CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00286585Updated Aug 27, 2012

TEAM-Project: Trial on the Effect of Anesthetics on Morbidity and Mortality

A Phase 4 interventional study of Inhalational anesthetic and Intravenous anesthetic, propofol in Coronary Artery Disease, sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. Completed at 3 sites in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-08-27.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
385
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Volatile anesthetics may provide some protection from myocardial ischemia, an effect called anesthetic preconditioning. In patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, this preconditioning effect resulted in better cardiac performance, faster recovery and lower morbidity and mortality.

The investigators will perform a prospective randomized multi-center study to compare volatile with total intravenous anesthesia in patients at a high cardiac risk who undergo major non-cardiac surgery.

Read the detailed description

Basic research and animal studies have detected that volatile anesthetics provide some protection from myocardial ischemia, an effect called anesthetic preconditioning. Recent clinical studies have found that this preconditioning effect is of clinical relevance in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, resulting in better cardiac function and faster recovery after surgery, and in lower one-year morbidity. In patients undergoing non cardiac surgery, cardiac complications also are the major cause of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Myocardial ischemia frequently occurs during and immediately after non cardiac surgery in patients with coronary artery disease, and is a strong predictor of subsequent cardiac complications and death. Whether or not volatile anesthetics also provide clinically relevant protection from perioperative ischemia and subsequent cardiac complications in patients undergoing non cardiac surgery is unknown. Therefore, we will perform a prospective, randomized multi-center study to compare volatile with total intravenous anesthesia in patients at high cardiac risk who undergo major non cardiac surgery. We hypothesize that the use of a volatile anesthetic will reduce the incidence of perioperative ischaemia and myocardial injury, as indicated primarily by less ST-segment changes in the Holter ECG and, if there will be an effect, secondarily by lower incidences of elevated troponin T and NT-pro-BNP levels. And we hypothesize that the use of a volatile anesthetic will reduce the one-year incidence of cardiac complications and all cause mortality after surgery. The results of this study may apply to a huge percentage of surgical patients because coronary artery disease is the clinically most relevant co-morbidity, and its prevalence is expected to increase with the steadily increasing number of surgical patients aged 65 yr and older.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

  • preconditioning
  • cardiac protection
  • morbidity
  • mortality
  • major non-cardiac surgery
  • cardiac mortality and morbidity
  • high cardiac perioperative risk
03

In context

Coronary Artery Disease

5,598 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 957 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 385 is above the median of 124 across 3,436 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland is the lead sponsor of 968 studies on the registry; 191 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients scheduled for a non-cardiac surgical procedure of high or intermediate cardiac risk are eligible if they have documented coronary artery disease (CAD) or are at high risk of CAD.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ongoing medication with sulfonylurea derivatives (unless stopped ≥ 2 days before surgery) or theophylline
  • Emergency surgery
  • Unstable angina pectoris
  • Preoperative hemodynamic instability
  • Severe hepatic disease
  • Renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \< 30 ml/min)
  • Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] \< 1 litre)
  • Absence of written patient consent
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
385 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Inhalational anesthetic

    Sevoflurane will be used as the main anesthetic in this arm, and no propofol will be administered

    Drug: Inhalational anesthetic

  • Active comparator
    Intravenous anesthetic, propofol

    Propofol will be used as the main anesthetic in this arm, and no inhalational anesthetic will be administered

    Drug: Intravenous anesthetic, propofol

Interventions

  • DrugInhalational anesthetic

    Sevoflurane, dosage according to the physician in charge

    Also known as: Ultane,, Sevorane

  • DrugIntravenous anesthetic, propofol

    Propofol, dosage according to the physician in charge

    Also known as: Diprivan,, Diprovan

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ischemia (Holter-electrocardiogram [ECG], troponin T, ECG)

    Time frame: 7 days postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Congestive heart failure (N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-pro-BNP])

    Time frame: 2 days postoperatively

  2. influence of genetic polymorphism on cardiac morbidity and mortality

    Time frame: 7 days, 6 and 12 months

  3. cardiac morbidity and mortality

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Kantonsspital
    Liestal, Basel-Land CH-4410, Switzerland
  • University Hospital
    Basel, CH-4000, Switzerland
  • Bürgerspital
    Solothurn, CH-4500, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mauermann E, Bolliger D, Seeberger E, Puelacher C, Corbiere S, Filipovic M, Seeberger M, Mueller C, Lurati Buse G. Incremental Value of Preoperative Copeptin for Predicting Myocardial Injury. Anesth Analg. 2016 Dec;123(6):1363-1371. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001635. PubMed 27870734 ↗
  • Lurati Buse GA, Schumacher P, Seeberger E, Studer W, Schuman RM, Fassl J, Kasper J, Filipovic M, Bolliger D, Seeberger MD. Randomized comparison of sevoflurane versus propofol to reduce perioperative myocardial ischemia in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 2012 Dec 4;126(23):2696-704. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.126144. Epub 2012 Nov 7. PubMed 23136158 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 27, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00286585
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Collaborators
Abbott
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 3, 2006
Start date
Feb 2006
Primary completion
Nov 2010
Completion
Nov 2011
Last update
Aug 27, 2012

Study contacts

Manfred Seeberger, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · Department of Anesthesia, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion