ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00321867Updated Jul 17, 2025

Graft-Augmented Rectocele Repair-A Randomized Surgical Trial

An interventional study of Graft augmented posterior repair and Control in Rectocele, sponsored by Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-17.

Sponsored by Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether adding a graft during a rectocele repair will improve the success rate of the repair.

Read the detailed description

Rectoceles may have a significant effect on the quality of life of women. Symptoms associated with rectoceles include a protruding vaginal mass, persistent pelvic pressure, and sexual dysfunction. Surgical repair is the most common treatment with success rates ranging from 65%-85% at 1-2 years. In an attempt to improve surgical outcomes, clinicians are using graft materials to augment weakened tissues in rectocele repairs: however, there is little data to support or refute these practices. The purpose of this study is to estimate the effect of graft augmentation on objective and subjective outcomes.

Comparison: Rectocele repair without graft, compared to rectocele repair with the SurgiSIS (TM) graft.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rectocele

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • rectocele
  • pelvic prolapse
  • graft
  • surgical repair
03

In context

Rectocele

50 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectocele; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 160 is above the median of 62 across 37 interventional studies indexed under Rectocele.

Browse Rectocele studies →

Lead sponsor

Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island is the lead sponsor of 93 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women with stage 2 or greater symptomatic rectocele
  • Women electing to undergo surgical rectocele repair
  • Women over age 21 years
  • Women willing to comply with study procedures and follow-up

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • History of porcine allergy
  • History of connective tissue disease, pelvic , or pelvic radiation
  • Women undergoing concurrent sacral colpopexy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
160 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1

    Native tissue repair

    Procedure: Control

  • Experimental
    2

    Posterior repair with graft

    Procedure: Graft augmented posterior repair

Interventions

  • ProcedureGraft augmented posterior repair

    Posterior repair with graft

  • ProcedureControl

    Native tissue repair

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Anatomic cure defined by standardized POPQ measures

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of life based on PFIQ validated questionnaire

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Sexual function

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Patient centered goals

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
    Providence, Rhode Island 02905, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sung VW, Rardin CR, Raker CA, Lasala CA, Myers DL. Porcine subintestinal submucosal graft augmentation for rectocele repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;119(1):125-33. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823d407e. PubMed 22183220 ↗
  • Yeung E, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Chen Z, Wallace SA, Mowat A, Maher C. Transvaginal mesh or grafts or native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 13;3(3):CD012079. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012079.pub2. PubMed 38477494 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 17, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00321867
Lead sponsor
Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
Responsible party
Vivian Sung (Principal Investigator, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 4, 2006
Start date
Jan 2004
Primary completion
Dec 2010
Completion
Jan 2012
Last update
Jul 17, 2025

Study contacts

Vivian W Sung, MD MPH
principal investigator · Women and Infants Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion