ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00319254Updated Jan 31, 2013Results posted

Study Evaluating SKI-606 (Bosutinib) In Subjects With Breast Cancer

A Phase 2 interventional study of SKI-606 (Bosutinib) in Breast Neoplasms and Neoplasm Metastasis, sponsored by Pfizer. Completed at 15 sites in 8 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-01-31.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
75
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if SKI-606 (Bosutinib) is effective in the treatment of advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Patients must have current Stage IIIB, IIIC or IV breast cancer and have progressed after 1 to 3 prior chemotherapy regimens.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Neoplasms
  • Neoplasm Metastasis

Keywords

  • Advanced Breast Cancer
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

14,825 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 75 is close to the median of 72 across 10,896 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,334 studies on the registry; 149 are open to participants now.

Of its 601 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 391 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Stage IIIB, IIIC or IV breast cancer not curable with available therapy.
  • Patients must have progressed after 1 but not more than 3 prior chemotherapy regimens.
  • of at least 16 weeks.
  • Ability to swallow whole capsules.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of or requirement for bisphosphonates within 8 weeks prior to screening.
  • Any other cancer within 5 years of screening, except for basal cell carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ
  • Uncontrolled cardiac disease including congestive heart failure, angina, heart attack, etc.
  • Recent or ongoing significant gastrointestinal disorder
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
75 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Advanced breast cancer

    Drug: SKI-606 (Bosutinib)

Interventions

  • SKI-606 (Bosutinib) 400mg once daily, for as long as tolerated or until disease progression.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate

    PFS was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. PFS was defined as time in weeks from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 7. Tumor progression was determined from oncologic assessment data (where data meet the criteria for progressive disease \[PD\]), or from death case report forms (CRFs). Percentage of participants who had not experienced progression or death by Week 16 is reported.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 30 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state.

    Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Survival was defined as the time period from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of death, censored at the participant's last contact date. Percentage of participants who were still alive at 2 years is reported.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Year 2

  2. Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)

    Percentage of participants with OR was based on the assessment of confirmed complete remission (CR) or confirmed partial remission (PR) according to sponsor modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Confirmed CR defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Confirmed PR defined as more than or equal to (\>=) 30% decrease in sum of the longest dimensions (LD) of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum LD. Confirmed responses are those that persist on repeat imaging study \>=4 weeks after initial documentation of response.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Year 1

  3. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit

    Clinical benefit was defined as a confirmed CR or PR, or stable disease (SD) for more than (\>) 24 weeks as the best response before the first evidence of progressive disease (PD). A participant demonstrating CR, PR, or SD \>24 weeks at any time while on study was counted in the numerator.

    Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Week 77)

  4. Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Results

    Number of participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) laboratory values are reported. Criteria for PCS laboratory values include: aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>5\*upper limit of normal(ULN) milliunit/milliliter(mU/mL); total bilirubin \>3\*ULN micromole/L; sodium \<130, magnesium \<0.4 and \>1.23 millimole/L; lipase \>2\*ULN microkats/L; neutrophils \<1\*10\^9/L. Participants meeting at least 1 PCS criteria are reported.

    Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Week 77)

  5. Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG)

    Number of participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) ECG findings are reported. Criteria for PCS ECG findings include: no sinus rhythm; heart rate \>=120 beats per minute (bpm) or increase \>=15 bpm; QT interval corrected using Bazett's formula (QTcB) \>60 milliseconds (msec) change from baseline; and overall ECG evaluation not normal.

    Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Week 77)

  6. Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Vital Signs, Physical Examinations, and Ophthalmological Examinations

    Number of participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital signs and physical examinations are reported. Criteria for PCS vital signs include: respiratory rate \>25 breaths/minute and PCS physical examinations include: an increase or decrease from baseline of \>=7% in body weight.

    Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (Week 77)

  7. Concomitant Medications Used for Management of Adverse Events (AEs)

    Number of participants taking any non-study medications which were administered from Study Day 1 to last dose of study treatment (Week 77) as a management of an AE were to be reported.

    Time frame: Day 1 up to end of treatment (Week 77)

  8. Change From Baseline in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) at Week 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, Every 8 Weeks Thereafter and 14 Days After Last Dose of Study Treatment

    KPS: 11 level score ranged 100 to 0, to assess functional impairment. 100:Normal; 90:Able to carry on normal activity; 80:Normal activity with effort, some signs or symptoms of disease; 70:Cares for self, unable to carry on normal activity or to do active work; 60:Requires occasional assistance but is able to care for most of needs; 50:Requires considerable assistance and frequent medical care; 40:Disabled,requires special care and assistance; 30:Severely disabled; hospitalization indicated although death is not imminent; 20:Very sick; 10:Morbibund,fatal processes progressing rapidly; 0:Death.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1,4,8,12,16, every 8 weeks thereafter and 14 days after last dose of study treatment

Other outcomes

  1. Population Pharmacokinetics (PK)

    Data for this Outcome Measure are not reported here because the analysis population includes participants who were not enrolled in this study. ClinicalTrials.gov is designed for reporting results from only those participants who were enrolled in the study and described in the Participant Flow and Baseline Characteristics modules.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 2, 7, 20 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Week 4 and pre-dose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 8, 12, 16, and 24

07

Results

Posted Jan 31, 2013

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBosutinib
Started75
Treated73
Completed21
Not completed54
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject4
Withdrew: Death46
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2
Withdrew: Enrolled, not treated2

Outcome measures

PrimaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate

PFS was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. PFS was defined as time in weeks from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 7. Tumor progression was determined from oncologic assessment data (where data meet the criteria for progressive disease \[PD\]), or from death case report forms (CRFs). Percentage of participants who had not experienced progression or death by Week 16 is reported.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate
percentage of participantsBosutinib
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate39.6 (28.1 to 50.8)
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 30 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state.

Time frame:
Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
percentage of participantsBosutinib
AEs97
SAEs33
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)

OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Survival was defined as the time period from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of death, censored at the participant's last contact date. Percentage of participants who were still alive at 2 years is reported.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Year 2
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Overall Survival (OS)
percentage of participantsBosutinib
Overall Survival (OS)26.4 (14.7 to 39.7)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)

Percentage of participants with OR was based on the assessment of confirmed complete remission (CR) or confirmed partial remission (PR) according to sponsor modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Confirmed CR defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Confirmed PR defined as more than or equal to (\>=) 30% decrease in sum of the longest dimensions (LD) of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum LD. Confirmed responses are those that persist on repeat imaging study \>=4 weeks after initial documentation of response.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Year 1
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)
percentage of participantsBosutinib
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)5.5 (1.5 to 13.4)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit

Clinical benefit was defined as a confirmed CR or PR, or stable disease (SD) for more than (\>) 24 weeks as the best response before the first evidence of progressive disease (PD). A participant demonstrating CR, PR, or SD \>24 weeks at any time while on study was counted in the numerator.

Time frame:
Baseline up to end of treatment (Week 77)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit
percentage of participantsBosutinib
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit27.4 (17.6 to 39.1)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Results

Number of participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) laboratory values are reported. Criteria for PCS laboratory values include: aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>5\*upper limit of normal(ULN) milliunit/milliliter(mU/mL); total bilirubin \>3\*ULN micromole/L; sodium \<130, magnesium \<0.4 and \>1.23 millimole/L; lipase \>2\*ULN microkats/L; neutrophils \<1\*10\^9/L. Participants meeting at least 1 PCS criteria are reported.

Time frame:
Baseline up to end of treatment (Week 77)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Results
participantsBosutinib
Sodium (<130 mmol/L)2
Magnesium (<0.4 mmol/L)3
Magnesium (>1.23 mmol/L)3
Total Bilirubin (>3*ULN)1
ALT (>5*ULN)12
AST (>5*ULN)10
Lipase (>2*ULN)1
Neutrophils (<1*10^9/L)1
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG)

Number of participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) ECG findings are reported. Criteria for PCS ECG findings include: no sinus rhythm; heart rate \>=120 beats per minute (bpm) or increase \>=15 bpm; QT interval corrected using Bazett's formula (QTcB) \>60 milliseconds (msec) change from baseline; and overall ECG evaluation not normal.

Time frame:
Baseline up to end of treatment (Week 77)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG)
participantsBosutinib
No sinus rhythm12
Heart Rate (>=120 bpm and increase >=15bpm)2
QTcB Interval (>60 msec change from baseline)1
Overall ECG not normal12
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Vital Signs, Physical Examinations, and Ophthalmological Examinations

Number of participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital signs and physical examinations are reported. Criteria for PCS vital signs include: respiratory rate \>25 breaths/minute and PCS physical examinations include: an increase or decrease from baseline of \>=7% in body weight.

Time frame:
Baseline up to end of treatment (Week 77)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Vital Signs, Physical Examinations, and Ophthalmological Examinations
participantsBosutinib
Respiratory Rate (> 25 breaths/minute)6
Weight (decrease >=7%)9
Weight (increase >=7%)1
Ophthalmological examinations0
SecondaryConcomitant Medications Used for Management of Adverse Events (AEs)

Number of participants taking any non-study medications which were administered from Study Day 1 to last dose of study treatment (Week 77) as a management of an AE were to be reported.

Time frame:
Day 1 up to end of treatment (Week 77)

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryChange From Baseline in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) at Week 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, Every 8 Weeks Thereafter and 14 Days After Last Dose of Study Treatment

KPS: 11 level score ranged 100 to 0, to assess functional impairment. 100:Normal; 90:Able to carry on normal activity; 80:Normal activity with effort, some signs or symptoms of disease; 70:Cares for self, unable to carry on normal activity or to do active work; 60:Requires occasional assistance but is able to care for most of needs; 50:Requires considerable assistance and frequent medical care; 40:Disabled,requires special care and assistance; 30:Severely disabled; hospitalization indicated although death is not imminent; 20:Very sick; 10:Morbibund,fatal processes progressing rapidly; 0:Death.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 1,4,8,12,16, every 8 weeks thereafter and 14 days after last dose of study treatment

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Other pre-specifiedPopulation Pharmacokinetics (PK)

Data for this Outcome Measure are not reported here because the analysis population includes participants who were not enrolled in this study. ClinicalTrials.gov is designed for reporting results from only those participants who were enrolled in the study and described in the Participant Flow and Baseline Characteristics modules.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 2, 7, 20 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Week 4 and pre-dose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Reported as:
Mean · nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Bosutinib—24/73 (32.9%)70/73 (95.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 24
Most frequent serious events
EventBosutinib
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations3/73
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders2/73
Disease progressionGeneral disorders2/73
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders2/73
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations2/73
Breast painReproductive system and breast disorders2/73
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/73
IleusGastrointestinal disorders1/73
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders1/73
Chest discomfortGeneral disorders1/73
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 24
Most frequent other events
EventBosutinib
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders48/73
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders40/73
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders33/73
FatigueGeneral disorders19/73
AstheniaGeneral disorders14/73
AnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders14/73
HeadacheNervous system disorders10/73
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders10/73
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders9/73
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations9/73

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Bosutinib
Mean54.27 ± 9.81
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Bosutinib
Female73
Male0
08

Study locations

15 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Duarte, California 91010-3000, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Darlinghurst, New South Wales 2010, Australia
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Dijon, 21034, France
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Saint-Herblain, 44805, France
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Pokfulam, Hong Kong
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Floriana, VLT 14, Malta
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Lodz, 90-553, Poland
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Wroclaw, 51-124, Poland
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Moscow, 115478, Russian Federation
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Dnipropetrovsk, 49102, Ukraine
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Sumy, 40005, Ukraine
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Uzhgorod, 88014, Ukraine
09

References and documents

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of May 2006, a primary completion of Feb 2009 and a completion of Feb 2009. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jan 2013, 3 years 11 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Jan 2010.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 24, 2006
First posted
Apr 27, 2006
Start
May 2006
Primary completionActual
Feb 2009
CompletionActual
Feb 2009
Results delay requested
Jan 27, 2010
Results first posted
Jan 31, 2013
Last update
Jan 31, 2013
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 31, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00319254
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 27, 2006
Start date
May 2006
Primary completion
Feb 2009
Completion
Feb 2009
Results posted
Jan 31, 2013
Last update
Jan 31, 2013

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Bosutinib

Start the discussion