ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00349466Updated May 9, 2022Results posted

Safety and Efficacy Study of CF101 to Treat Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca

A Phase 2 interventional study of CF101 and Placebo in Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca, sponsored by Can-Fite BioPharma. Completed at 3 sites in Israel. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-09.

Sponsored by Can-Fite BioPharma · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Phase 2, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in adult males and females, aged 18 years and over, with a diagnosis of moderate-to-severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS). Patients will be randomized to receive either CF101 1 mg or matching placebo, given orally every 12 hours (q12h) for 12 weeks. A Screening Period of up to 4 weeks that includes a 2-week run-in period will precede a 12-week treatment period, followed by a 2-week follow-up period.

Read the detailed description

At a Screening Visit, patients who provide written informed consent will have screening procedures performed, including a complete medical history, medication history, physical examination, including height, weight, sitting blood pressure, pulse rate and temperature, and clinical laboratory tests. Disease activity will be assessed using tear meniscus (TM) height, tear break-up time (BUT), fluorescein staining (FS), Schirmer test, and the Dry Eye Symptom Score (DESS). Doses of artificial tears must be stable for >2 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.

Eligible patients will begin a 2-week run-in period, during which time they will be instructed to discontinue use of all topical ophthalmic medications except for lubricant eye drops. Patients who successfully complete the 2-week run-in period will be randomized to their assigned medication (CF101 1 mg or matching placebo) to be taken orally every q12h for 12 weeks. Patients will return for assessments and a new supply of study medication at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12, and at Week 14 for a final follow-up assessment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca

Keywords

  • Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
  • KCS
  • Dry Eye
03

In context

Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca

85 studies on the registry are indexed under Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca; 1 is open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 80 is close to the median of 82 across 75 interventional studies indexed under Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca.

Browse Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca studies →

Lead sponsor

Can-Fite BioPharma is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female, 18 years of age and over;
  • Have a diagnosis of moderate-to-severe KCS as defined by: (1) Schirmer Test (ST) (without anesthesia) \< 7 mm/5 min in either eye; AND (2) Positive FS, defined as a corneal punctate fluorescein staining score of ≥1 in either eye, where 0 = none and 3= severe; AND (3) At least 1 of the following ocular symptoms scored at ≥2, where 0 = none and 4 = very severe/interferes with normal activities: photophobia, blurred vision, foreign body sensation, soreness or pain, itching, burning, dryness;
  • Willing to use no topical ocular treatments except for the unpreserved artificial tears;
  • Doses of unpreserved artificial tears have been stable for >2 weeks prior to Screening Visit;
  • Females of must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening and throughout the study, to be eligible for, and continue participation in, the study;
  • Females of child-bearing potential must be willing to use 2 methods of deemed adequate by the Investigator (for example oral contraceptive pills plus a barrier method) to be eligible for, and continue participation in, the study;
  • Ability to complete the study in compliance with the protocol; and
  • Ability to understand and provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has Sjögren's Syndrome with significant systemic non-exocrine gland involvement;
  • Has Stevens-Johnson Syndrome;
  • If KCS is due to rheumatoid arthritis or other diseases, patient may not be receiving disease-modifying drugs, including methotrexate and biological agents;
  • Use of systemic drugs;
  • Use of oral >10 mg prednisone, or equivalent, per day;
  • Use of topical steroids within 2 weeks prior to the Screening Visit and for the duration of the study;
  • Receipt of topical cyclosporine eye drops within 3 months prior to the Screening Visit and for the duration of the trial;
  • Presence of chronic ocular disease other than KCS requiring topical treatment;
  • Presence of post-burn ocular injury;
  • Ocular herpes simplex virus infection;
  • Concomitant use of contact lenses;
  • Persistent intraocular inflammation or infection;
  • Active blepharitis;
  • Recent surgical occlusion of the lacrimal puncta;
  • Subepithelial corneal scarring;
  • Anesthetic or neurotrophic corneas;
  • level \<9.0 gm/L;
  • count \<125,000/mm\^3;
  • White blood cell count \<3500/mm\^3;
  • Serum creatinine level outside the laboratory's normal limits;
  • Liver aminotransferase levels greater than 2 times the laboratory's ;
  • Pregnancy, planned pregnancy, lactation, or inadequate as judged by the Investigator;
  • History of within the past 5 years (excluding basal cell carcinoma of the skin);
  • Significant acute or chronic medical, ophthalmic, or psychiatric illness that, in the judgment of the Investigator, could compromise patient safety, limit the patient's ability to complete the study, and/or compromise the objectives of the study;
  • Participation in another drug or vaccine trial concurrently or within 30 days; or
  • Other conditions which would confound the study evaluations or endanger the safety of the patient.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CF101 1mg

    CF101 1 mg given orally every 12 hours for 12 weeks

    Drug: CF101

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo given orally every 12 hours for 12 weeks

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugCF101

    Orally CF101 1mg

    Also known as: Piclidenoson

  • DrugPlacebo

    Orally matching Placebo

    Also known as: Inactive pill

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Schirmer Test (ST) Score in Millimeters

    Involved placing a standardized paper tear strip inside the lower eyelid for 5 minutes. The tear strip was then removed and the length of the strip that was wet from tears was measured in millimeters. Change from baseline is calculated. Scores range 0-35 mm, with higher scores indicating more (better) tear production.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Tear Break-Up Time (BUT) in Seconds

    Time elapsed between a complete blink and the development of the first random dry spot on the tear film as seen under fluorescent light. Change from baseline is calculated. Scores range 0-30 seconds, with higher scores indicating better tear composition and function.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Number of Subjects With >25% Improvement in Fluorescein Staining of the Cornea (FS) at Week 12

    Severity of corneal epithelial loss as graded by Fluorescein Staining of the cornea, assessed on a 0-4+ scale with 0 = none and 4+ = severe de-epithelialization (in other words, higher scores indicate worse disease), expressed as number of participants with \>25% improvement at Week 12 relative to baseline.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Subjects Experiencing Clinical Success at Week 12

    Proportion of subjects experiencing improvement of ≥25% over baseline at Week 12 in (a) tear breakup time (BUT), (b) superficial punctate keratitis as assessed by fluorescein staining (FS), or Schirmer Test (ST)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Dry Eye Symptom Score (DESS)

    DESS consists of 12 questions designed to assess the symptoms of ocular irritation, covering three areas: ocular symptoms, environmental triggers and vision-related function. Each of the 12 symptoms can be graded 0-4, with 0 indicating no symptoms over the past week, and 4 meaning constant symptoms over the past week. Scores from all answered questions are summed. The final score is multiplied by (25/number of questions answered) to give an outcome between 0 (no symptoms) to 100 (worst possible symptoms). Change from baseline is calculated.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Tear Meniscus (TM) Height

    Indicator of tear volume. TM was recorded on a scale from 0-3, with 0=none, 1=trace, 2=normal, and 3=high, with higher scores meaning better tear production and integrity. Change from baseline.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Use of Artificial Tears

    Daily use of REFRESH TEARS® Lubricant Eye Drops artificial tears supplied to each patient was recorded in diaries provided to patients. Percent change from baseline is calculated.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Results

Posted Aug 12, 2011

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCF101 1 mgPlacebo
Started4238
Completed3335
Not completed93

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Schirmer Test (ST) Score in Millimeters

Involved placing a standardized paper tear strip inside the lower eyelid for 5 minutes. The tear strip was then removed and the length of the strip that was wet from tears was measured in millimeters. Change from baseline is calculated. Scores range 0-35 mm, with higher scores indicating more (better) tear production.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Millimeters
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Schirmer Test (ST) Score in Millimeters
MillimetersCF101 1 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Schirmer Test (ST) Score in Millimeters1.25 ± 0.7653.81 ± 0.814
Statistical analysis
  • CF101 1 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.027
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Tear Break-Up Time (BUT) in Seconds

Time elapsed between a complete blink and the development of the first random dry spot on the tear film as seen under fluorescent light. Change from baseline is calculated. Scores range 0-30 seconds, with higher scores indicating better tear composition and function.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · seconds
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Tear Break-Up Time (BUT) in Seconds
secondsCF101 1 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Tear Break-Up Time (BUT) in Seconds2.83 ± 0.9060.48 ± 0.083
Statistical analysis
  • CF101 1 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.083
PrimaryNumber of Subjects With >25% Improvement in Fluorescein Staining of the Cornea (FS) at Week 12

Severity of corneal epithelial loss as graded by Fluorescein Staining of the cornea, assessed on a 0-4+ scale with 0 = none and 4+ = severe de-epithelialization (in other words, higher scores indicate worse disease), expressed as number of participants with \>25% improvement at Week 12 relative to baseline.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects With >25% Improvement in Fluorescein Staining of the Cornea (FS) at Week 12
participantsCF101 1 mg BIDPlacebo BID
Number of Subjects With >25% Improvement in Fluorescein Staining of the Cornea (FS) at Week 122212
Statistical analysis
  • CF101 1 mg BID vs Placebo BID · Fisher Exact · p = 0.028
SecondaryNumber of Subjects Experiencing Clinical Success at Week 12

Proportion of subjects experiencing improvement of ≥25% over baseline at Week 12 in (a) tear breakup time (BUT), (b) superficial punctate keratitis as assessed by fluorescein staining (FS), or Schirmer Test (ST)

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Subjects Experiencing Clinical Success at Week 12
ParticipantsCF101 1 mgPlacebo
Number of Subjects Experiencing Clinical Success at Week 122420
Statistical analysis
  • CF101 1 mg vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.655
SecondaryChange From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Dry Eye Symptom Score (DESS)

DESS consists of 12 questions designed to assess the symptoms of ocular irritation, covering three areas: ocular symptoms, environmental triggers and vision-related function. Each of the 12 symptoms can be graded 0-4, with 0 indicating no symptoms over the past week, and 4 meaning constant symptoms over the past week. Scores from all answered questions are summed. The final score is multiplied by (25/number of questions answered) to give an outcome between 0 (no symptoms) to 100 (worst possible symptoms). Change from baseline is calculated.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Dry Eye Symptom Score (DESS)
score on a scaleCF101 1 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Dry Eye Symptom Score (DESS)34.44 ± 25.39334.53 ± 20.605
Statistical analysis
  • CF101 1 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.387
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Tear Meniscus (TM) Height

Indicator of tear volume. TM was recorded on a scale from 0-3, with 0=none, 1=trace, 2=normal, and 3=high, with higher scores meaning better tear production and integrity. Change from baseline.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Tear Meniscus (TM) Height
units on a scaleCF101 1 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Tear Meniscus (TM) Height0.38 ± 0.6370.13 ± 0.694
Statistical analysis
  • CF101 1 mg vs Placebo · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.203
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Use of Artificial Tears

Daily use of REFRESH TEARS® Lubricant Eye Drops artificial tears supplied to each patient was recorded in diaries provided to patients. Percent change from baseline is calculated.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage change from baseline
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Use of Artificial Tears
percentage change from baselineCF101 1 mgPlacebo
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Use of Artificial Tears355625.0 ± 410162.00187883.1 ± 477720.08
Statistical analysis
  • CF101 1 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = .807

Adverse events

Collected over Starting on week 2 till week 12 and continue till follow up visit on week 14. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
CF101 1 mg—0/39 (0%)20/39 (51.3%)
Placebo—0/37 (0%)8/37 (21.6%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventCF101 1 mgPlacebo
HeadacheNervous system disorders3/394/37
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders3/392/37
PalpitationsCardiac disorders3/390/37
ItchingSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3/391/37
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders2/390/37
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/391/37
MyalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/390/37
FatigueGeneral disorders2/390/37

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)CF101 1 mgPlaceboTotal
Mean56.2 ± 14.461.4 ± 1311.758.7 ± 13.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CF101 1 mgPlaceboTotal
Female242852
Male181028
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)CF101 1 mgPlaceboTotal
Israel423880
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Meir Hospital
    Kfar-Saba, 44281, Israel
  • Sheba Medical Center
    Tel Hashomer, 5262, Israel
  • Assaf Harofeh Medical Center
    Tsrifin, 70300, Israel
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Avni I, Garzozi HJ, Barequet IS, Segev F, Varssano D, Sartani G, Chetrit N, Bakshi E, Zadok D, Tomkins O, Litvin G, Jacobson KA, Fishman S, Harpaz Z, Farbstein M, Yehuda SB, Silverman MH, Kerns WD, Bristol DR, Cohn I, Fishman P. Treatment of dry eye syndrome with orally administered CF101: data from a phase 2 clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2010 Jul;117(7):1287-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.11.029. Epub 2010 Mar 20. PubMed 20304499 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2007, a primary completion of May 2009 and a completion of May 2009. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Aug 2011, 2 years 3 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 6, 2006
First posted
Jul 7, 2006
Start
Jan 2007
Primary completionActual
May 2009
CompletionActual
May 2009
Results first posted
Aug 12, 2011
Last update
May 9, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 9, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00349466
Lead sponsor
Can-Fite BioPharma
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 7, 2006
Start date
Jan 2007
Primary completion
May 2009
Completion
May 2009
Results posted
Aug 12, 2011
Last update
May 9, 2022

Study contacts

Irit Bareket, MD
principal investigator · Sheba Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: CF101

Start the discussion