CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00285805Updated Aug 24, 2010

The Influence of Rosiglitazone on the Diuretic Effect of Furosemide and Amiloride

An interventional study of Rosiglitazone versus placebo and response (sodium excretion) to amiloride infusion in Insulin Resistance, sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-08-24.

Sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
13
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Thiazolidinedione derivates (TZD's) are Peroxisome-Proliferator-Activated-Receptor-γ agonists (PPARγ-agonists) and enhance insulin sensitivity. One of the side effects, however, is the fact that subjects treated with these drugs seem to be more prone to fluid retention. The precise mechanism of rosiglitazone-related fluid retention is unknown, but it is clear that either primary or secondary renal sodium retention is part of the mechanism. Furthermore in observational studies, TZD-related oedema seems to be resistant to loop diuretic therapy. The recent finding that rosiglitazone induces upregulation of the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) in the kidney could be the explanation for TZD-related fluid retention and the observed resistance to loop diuretics. In the present human in-vivo study the following hypothesis will be tested:

Rosiglitazone treatment stimulates the activity of ENaC in the distal nephron, which enhances the natriuretic effect of amiloride and decreases the natriuretic effect of furosemide in parallel.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, single-centre, cross-over study with 4 weeks of wash out comparing placebo with rosiglitazone 4 mg bid for 9 weeks treatment periods. Randomization of the treatment sequence will be computer-generated, with a sequentially driven allocation. Randomization and blinding will be performed at the department of Clinical Pharmacy. After 8 (furosemide) and 9 (amiloride) weeks in each period the end-point experiments will be performed. During all visits (week 0, 4, 8, 9) of each period, adverse events and pill compliance will be recorded. In addition, physical examination, foot volume and bio-impedance measurements will be performed and safety chemical, and hematological profiles will be determined. Only at start and at 8 weeks in each period, glucose, insulin and HbA1c are measured. All visits and interventions will be performed at the Clinical Research Center Nijmegen (CRCN).

Furosemide end-point experiment Each participant will attend the hospital at 8 a.m. after an overnight fast and abstinence of alcohol and caffeine for 20 hours, delivering a 24-hour urine collection and the present morning voiding. The previous three days each participant will adhere to an individualized diet containing 150 mmol of sodium and 80 mmol of potassium prescribed by a dietician. First, blood will be collected to measure fasting glucose and insulin concentrations. Then the subject will be given an individualized breakfast including 1 cup of water. Afterwards a brachial vein will be cannulated and connected to a Braunpump (10 ml/hr NaCl 0.9%), followed by blood drawing for safety and vascular hormone measurements (aldosterone, Atrial Natriuretic Peptide (ANP), Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and renin).

A bolus of furosemide (40 mg) will be injected through a small cannule in a vein of the contra-lateral arm, just after bladder emptying. Venous blood samples will be drawn at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90,120, 150, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420 and 480 minutes after bolus injection to measure plasma furosemide levels. The participants will be asked to urinate regularly, at least hourly. The exact time of voiding and the urine volume will be recorded. Two urine samples will be taken. In one sample, sodium and creatinine concentrations will be measured while the other sample will be light-protected and immediately frozen for measurement of furosemide levels later on. To prevent dehydration each participant will be asked to drink tap water equal to the volume of diuresis in the previous hour. During the test the participant will be sitting on a bed. At noon the participant will be offered an individualized lunch. After 8 hours each participant will leave the hospital with the instruction to adhere to the diet without fluid restrictions and to collect the urine for up to 24 hours after start of the experiment.

Amiloride end-point experiment Until amiloride infusion the procedures will be similar. At time point 0, venous infusion of a loading dose of amiloride will be started (150 μg/kg in 60 minutes) followed by maintenance infusion (0.20 μg/kg/min) for 4 hours. Amiloride will be obtained as a sterile powder in the form of amiloride HCl/2H2O . Directly before use, the powder will be dissolved in NaCl 0,9% up to a concentration of 1 mg/ml and the solution was filtered through a 0.22 μm Millipore filter. Venous blood for measurement of the amiloride concentration will be sampled at 60, 180, 300 and 420 minutes. All the other procedures will be similar to the furosemide experiment.

Pharmacokinetic considerations on the amiloride-dose The peak plasma levels 3-4 hours after intake of 10 or 20 mg amiloride are 20 μg/L (32) and 38-40 μg/L respectively(33). These concentrations are well below the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of amiloride for Na+/H+ and Na+/Ca2+-transporters and the α1-receptor, but well above the IC50 for ENaC(34). Using the pharmacokinetic characteristics of amiloride(35) we calculated the required amiloride infusion in order to reach a steady-state concentration between 30-45 μg/L.

Exosome extraction:

Urinary exosomes will be isolated by ultracentrifugation and ENaC abundance will be measured by immunoblotting as previously described (19;36) and normalized to urine creatinine levels. 4 µg of protein lysed in Laemmli buffer will be loaded on 8% SDS-PAGE. PAGE, blotting and blocking of the PVDF membranes will be done as previously described. Membrane will be incubated with 1:4000-diluted affinity-purified rabbit α-ENaC antibody (Rossier BC, Lausanne, Switzerland), followed by 1:5,000-diluted goat anti-rabbit IgG's as secondary antibody coupled to horseradish peroxidase. Blotting signals will be visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence. The samples will be normalized for the expression level of α-ENaC in placebo treatment and indicated as percentage.

02

Conditions studied

  • Insulin Resistance

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Rosiglitazone
  • Furosemide
  • Amiloride
  • Epithelial sodium channel
  • Sodium excretion
03

In context

Insulin Resistance

1,960 studies on the registry are indexed under Insulin Resistance; 306 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 13 is below the median of 40 across 1,536 interventional studies indexed under Insulin Resistance.

Browse Insulin Resistance studies →

Lead sponsor

Radboud University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 959 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy but with 2 features of the metabolic syndrome (AHA/NHLBI) (16)
  • Willing and able to provide a signed and dated written informed consent.
  • Male or female subject aged between 30 and 70 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fasting glucose > 7,0 mmol/L or the use of hypoglycaemic agents. If fasting plasma glucose is between 6.1 and 7,0 mmol/L,an oral 75 g glucose test will be performed to exclude diabetes mellitus.
  • Exposure to a PPAR-g agonist during the last 4 months or a documented significant hypersensitivity to a PPAR-g agonist.
  • Participant in another study.
  • Angina or heart failure (NYHA I-IV).
  • Clinically significant liver disease (3 times the upper normal limit of ALAT, ASAT, AF, γGT or LDH)
  • Clinically significant anaemia (male Hb \< 6,9 mmol/L, female \< 6,25 mmol/L)
  • Creatinin clearance \< 40 mL/min
  • Pregnancy, lactation
  • Alcohol or drug abuse. Liquorice
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
13 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Rosiglitazone-placebo

    Drug: Rosiglitazone versus placebo · Drug: response (sodium excretion) to amiloride infusion · Drug: response (sodium excretion) to furosemide infusion

  • Other
    placebo-rosiglitazone

    Drug: Rosiglitazone versus placebo · Drug: response (sodium excretion) to amiloride infusion · Drug: response (sodium excretion) to furosemide infusion

Interventions

  • DrugRosiglitazone versus placebo
  • Drugresponse (sodium excretion) to amiloride infusion
  • Drugresponse (sodium excretion) to furosemide infusion
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in cumulative sodium excretion over an 8-hour period following amiloride infusion after 9 weeks of treatment with either rosiglitazone or placebo.

    Time frame: week: 9, 22

Secondary outcomes

  1. The difference in ER50 (urine excretion rate of furosemide with the half maximal effect) after 8 weeks of treatment with either rosiglitazone or placebo.

    Time frame: week: 8, 21

  2. The difference in the ENac abundance in exosomes in the urine measured after 8 weeks of treatment with either rosiglitazone or placebo

    Time frame: week: 8, 21

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Radboud University Nijmegen medical centre
    Nijmegen, 6500 HB, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nesto RW, Bell D, Bonow RO, Fonseca V, Grundy SM, Horton ES, Le Winter M, Porte D, Semenkovich CF, Smith S, Young LH, Kahn R; American Heart Association; American Diabetes Association. Thiazolidinedione use, fluid retention, and congestive heart failure: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association and American Diabetes Association. October 7, 2003. Circulation. 2003 Dec 9;108(23):2941-8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000103683.99399.7E. No abstract available. PubMed 14662691 ↗
  • Hong G, Lockhart A, Davis B, Rahmoune H, Baker S, Ye L, Thompson P, Shou Y, O'Shaughnessy K, Ronco P, Brown J. PPARgamma activation enhances cell surface ENaCalpha via up-regulation of SGK1 in human collecting duct cells. FASEB J. 2003 Oct;17(13):1966-8. doi: 10.1096/fj.03-0181fje. Epub 2003 Aug 15. PubMed 12923071 ↗
  • Guan Y, Hao C, Cha DR, Rao R, Lu W, Kohan DE, Magnuson MA, Redha R, Zhang Y, Breyer MD. Thiazolidinediones expand body fluid volume through PPARgamma stimulation of ENaC-mediated renal salt absorption. Nat Med. 2005 Aug;11(8):861-6. doi: 10.1038/nm1278. Epub 2005 Jul 10. PubMed 16007095 ↗
  • Niemeyer NV, Janney LM. Thiazolidinedione-induced edema. Pharmacotherapy. 2002 Jul;22(7):924-9. doi: 10.1592/phco.22.11.924.33626. PubMed 12126225 ↗
  • van Meyel JJ, Smits P, Russel FG, Gerlag PG, Tan Y, Gribnau FW. Diuretic efficiency of furosemide during continuous administration versus bolus injection in healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1992 Apr;51(4):440-4. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1992.44. PubMed 1563213 ↗
  • Baba WI, Lant AF, Smith AJ, Townshend MM, Wilson GM. Pharmacological effects in animals and normal human subjects of the diuretic amiloride hydrochloride (MK-870). Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1968 May-Jun;9(3):318-27. doi: 10.1002/cpt196893318. No abstract available. PubMed 5649984 ↗
  • Pisitkun T, Shen RF, Knepper MA. Identification and proteomic profiling of exosomes in human urine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Sep 7;101(36):13368-73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403453101. Epub 2004 Aug 23. PubMed 15326289 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 24, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00285805
Lead sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center
First posted
Feb 2, 2006
Start date
Feb 2006
Primary completion
Oct 2006
Completion
Nov 2006
Last update
Aug 24, 2010

Study contacts

Paul Smits, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, head of department Pharmacology and Toxicology.
Cees JJ Tack, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, chairman of the departement of diabetology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion