A Phase 2 interventional study of belinostat in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma, Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, sponsored by Valerio Therapeutics. Terminated at 15 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-07-28.
Sponsored by Valerio Therapeutics · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
Open-label, non-randomized trial to assess the effectiveness of PXD101 in patients with recurrent or refractory cutaneous or peripheral and other types of T-cell lymphomas. PXD101 is a new, potent histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor. Patients are treated with belinostat(PXD101) 1000 mg/m2 on days 1-5 of a 21 day cycle.
5,578 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphoma; 825 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 53 is above the median of 40 across 4,508 interventional studies indexed under Lymphoma.
Browse Lymphoma studies →Valerio Therapeutics is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Adequate bone marrow and hepatic function including the following:
Exclusion Criteria:
PXD101 1000 mg/m2 once daily for 5 days every 21 days
Drug: belinostat
PXD101 1000 mg/m2 once daily for 5 days every 21 days
Drug: belinostat
Also known as: PXD101
Objective Response Rate in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL)
Tumor response was assessed using Cheson (Cheson 2007) and SWAT criteria. The SWAT score represents the product of the percentage total body surface area (TBSA) involvement of each lesion type (patch, plaque, and tumor or ulceration), multiplied by a weighting factor.
Time frame: throughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 years
Objective Response Rate in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL))
Tumor response was assessed using the revised criteria of Cheson (Cheson 2007).Tumor assessments were done using conventional radiographic methods, e.g. CT or CT/PET.
Time frame: throughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 years
Time to Progression
Time to progression was defined as the interval between the first date of treatment and the first notation of disease progression.
Time frame: throughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 years
Time to Response
Time to response was defined as the interval between the first date of treatment and the first notation of response.
Time frame: throughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 years
Duration of Response
Duration of response was defined as the time from first notation of response until the time of first notation of disease progression.
Time frame: throughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 years
| Milestone | Arm A (CTCL, ITT Population) | Arm B (PTCL, ITT Population) |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 29 | 24 |
| Completed | 1 | 4 |
| Not completed | 28 | 20 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 6 | 3 |
| Withdrew: Lack of efficacy | 13 | 6 |
| Withdrew: Death | 1 | 3 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 0 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Physician decision | 8 | 7 |
Tumor response was assessed using Cheson (Cheson 2007) and SWAT criteria. The SWAT score represents the product of the percentage total body surface area (TBSA) involvement of each lesion type (patch, plaque, and tumor or ulceration), multiplied by a weighting factor.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Tumor response was assessed using the revised criteria of Cheson (Cheson 2007).Tumor assessments were done using conventional radiographic methods, e.g. CT or CT/PET.
| percentage of patients with OR | PTCL (ITT Population) |
|---|---|
| Objective Response Rate in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL)) | 25 |
Time to progression was defined as the interval between the first date of treatment and the first notation of disease progression.
| Days | Arm A (CTCL, ITT Population) | Arm B (PTCL, ITT Population) |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Progression | 43 (15 to 304) | 82 (9 to 890) |
Time to response was defined as the interval between the first date of treatment and the first notation of response.
| Days | Arm A (CTCL, ITT Population) | Arm B (PTCL, ITT Population) |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Response | 40 (15 to 176) | 100 (9 to 431) |
Duration of response was defined as the time from first notation of response until the time of first notation of disease progression.
| Days | Arm A (CTCL, ITT Population) | Arm B (PTCL, ITT Population) |
|---|---|---|
| Duration of Response | 83 (56 to 129) | 109 (7 to 460) |
Tumor response was assessed using Cheson (Cheson 2007) and SWAT criteria. The SWAT score represents the product of the percentage total body surface area (TBSA) involvement of each lesion type (patch, plaque, and tumor or ulceration), multiplied by a weighting factor.
| participants | Arm A (CTCL, ITT Population) |
|---|---|
| Objective Response Rate in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL) | 4 |
Collected over Throughout study, up to 4 weeks after last drug administration. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A (CTCL, ITT Population) | — | 7/29 (24.1%) | 29/29 (100%) |
| Arm B (PTCL, ITT Population) | — | 8/24 (33.3%) | 23/24 (95.8%) |
| Event | Arm A (CTCL, ITT Population) | Arm B (PTCL, ITT Population) |
|---|---|---|
| SepsisInfections and infestations | 2/29 | 0/24 |
| Disease progressionGeneral disorders | 1/29 | 1/24 |
| Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders | 1/29 | 1/24 |
| ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 0/29 | 1/24 |
| Ventricular fibrillationCardiac disorders | 0/29 | 1/24 |
| PyrexiaGeneral disorders | 0/29 | 1/24 |
| PneumoniaInfections and infestations | 0/29 | 1/24 |
| Muscular weaknessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 0/29 | 1/24 |
| PneumonitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 0/29 | 1/24 |
| Ileus paralyticGastrointestinal disorders | 0/29 | 1/24 |
| Event | Arm A (CTCL, ITT Population) | Arm B (PTCL, ITT Population) |
|---|---|---|
| NauseaGastrointestinal disorders | 17/29 | 16/24 |
| ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders | 5/29 | 9/24 |
| FatigueGeneral disorders | 6/29 | 8/24 |
| VomitingGastrointestinal disorders | 8/29 | 6/24 |
| PyrexiaGeneral disorders | 5/29 | 6/24 |
| PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 7/29 | 2/24 |
| Injection site reactionGeneral disorders | 0/29 | 5/24 |
| DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders | 4/29 | 5/24 |
| DizzinessNervous system disorders | 6/29 | 5/24 |
| AnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 3/29 | 5/24 |
Patients received PXD101, 1000 mg/m2/day over 30 minutes days 1-5 of a 21-day cycle. Patients with OR or stable disease were permitted to continue with PXD101 for up to 8 cycles or until progressive disease. Patients with PR or SD could continue therapy beyond 8 cycles until progression in consultation with Investigators and Sponsor.
| Age, Continuous(years) | CTCL (ITT Population) | PTCL (ITT Population) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 64.1 ± 13.4 | 58.8 ± 15.9 | 61.7 ± 14.7 |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | CTCL (ITT Population) | PTCL (ITT Population) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 12 | 12 | 24 |
| >=65 years | 17 | 12 | 29 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | CTCL (ITT Population) | PTCL (ITT Population) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 15 | 7 | 22 |
| Male | 14 | 17 | 31 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | CTCL (ITT Population) | PTCL (ITT Population) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 17 | 39 |
| France | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Israel | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Thailand | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| Germany | 1 | 0 | 1 |
This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Valerio Therapeutics