An interventional study of constant CPAP devices and automatic CPAP devices in Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, sponsored by Konrad E. Bloch. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-30.
Sponsored by Konrad E. Bloch · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Hypothesis: Computer controlled continuous positive airway pressure (autoCPAP) is equally effective in improving obstructive sleep apnea syndrome symptoms, breathing disturbances, objective vigilance, and it is cost-effective compared to conventional fixed continuous positive airway pressure.
1,422 studies on the registry are indexed under Apnea; 159 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 208 is above the median of 50 across 965 interventional studies indexed under Apnea.
Browse Apnea studies →This is the only study on the registry with Konrad E. Bloch as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
constant CPAP
Device: constant CPAP devices
automatic CPAP
Device: automatic CPAP devices
different CPAP mode
different CPAP mode
subjective sleepiness and other OSAS symptoms
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years
quality of life
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years
percentage of withdrawal and cross-over to other CPAP mode
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years
objective vigilance
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years
blood pressure
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years
cost/utility ratios
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years
major outcomes in subgroups of patients with severe and mild OSAS
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years
circulating markers of inflammation and cardiovascular risk
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years
side effects
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years
nocturnal respiratory disturbances
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years
treatment adherence
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.