ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00292799Updated Sep 27, 2021

An RCT of Metformin Vs Orlistat in Obese Anovulatory Women

An interventional study of Orlistat Vs Metformin in Anovulation and Obesity, sponsored by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-09-27.

Sponsored by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study aims to investigate the role of the weight reduction agent, Orlistat compared to the Metformin for the management of women who are obese and do not ovulate or have difficulty conceiving. Patients will receive either one of these medications and will be monitored at regular intervals with hormone blood tests and ultrasound scans in order to study the effect of the medications on the reproductive functions. Patients will receive the medications for three months and the study will end if the patient becomes pregnant. The study also aims to investigate the dose of metformin that should be used as there is no consensus to date regarding the optimum dosage for this drug

Read the detailed description

We aim to recruit 40 patients suffering from anovulatory obesity with a BMI of 30 or more. Patients will be included from all ethnic groups.

Patients will have a baseline history, clinical examination, hormonal profile (FSH/LH, fasting Insulin/glucose ratio, androgen profile, day 21 serum progesterone, serum leptin and ghrelin levels) ultrasound examination (ovarian volume and antral follicle count), including Doppler blood flow study (ovarian stromal velocity, PI, RI, SD ratio and power Doppler) Participants will then be randomised to receive either metformin or orlistat. Patients receiving orlistat will receive the standard dose of the drug as recommended in the BNF. Metformin will be given in an incremental dose starting at 1000mg per day and increased at 4 weekly intervals to 2000mg/d, depending on the occurrence of any gastrointestinal intolerance. The endocrinological and ultrasound investigations will be repeated at 4 weekly intervals. Both groups will be given a standard exercise and diet program in conjunction with medical treatment.

The clinical endpoint will be the achievement of conception, a Body Mass Index of less than 30, or completion of a 3-month course of treatment.

Study design:

A randomised controlled open label clinical trial. Participants be randomised using a computer generated randomisation program available at the pharmacy of the Jessop Wing, into either one of two arms: metformin or orlistat. The randomisation will be stratified in order to achieve a homogenous distribution of PCOS and non-PCOS patients in both arms of the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anovulation
  • Obesity

Keywords

  • Polycystic ovary syndrome
  • Obesity
  • metformin
  • orlistat
03

In context

Anovulation

75 studies on the registry are indexed under Anovulation; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 36 is below the median of 80 across 52 interventional studies indexed under Anovulation.

Browse Anovulation studies →

Lead sponsor

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 214 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. In the childbearing period 2. Obese with a of 30 or more. 3. Are anovulatory as shown by day 21-serum progesterone. 4. Polycystic ovarian syndrome will be diagnosed according if at least two of the following three features are present, after exclusion of other aetiologies (Azziz, 2004): (i) Oligo- or anovulation, (ii) Clinical and/or biochemical hyperandrogenism (iii) Polycystic ovaries.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. of less than 30
  2. Patients not requesting treatment for their symptoms
  3. Patients with for any of the medications: renal or hepatic impairment, malabsorption syndrome, cholestasis
  4. Diabetic patients
  5. Pregnancy
  6. Breast feeding
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Interventions

  • DrugOrlistat Vs Metformin
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Outcome measures:

  2. 1- The occurrence of ovulation as measured by day-21 serum progesterone ( equal to or more than 30mmol/L).

  3. 2- Number of patients who have lost at least 5% of body weight at the end of the study.

  4. 3- Improvement/deterioration of clinical symptoms: hyper androgenic features, obesity and menstrual disturbances

  5. 4- Change in the ovarian Doppler indices.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Jessop Wing
    Sheffield, S10 2SF, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Metwally M, Amer S, Li TC, Ledger WL. An RCT of metformin versus orlistat for the management of obese anovulatory women. Hum Reprod. 2009 Apr;24(4):966-75. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den454. Epub 2008 Dec 18. PubMed 19095663 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Feb 2006, a primary completion of Feb 2008 and a completion of Feb 2008. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 15, 2006
First posted
Feb 16, 2006
Start
Feb 2006
Primary completionActual
Feb 2008
CompletionActual
Feb 2008
Last update
Sep 27, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 27, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00292799
Collaborators
Hoffmann-La Roche
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 16, 2006
Start date
Feb 2006
Primary completion
Feb 2008
Completion
Feb 2008
Last update
Sep 27, 2021

Study contacts

Professor William L Ledger, D.Phil,FRCOG
study chair · Sheffield University
Dr Mostafa Metwally
study director · Sheffield University
Professor TC Li
study chair · Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion