ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00280306Updated Jun 4, 2015

White Matter Fiber Tracking and Assessment of White Matter Integrity in the Cervical Spinal Cord

An observational study in Spinal Cord Compression, sponsored by Weill Medical College of Cornell University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-06-04.

Sponsored by Weill Medical College of Cornell University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
35
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

White matter fiber tracking may provide a novel tool to assess the integrity of injured motor tracts in the cervical spine. It provides information about fiber directions which is not given by conventional MRI. White matter fiber tracking in the brain is used at several institutions, including our own medical college, for presurgical planning of tumor excision. We believe that the technical and clinical experience gained for the brain can be applied to fiber tracking in the cervical spine as well.

Read the detailed description

White matter fiber tracking may provide a novel tool to assess the integrity of injured motor tracts in the cervical spine. It provides information about fiber directions which is not given by conventional MRI. White matter fiber tracking in the brain is used at several institutions, including our own medical college, for presurgical planning of tumor excision. We believe that the technical and clinical experience gained for the brain can be applied to fiber tracking in the cervical spine as well. White matter fiber tracking in the cervical spine has some important clinical applications:

  • A better understanding of the relationship between abnormal cervical spinal anatomy and the impact on fiber tracts would be helpful in determining the best treatment for a particular patient. It may be able to define the indication and role of surgical decompression and stabilization based on quantifiable and reproducible data obtained with this new imaging technology.
  • It could help the surgeon to determine what type of surgical approach to choose (anterior versus posterior surgery, depending on the degree of compression / impingement on nerve fibers).
  • Correlation between quantitative diffusion measures and spinal cord injury may be used in monitoring the response to treatment and may therefore be an important parameter for clinicians to follow.
  • White matter fiber tracking may also help to determine the pathophysiology underlying cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Currently, there is a debate as to whether cervical spondylitic myelopathy is caused mainly by compressive narrowing of the spinal canal, which may lead to focal ischemia and tissue injury, or whether excessive motion due to cervical spondylosis results in increased strain and shear of spinal axons resulting in injury (Henderson et al., Neurosurgery 56(5):1101-13, 2005). If the latter is correct one would expect diffusion changes along the course of white matter tracks above and below the spondylotic changes.

We will first study a pool of 15 normal control subjects to refine our data acquisition and postprocessing tools, and to sample quantitative diffusion based data for the normal cervical spine. A second group of subjects will include 10 patients with significant cervical spondylosis and upper extremity radiculopathy without myelopathy. The third group will be 10 patients with cervical spondylosis and signs and symptoms of myelopathy. The two patient groups will allow us to define systematic differences between normal values and values in the injured spine.

The DTI data will be processed using tools for artifact correction first and then tools for rendering T2 weighted images, diffusion weighted images, ADC maps and FA values.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Cord Compression
03

In context

Spinal Cord Compression

52 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Compression; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 35 is below the median of 70 across 17 observational studies indexed under Spinal Cord Compression.

Browse Spinal Cord Compression studies →

Lead sponsor

Weill Medical College of Cornell University is the lead sponsor of 892 studies on the registry; 165 are open to participants now.

Of its 123 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 94 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Cervical spinal cord compression

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Normal controls Spinal cord injury

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

N/A

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
35 participants (actual)

Interventions

  • OtherNo interventions

    No intervention

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Imaging study of white matter in spinal cord; define systematic differences between normal values and values in the injured spine

    Time frame: Up to 3 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Weill Medical College of Cornell
    New York, New York 10021, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 4, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00280306
Collaborators
Cervical Spine Research Society
Responsible party
Henning U. Voss (Associate Professor of Physics in Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 20, 2006
Start date
Nov 2005
Primary completion
Oct 2008
Completion
Oct 2008
Last update
Jun 4, 2015

Study contacts

Henning U Voss
principal investigator · Weill Medical College of Cornell
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion