ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00373828Updated Feb 20, 2013

Non-cardiac Chest Pain Evaluation and Treatment Study (CARPA) - Part 1: Diagnosis.

An observational study in Non-Cardiac Chest Pain, Undiagnosed Chest Pain and Musculoskeletal Chest Pain, sponsored by Clinical Locomotion Science. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-02-20.

Sponsored by Clinical Locomotion Science · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
302
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The overall aim of the project is to evaluate diagnosis and treatment of chest pain originating from the musculoskeletal system. Specifically, we wish to investigate prevalence and character of such chest pain in a population of patients with acute chest pain, admitted to a university hospital based acute chest pain clinic, and undergoing evaluation of acute coronary syndrome (Part 1). Then, to test a manually-based treatment protocol to patients with diagnosed musculoskeletal chest pain in a randomized clinical trial (Part 2).

The specific purpose of this study (Part 1) is to determine the exact number of patients with acute chest pain origination from the musculoskeletal system, and to describe their cardiac status with respect to ischemic heart disease. Further, we wish to evaluate the decision making process of the chiropractor.

Read the detailed description

Acute chest pain is a common reason for hospital admission. The focus of diagnosis is of course pain of cardiac origin including myocardial infarction and/or other ischemic heart disease; however, in up to 50% of cases the aetiology may be non-cardiac. Differential diagnoses include primarily pulmonary, gastrointestinal, psychosocial, or musculoskeletal problems, and musculoskeletal problems may account for around 20% of the total number of admissions in acute chest pain clinics. Thus the musculoskeletal system is a recognized possible source of pain in patients with chest pain even though a confident diagnosis of musculoskeletal chest pain can be difficult to establish since no gold standard exists to verify this diagnosis.

Chest pain patients with normal coronary anatomy have an excellent prognosis for survival and a future risk of cardiac morbidity similar to that reported in the background population. However, about three quarters of patients with non-cardiac chest pain continue to suffer from residual chest pain with large socio-economic consequences. Therefore, a search for an alternative cause with related possibilities for treatment is warranted. Given these perspectives, the general objective of the present work is to study the diagnosis of chest pain originating from the musculoskeletal system of the cervical and thoracic spine, and thorax in patients with chest pain of various origins, and to evaluate ischemic heart disease status among patients with presumed musculoskeletal pain.

Evaluation:

Patients with musculoskeletal chest pain will be identified using a standardized examination protocol comprised of a semi-structured interview, a general health examination, and a specific manual examination of the muscles and joints of the neck, thoracic spine and thorax. All patients will have a Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) performed and results from the MPI will be compared with the musculoskeletal status. Specific important parameters of the standardized examination protocol will be identified and the decision making process of the chiropractor will be evaluated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-Cardiac Chest Pain
  • Undiagnosed Chest Pain
  • Musculoskeletal Chest Pain
  • Ischemic Heart Disease

Keywords

  • Chest Pain
  • Chest Wall
  • Angina Pectoris
  • Atypical Chest Pain
  • Physical Examination
  • Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
  • Observational Study
  • Non-Cardiac Chest Pain
  • Ischemic Heart Disease
03

In context

Myocardial Ischemia

3,242 studies on the registry are indexed under Myocardial Ischemia; 390 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 302 is close to the median of 333 across 1,142 observational studies indexed under Myocardial Ischemia.

Browse Myocardial Ischemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Clinical Locomotion Science is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Three hundred consecutive patients with an episode of suspected non-cardiac acute chest pain will be recruited from among patients discharged from an acute chest pain clinic situated at a large specialized cardiology department.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Acute episode of chest pain of less than 7 days duration as primary reason for admission to a chest pain clinic.
  • Admitted to a chest pain clinic, suspected of acute coronary infarction, but with a negative diagnosis confirmed by normal coronary enzymes and normal ECG.
  • Pain arising from the thorax and/or neck.
  • Able to read and understand Danish.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute coronary syndrome.
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
  • Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
  • Other disease, diagnosed during this admission, which is likely to have caused the acute episode of chest pain.
  • No written consent.
  • Inflammatory joint disease.
  • Diabetes mellitus, type I.
  • Fibromyalgia.
  • Sharp trauma to the chest.
  • Malignant disease.
  • Apoplexy.
  • Gross osseous anomalies, such as pronounced scoliosis.
  • Known or suspected osteoporosis.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Dementia/unable to cooperate.
  • Not residing in the County of Funen.
  • Does not want to participate.
  • Other - reason for exclusion will be noted.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
302 participants (actual)
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Musculoskeletal chest pain

    Presence of MSCP yes/no

    Time frame: baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The Dept. of Cardiology and Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital
    Sdr. Boulevard 29, Odense C DK-5000, Denmark
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Stochkendahl MJ, Christensen HW, Vach W, Hoilund-Carlsen PF, Haghfelt T, Hartvigsen J. Diagnosis and treatment of musculoskeletal chest pain: design of a multi-purpose trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Mar 31;9:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-40. PubMed 18377636 ↗
  • Stochkendahl MJ, Vach W, Hartvigsen J, Hoilund-Carlsen PF, Haghfelt T, Christensen HW. Reconstruction of the decision-making process in assessing musculoskeletal chest pain: an exploratory study using recursive partitioning. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 Mar-Apr;35(3):184-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.01.009. Epub 2012 Feb 27. PubMed 22377444 ↗

Related links

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 20, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00373828
Lead sponsor
Clinical Locomotion Science
Collaborators
Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, The County of Funen, Denmark, Foundation for Chiropractic Research and Post Graduate Education
Responsible party
Mette Jensen Stochkendahl (DC, PhD, Clinical Locomotion Science) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 8, 2006
Start date
Jun 2006
Primary completion
Mar 2008
Completion
Mar 2008
Last update
Feb 20, 2013

Study contacts

Poul Flemming Hoilund-Carlsen, Professor
study chair · The Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital
Torben Haghfelt, Professor
study chair · The Dept. of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion