CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00383136FATAUpdated Jan 16, 2008

FATA: Randomized Study on Facilitated Angioplasty With Tirofiban or Abciximab

A Phase 4 interventional study of tirofiban high-bolus dose regimen and Abciximab in Acute Myocardial Infarction, sponsored by University of Bologna. Completed at 6 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2008-01-16.

Sponsored by University of Bologna · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
692
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The elective("standard of care") treatment of ST - elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) currently consists of primary angioplasty with stent implantation during administration of Abciximab, a inhibitor of GP IIb/IIIa platelet receptor.

Tirofiban is another potent inhibitor of GP IIb/IIIa platelet receptor with an efficacy on platelet aggregation inhibition equal to or greater than Abciximab if a high dose bolus is used, i.e. 25 microg/kg, (platelet aggregation inhibition > 90% 15 minutes after infusion). It can therefore be hypothesized that this drug can improve the results of primary angioplasty to the same extent as Abciximab.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy, in terms of myocardial reperfusion indices, of Abciximab and high dose of Tirofiban in primary angioplasty for STEMI, both in the case of treatment before transfer and of treatment in the catheterization laboratory during the procedure.

The reference hypothesis for the study objective is the equivalence or the non-inferiority of Tirofiban with respect to Abciximab.

Read the detailed description

The Facilitated Angioplasty with Tirofiban or Abciximab Study (FATA Study) is a prospective multicentre study, randomized in 2 groups (high dose Tirofiban or Abciximab), on a sample of 700 patients with acute myocardial infarction for whom primary angioplasty is indicated. Patients will be enrolled in the Emergency Room or in the Intensive Care Unit and other hospital departments or externally in the event of intervention by the Emergency Ambulance Service 118. For all these patients it must be possible to administer a IIb/IIIa inhibitor immediately after ECG and clinical diagnosis, before transfer to the cath lab for the primary angioplasty procedure. Patients arriving directly in the cath lab without being randomized before transfer will also be included.

Major exclusion criteria are: Complete left bundle branch block, Previous myocardial infarction at the same site, Post-anoxic coma, Known thrombocytopenia or leucopenia, Previous episodes of hemorrhagic diathesis or allergy to ASA or thienopyridine; Anticoagulant therapy with dicumarol with INR > 2; Previous treatment with thrombolytics (within the previous 48 hours).

Randomization will take place as soon as possible after the diagnostic ECG and will be performed by means of a centralized automatic system using SMS messages sent by ordinary cell phones.

The primary endpoint is ST resolution 90 minutes after opening of the affected vessel. Secondary endpoints include: Patency of the vessel at the first selective angiography, no reflow phenomenon during the procedure, TIMI 3 flow at the end of the procedure, MACE (death, reinfarction*, urgent TVR°) at 30 days, MACE (death, reinfarction*, TVR°) at 6 months, major bleeding requiring transfusion or surgery, or a reduction in Hb of more than 5 g%, Ictus and intracranial hemorrhage.

To demonstrate the study hypothesis, i.e. that Tirofiban is equivalent to Abciximab in facilitating primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction, with sufficient statistical significance, the necessary number of patients for each drug was calculated on the basis of the methods used in equivalence studies and was fixed in 350 pts per group.

390 patients have been randomized (as of Sept 15th, 2006). Results are expected by the end of 2007.

This study will establish whether in primary angioplasty a high dose of Tirofiban has an equivalent effect to Abciximab, first in terms of microcirculation protection and then of long-term clinical results. If this hypothesis is confirmed, Tirofiban could be used as an alternative to Abciximab, with considerable savings given its much lower cost.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

  • STEMI
  • Primary Angioplasty
  • Abciximab
  • Tirofiban
03

In context

Myocardial Infarction

2,744 studies on the registry are indexed under Myocardial Infarction; 418 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 692 is above the median of 148 across 1,595 interventional studies indexed under Myocardial Infarction.

Browse Myocardial Infarction studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Bologna is the lead sponsor of 153 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. STEMI diagnosed due to the presence of chest pain lasting at least 20 minutes and less than 6 hours, associated with elevation of the ST segment >1 mm in at least 2 adjacent leads
  2. Informed consent
  3. Age > 18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Complete left bundle branch block
  2. Previous myocardial infarction at the same site
  3. Post-anoxic coma
  4. Known thrombocytopenia or leucopenia
  5. Severe hepatic dysfunction;
  6. Previous episodes of hemorrhagic diathesis or allergy to ASA or thienopyridine;
  7. Recent major surgery (\< 3 months before)
  8. Associated diseases that involve short life expectancy (\< 2 years);
  9. Arterial hypertension (AP >180/110);
  10. Positive case history for stroke within the previous 30 days;
  11. Positive case history for intracranial disease (aneurysm, arterovenous malformation);
  12. Major trauma within the previous six weeks;
  13. A clinical condition which, in the doctor's opinion, could interfere with the patient's full participation in the study;
  14. Pregnancy or fertile age;
  15. Anticoagulant therapy with dicumarol with INR > 2;
  16. Renal insufficiency (creatinine > 3.0 mg/dl) known at the time of the study;
  17. Previous treatment with thrombolytics (within the previous 48 hours);
  18. Participation in other studies in progress.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
692 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Tirofiban

    Drug: tirofiban high-bolus dose regimen

  • Active comparator
    2

    Abciximab

    Drug: Abciximab

Interventions

  • Drugtirofiban high-bolus dose regimen

    bolus of 25 mcg/kg of body weight, followed by 18 hours infusion of 0.15 mcg/kg/min.

    Also known as: Aggrastat

  • DrugAbciximab

    bolus of 0.25 mg/kg of body weight, followed by 12 hours infusion of 0.125 mcg/kg per minute

    Also known as: Reopro

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. ST resolution

    Time frame: 90 minutes after opening of the IRA

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patency of the IRA

    Time frame: at the first selective angiography

  2. No reflow

    Time frame: during the procedure

  3. TIMI 3 flow

    Time frame: at the end of the procedure

  4. Myocardial blush grade

    Time frame: at the end of the procedure

  5. Contractile recovery assessed with total FE and WMSI measured by echocardiography

    Time frame: at 48 hours and 30 days

  6. MACE (death, reinfarction*, urgent TVR)

    Time frame: at 30 days

  7. MACE (death, reinfarction*, TVR)

    Time frame: One year

  8. Major bleeding requiring transfusion or surgery, or a reduction in Hb of more than 5 g%.

    Time frame: in-hospital

  9. Intracranial hemorrhage.

    Time frame: in-hospital

  10. Symptoms associated with new ECG alterations and a new increase in myocardial enzymes

    Time frame: in-hospital

  11. Need for a new PTCA or CABG

    Time frame: In-hospital, 30 days, one year

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • Divisione Di Cardiologia, Ospedale Maggiore
    Bologna, BO 40100, Italy
  • Laboratorio Di Emodinamica, Istituto Di Cardiologia, Azienda Ospedaliera S.Orsola Malpighi
    Bologna, BO 40138, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico
    Modena, MO 41100, Italy
  • Divisione Di Cardiologia, Ospedale S.Maria Nuova
    Reggio Emilia, RE 42100, Italy
  • Divisione Di Cardiologia, Ospedale Per Gli Infermi
    Rimini, RN 47900, Italy
  • Divisione Di Cardiologia Ii, Ospedale Policlinico Le Molinette
    Torino, TO 10100, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Marzocchi A, Manari A, Piovaccari G, Marrozzini C, Marra S, Magnavacchi P, Sangiorgio P, Marinucci L, Taglieri N, Gordini G, Binetti N, Guiducci V, Franco N, Reggiani ML, Saia F; FATA Investigators. Randomized comparison between tirofiban and abciximab to promote complete ST-resolution in primary angioplasty: results of the facilitated angioplasty with tirofiban or abciximab (FATA) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction trial. Eur Heart J. 2008 Dec;29(24):2972-80. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn467. Epub 2008 Oct 21. PubMed 18940887 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 16, 2008, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00383136
Lead sponsor
University of Bologna
First posted
Oct 2, 2006
Start date
Jun 2003
Primary completion
Sep 2007
Completion
Sep 2007
Last update
Jan 16, 2008

Study contacts

ANTONIO MARZOCCHI, MD
principal investigator · ISTITUTO DI CARDIOLOGIA, AZIENDA OSPEDALIERA S.ORSOLA-MALPIGHI, BOLOGNA

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion