CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00358787Updated Jan 10, 2018

Management of Displaced Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus Using Lateral vs. Crossed K-wires

An interventional study of Crossed K-wiring of supracondylar fracture of the humerus and Lateral K-wiring of supracondylar fracture of the humerus in Humeral Fractures, sponsored by University of British Columbia. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 7 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-01-10.

Sponsored by University of British Columbia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
55
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Years to 7 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Completely displaced (Type III) supracondylar fractures of the humerus are treated in the operating room and are held together with pins stuck into the bone. There are two ways of inserting the pins: crossed and laterally. The crossed method is often used because it is thought to be more stable, but this method also carries a risk of hitting the ulnar nerve. It is not known which method is more stable. Our hypothesis is that loss of reduction will be equivalent between the two pinning methods.

Read the detailed description

Children with type III supracondylar fractures of humerus who meet the study inclusion criteria will be invited to participate in the study by the on call orthopaedic surgeon. All patients will be required to provide informed consent. Patients will then be randomized through a random number software package and will commence immediately after confirmation of inclusion into the study. The fracture is reduced and fixed percutaneously either with crossed or lateral K wires, according to which group the subject was randomized to. Post reduction antero-posterior and lateral radiographs of the elbow are done in the operating room. Above elbow cast is applied. Radiographs are taken at follow-up visits to the clinic. The radiographs are measured to determine loss of reduction between immediate post-op films and films taken immediately prior to pin removal.

02

Conditions studied

  • Humeral Fractures

Keywords

  • Supracondylar fracture
  • humerus
  • ulnar nerve injury
  • Baumann's angle
  • Supracondylar fracture of the humerus
03

In context

Fractures, Bone

2,261 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Bone; 325 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 55 is below the median of 69 across 1,482 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Bone.

Browse Fractures, Bone studies →

Lead sponsor

University of British Columbia is the lead sponsor of 1,309 studies on the registry; 253 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (17%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 7 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female patients scheduled for closed reduction and K wiring of supracondylar fractures of the humerus under general anaesthesia a
  • Type-3 Supracondylar fractures of the humerus.
  • Aged 3 to 7 years old
  • Consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Open supracondylar fractures of the humerus
  • Children with pre-operative ulnar nerve injury
  • Supracondylar fractures with compartment syndrome needing fasciotomy
  • Supracondylar fractures needing vascular repair
  • Refusal to provide informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
55 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1

    Crossed K wire orientation for surgical management of a type III Supracondylar fracture.

    Procedure: Crossed K-wiring of supracondylar fracture of the humerus

  • Active comparator
    2

    Lateral K wire orientation for surgical management of a type III Supracondylar fracture.

    Procedure: Lateral K-wiring of supracondylar fracture of the humerus

Interventions

  • ProcedureCrossed K-wiring of supracondylar fracture of the humerus

    Closed reduction of the fracture followed by crossed K wire percutaneous pinning.

  • ProcedureLateral K-wiring of supracondylar fracture of the humerus

    Closed reduction of the fracture followed by lateral K wire percutaneous pinning.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Loss of reduction between lateral K wires and crossed K wires in the treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus (at pin removal)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional outcome (3 years post-op)

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. Rate of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury

07

Study locations

1 site
  • British Columbia Children's Hospital
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6H 3V4, Canada
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 10, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00358787
Lead sponsor
University of British Columbia
Responsible party
Kishore Mulpuri (Principle Investigator, University of British Columbia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 1, 2006
Start date
Jul 2008
Primary completion
Nov 2017
Completion
Nov 2017
Last update
Jan 10, 2018

Study contacts

Kishore Mulpuri, MD
principal investigator · The University of British Columbia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion