An interventional study of moderated support and peer-led in Breast Cancer, sponsored by Christiana Care Health Services. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-12-21.
Sponsored by Christiana Care Health Services · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
Purpose: The purpose of this project is to evaluate whether psychosocial outcomes in women with breast cancer differ based on the format of online group support. This objective will be addressed by the following specific aims:
Specific Aim #1 is to determine if there is a difference in depressive symptoms between women with breast cancer assigned to one of two treatment conditions: moderated online support or peer-led online support.
Specific Aim #2 is to determine if there is a difference in perceived social support between women with breast cancer who are assigned to one of two treatment conditions: moderated online support or peer-led online support.
Specific Aim #3 is to determine if there is a difference in quality of life in women with breast cancer who are assigned to one of two treatment conditions: moderated online support or peer-led online support.
NOTE: Once the study began, it was obvious that we could not prevent anyone from joining a support group, if that was her choice. We also could not control if participants joined a second online support group or face-to-face group during the study. Therefore, we decided to omit a "usual care" (no support) group. The study was completed with just two groups: moderated and peer-support.
Purpose/Specific Aims: The purpose of this randomized two-group longitudinal study is to evaluate whether psychosocial outcomes in women with breast cancer differ based on the format of online group support. Rationale/Significance of study: No research has explored differences in psychosocial outcomes between online support groups that use a professional moderator and those that use a peer-led (self-help) format. This study will address one of the goals put forth in the 2003-2005 ONS Research Agenda, by studying the effects of technology based interventions (online support) on psychosocial outcomes (depression, perceived social support, quality of life) in women with breast cancer. This work will add to the nursing research base with regard to online support for women with breast cancer and provide a springboard for additional studies to enhance the research base. Conceptual Framework: The concept of openness, based on the mutual interaction between human beings and their environment, and emphasized in Rogers' Science of Unitary Human Beings provides a basis for this project. The research will utilize two different support environments and measure how interactions in each affect psychosocial outcomes over time. Main Research Variables: The independent variables are two treatment conditions (moderated online support, peer-led online support). The dependent variables are depressive symptoms, perceived social support, and quality of life. Design: A randomized longitudinal design, comparing two types of online support groups, on the basis of three principal measures, will be used. Each measure will be obtained at baseline and at three later timepoints. Setting: Support groups will be accessed from secure and password protected university web pages devoted exclusively to this study. Sample: Sixty women with breast cancer, at least 21 years of age, who have Internet access will be recruited. Methods: Women will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment conditions (moderated online support, peer-led online support) given a password, and instructed to complete a Demographic Form and the study questionnaires online. All subjects will be asked to complete the study questionnaires again at 6, 12, and 16 weeks. Moderated groups will run in a semi-structured format over 12 weeks, with a different discussion topic moderated each week by the moderator. Peer-led groups will be run in a peer support format over 12 weeks. Implications for practice: Women with breast cancer are turning to online resources for support. Nurses should be aware of the benefits/limitations of this support alternative. A cost benefit may be suggested if it is shown that peer-led online support has psychosocial benefits similar to professionally facilitated groups. Additional research is needed to explore the impact of online support on psychosocial outcomes in people with other cancers, minorities, and men. This study will add important information to the research base regarding online support groups and help determine the best strategy for online cancer support.
NOTE: It was obvious that we could not prevent anyone from joining a support group, if that was her choice. We also could not control if participants joined a second online support group or face-to-face group during the study. Therefore, we dropped the "usual care" (no support) group. The study was completed with just two groups: moderated and peer-support.
12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 51 is below the median of 72 across 9,303 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.
Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →Christiana Care Health Services is the lead sponsor of 94 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Inclusion Criteria: Clinical diagnosis of breast cancer
Exclusion Criteria:
12-week online support led by a healthcare professional
Behavioral: moderated support
12-week online support group in a peer-led format
Behavioral: peer-led
one 12-week online support group led by a professional healthcare provider
12-week online support in a peer-led format
Scores on the Personal Resource Questionnaire 85.
The Personal Resource Questionnaire 85 (PRQ85), Part II measures perceived social support and consists of 25 items in a seven-point Likert format which are rated from seven (7) strongly agree, to one (1) strongly disagree. Scores range from 25 to 175 with higher scores indicative of higher levels of perceived social support. Alpha reliability of the PRQ 85 has been demonstrated at \>.90
Time frame: 16 weeks
Scores on the CES-D Scale
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is a 20-item self-report scale widely used in the assessment of depression. Each item is given a rating of 0 to 3, with a potential range of 0 to 60 for the entire scale. Higher scores are associated with depression. The cutoff for the diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder on the CES-D is 16. The instrument is a reliable measure (Alpha \>.85) of depression
Time frame: 16 weeks
Scores on the Quality of Life (QOL) Question on the Rotterdam Symptom Check List (RSCL).
The Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) measures quality of life in cancer patients. The RSCL checklist includes a QOL life question on a scale of 1 (excellent) to 7 (extremely poor). This was used as a measure of overall QOL.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Subjects were recruited via flyers, word of mouth, at clinics, and via university electronic news. Participants were recruited from August 2005 through December 2008.
| Milestone | Moderated Group | Non-facilitated (Peer-led) |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 25 | 26 |
| Completed | 25 | 26 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 |
The Personal Resource Questionnaire 85 (PRQ85), Part II measures perceived social support and consists of 25 items in a seven-point Likert format which are rated from seven (7) strongly agree, to one (1) strongly disagree. Scores range from 25 to 175 with higher scores indicative of higher levels of perceived social support. Alpha reliability of the PRQ 85 has been demonstrated at \>.90
| Scores on a scale | Moderated Group | Non-facilitated (Peer-led) |
|---|---|---|
| Scores on the Personal Resource Questionnaire 85. | 50.22 ± 3.23 | 53.44 ± 3.08 |
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is a 20-item self-report scale widely used in the assessment of depression. Each item is given a rating of 0 to 3, with a potential range of 0 to 60 for the entire scale. Higher scores are associated with depression. The cutoff for the diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder on the CES-D is 16. The instrument is a reliable measure (Alpha \>.85) of depression
| Scores on a scale | Moderated Group | Non-facilitated (Peer-led) |
|---|---|---|
| Scores on the CES-D Scale | 9.65 ± 1.98 | 12.97 ± 1.84 |
The Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) measures quality of life in cancer patients. The RSCL checklist includes a QOL life question on a scale of 1 (excellent) to 7 (extremely poor). This was used as a measure of overall QOL.
| Scores on a scale | Moderated Group | Non-facilitated (Peer-led) |
|---|---|---|
| Scores on the Quality of Life (QOL) Question on the Rotterdam Symptom Check List (RSCL). | 1.90 ± .31 | 2.30 ± .36 |
Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moderated | — | 0/25 (0%) | 0/25 (0%) |
| Peer-led | — | 0/26 (0%) | 0/26 (0%) |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Moderated Group | Non-facilitated (Peer-led) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 23 | 25 | 48 |
| >=65 years | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Age Continuous(years) | Moderated Group | Non-facilitated (Peer-led) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 52.97 ± 10.75 | 51.52 ± 8.92 | 52.25 ± 9.95 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Moderated Group | Non-facilitated (Peer-led) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 25 | 26 | 51 |
| Male | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Moderated Group | Non-facilitated (Peer-led) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 26 | 51 |
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Christiana Care Health Services