with VAS > 40 mm and impossibility to have his usual activity
  • Surgical discectomy (less than 2 years and more than 6 months)
  • Painless of more than one month and less than one year after the discectomy
  • MRI with gadolinium injection of less than 6 months and done more than 6 months after the discectomy
  • Presence of spinal fibrosis on MRI (hyposignal in T1 enhanced by gadolinium and hypersignal in T2)
  • failure of epidural injection treatment
  • absence of tuberculosis
  • for woman

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic psychiatric pathologies not treated
  • Presence of conflict between nerve root and herniated disc or disc fragments or spinal stenosis
  • severe cognitives troubles
  • severe cardiac failure (class III or IV)
  • Tuberculosis (active or latent), severe infections
  • Cancers
  • Allergy reactions to the drug studied
  • Difficulties to understand french
  • Patients enrolled in another clinical trial in the past three months
  • pregnancy, breastfeeding or no
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
38 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TNF-alpha blocker

    Treatment with TNF-alpha blocker

    Drug: TNF blocker

  • Active comparator
    Placebo

    Treatment with placebo

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugTNF blocker

    Treatment with TNF-alpha blocker

  • DrugPlacebo

    Treatment with placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sciatica pain

    Visual analogue scale of lumbar pain

    Time frame: 10 days after treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional assessments

    Time frame: At 10, 30, 90, 180 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hopital Cochin
    Paris, Paris 75014, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nguyen C, Palazzo C, Grabar S, Feydy A, Sanchez K, Zee N, Quinquis L, Ben Boutieb M, Revel M, Lefevre-Colau MM, Poiraudeau S, Rannou F. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha blockade in recurrent and disabling chronic sciatica associated with post-operative peridural lumbar fibrosis: results of a double-blind, placebo randomized controlled study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Nov 19;17:330. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0838-4. PubMed 26596627 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Feb 2007, a primary completion of Oct 2012 and a completion of Dec 2014. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 4, 2006
First posted
Oct 6, 2006
Start
Feb 2007
Primary completionActual
Oct 2012
CompletionActual
Dec 2014
Last update
Mar 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00385086
Collaborators
URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 6, 2006
Start date
Feb 2007
Primary completion
Oct 2012
Completion
Dec 2014
Last update
Mar 4, 2026

Study contacts

Francois Rannou, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion