ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07734584FlushTEVARUpdated Jul 29, 2026

A Standard Carbon Dioxide Flushing Protocol to Reduce Air Embolization During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

An interventional study of Carbon dioxide pre-implant endograft flushing followed by saline flushing and Saline endograft flushing in Type B Acute Aortic Syndrome and Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aneurysms With Crawford Extent I, II, III, or IV, sponsored by University of Bologna. Recruiting at 4 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-29.

Sponsored by University of Bologna · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2025, registered Jul 2026).
  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

FlushTEVAR is a non-profit, interventional, randomized, controlled, single-blind, national multicenter study promoted by the University of Bologna and coordinated by the Vascular Surgery Unit of IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico di Sant'Orsola, under the direction of Prof. Mauro Gargiulo, who also serves as Principal Investigator. The study aims to develop and evaluate a pre-implant thoracic endograft flushing technique using carbon dioxide (CO₂) to reduce periprocedural embolic events and cerebral infarctions in patients undergoing Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR).

TEVAR is currently the treatment of choice for acute aortic syndromes and aneurysms involving the descending thoracic aorta. Despite its widespread use, TEVAR remains associated with significant neurological complications, with an incidence ranging from 3% to 8% in standard procedures and reaching up to 16% in more complex endovascular interventions. Cerebral embolization caused by solid and gaseous particles is considered the main cause of perioperative stroke and silent brain infarction (SBI), the latter being defined as ischemic brain injury detected by neuroradiological imaging in the absence of immediate clinical symptoms. During TEVAR, approximately 90% of microembolic signals detected in the middle cerebral artery are caused by gaseous emboli, with the highest number occurring during endograft deployment. This phenomenon is associated with the manufacturing and sterilization processes of endografts, during which gas microparticles become trapped between the endograft and its delivery system and are subsequently released into the bloodstream when the device is deployed at the intended aortic site.

The primary objective of the study is to assess the difference in the incidence of major neurological events, including stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA), as well as silent brain infarctions, between patients whose endografts undergo a standardized pre-implant flushing protocol with CO₂ followed by conventional saline flushing, and patients receiving standard saline flushing alone. Major neurological events will be assessed clinically, while silent brain infarctions will be evaluated using study-specific diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) of the brain performed within 72 hours after the procedure.

A total of 90 patients will be enrolled across four participating centers and randomized in a 1:1 ratio after providing informed consent. Forty-five patients will be allocated to the experimental arm and treated with CO₂ flushing before the standard saline flushing procedure during TEVAR, while forty-five patients will be allocated to the control arm and will receive standard saline flushing only.

Eligible patients must be at least 18 years of age and present with type B acute aortic syndrome in the acute, subacute, or chronic phase, or thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms with Crawford extent I, II, III, or IV. Written informed consent is required for participation. Patients will be excluded if the procedure is performed using CO₂ angiography, if endografts without a sheath are used, if emergency endovascular treatment is required, if they have experienced a stroke or TIA within the previous six months, if the proximal sealing zone is 0 or 1, if any contraindication to DW-MRI is present, or in cases of pregnancy or breastfeeding.

At study completion, the two treatment groups will be compared on the basis of diffusion-weighted brain MRI findings. The primary endpoint is the number of silent brain infarctions and the determination of whether a statistically significant difference exists between the CO₂ flushing group and the saline flushing group. The safety of the procedure will be evaluated through both technical and clinical success. The planned study duration is three years, and postoperative rates of SBI and TIA/stroke will be compared between groups using Fisher's and Pearson's chi-square tests.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type B Acute Aortic Syndrome
  • Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aneurysms With Crawford Extent I, II, III, or IV

Keywords

  • TEVAR
  • CO2
  • aneurysm
  • flushing
  • silent brain infarctions
  • transient ischemic attack (TIA)
  • stroke
  • endograft
  • aorta
03

In context

Aneurysm

381 studies on the registry are indexed under Aneurysm; 78 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 90 is above the median of 46 across 235 interventional studies indexed under Aneurysm.

Browse Aneurysm studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Bologna is the lead sponsor of 158 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age is at least 18 years
  • Present with type B acute aortic syndrome in the acute, subacute, or chronic phase
  • Thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms with Crawford extent I, II, III, or IV
  • Written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Procedure performed using CO₂ angiography
  • Endografts without a sheath is used
  • Emergency endovascular treatment required
  • Patient has experienced a stroke or within the previous six months
  • Proximal sealing zone is 0 or 1
  • Any to DW-MRI
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CO₂ flushing before the standard saline flushing procedure during TEVAR

    Procedure: Carbon dioxide pre-implant endograft flushing followed by saline flushing · Procedure: Saline endograft flushing

  • Active comparator
    only standard saline flushing procedure during TEVAR

    Procedure: Saline endograft flushing

Interventions

  • ProcedureCarbon dioxide pre-implant endograft flushing followed by saline flushing

    The CO2 flushing technique is conducted using an automated injector with the application of standard injection volume and pressure. Specifically, the endoprosthesis will be flushed from the side port of the delivery system with 3 CO2 injections at 750 mmHg of pressure and 100 cc of volume.

  • ProcedureSaline endograft flushing

    Following the IFU, the endograft delivery system will be flushed with 60 ml of saline solution at 0.9%.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assess the number and location of SBI using study-specific diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and determine if there is a statistically significant difference of SBI number in the "CO2 arm", compared to the "saline solution arm".

    The primary objective of the study is to assess the difference in terms of incidence (number) of ischaemic cerebral lesions, detected by DW-MRI after TEVAR, between patients whose endografts undergo a standardized pre-implant flushing protocol with CO₂ followed by conventional saline flushing, and patients receiving standard saline flushing alone,

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours after endovascular repair

Secondary outcomes

  1. Technical and clinical success

    Technical success: successfull endograft deployment, patency, absence of type I-III endoleak, retrograde dissections. Clinical success: absence of major stroke, death, paraplegia, major bleeding, acute kidney injury.

    Time frame: Peri-operatively

07

Study locations

1 of 4 sites recruiting
  • IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
    Bologna, Italy 40138, Italy
    Recruiting
    • Mauro Gargiulo, MD · Contactmauro.gargiulo2@unibo.it · 0512144252
    • Mascoli Chiara, MD · Contactchiara.mascoli@aosp.bo.it · 0512144278
    • Mauro Gargiulo, MD · Principal investigator
    • Chiara Mascoli, MD · Sub investigator
    • Stefania Caputo, MD · Sub investigator
  • A.S.S.T. Spedali Civili di Brescia
    Brescia, Italy 25123, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
  • IRCCS Policlinico San Martino di Genova
    Genova, Italy 16132, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Padova
    Padova, Italy 35128, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Franco Grego, MD · Contactfranco.grego@unipd.it · 0498212638
    • Franco Grego, MD · Principal investigator
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2028, 36 months after the start.

Of 45 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Aneurysm, half reached primary completion within 75 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12. This study's planned 36 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 83 studies reached it within 45 months; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 134.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 9, 2026
First posted
Jul 29, 2026
StartActual
Jul 15, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jul 15, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jul 15, 2028
Last update
Jul 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07734584
Collaborators
AngioDroid s.r.l., Bologna (Italy)
Responsible party
Mauro Gargiulo (Director, Professor, University of Bologna) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 29, 2026
Start date
Jul 15, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 15, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 15, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 29, 2026

Study contacts

Mauro Gargiulo, MD
Contact
mauro.gargiulo2@unibo.it
0512144252 ext. +39
Chiara Mascoli, MD
Contact
chiara.mascoli@aosp.bo.it
0512144278 ext. +39
Mauro Gargiulo, MD
principal investigator · University of Bologna

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion