ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07918807Updated Nov 5, 2026

Addressing Food Insecurity in Pregnancy

An observational study in Food Insecurity and Pregnancy, sponsored by Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island · Observational

Updated Nov 5, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
700
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn if providing meal kits during pregnancy is helpful for people experiencing food insecurity. The study will also learn about participants' experiences with receiving meal kits during pregnancy and after giving birth. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does receiving meal kits affect pregnancy and health outcomes?
  • How do participants experience and use the meal kits?
  • What benefits or challenges do participants report when receiving the meal kits?

Participants who screen positive for food insecurity during routine prenatal care will be offered weekly meal kits through Meals on Wheels Rhode Island (MoWRI). Participants who accept the meal program will receive meal kits throughout pregnancy and through two weeks after giving birth. Participants who do not enroll in the meal program will continue to receive their usual prenatal care and referrals to food and nutrition resources.

Participants will:

  • Complete surveys about their health, food access, and experiences with the meal program.
  • Continue their regular prenatal care.
  • Some participants will be invited to complete an interview about their experiences.
Read the detailed description

Food insecurity during pregnancy is associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes and may be an important modifiable social determinant of health. This mixed-methods observational study will evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes associated with providing meal support to pregnant persons experiencing food insecurity who receive prenatal care at the Women \& Infants Hospital of Rhode Island Obstetrics and Gynecology Care Center (OGCC).

All pregnant persons receiving prenatal care at the OGCC are routinely screened for food insecurity as part of social determinants of health screening. Screening may be conducted using the clinic's standard screening language or the Hunger Vital Sign, a validated two-question screening tool derived from the U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module.

  1. "Within the past 12 months we worried whether our food would run out before we got money to buy more."
  2. "Within the past 12 months the food we bought just didn't last and we didn't have money to get more."

A response of "sometimes true" or "often true" to either or both questions is considered a positive screen for food insecurity.

Individuals who screen positive for food insecurity during a routine prenatal visit, including prenatal intake, new obstetric visits, new high-risk appointments, or other obstetric follow-up visits, will be offered enrollment in Meals on Wheels Rhode Island (MoWRI). Participants who agree to participate in the meal delivery program will comprise the intervention group. Their contact information will be provided to MoWRI, which will confirm individual and/or household meal needs and arrange delivery of weekly meal kits throughout pregnancy through two weeks postpartum.

Participants who decline or do not enroll in the MoWRI meal program for any reason will comprise the usual-care group. These participants will continue to receive standard prenatal care, including routine nutrition counseling and referrals to community resources such as the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and other resources available through the OGCC.

Assignment to the intervention or usual-care group will not be randomized. Group assignment will be determined by the participant's decision to accept or decline enrollment in the MoWRI meal program. Participants in both groups will otherwise receive the same routine prenatal medical care, with medical problems documented and managed according to standard clinical practice.

A mixed-methods approach will be used to evaluate participant outcomes and experiences. Quantitative data will be collected through participant surveys and abstraction of relevant information from the medical record. Qualitative data will be collected through participant interviews exploring experiences with food insecurity, the meal program, prenatal care, and perceived benefits or challenges associated with the intervention. Quantitative and qualitative findings will be analyzed in parallel and integrated to provide a comprehensive assessment of the intervention and participant experiences.

02

Conditions studied

  • Food Insecurity
  • Pregnancy

Keywords

  • Meal Supplementation
  • Food Insecurity in Pregnancy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island is the lead sponsor of 93 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All pregnant persons receiving prenatal care at the OGCC are screened for food insecurity using either the clinic's standard verbiage during the routine social determinants of health screening or the "Hunger Vital Sign" during their routine prenatal visits (including their prenatal intake visit, new OB visit, new High-Risk appointments, or other OB follow up visits). Those who screen positive during one of these visits will be offered enrollment into MoWRI's supplemental nutrition program and this study. Patient who choose to receive meals through MoWRI can opt out of participation in the study. Patients who elect not to receive meals through MoWRI are still eligible to participate in the study.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant persons aged 18-50 years.
  • Receiving prenatal care at the Women \& Infants Hospital of Rhode Island (WIH) Obstetrics \& Gynecology Care Center (OGCC).
  • Screen positive for food insecurity.
  • Able to give (interpreter services will be offered for non-English speakers).
  • Planning to continue care and deliver at WIH.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Plans to relocate or transfer prenatal care outside OGCC before delivery.
  • Medical that would severely alter dietary intake (as assessed by clinician).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
700 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Usual Care

    Participants identified as food insecure and referred to Social Work for standard assistance.

  • Intervention with Meal Supplementation

    Participants identified as food insecure and referred to meal supplementation program, based on program availability.

    Dietary Supplement: Supplemental meal delivery

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementSupplemental meal delivery

    Weekly deliveries of supplemental meals to pregnant persons and their households from enrollment until two weeks postpartum.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Qualitative perceptions of nutritional support and dietary quality among program participants

    Assessment of pregnant patients' experiences, program satisfaction, barriers to food access, and perceived changes in dietary quality resulting from the Meals on Wheels Rhode Island program. Data will be collected via semi-structured qualitative interviews or focus groups with the intervention group. Eligible participants include those who completed the nutritional intervention prior to the interview date. Text data will be transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis.

    Time frame: Within 12 months following completion of the nutritional intervention

  2. Proportion of participants experiencing any maternal medical complication

    A composite clinical endpoint evaluating overall maternal health complications. A participant will be counted once if they develop at least one of the following clinically diagnosed conditions: gestational diabetes, anemia, chronic hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, or eclampsia. Rates will be compared between the intervention group (receiving meal delivery) and the control group (not receiving meals).

    Time frame: From enrollment through delivery (up to 42 weeks of gestation)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of participants experiencing delivery-related complications

    The percentage of participants who experience at least one of the following binary (yes/no) labor and delivery events: mode of delivery categorized as cesarean section (vs. vaginal delivery), placental complications (e.g., abruption or previa), clinically documented maternal infections during labor, precipitous labor and delivery (expulsion of the fetus within 3 hours of regular contractions), or an umbilical cord complication.

    Time frame: At delivery (up to 42 weeks of gestation)

  2. Gestational age at delivery

    Gestational age at delivery, measured in completed days.

    Time frame: At delivery (up to 42 weeks of gestation)

  3. Proportion of neonates with breech or fetal malpresentation

    The percentage of neonates presenting in a breech position or other non-vertex fetal malpresentation (yes/no) documented by the clinical team at the time of delivery.

    Time frame: At delivery (up to 42 weeks of gestation)

  4. Change from baseline in maternal depression symptoms

    This outcome tracks maternal mental health metrics over time, comparing the intervention group to the control group. It measures depression symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) total score (range 0-27, higher scores indicate worse symptoms).

    Time frame: Baseline (Prenatal Intake or New OB visit, whichever comes first) to approximately 6 weeks postpartum

  5. Neonate birth weight

    Neonate birth weight, measured continuously in grams.

    Time frame: At birth (up to 42 weeks of gestation)

  6. Apgar scores

    Apgar scores assessed at 1, 5, and 10 minutes after birth. Each score is measured on a standardized scale from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better clinical transition.

    Time frame: 1, 5, and 10 minutes after birth

  7. Change in maternal weight from baseline

    This outcome tracks maternal gestational weight gain (measured in kilograms) over time, comparing the intervention group to the control group.

    Time frame: Baseline (Prenatal Intake or New OB visit, whichever comes first) to approximately 6 weeks postpartum

  8. Proportion of participants with a preterm delivery

    The percentage of participants who experience a live birth prior to 37 completed weeks of gestation (less than 259 days). Gestational age will be determined based on the first day of the last menstrual period and confirmed by early ultrasound dating. Rates will be compared between the intervention group (receiving MoWRI meal delivery) and the concurrent control group (not receiving meals).

    Time frame: At delivery (up to 42 weeks of gestation)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Walker RE, Keane CR, Burke JG. Disparities and access to healthy food in the United States: A review of food deserts literature. Health Place. 2010 Sep;16(5):876-84. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.04.013. Epub 2010 Apr 24. PubMed 20462784 ↗
  • Stoody EE, Spahn JM, Casavale KO. The Pregnancy and Birth to 24 Months Project: a series of systematic reviews on diet and health. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Mar 1;109(Suppl_7):685S-697S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy372. PubMed 30982878 ↗
  • Ridberg RA, Levi R, Marpadga S, Akers M, Tancredi DJ, Seligman HK. Additional Fruit and Vegetable Vouchers for Pregnant WIC Clients: An Equity-Focused Strategy to Improve Food Security and Diet Quality. Nutrients. 2022 Jun 1;14(11):2328. doi: 10.3390/nu14112328. PubMed 35684128 ↗
  • Ramakrishnan U, Grant F, Goldenberg T, Zongrone A, Martorell R. Effect of women's nutrition before and during early pregnancy on maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012 Jul;26 Suppl 1:285-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01281.x. PubMed 22742616 ↗
  • Murphy LM, Lefkowitz J, Duckworth M, Schlichting L, Tuuli MG, Lewkowitz AK. Pilot study of prenatal community meal supplementation program demonstrates feasibility. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Jul;6(7):101382. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101382. Epub 2024 May 16. No abstract available. PubMed 38761888 ↗
  • Marshall NE, Abrams B, Barbour LA, Catalano P, Christian P, Friedman JE, Hay WW Jr, Hernandez TL, Krebs NF, Oken E, Purnell JQ, Roberts JM, Soltani H, Wallace J, Thornburg KL. The importance of nutrition in pregnancy and lactation: lifelong consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 May;226(5):607-632. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.12.035. Epub 2021 Dec 27. PubMed 34968458 ↗
  • Augusto ALP, de Abreu Rodrigues AV, Domingos TB, Salles-Costa R. Household food insecurity associated with gestacional and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Apr 17;20(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02917-9. PubMed 32303221 ↗
  • Chehab RF, Croen LA, Laraia BA, Greenberg MB, Ngo AL, Ferrara A, Zhu Y. Food Insecurity in Pregnancy, Receipt of Food Assistance, and Perinatal Complications. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2455955. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55955. PubMed 39847356 ↗
  • Gundersen C, Engelhard EE, Crumbaugh AS, Seligman HK. Brief assessment of food insecurity accurately identifies high-risk US adults. Public Health Nutr. 2017 Jun;20(8):1367-1371. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017000180. Epub 2017 Feb 20. PubMed 28215190 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared with researchers outside of the study team. Study data will include information obtained from medical records, participant-completed surveys, and qualitative interviews, including demographic, clinical, pregnancy, delivery, neonatal, and survey data. Interview transcripts will contain participants' open-ended responses to semi-structured interview questions. Data will be stored securely and access will be limited to authorized members of the research team. Because the study collects sensitive health and personal information, IPD will not be made available for sharing outside the institution. Any future data sharing or transfer outside the institution would require appropriate institutional and IRB approval and applicable data-sharing agreements and privacy protections.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Jan 2029, 26 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 19, 2026
First posted
Nov 5, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 2029
CompletionEst.
Jan 2029
Last update
Nov 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07918807
Lead sponsor
Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
Collaborators
Meals on Wheels of Rhode Island, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Point32Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 5, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Study contacts

Janet Lefkowitz, DO
Contact
jlefkowitz@kentri.org
401-430-2735
Joni Harris, MS
Contact
jonharris@carene.org
Janet Lefkowitz, DO
principal investigator · Women & Infants Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion