CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00287586TEAAMUpdated Jun 29, 2017Results posted

Testosterone Replacement in Older Men and Atherosclerosis Progression

A Phase 4 interventional study of Testosterone Gel (Androgel) and Placebo in Hypogonadism and Atherosclerosis, sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to male participants aged 60 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-06-29.

Sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2004, registered Feb 2006).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
308
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

As men grow older, their testosterone levels decrease with age. One-third of men, 70 years of age or older, have low testosterone levels. It is known that short-term testosterone replacement is safe, and can increase muscle strength and physical function, but the risks of long-term testosterone replacement in older men with low testosterone levels are incompletely understood.

Atherosclerosis is characterized by thickening of the artery walls, and the narrowing of the blood vessels as cholesterol is deposited in the lining of the arteries. It is the major cause of cardiovascular disease including ischemic heart disease (heart attacks) and stroke. Although, historically, there has been a widespread perception that higher levels of testosterone might increase the risk of atherosclerosis, the evidence from research does not support this. In observational studies, higher testosterone levels have been correlated with more favorable cardiovascular risk factors, and supplementation with testosterone to bring older men into the normal range for healthy younger men appears to improve several cardiovascular risk factors, and may slow the progression of atherosclerosis.

The primary purpose of this study is to look at the effects of testosterone replacement on the progression of atherosclerosis in older men. This study is also being done to find out whether replacement with testosterone in older men with low testosterone levels improves their health-related quality of life.

Read the detailed description

Although short-term administration of testosterone in replacement doses is relatively safe, the risks of long-term testosterone administration in older men remain poorly understood. The two major areas of concern include the potential for increased risk of atherosclerotic heart disease and exacerbation of a pre-existing, subclinical prostate cancer. There is a widespread perception that testosterone supplementation adversely affects plasma lipoprotein profile and increases the risk of atherosclerotic heart disease; this premise is not supported by data. Thus, the long-term consequences of testosterone supplementation on the risk of atherosclerosis progression remain unknown. While supraphysiological doses of testosterone and non-aromatizable androgens frequently employed by body-builders undoubtedly decrease plasma high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels, physiologic testosterone replacement in older men has been associated with only a modest or no decrease in plasma HDL-cholesterol. Cross-sectional studies of middle-aged men find a direct, rather than an inverse, relationship between serum testosterone levels and plasma HDL-cholesterol concentrations as well as an inverse correlation between serum testosterone levels and visceral fat volume. Testosterone supplementation of middle-aged men with truncal obesity is associated with a reduction in visceral fat volume, serum glucose concentration, blood pressure, and an improvement in insulin sensitivity. All of these changes are associated with lower risk for atherosclerosis. These data suggest that serum testosterone levels in the range that is mid-normal for healthy young men are consistent with an optimal cardiovascular risk profile at any age, and that testosterone concentrations either above or below the physiologic male range may increase the risk of atherosclerotic heart disease. Studies in a low density lipoprotein (LDL)-receptor deficient mice provide compelling evidence that testosterone retards early atherogenesis, and that testosterone effects on atherogenesis are mediated through its conversion to estradiol by the action of aromatase enzyme that is expressed in the vessel wall. The effects of testosterone replacement on cardiovascular risk in humans have never been directly examined. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to examine directly the effects of testosterone replacement on atherosclerosis progression in men by measuring common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CCA IMT) and coronary artery calcification (CAC) by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), two independent measurements of generalized atherosclerosis.

The second objective of this study is to determine whether physiologic testosterone replacement of older men with low testosterone levels improves health-related quality of life. Aging-associated decline in physical, sexual, and cognitive functions contributes to diminished quality of life in older men. Although the pathophysiology of impairment in each of these subdomains of health-related quality of life is complex and multifactorial, one correctable cause of the diminished quality of life in older men is the decrease in serum testosterone concentrations. Total and free testosterone (T) levels decline with advancing age in normal men, with a significant number of men meeting usual criteria for hypogonadism by the sixth to seventh decades. Spontaneous and experimentally-induced androgen-deficiency in young men is associated with decreased muscle mass and strength and impaired sexual function. Because loss of muscle mass and function contributes to diminished health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in older men, anabolic therapies such as testosterone that increase muscle mass and strength, would be expected to improve physical function. In older men with low testosterone levels, testosterone might also improve sexual function and marital interaction. A growing body of literature suggests that testosterone impacts neuronal functioning and may affect cognitive performance. Because physical, sexual, and cognitive functions are important determinants of health-related quality of life, testosterone replacement of older men with low testosterone levels would be expected to improve general health perceptions.

The aging of humans is a recent evolutionary event. Of the thousand generations of men and women who have lived on this planet, only the humans of the last two generations could have hoped to live past the age of 50. The population is getting proportionally older. The number of people 85 years of age and older today is substantially greater than at the beginning of the 20th century. Advancing age is associated with decreased muscle mass and strength, and impairment of physical, sexual, and cognitive functions. Diminished muscle mass and strength increases the risk of falls, disability and poor quality of life. Age-related impairment of sexual and cognitive functions also contributes to overall reduction in quality of life. Testosterone replacement, by improving some aspects of physical, sexual and cognitive functions, would be expected to improve health-related quality of life.

Previous studies have established that testosterone replacement in older men with low testosterone levels increases muscle mass and strength. However, lack of information in two areas has prevented formulation of general recommendations about wider use of testosterone replacement in older men. First, the effectiveness of testosterone in improving physical function, quality of life, and other health-related outcomes has not been demonstrated. Second, while there is agreement that short-term administration of testosterone in replacement doses is safe, the long-term risks of testosterone supplementation in older men remain unknown. The areas of major concern are the risks of prostate cancer and heart disease. Because of the high prevalence, even small increases in the incidence rates of atherosclerotic heart disease associated with testosterone supplementation will have significant impact on overall morbidity and mortality, and health care costs. The study will evaluate one important aspect of the long-term safety of testosterone administration by directly examining its effects on the rate of progression of atherosclerosis. If the study demonstrates that testosterone retards atherosclerosis progression, then that would provide one additional reason for testosterone supplementation of older men with low testosterone levels. If the study demonstrates a neutral effect of testosterone on atherosclerosis progression, that information would also be reassuring and useful to regulatory agencies. This study will establish the efficacy of testosterone replacement in improving physical, sexual and cognitive functions that are major determinants of health-related quality of life in older men.

In spite of the paucity of efficacy and safety data, the sales of testosterone and other androgenic products have witnessed explosive growth because of increased media attention and public interest. During the summer of 2000, testosterone-related stories were on the cover of Time, Newsweek, New York Times, and Los Angeles Times. The prescription sales of testosterone that had been growing at 25-30% annual rate since 1993, almost doubled in the year 2000, and have cumulatively increased 500% since 1993 (Source: IMS Sales Data, provided by Reed Selby, Marketing Director for ALZA Corporation). The growing testosterone use in older men, without a clear understanding of its benefits or long-term risks, has raised concern among regulatory agencies. The proposed study by providing definitive information on the effects of testosterone replacement on several measures of efficacy and safety in older men would facilitate an analysis of its risk:benefit ratio.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypogonadism
  • Atherosclerosis

Keywords

  • Testosterone Replacement
  • Heart Disease
  • Vascular Disease
  • Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease
  • Cholesterol
  • Obesity
  • Blood pressure
  • Quality of Life
03

In context

Atherosclerosis

1,567 studies on the registry are indexed under Atherosclerosis; 264 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 308 is above the median of 106 across 882 interventional studies indexed under Atherosclerosis.

Browse Atherosclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Brigham and Women's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,236 studies on the registry; 224 are open to participants now.

Of its 116 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 64 (55%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 60 years or greater
  • Hypogonadism, Testosterone 100-400 ng/dl or Free Testosterone \< 50 pg/ml
  • Generally good health
  • At least 8 years of primary school education
  • Able to pass screening test for dementia
  • Able to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Testosterone level \< 100 ng/dl (these individuals will be referred for evaluation of severe hypogonadism)
  • Use of testosterone or other androgens [dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), Androstenedione] in last year
  • Use of growth hormone in the last year
  • Current alcohol of drug dependence [Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) Score > 8]
  • Diseases known to affect gonadal function
  • Medications known to affect gonadal function eg. anticonvulsants, glucocorticoids such as prednisone
  • Prostate cancer, breast cancer
  • Any cancer that may limit life expectancy to less than 5 years
  • Limiting neuromuscular, joint or bone disease
  • History of stroke with residual neurologic deficit
  • Neurologic condition that would impair cognitive function including:

epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Parkinson's disease, stroke

  • Psychiatric disorder in the last year meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSMIV) Axis 1 criteria
  • Use of psychotropic medicine for at least 6 months
  • Dementia as assessed by (Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status modified score less than 31)
  • Severe symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (American Urological Association symptom index score greater than 21)
  • Prostate nodule or induration of digital rectal exam (DRE)
  • Prostate specific antigen (PSA) greater than 4 unless participant has had a negative transrectal biopsy within last 3 months
  • Limiting heart disease in including New York (NY) Class III or IV - congestive heart failure, unstable angina, or myocardial infarction (MI) in last 3 months
  • Liver function tests [aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase(ALT)] greater than 3 times the upper limit of the reference range
  • Serum creatinine (Cr) greater than 2.5 mg/dl
  • Hematocrit greater than 48%
  • Hemoglobin (Hb)A1c greater than 9.0%
  • Untreated thyroid disease
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure greater than 160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure greater than 100 mmHg)
  • Body mass index (BMI greater than 35 kg/m2)
  • Untreated severe obstructive sleep apnea
  • Development of electrocardiogram (EKG) changes consistent with myocardial ischemia or changes in blood pressure during cardiopulmonary exercise testing will be excluded from testing of muscle strength and physical function.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
308 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Testosterone

    Participants received 7.5 g of 1% testosterone gel to achieve a nominal delivery of 75 mg testosterone daily for 3 years. Dose adjustments were made by an unblinded observer. (Serum testosterone level measured on treatment day 15 was measured in a sample sent separately to the laboratory such that the results were reported directly to unblinded physician, who then communicated the decision about dose adjustment (or not) directly to the research pharmacist through e-mail.)

    Drug: Testosterone Gel (Androgel)

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants received placebo-matching testosterone gel daily for 3 years.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugTestosterone Gel (Androgel)

    7.5 g of 1% testosterone gel to achieve a nominal delivery of 75 mg testosterone daily for 3 years

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo-matching testosterone gel daily for 3 years

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Common Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness (IMT)

    B-mode carotid artery images for IMT were acquired from the far wall of the distal centimeter of the right carotid artery with high-resolution ultrasound equipment. IMT is used as a predictor of the incidence of cardiovascular events. An increase in the IMT thickness is associated with a higher incidence of cardiovascular events. Less thickening is best. Change is expressed in millimeters (mm).

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 36

  2. Change From Baseline in Coronary Artery Calcium Score

    A multiple detector computed tomography (MDCT) scan was performed. Proximal coronary arteries were visualized, and at least 30 consecutive images were obtained at 3-mm intervals. Coronary calcium was defined as a plaque of at least 3 contiguous pixels (area, 1.02 mm\^2) with a density of more than 130 Hounsfield units.The lesion score was calculated by multiplying lesion area by a density factor derived from Hounsfield units. The Agatston method was used to determine the total calcium score by summing the lesion scores from the left main, left anterior descending, circumflex, and right coronary arteries. The Agatston score is the measure of calcification in arteries expressed on continuous scale with "0" value (better) indicating no calcification and score above 400 (worse) indicating high calcification. There is no upper limit for this measure. A positive change from baseline indicates a worsening.

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 36

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Lipid Profiles

    Laboratory tests included in the lipid profile were Total Cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C), Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) and Triglycerides.Lower values for Total Cholesterol, LDL-C are better and a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Higher values for HDL-C are better and a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 36

  2. Changes in Biomarkers of Inflammation

    Time frame: Three years

  3. Changes in Blood Pressure

    Time frame: Three years

  4. Change From Baseline in Complex Figure (Immediate) and Complex Figure (Delayed)

    Cognitive Function was assessed by Complex Figure (Immediate) and (Delayed). The Complex Figure Test consists of three tasks: copy, immediate recall, and delayed recall. Participants were presented with a complex design and then asked to draw the same figure. Subsequently, they were instructed to draw what they remembered immediately, and after a 30 minute delay. Scoring was based on the number of correct items for a total possible score of 0 (worst) to 36 (Best). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. A negative change from Baseline indicates a worsening.

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 36

  5. Change From Baseline in Paragraph Recall Test (Delayed)

    Cognitive Function was assessed by the Paragraph Recall Test (Delayed). In the Paragraph Recall Test, participants were read two short paragraphs and asked to recall them immediately and after a 30 minute delay, using the exact words that were read aloud. Scoring was based on the number of items correctly recalled. More items correctly recalled is best and a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 36

  6. Change From Baseline in the Buschke Selective Reminding Test (Delayed)

    Cognitive function was assessed by the Buschke Selective Reminding Test. In the Buschke Selective Reminding Test, participants were read 12 words and asked to recall as many words as possible. Subsequent trials included only those words that were not recalled in the preceding trial. Individuals were also asked to recall the list 30 minutes later. To assess phonemic and category fluency, participants were asked to name as many items from a given category as possible in 1 minute. Higher number of correct items is best and a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 36

  7. Change From Baseline in the Verbal Fluency Test

    Cognitive function was assessed by the Verbal Fluency Test. Participants were asked to name as many letters from a given category as possible in 1 minute. Higher number of letters is best and a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 36

  8. Change From Baseline in the Category Fluency Test

    Cognitive function was assessed by the Category Fluency Test. Participants were asked to name as many items from a given category as possible. Higher number of items named is best and a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 36

  9. Change From Baseline in the Stroop Interference Test

    Cognitive function was assessed by the Stroop Interference Test. In the Stroop Interference Test, participants were presented with a word list of colors printed in ink of a color different from how the printed word read. Participants were instructed to read aloud the color of the ink in which a word was printed, while not verbalizing the word itself. The time in seconds that the items were correctly identified was recorded. Less time is better and a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 36

  10. Change From Baseline in the Trail Making Test B

    Cognitive function was assessed by the Trail Making Test B. Trail Making Test B involved participants connecting numbers (1-13) and letters (A-L) alternately (1-A, 2-B, etc) on a piece of paper as quickly as possible. Scores represent the time it takes the participant to complete the test. Less time is best and a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening.

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 36

  11. Change From Baseline in Chest Press Strength and Leg Press Strength

    Maximal voluntary strength of the lower and upper extremities was assessed using the one repetition maximum (1-RM) method for the seated leg press and chest press exercises. Participants were positioned with standardized seat position and foot placement that allowed 90° of knee flexion for the leg press exercise. Seat height and handle position was standardized for the chest press. Participants were familiarized with the exercises, practiced the technique and completed a 5-minute warm-up. The 1-RM procedure consisted of a warm up set with 5 to 8 repetitions at a resistance set to about 50% of the participant's estimated 1-RM and progressed with increasing loads interspersed with standardized rest periods until the participant was able to perform only one full-range-of-motion repetition.

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 36

  12. Change From Baseline in Unloaded Stair Climb Power and Loaded Stair Climb Power

    Physical Function was evaluated using two tests of stair climb power using an indoor 12-step staircase. One test consisted of ascending the 12-steps as rapidly as possible without running (unloaded stair climb) while the second test required participants to carry a load equivalent to 20% of their baseline body weight evenly distributed in two canvas tote bags (loaded stair climb). Time to ascend the stairs was measured electronically with a digital clock and switch mats placed at the base of the steps and on the 12th step. Power in watts is calculated by the following: \[body weight (kilograms) \* distance (meters)/ (time/60)\] /6.12. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 36

  13. Change in Sexual Function as Assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)

    IIEF is a validated, 15-item questionnaire that assesses 5 domains of sexual function: erectile function (6 questions), orgasmic function (2 questions), sexual desire (2 questions), intercourse satisfaction (3 questions), and overall sexual satisfaction (2 questions). Each question was answered on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5 (best) with a total possible score range of 0 to 75 with higher scores representing better function. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 36

  14. Change in Health Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Short Form 36 (SF-36)

    The SF-36 measures 8 domains of the QoL: physical function, bodily pain, vitality, role limitations due to physical problems, general health perceptions, emotional well-being, social function, and role limitations due to emotional problems. Each domain is scored separately from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health-related QoL. The Overall Score is the average of the individual domain scores. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 36

07

Results

Posted Jun 29, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTestosteronePlacebo
Started156152
Intent-to-treat: received study drug155151
Completed111100
Not completed4552
Withdrew: Withdrew consent1930
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up54
Withdrew: Death23
Withdrew: Elevated hematocrit30
Withdrew: Rash30
Withdrew: Elevated prostate specific antigen20
Withdrew: Stroke20
Withdrew: Myocardial infarction10
Withdrew: Lower urinary tract symptoms10
Withdrew: Cognitive impairment10
Withdrew: Pancreatic cancer13
Withdrew: Sleep apnea10
Withdrew: Shoulder pain10
Withdrew: Inappropriate behaviour with staff10
Withdrew: Nonadherence11
Withdrew: Enrolled in another study10
Withdrew: Major depression02
Withdrew: Lung cancer02
Withdrew: Elevated ipss score01
Withdrew: Retroperitoneal cancer01
Withdrew: Mastodynia and gynecomastia01
Withdrew: Mood swings and irritability01
Withdrew: Bradycardia01
Withdrew: Itchy swollen eyes01
Withdrew: Recurrent melanoma01

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Common Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness (IMT)

B-mode carotid artery images for IMT were acquired from the far wall of the distal centimeter of the right carotid artery with high-resolution ultrasound equipment. IMT is used as a predictor of the incidence of cardiovascular events. An increase in the IMT thickness is associated with a higher incidence of cardiovascular events. Less thickening is best. Change is expressed in millimeters (mm).

Time frame:
Baseline and Month 36
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Change From Baseline in Common Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness (IMT)
mmTestosteronePlacebo
Baseline0.877 ± 0.2100.879 ± 0.199
Change at Month 360.036 ± 0.0590.033 ± 0.077
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Coronary Artery Calcium Score

A multiple detector computed tomography (MDCT) scan was performed. Proximal coronary arteries were visualized, and at least 30 consecutive images were obtained at 3-mm intervals. Coronary calcium was defined as a plaque of at least 3 contiguous pixels (area, 1.02 mm\^2) with a density of more than 130 Hounsfield units.The lesion score was calculated by multiplying lesion area by a density factor derived from Hounsfield units. The Agatston method was used to determine the total calcium score by summing the lesion scores from the left main, left anterior descending, circumflex, and right coronary arteries. The Agatston score is the measure of calcification in arteries expressed on continuous scale with "0" value (better) indicating no calcification and score above 400 (worse) indicating high calcification. There is no upper limit for this measure. A positive change from baseline indicates a worsening.

Time frame:
Baseline and Month 36
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Coronary Artery Calcium Score
score on a scaleTestosteronePlacebo
Baseline451.78 ± 715.41508.31 ± 694.87
Change at Month 36103.61 ± 289.45124.54 ± 208.42
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Lipid Profiles

Laboratory tests included in the lipid profile were Total Cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C), Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) and Triglycerides.Lower values for Total Cholesterol, LDL-C are better and a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Higher values for HDL-C are better and a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Month 36
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profiles
mg/dLTestosteronePlacebo
Total Cholesterol, Baseline187.15 ± 42.09183.44 ± 36.68
Total Cholesterol, Change at Month 36-14.88 ± 35.92-12.56 ± 33.90
HDL-C, Baseline47.11 ± 11.9748.71 ± 14.21
HDL-C, Change at Month 360.18 ± 9.692.00 ± 11.08
LDL-C, Baseline115.64 ± 35.18109.66 ± 31.86
LDL-C, Change at Month 36-11.24 ± 26.80-13.92 ± 30.80
Triglycerides, Baseline142.695 ± 87.93138.95 ± 76.37
Triglycerides, Change at Month 36-19.41 ± 73.69-12.62 ± 84.62
SecondaryChanges in Biomarkers of Inflammation
Time frame:
Three years

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryChanges in Blood Pressure
Time frame:
Three years

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryChange From Baseline in Complex Figure (Immediate) and Complex Figure (Delayed)

Cognitive Function was assessed by Complex Figure (Immediate) and (Delayed). The Complex Figure Test consists of three tasks: copy, immediate recall, and delayed recall. Participants were presented with a complex design and then asked to draw the same figure. Subsequently, they were instructed to draw what they remembered immediately, and after a 30 minute delay. Scoring was based on the number of correct items for a total possible score of 0 (worst) to 36 (Best). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. A negative change from Baseline indicates a worsening.

Time frame:
Baseline and Month 36
Reported as:
Mean · correct items
Change From Baseline in Complex Figure (Immediate) and Complex Figure (Delayed)
correct itemsTestosteronePlacebo
Complex Figure:Immediate, Baseline20.95 ± 6.5020.31 ± 6.20
Complex Figure:Immediate, Change at Month 36-1.25 ± 4.90-0.24 ± 6.11
Complex Figure:Delayed, Baseline20.28 ± 6.0819.75 ± 6.11
Complex Figure:Delayed, Change at Month 36-0.49 ± 5.20-0.24 ± 5.74
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Paragraph Recall Test (Delayed)

Cognitive Function was assessed by the Paragraph Recall Test (Delayed). In the Paragraph Recall Test, participants were read two short paragraphs and asked to recall them immediately and after a 30 minute delay, using the exact words that were read aloud. Scoring was based on the number of items correctly recalled. More items correctly recalled is best and a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Month 36
Reported as:
Mean · correct items
Change From Baseline in Paragraph Recall Test (Delayed)
correct itemsTestosteronePlacebo
Paragraph: Delayed, Baseline13.69 ± 6.3713.57 ± 6.12
Paragraph:Delayed, Change at Month 362.15 ± 6.051.72 ± 4.82
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Buschke Selective Reminding Test (Delayed)

Cognitive function was assessed by the Buschke Selective Reminding Test. In the Buschke Selective Reminding Test, participants were read 12 words and asked to recall as many words as possible. Subsequent trials included only those words that were not recalled in the preceding trial. Individuals were also asked to recall the list 30 minutes later. To assess phonemic and category fluency, participants were asked to name as many items from a given category as possible in 1 minute. Higher number of correct items is best and a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Month 36
Reported as:
Mean · correct items
Change From Baseline in the Buschke Selective Reminding Test (Delayed)
correct itemsTestosteronePlacebo
Buschke Total Correct Delayed, Baseline8.00 ± 2.807.76 ± 2.69
Buschke Total Correct Delayed, Change at Month 360.47 ± 2.460.85 ± 2.21
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Verbal Fluency Test

Cognitive function was assessed by the Verbal Fluency Test. Participants were asked to name as many letters from a given category as possible in 1 minute. Higher number of letters is best and a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Month 36
Reported as:
Mean · letters
Change From Baseline in the Verbal Fluency Test
lettersTestosteronePlacebo
Baseline26.96 ± 10.2527.02 ± 8.97
Change at Month 362.86 ± 8.841.77 ± 7.35
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Category Fluency Test

Cognitive function was assessed by the Category Fluency Test. Participants were asked to name as many items from a given category as possible. Higher number of items named is best and a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Month 36
Reported as:
Mean · items
Change From Baseline in the Category Fluency Test
itemsTestosteronePlacebo
Category Fluency, Baseline18.07 ± 5.6118.01 ± 5.62
Category Fluency, Change at Month 362.25 ± 6.810.37 ± 6.77
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Stroop Interference Test

Cognitive function was assessed by the Stroop Interference Test. In the Stroop Interference Test, participants were presented with a word list of colors printed in ink of a color different from how the printed word read. Participants were instructed to read aloud the color of the ink in which a word was printed, while not verbalizing the word itself. The time in seconds that the items were correctly identified was recorded. Less time is better and a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Month 36
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Change From Baseline in the Stroop Interference Test
secondsTestosteronePlacebo
Stroop Interference, Baseline55.64 ± 15.6056.84 ± 15.85
Stroop Interference, Change at Month 36-1.07 ± 14.480.99 ± 16.10
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Trail Making Test B

Cognitive function was assessed by the Trail Making Test B. Trail Making Test B involved participants connecting numbers (1-13) and letters (A-L) alternately (1-A, 2-B, etc) on a piece of paper as quickly as possible. Scores represent the time it takes the participant to complete the test. Less time is best and a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening.

Time frame:
Baseline and Month 36
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Change From Baseline in the Trail Making Test B
secondsTestosteronePlacebo
Trails B, Baseline98.52 ± 42.4097.57 ± 31.82
Trails B, Change at Month 363.88 ± 34.1511.26 ± 40.61
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Chest Press Strength and Leg Press Strength

Maximal voluntary strength of the lower and upper extremities was assessed using the one repetition maximum (1-RM) method for the seated leg press and chest press exercises. Participants were positioned with standardized seat position and foot placement that allowed 90° of knee flexion for the leg press exercise. Seat height and handle position was standardized for the chest press. Participants were familiarized with the exercises, practiced the technique and completed a 5-minute warm-up. The 1-RM procedure consisted of a warm up set with 5 to 8 repetitions at a resistance set to about 50% of the participant's estimated 1-RM and progressed with increasing loads interspersed with standardized rest periods until the participant was able to perform only one full-range-of-motion repetition.

Time frame:
Baseline and Month 36
Reported as:
Mean · newton
Change From Baseline in Chest Press Strength and Leg Press Strength
newtonTestosteronePlacebo
Chest Press Strength, Baseline516.99 ± 133.37513.83 ± 104.92
Chest Press Strength, Change at Month 36-12.73 ± 54.20-26.20 ± 40.88
Leg Press Strength, Baseline2270.37 ± 424.812233.74 ± 416.06
Leg Press Strength, Change at Month 36-37.26 ± 230.42-65.33 ± 251.94
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Unloaded Stair Climb Power and Loaded Stair Climb Power

Physical Function was evaluated using two tests of stair climb power using an indoor 12-step staircase. One test consisted of ascending the 12-steps as rapidly as possible without running (unloaded stair climb) while the second test required participants to carry a load equivalent to 20% of their baseline body weight evenly distributed in two canvas tote bags (loaded stair climb). Time to ascend the stairs was measured electronically with a digital clock and switch mats placed at the base of the steps and on the 12th step. Power in watts is calculated by the following: \[body weight (kilograms) \* distance (meters)/ (time/60)\] /6.12. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Month 36
Reported as:
Mean · watts
Change From Baseline in Unloaded Stair Climb Power and Loaded Stair Climb Power
wattsTestosteronePlacebo
Unloaded Stair Climb Power, Baseline536.33 ± 134.40535.78 ± 125.70
Unloaded Stair Climb Power, Change at Month 36-8.17 ± 71.60-12.89 ± 64.28
Loaded Stair Climb Power, Baseline581.24 ± 148.73594.84 ± 150.28
Loaded Stair Climb Power, Change at Month 36-8.44 ± 70.56-12.76 ± 63.13
SecondaryChange in Sexual Function as Assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)

IIEF is a validated, 15-item questionnaire that assesses 5 domains of sexual function: erectile function (6 questions), orgasmic function (2 questions), sexual desire (2 questions), intercourse satisfaction (3 questions), and overall sexual satisfaction (2 questions). Each question was answered on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5 (best) with a total possible score range of 0 to 75 with higher scores representing better function. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Month 36
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Sexual Function as Assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)
score on a scaleTestosteronePlacebo
Erectile Function, Baseline18.33 ± 10.1118.67 ± 10.64
Erectile Function, Change at Month 36-0.15 ± 7.40-0.80 ± 7.55
Orgasmic Function, Baseline7.37 ± 3.616.38 ± 3.86
Orgasmic Function, Change at Month 36-0.65 ± 3.350.24 ± 3.44
Sexual Desire, Baseline6.89 ± 2.046.58 ± 2.19
Sexual Desire, Change at Month 360.18 ± 1.940.07 ± 1.87
Intercourse Satisfaction, Baseline8.32 ± 5.928.14 ± 5.94
Intercourse Satisfaction, Change at Month 360.05 ± 4.56-0.71 ± 4.11
Overall Satisfaction, Baseline6.24 ± 2.846.12 ± 2.64
Overall Satisfaction, Change at Month 360.40 ± 2.770.81 ± 2.54
Total Score, Baseline48.48 ± 21.0949.67 ± 23.25
Total Score, Change at Month 360.22 ± 15.54-0.39 ± 15.32
SecondaryChange in Health Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Short Form 36 (SF-36)

The SF-36 measures 8 domains of the QoL: physical function, bodily pain, vitality, role limitations due to physical problems, general health perceptions, emotional well-being, social function, and role limitations due to emotional problems. Each domain is scored separately from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health-related QoL. The Overall Score is the average of the individual domain scores. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Month 36
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Health Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Short Form 36 (SF-36)
score on a scaleTestosteronePlacebo
Energy/Fatigue, Baseline69.92 ± 18.4771.21 ± 14.67
Energy/Fatigue, Change at Month 36-1.45 ± 13.40-0.46 ± 12.57
Emotional Well-Being, Baseline82.67 ± 12.6483.17 ± 11.38
Emotional Well-Being, Change at Month 36-1.16 ± 14.760.91 ± 11.60
Role Limitations/Emotional Problems, Baseline90.00 ± 23.2189.08 ± 26.04
Role Limitations/Emotional Problems,Change3.51 ± 32.69-9.09 ± 34.00
Social Functioning, Baseline90.42 ± 16.1792.89 ± 13.06
Social Functioning, Change at Month 36-3.29 ± 22.64-4.83 ± 14.06
Physical Functioning, Baseline82.00 ± 20.1583.28 ± 18.79
Physical Functioning, Change at Month 36-3.82 ± 21.20-2.39 ± 21.09
Role Limitations/Physical Health, Baseline80.00 ± 30.8188.79 ± 21.55
Role Limitations,/Physical Health, Change-1.97 ± 24.23-9.66 ± 34.61
Pain, Baseline82.83 ± 17.2982.24 ± 15.84
Pain, Change at Month 36-7.96 ± 14.81-5.97 ± 17.90
General Health, Baseline74.17 ± 19.5176.72 ± 15.18
General Health, Change at Month 36-0.53 ± 11.90-3.75 ± 14.59
Overall Score, Baseline81.50 ± 14.1283.42 ± 12.45
Overall Score, Change at Month 36-2.08 ± 11.88-4.40 ± 12.24

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Testosterone—24/155 (15.5%)33/155 (21.3%)
Placebo—25/151 (16.6%)20/151 (13.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 62
Most frequent serious events
EventTestosteronePlacebo
DeathGeneral disorders1/1556/151
Angina pectorisCardiac disorders1/1553/151
Prostate cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)3/1552/151
Cerebrovascular accident (CVA)Nervous system disorders3/1550/151
Colon cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)2/1550/151
AngioplastySurgical and medical procedures2/1550/151
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders2/1550/151
Pulmonary carcinoma complicationsNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/1551/151
Pancreatic cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/1551/151
Pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1551/151
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTestosteronePlacebo
Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)Investigations16/1559/151
Upper respiratory infectionInfections and infestations12/15512/151
Elevated hematocrit (HCT)Investigations8/1550/151

Baseline characteristics

Intent-to-treat Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)TestosteronePlaceboTotal
Mean66.9 ± 5.068.3 ± 5.367.6 ± 5.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)TestosteronePlaceboTotal
Female000
Male155151306
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Kronos Longevity Research Institute
    Phoenix, Arizona 85016, United States
  • Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science
    Los Angeles, California 90059, United States
  • Boston University / Boston Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02118, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Huang G, Pencina KM, Li Z, Basaria S, Bhasin S, Travison TG, Storer TW, Harman SM, Tsitouras P. Long-Term Testosterone Administration on Insulin Sensitivity in Older Men With Low or Low-Normal Testosterone Levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Apr 1;103(4):1678-1685. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-02545. PubMed 29373734 ↗
  • Bhasin S, Travison TG, O'Brien L, MacKrell J, Krishnan V, Ouyang H, Pencina K, Basaria S. Contributors to the substantial variation in on-treatment testosterone levels in men receiving transdermal testosterone gels in randomized trials. Andrology. 2018 Jan;6(1):151-157. doi: 10.1111/andr.12428. Epub 2017 Oct 5. PubMed 28981994 ↗
  • Gagliano-Juca T, Icli TB, Pencina KM, Li Z, Tapper J, Huang G, Travison TG, Tsitouras P, Harman SM, Storer TW, Bhasin S, Basaria S. Effects of Testosterone Replacement on Electrocardiographic Parameters in Men: Findings From Two Randomized Trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017 May 1;102(5):1478-1485. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-3669. PubMed 27992261 ↗
  • Storer TW, Basaria S, Traustadottir T, Harman SM, Pencina K, Li Z, Travison TG, Miciek R, Tsitouras P, Hally K, Huang G, Bhasin S. Effects of Testosterone Supplementation for 3 Years on Muscle Performance and Physical Function in Older Men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Feb 1;102(2):583-593. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-2771. PubMed 27754805 ↗
  • Huang G, Wharton W, Bhasin S, Harman SM, Pencina KM, Tsitouras P, Li Z, Hally KA, Asthana S, Storer TW, Basaria S. Effects of long-term testosterone administration on cognition in older men with low or low-to-normal testosterone concentrations: a prespecified secondary analysis of data from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled TEAAM trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Aug;4(8):657-665. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30102-4. Epub 2016 Jul 1. PubMed 27377542 ↗
  • Basaria S, Harman SM, Travison TG, Hodis H, Tsitouras P, Budoff M, Pencina KM, Vita J, Dzekov C, Mazer NA, Coviello AD, Knapp PE, Hally K, Pinjic E, Yan M, Storer TW, Bhasin S. Effects of Testosterone Administration for 3 Years on Subclinical Atherosclerosis Progression in Older Men With Low or Low-Normal Testosterone Levels: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Aug 11;314(6):570-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8881. PubMed 26262795 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 29, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00287586
Lead sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Collaborators
Solvay Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Shalendar Bhasin, MD (MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 7, 2006
Start date
Sep 2004
Primary completion
Feb 7, 2012
Completion
May 12, 2012
Results posted
Jun 29, 2017
Last update
Jun 29, 2017

Study contacts

Shalender Bhasin, MD
principal investigator · Boston University / Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion