An observational study in Leprosy, sponsored by Colorado State University. Completed at 1 site in Philippines. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-06-23.
Sponsored by Colorado State University · Observational
The purpose of the study is to see if new methods can be used to determine why Multidrug Therapy (MDT), used to cure leprosy patients effectively for twenty years, is not as effective against Leprosy in the Philippines. Researchers do not know how people get infected with leprosy or what causes the disease to relapse after cure with adequate MDT. Blood, skin scrapings, nasal swabs and biopsies, will be collected from leprosy patients to perform tests related to the detection of the disease and the germ. The tests will be used to find out if the bacteria in the body are related to the bacteria found in other patients or contacts. This will help the researchers to know where these bacteria come from, and to see how they spread. Other tests will be performed to see if the bacteria can be killed by two common medicines given to leprosy patients. Study participants will include individuals age 18 and older presenting to Leonard Wood Memorial for the diagnosis and/or relapse of leprosy.
The overall objectives of this study are to understand the factors leading to continued incidence of leprosy in the Philippines by novel molecular methodologies using a combination of retrospective and prospective sampling approaches. The overall objectives include: (1) strain typing of M. leprae isolates obtained from new and relapsed leprosy patients in the Philippines to identify clusters and transmission patterns when combined with conventional epidemiological criteria; (2) to determine the viability of M. leprae by mRNA detection in specimens collected from new patients; and those with signs of relapse; (3) to identify and determine the extent of mutations conferring resistance in past and circulating M. leprae isolates from leprosy patients to two Multidrug therapy (MDT) drugs; Dapsone and Rifampicin and; (4) to detect chains of transmission in endemic populations by a retrospective analyses of isolates in sample banks when combined with strain typing information from new cases and conventional epidemiological criteria. The following are the outcome measures for each of the objectives: (1) strain typing: identification of genotypes; (2) percent of samples from patients and their contacts containing viable M. leprae (as judged by the presence of mRNA for a panel of M. leprae genes; (3) percent of samples from patients and their contacts containing mutations in M. leprae rpoB and folP 1 genes and identification of new mutations associated with relapse and; (4) identification of matching or similar genotypes in new samples obtained from patients and their household contacts with those in retrospective samples. Clinical specimens that contain M. leprae bacilli such as skin biopsy, slit skin smears, nasal swabs and blood are required to obtain M. leprae DNA to meet the objectives of the study. Nasal swabs will be used for assessing the role of the nasal mucosa in infection and dissemination in leprosy. The blood is useful for monitoring the humoral responses to infection. Skin biopsy, slit skin smears, nasal swabs and blood will be obtained from informed consenting patients. Enrollment and sample collection procedures will take approximately 1-2 hours. These procedures will be performed during the patient's visit to the clinic for diagnosis and therapy for leprosy. As part of the study, a punch biopsy from a lesion is being collected to enable sufficient quantities of DNA to be extracted for strain typing, a critical objective of this study. Patients will be required to visit the site once more after 7-10 days to assess the biopsy site. This visit may take 30-60 minutes. An epidemiology survey containing demographic and clinical information will be obtained from each participant. Study participants for prospective sample collections will include volunteering and consenting individuals, 18 years old and above, reporting at Leonard Wood Memorial (LWM) CebuSkin Clinic, Leonard Wood Memorial Center for Biomedical Research, Cebu, Philippines for the diagnosis of leprosy and/or relapse of leprosy.
52 studies on the registry are indexed under Leprosy; 13 are open to participants now.
Browse Leprosy studies →Colorado State University is the lead sponsor of 117 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.
Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (60%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Blood, nasal swabs, slit skin smears and biopsies will be obtained prospectively from individuals greater than 18 years of age, representing newly diagnosed and relapse leprosy patients. The study participants will be obtained from LWM clinic. DNA and RNA based methodologies will be developed and applied to obtain data necessary for substantiation of a number of factors implicated in transmission of leprosy in Philippines.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The record gives a start of Apr 2006 and a completion of Dec 2010. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.