CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00290888Updated Mar 27, 2015Results posted

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair of Full Thickness Tears With and Without Arthroscopic Acromioplasty

An interventional study of Acromioplasty in Rotator Cuff Tear and Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, sponsored by Panam Clinic. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-03-27.

Sponsored by Panam Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
86
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Surgical repair of full thickness tears of the rotator cuff is a controversial issue, with several procedures currently being used to treat the tear. The two most common treatments at this point in time are arthroscopic cuff repair with and without acromioplasty. However, an arthroscopic cuff repair without acromioplasty may offer the same degree of improvement as one that includes acromioplasty, but without threatening the shoulder stability that is provided by the acromion and coracoacromial ligament. This prospective study examines the hypothesis that appropriate shoulder function can be restored through the execution of the traditional arthroscopic cuff repair without acromioplasty.

Read the detailed description

There exists some controversy in the current trend in repair of full thickness tears of the rotator cuff. The two most common treatments at this point in time are arthroscopic cuff repair with and without acromioplasty. The purpose of acromioplasty is to create adequate space for the rotator cuff tendons. Arthroscopic acromioplasty involves the removal of the subacromial bursa, resection of the coracoacromial ligament and anteroinferior portion of the acromion, and resection of any osteophytes from the acromioclavicular joint that are thought to be contributing to impingement. However, acromioplasty without cuff repair has been reported to have both good and poor results, showing that the technique may be suspect in repair of full thickness tears alone.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of arthroscopic cuff repair with acromioplasty to arthroscopic cuff repair without acromioplasty in repair of full thickness tears of the rotator cuff.

We hypothesize that there will be a significant clinical improvement in quality of life in patients who receive a rotator cuff repair without acromioplasty compared to those who receive a cuff repair with acromioplasty.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rotator Cuff Tear
  • Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

Keywords

  • Rotator Cuff Tear
  • Tendon Repair
  • Acromioplasty
  • Arthroscopy
  • Orthopedic Surgery
03

In context

Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

304 studies on the registry are indexed under Shoulder Impingement Syndrome; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 86 is above the median of 54 across 261 interventional studies indexed under Shoulder Impingement Syndrome.

Browse Shoulder Impingement Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Panam Clinic is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Ages 18 or older
  • Complete rotator cuff tear up to 4 cm in size
  • Persistent pain and functional disability for at least 6 months
  • Failure of conservative treatment
  • Establishment of final eligibility based upon visual exam of rotator cuff tear during surgery and determination of repairability

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of significant osteoarthritis or cartilage damage in the shoulder
  • Evidence of glenohumeral instability including Bankart lesions and labral tears of any type
  • Previous surgeries of the shoulder
  • Evidence of major joint trauma, infection, or necrosis in the shoulder
  • Patients with partial thickness tears of the rotator cuff
  • Patients unable to provide informed consent due to language barrier or mental status
  • Patients with a major medical condition that would affect quality of life and influence the results of the study
  • Patients with worker compensation claims
  • Patients unwilling to be followed for the duration of the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
86 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    ACR

    Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair without acromioplasty

    Procedure: Acromioplasty

  • Experimental
    ACR-A

    Arthorscopic rotator cuff repair with acromioplasty

    Procedure: Acromioplasty

Interventions

  • ProcedureAcromioplasty
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC)

    Calculated as percentage with an increase in score indicating an improvement in outcome.

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Form for the Assessment of the Shoulder (ASES)

    Calculated as a percentage with an increase in score reflecting an improvement in outcome.

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Shoulder Range of Motion

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. Upper Extremity Strength Grading

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Results

Posted May 9, 2014
Limitations and caveats
Variation in surgical technique and post-op rehabilitation. We do not have confirmation of cuff healing status as no imaging was carried out post-operatively. Assessment of AC morphology is subjective \& based solely on pre-operative radiographs.

Participant flow

A total of 86 patients were randomized to either ACR-A or ACR

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneArthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Without AcromioplastyArthorscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Acromioplasty
Started4145
Completed3844
Not completed31
Withdrew: Physician decision31

Outcome measures

PrimaryWestern Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC)

Calculated as percentage with an increase in score indicating an improvement in outcome.

Time frame:
24 months
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of total score
Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC)
percentage of total scoreArthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Without AcromioplastyArthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Acromioplasty
Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC)80.5 ± 22.386.7 ± 16.2
PrimaryAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Form for the Assessment of the Shoulder (ASES)

Calculated as a percentage with an increase in score reflecting an improvement in outcome.

Time frame:
24 months
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of total score
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Form for the Assessment of the Shoulder (ASES)
percentage of total scoreArthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Without AcromioplastyArthorscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Acromioplasty
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Form for the Assessment of the Shoulder (ASES)84.6 ± 20.189.8 ± 14.4
SecondaryShoulder Range of Motion
Time frame:
24 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryUpper Extremity Strength Grading
Time frame:
24 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Without Acromioplasty—0/41 (0%)0/41 (0%)
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Acromioplasty—0/45 (0%)0/45 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Without AcromioplastyArthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With AcromioplastyTotal
Mean57.1 ± 9.556.2 ± 7.956.7 ± 8.7
Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Without AcromioplastyArthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With AcromioplastyTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years414586
>=65 years000
Gender
Gender(participants)Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Without AcromioplastyArthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With AcromioplastyTotal
Female151429
Male302454
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Without AcromioplastyArthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With AcromioplastyTotal
Canada414586
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Panam Clinic
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3M 3E4, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kirkley A, Griffin S, McLintock H, Ng L. The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Am J Sports Med. 1998 Nov-Dec;26(6):764-72. doi: 10.1177/03635465980260060501. PubMed 9850776 ↗
  • Baker CL, Liu SH. Comparison of open and arthroscopically assisted rotator cuff repairs. Am J Sports Med. 1995 Jan-Feb;23(1):99-104. doi: 10.1177/036354659502300117. PubMed 7726359 ↗
  • Gartsman GM. Arthroscopic assessment of rotator cuff tear reparability. Arthroscopy. 1996 Oct;12(5):546-9. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(96)90192-9. PubMed 8902127 ↗
  • Miller C, Savoie FH. Glenohumeral abnormalities associated with full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. Orthop Rev. 1994 Feb;23(2):159-62. PubMed 8196974 ↗
  • Budoff JE, Nirschl RP, Guidi EJ. Debridement of partial-thickness tears of the rotator cuff without acromioplasty. Long-term follow-up and review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 May;80(5):733-48. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199805000-00016. No abstract available. PubMed 9611036 ↗
  • Gartsman GM, Taverna E. The incidence of glenohumeral joint abnormalities associated with full-thickness, reparable rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 1997 Aug;13(4):450-5. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(97)90123-7. PubMed 9276051 ↗
  • Esch JC. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression and postoperative management. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993 Jan;24(1):161-71. PubMed 8421609 ↗
  • Levy HJ, Gardner RD, Lemak LJ. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression in the treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 1991;7(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/0749-8063(91)90071-5. PubMed 2009126 ↗
  • Cofield RH. Rotator cuff disease of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985 Jul;67(6):974-9. No abstract available. PubMed 4019548 ↗
  • Bokor DJ, Hawkins RJ, Huckell GH, Angelo RL, Schickendantz MS. Results of nonoperative management of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Sep;(294):103-10. PubMed 8358901 ↗
  • Ellman H, Kay SP, Wirth M. Arthroscopic treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: 2- to 7-year follow-up study. Arthroscopy. 1993;9(2):195-200. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80374-3. PubMed 8461081 ↗
  • Neer CS 2nd. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972 Jan;54(1):41-50. No abstract available. PubMed 5054450 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 27, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00290888
Lead sponsor
Panam Clinic
Responsible party
Peter MacDonald (Department Head, Orthopaedics, Panam Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 13, 2006
Start date
Apr 2004
Primary completion
Mar 2011
Completion
Mar 2011
Results posted
May 9, 2014
Last update
Mar 27, 2015

Study contacts

Peter MacDonald, MD, FRCS(C)
principal investigator · Panam Clinic Orthopedics and Sports Medicine/University of Manitoba

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion