CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01385748Updated Nov 28, 2017Results posted

Efficacy and Safety Study of Clonidine Lauriad® to Treat Oral Mucositis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Clonidine Lauriad® 50µg and Clonidine Lauriad® 100µg in Oral Mucositis, sponsored by Valerio Therapeutics. Completed at 51 sites in 6 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-28.

Sponsored by Valerio Therapeutics · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
183
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Clonidine Lauriad® to treat chemoradiation therapy induced severe oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Oral Mucositis
03

In context

Mucositis

488 studies on the registry are indexed under Mucositis; 70 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 183 is above the median of 50 across 394 interventional studies indexed under Mucositis.

Browse Mucositis studies →

Lead sponsor

Valerio Therapeutics is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female
  • Aged > 18 years
  • Suffering from a newly diagnosed squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx or larynx histologically-confirmed and having undergone resective surgery
  • Prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy allowed provided that, the patient did not experience a World Health Organization (WHO) grade > 2 oral mucositis during the neoadjuvant therapy.
  • Patient eligible to receive concurrent chemo-radiation defined as:

    1. A continuous course of conventional external beam irradiation (IMRT eligible) with a minimum cumulative radiation dose of 50 Gy or a maximum of 70 Gy, based on a daily dosing between 1.8 and 2.2 Gy combined with platinum based chemotherapy on a weekly or tri-weekly cycles.
    2. Planned radiation treatment fields must include at least two oral tissue sites (among right or left buccal mucosa, floor of mouth, tongue, right or left soft palate) with each site receiving a total of 50 Gy or a maximum of 70 Gy. The radiation treatment plan will be reviewed by a designated radiation oncologist.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2
  • Screening laboratory tests:

    1. Haemoglobin ≥ 10g/dL
    2. Absolute neutrophil counts ≥ 1500 cells/mm3
    3. Platelets ≥ 100.000/mm3
    4. Conjugated bilirubin ≤ 2 times Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
    5. Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 3 ULN
    6. Negative serum pregnancy test
  • Women of child bearing potential must have effective contraception method (oral or device)
  • Signed written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Tumours of the lips, sinuses, salivary glands
  • Prior radiation of the head and neck area
  • Curative surgery less than 2 weeks or more than 15 weeks prior to the initiation of radiation therapy-chemotherapy (RT-CT)
  • Presence of active infectious disease
  • Presence of active oral infectious disease, including oropharyngeal candidiasis and/or orofacial herpes
  • Presence of oral mucositis
  • Known or suspected chronic viral diseases including HIV
  • Systolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg and/or Diastolic blood pressure \< 50 mmHg
  • Recent stroke within the last 6 months
  • Bradyarrhythmia (\<60 b/min), including sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular (AV) nodal conduction block 2nd or 3rd degree
  • Subjects with orthostatic hypotension, defined by a decrease of systolic BP and/or diastolic BP above 20 mmHg when the patient stands up
  • Renal insufficiency (creatinine blood level > 1.5ULN)
  • Ongoing heavy alcohol consumption (>100g alcohol/day)
  • Administration of any concomitant treatment likely to interfere with clonidine
  • Known hypersensitivity to clonidine, history of allergy or intolerance to milk proteins or any other component of the product
  • Presence of severe or uncontrolled depression
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • Inability to give informed consent or comply with study requirements
  • Unable or unwilling to comply with follow-up visits
  • Participation to a clinical trial within 30 days prior to randomization and during the entire duration of the study
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
183 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Clonidine Lauriad® 50µg

    50µg muco-adhesive buccal tablets, once de day, every day up to 8 weeks

    Drug: Clonidine Lauriad® 50µg

  • Active comparator
    Clonidine Lauriad® 100µg

    100µg muco-adhesive buccal tablets, once a day, every day up to 8 weeks

    Drug: Clonidine Lauriad® 100µg

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Lauriad®

    Placebo muco-adhesive buccal tablets, once a day, every day up to 8 weeks

    Drug: Placebo Lauriad®

Interventions

  • DrugClonidine Lauriad® 50µg

    50µg muco-adhesive buccal tablet once day every day up to 8 weeks

  • DrugClonidine Lauriad® 100µg

    100µg muco-adhesive buccal tablets, once a day, every day up to 8 weeks

  • DrugPlacebo Lauriad®

    placebo muco-adhesive buccal tablets, once a day, every day up to 8 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cumulative Radiation Dose at Which Severe Oral Mucositis (World Health Organization [WHO] Score ≥ 3) Was First Observed

    The primary endpoint planned in the protocol was the percentage of participants with an oral mucositis score greater than or equal to 3 using the WHO oral mucositis severity scale at a cumulative radiation dose of 50 Gy. This was modified by protocol amendment to the cumulative radiation dose at which a WHO score greater than or equal to 3 was first observed. This change was made to account for the fact that in real practice most patients receive a cumulative dose between 60 and 70 Gy. The presence of grade 3 or 4 oral mucositis was assessed twice weekly during the active phase (radiotherapy) by a trained radiation oncologist or an ear nose and throat specialist who took into account the field of radiation treatment. WHO score 3 = oral ulcers, liquid diet only; WHO score 4 = oral alimentation impossible. Each assessment was associated with the actual cumulative dose of radiotherapy.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. At Least One Opioid Use (Class 3 Analgesic)

    Opioid use was recorded twice weekly during the active phase (radiotherapy)

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Opioid Use: Minimal Total Cumulative Dose Administered (Mean, Standard Deviation)

    Opioid use was recorded twice weekly for up to 8 weeks during the active phase (radiotherapy). The sum of non-missing total cumulative doses across all class 3 analgesics recorded for the considered participant is reported.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  3. Opioid Use: Minimal Total Cumulative Dose Administered (Median, Range)

    Opioid use was recorded twice weekly for up to 8 weeks during the active phase (radiotherapy). The sum of non-missing total cumulative doses across all class 3 analgesics recorded for the considered participant is reported.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  4. Overall Survival

    After the end-of study visit, the investigator center collects OS follow-up data for each patient who has consented to participate in the follow-up data collection. the OS follow-up period was still ongoing at time of the primary analysis and ended in Nov 2016. The analysis was condicted on the ITT population. The overall survival was evaluate every 6 months after last subject completed in patients who has consented to participate .

    Time frame: 2 years

Other outcomes

  1. Time to Onset of Severe Oral Mucositis

    Time to onset is the duration until first Severe Oral Mucositis. Severe Oral Mucositis was defined as a Grade 3 or Grade 4 score on the World Health Organization (WHO) oral mucositis severity scale. Participants were assessed twice weekly during the active phase (radiotherapy) by a trained radiation oncologist or an ear nose and throat specialist who took into account the field of radiation treatment. WHO score 3 = ulcers, extensive erythema, and the inability of the participant to swallow a solid diet; WHO score 4 = mucositis to the extent that alimentation was not possible.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. The Maximum Severity of Oral Mucositis

    Participants were assessed using the World Health Organization (WHO) oral mucositis severity scale twice weekly during the active phase (radiotherapy) by a trained radiation oncologist or an ear nose and throat specialist who took into account the field of radiation treatment. The WHO scores were as follows: 0 = None; 1 = oral soreness, erythema; 2 = oral erythema, ulcers, solid diet tolerated; 3 = oral ulcers, liquid diet only; 4 = oral alimentation impossible. The maximum severity was the maximum score reported during the active phase.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  3. The Overall Incidence of Grade 3/4 Mucositis During the Active Phase.

    The presence of grade 3 or 4 oral mucositis on the World Health Organization (WHO) oral mucositis severity scale was assessed twice weekly during the active phase (radiotherapy) by a trained radiation oncologist or an ear nose and throat specialist who took into account the field of radiation treatment. WHO score 3 = ulcers, extensive erythema, and the inability of the participant to swallow a solid diet; WHO score 4 = mucositis to the extent that alimentation was not possible.The number of participants with at least one Grade 3 or Grade 4 mucositis score during the active phase is reported.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  4. Salivary Flow Assessment Using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTC) for Xerostomia: Time to First Grade 2 or Higher

    Salivary flow was assessed and scored by the investigator weekly using the NCI-CTC scale for xerostomia for up to 8 weeks during the active phase (radiotherapy). Time to appearance of Grade 2 or higher on the following 4-point scoring scale is reported: 0 = normal; 1 = symptomatic (dry or thick saliva) without significant dietary alteration (unstimulated saliva flow greater than 0.2 mL/minute); 2 = symptomatic and significant oral intake alterations (e.g. copious water, other lubricants, diet limited to purees and/or soft, moist foods) (unstimulated saliva 0.1 to 0.2 mL/minute); and 3 = symptoms leading to inability to adequately aliment orally, intravenous fluids, tube feedings, or total parenteral nutrition indicated (unstimulated saliva \< 0.1 mL/minute).

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  5. Overall Treatment Compliance According to the Patient Diary

    All participants complete a daily questionnaire during the active phase (radiotherapy). Compliance = \[ number of tablets / (end date of treatment - start date treatment + 1 ) \] \* 100. The "number of tablets" is the number of days with a tablet applied and treatment start and end dates are the first and last dates of the patient diary with a tablet applied.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

07

Results

Posted Aug 9, 2017

Participant flow

183 participants were randomized from 6 countries during 4 years

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneClonidine Lauriad® 50 µgClonidine Lauriad® 100 µgPlacebo Lauriad®
Started566562
Completed415149
Not completed151413
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject745
Withdrew: Noncompliance316
Withdrew: Other171
Withdrew: Adverse event421

Outcome measures

PrimaryCumulative Radiation Dose at Which Severe Oral Mucositis (World Health Organization [WHO] Score ≥ 3) Was First Observed

The primary endpoint planned in the protocol was the percentage of participants with an oral mucositis score greater than or equal to 3 using the WHO oral mucositis severity scale at a cumulative radiation dose of 50 Gy. This was modified by protocol amendment to the cumulative radiation dose at which a WHO score greater than or equal to 3 was first observed. This change was made to account for the fact that in real practice most patients receive a cumulative dose between 60 and 70 Gy. The presence of grade 3 or 4 oral mucositis was assessed twice weekly during the active phase (radiotherapy) by a trained radiation oncologist or an ear nose and throat specialist who took into account the field of radiation treatment. WHO score 3 = oral ulcers, liquid diet only; WHO score 4 = oral alimentation impossible. Each assessment was associated with the actual cumulative dose of radiotherapy.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Median · Cumulative radiation dose (Gy)
Cumulative Radiation Dose at Which Severe Oral Mucositis (World Health Organization [WHO] Score ≥ 3) Was First Observed
Cumulative radiation dose (Gy)Clonidine Lauriad® 50 µgClonidine Lauriad® 100 µgPlacebo Lauriad®Clonidine Lauriad® Muco-adhesive Buccal Tablets Pooled
Cumulative Radiation Dose at Which Severe Oral Mucositis (World Health Organization [WHO] Score ≥ 3) Was First Observed66 (44 to NA)56 (44 to NA)48 (42 to 61.6)60 (48 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Clonidine Lauriad® 50 µg vs Placebo Lauriad® · Log Rank · p = 0.165 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.677 · 95% CI 0.387 to 1.186The log rank test at 5% significance level was used.
  • Clonidine Lauriad® 100 µg vs Placebo Lauriad® · Log Rank · p = 0.421 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.817 · 95% CI 0.495 to 1.35The log rank test at 5% significance level was used.
  • Placebo Lauriad® vs Clonidine Lauriad® Muco-adhesive Buccal Tablets Pooled · Log Rank · p = 0.211 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.754 · 95% CI 0.484 to 1.175The log rank test at 5% significance level was used.
SecondaryAt Least One Opioid Use (Class 3 Analgesic)

Opioid use was recorded twice weekly during the active phase (radiotherapy)

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
At Least One Opioid Use (Class 3 Analgesic)
participantsClonidine Lauriad® 50 µgClonidine Lauriad® 100 µgPlacebo Lauriad®
Missing210
Yes233030
No313432
SecondaryOpioid Use: Minimal Total Cumulative Dose Administered (Mean, Standard Deviation)

Opioid use was recorded twice weekly for up to 8 weeks during the active phase (radiotherapy). The sum of non-missing total cumulative doses across all class 3 analgesics recorded for the considered participant is reported.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · morphine dose equivalent
Opioid Use: Minimal Total Cumulative Dose Administered (Mean, Standard Deviation)
morphine dose equivalentClonidine Lauriad® 50 µgClonidine Lauriad® 100 µgPlacebo Lauriad®Clonidine Lauriad® Muco-adhesive Buccal Tablets Pooled
Opioid Use: Minimal Total Cumulative Dose Administered (Mean, Standard Deviation)469.31 ± 633.51415.49 ± 490.55624.94 ± 958.81439.95 ± 553.88
SecondaryOpioid Use: Minimal Total Cumulative Dose Administered (Median, Range)

Opioid use was recorded twice weekly for up to 8 weeks during the active phase (radiotherapy). The sum of non-missing total cumulative doses across all class 3 analgesics recorded for the considered participant is reported.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Median · morphine dose equivalent
Opioid Use: Minimal Total Cumulative Dose Administered (Median, Range)
morphine dose equivalentClonidine Lauriad® 50 µgClonidine Lauriad® 100 µgPlacebo Lauriad®Clonidine Lauriad® Muco-adhesive Buccal Tablets Pooled
Opioid Use: Minimal Total Cumulative Dose Administered (Median, Range)183.6 (12 to 2249.1)174 (15 to 1804)215 (20 to 3672)178.65 (12 to 2249.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Clonidine Lauriad® 50 µg vs Placebo Lauriad® · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.807 (Significance threshold = 5%)
  • Clonidine Lauriad® 100 µg vs Placebo Lauriad® · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.971 (Significance threshold = 5%)
SecondaryOverall Survival

After the end-of study visit, the investigator center collects OS follow-up data for each patient who has consented to participate in the follow-up data collection. the OS follow-up period was still ongoing at time of the primary analysis and ended in Nov 2016. The analysis was condicted on the ITT population. The overall survival was evaluate every 6 months after last subject completed in patients who has consented to participate .

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival
monthsClonidine Lauriad® 50 µgClonidine Lauriad® 100 µgPlacebo Lauriad®Clonidine Lauriad® Muco-adhesive Buccal Tablets Pooled
Overall Survival47 (17.3 to NA)58.8 (35.9 to NA)41.8 (27.7 to NA)58.8 (32.3 to NA)
Other pre-specifiedTime to Onset of Severe Oral Mucositis

Time to onset is the duration until first Severe Oral Mucositis. Severe Oral Mucositis was defined as a Grade 3 or Grade 4 score on the World Health Organization (WHO) oral mucositis severity scale. Participants were assessed twice weekly during the active phase (radiotherapy) by a trained radiation oncologist or an ear nose and throat specialist who took into account the field of radiation treatment. WHO score 3 = ulcers, extensive erythema, and the inability of the participant to swallow a solid diet; WHO score 4 = mucositis to the extent that alimentation was not possible.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Time to Onset of Severe Oral Mucositis
weeksClonidine Lauriad® 50 µgClonidine Lauriad® 100 µgPlacebo Lauriad®Clonidine Lauriad® Muco-adhesive Buccal Tablets Pooled
Time to Onset of Severe Oral Mucositis6.4 (4.6 to NA)6 (4.6 to 8)5.1 (4.4 to 6.9)6.4 (5.1 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Clonidine Lauriad® 50 µg vs Placebo Lauriad® · Log Rank · p = 0.199 (Significance threshold = 5%) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.698 · 95% CI 0.398 to 1.223
  • Clonidine Lauriad® 100 µg vs Placebo Lauriad® · Log Rank · p = 0.424 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.817 · 95% CI 0.493 to 1.353Significance threshold = 5%
  • Placebo Lauriad® vs Clonidine Lauriad® Muco-adhesive Buccal Tablets Pooled · Log Rank · p = 0.235 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.764 · 95% CI 0.489 to 1.193Significance threshold = 5%
Other pre-specifiedThe Maximum Severity of Oral Mucositis

Participants were assessed using the World Health Organization (WHO) oral mucositis severity scale twice weekly during the active phase (radiotherapy) by a trained radiation oncologist or an ear nose and throat specialist who took into account the field of radiation treatment. The WHO scores were as follows: 0 = None; 1 = oral soreness, erythema; 2 = oral erythema, ulcers, solid diet tolerated; 3 = oral ulcers, liquid diet only; 4 = oral alimentation impossible. The maximum severity was the maximum score reported during the active phase.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
The Maximum Severity of Oral Mucositis
participantsClonidine Lauriad® 50 µgClonidine Lauriad® 100 µgPlacebo Lauriad®Clonidine Lauriad® Muco-adhesive Buccal Tablets Pooled
Grade 076413
Grade 197916
Grade 215201135
Grade 317203037
Grade 4610616
No value during the concerned period2224
Statistical analysis
  • Clonidine Lauriad® 50 µg vs Placebo Lauriad® · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.176Significance threshold = 5%
  • Clonidine Lauriad® 100 µg vs Placebo Lauriad® · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.61Significance threshold = 5%
  • Placebo Lauriad® vs Clonidine Lauriad® Muco-adhesive Buccal Tablets Pooled · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.295Significance threshold = 5%
Other pre-specifiedThe Overall Incidence of Grade 3/4 Mucositis During the Active Phase.

The presence of grade 3 or 4 oral mucositis on the World Health Organization (WHO) oral mucositis severity scale was assessed twice weekly during the active phase (radiotherapy) by a trained radiation oncologist or an ear nose and throat specialist who took into account the field of radiation treatment. WHO score 3 = ulcers, extensive erythema, and the inability of the participant to swallow a solid diet; WHO score 4 = mucositis to the extent that alimentation was not possible.The number of participants with at least one Grade 3 or Grade 4 mucositis score during the active phase is reported.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
The Overall Incidence of Grade 3/4 Mucositis During the Active Phase.
participantsClonidine Lauriad® 50 µgClonidine Lauriad® 100 µgPlacebo Lauriad®Clonidine Lauriad® Muco-adhesive Buccal Tablets Pooled
Missing2224
No31332464
Yes23303653
Statistical analysis
  • Clonidine Lauriad® 50 µg vs Placebo Lauriad® · Chi-squared · p = 0.063 (Significance threshold = 5%)
  • Clonidine Lauriad® 100 µg vs Placebo Lauriad® · Chi-squared · p = 0.169
  • Placebo Lauriad® vs Clonidine Lauriad® Muco-adhesive Buccal Tablets Pooled · Chi-squared · p = 0.064Significance threshold = 5%
Other pre-specifiedSalivary Flow Assessment Using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTC) for Xerostomia: Time to First Grade 2 or Higher

Salivary flow was assessed and scored by the investigator weekly using the NCI-CTC scale for xerostomia for up to 8 weeks during the active phase (radiotherapy). Time to appearance of Grade 2 or higher on the following 4-point scoring scale is reported: 0 = normal; 1 = symptomatic (dry or thick saliva) without significant dietary alteration (unstimulated saliva flow greater than 0.2 mL/minute); 2 = symptomatic and significant oral intake alterations (e.g. copious water, other lubricants, diet limited to purees and/or soft, moist foods) (unstimulated saliva 0.1 to 0.2 mL/minute); and 3 = symptoms leading to inability to adequately aliment orally, intravenous fluids, tube feedings, or total parenteral nutrition indicated (unstimulated saliva \< 0.1 mL/minute).

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Salivary Flow Assessment Using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTC) for Xerostomia: Time to First Grade 2 or Higher
weeksClonidine Lauriad® 50 µgClonidine Lauriad® 100µgPlacebo Lauriad®Clonidine Lauriad® Muco-adhesive Buccal Tablets Pooled
Salivary Flow Assessment Using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTC) for Xerostomia: Time to First Grade 2 or Higher6 (4.9 to 9.4)7.4 (6 to NA)5.1 (4.1 to 7.1)7.1 (5.7 to 9.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Clonidine Lauriad® 50 µg vs Placebo Lauriad® · Log Rank · p = 0.388 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.824 · 95% CI 0.484 to 1.401Significance threshold = 5%
  • Clonidine Lauriad® 100µg vs Placebo Lauriad® · Log Rank · p = 0.054 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.601 · 95% CI 0.357 to 1.012Significance threshold = 5%
  • Placebo Lauriad® vs Clonidine Lauriad® Muco-adhesive Buccal Tablets Pooled · Log Rank · p = 0.102 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.692 · 95% CI 0.444 to 1.078Significance threshold = 5%
Other pre-specifiedOverall Treatment Compliance According to the Patient Diary

All participants complete a daily questionnaire during the active phase (radiotherapy). Compliance = \[ number of tablets / (end date of treatment - start date treatment + 1 ) \] \* 100. The "number of tablets" is the number of days with a tablet applied and treatment start and end dates are the first and last dates of the patient diary with a tablet applied.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of compliance
Overall Treatment Compliance According to the Patient Diary
percentage of complianceClonidine Lauriad® 50 µgClonidine Lauriad® 100 µgPlacebo Lauriad®Clonidine Lauriad® Muco-adhesive Buccal Tablets Pooled
Overall Treatment Compliance According to the Patient Diary94.28 ± 8.2393.12 ± 11.8996.12 ± 5.5993.66 ± 10.34

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Clonidine Lauriad® 50µg—16/55 (29.1%)48/55 (87.3%)
Clonidine Lauriad® 100µg—21/64 (32.8%)60/64 (93.8%)
Placebo Lauriad®—14/62 (22.6%)61/62 (98.4%)
Clonidine Lauriad® Muco-adhesive Buccal Tablets Pooled—37/119 (31.1%)108/119 (90.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 46
Most frequent serious events
EventClonidine Lauriad® 50µgClonidine Lauriad® 100µgPlacebo Lauriad®Clonidine Lauriad® Muco-adhesive Buccal Tablets Pooled
General physical health deteriorationGeneral disorders4/551/640/625/119
StomatitisGastrointestinal disorders2/554/642/626/119
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/552/643/623/119
Renal failureRenal and urinary disorders1/553/643/624/119
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders1/553/640/624/119
DysphagiaGastrointestinal disorders2/552/642/624/119
InfectionInfections and infestations2/551/640/623/119
HypotensionVascular disorders2/550/640/622/119
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/552/640/622/119
MalnutritionMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/552/641/622/119
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 45
Most frequent other events
EventClonidine Lauriad® 50µgClonidine Lauriad® 100µgPlacebo Lauriad®Clonidine Lauriad® Muco-adhesive Buccal Tablets Pooled
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders29/5529/6444/6258/119
DysphagiaGastrointestinal disorders18/5519/6429/6237/119
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders22/5517/6417/6239/119
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders14/5515/6424/6229/119
Radiation skin injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications14/5522/6424/6236/119
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders18/5517/6416/6235/119
Oral painGastrointestinal disorders16/5519/6416/6235/119
Abnormal loss of weightMetabolism and nutrition disorders4/5511/6417/6215/119
DysgeusiaGastrointestinal disorders14/5511/6412/6225/119
AstheniaGeneral disorders9/5511/6414/6220/119

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Clonidine Lauriad® 50 µgClonidine Lauriad® 100 µgPlacebo Lauriad®Total
Median58.8 (30 to 79)55.7 (22 to 75)56.6 (33 to 72)57.3 (22 to 79)
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)Clonidine Lauriad® 50 µgClonidine Lauriad® 100 µgPlacebo Lauriad®Total
18 to 64 years435850151
65 to 84 years1371232
85 years and over0000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Clonidine Lauriad® 50 µgClonidine Lauriad® 100 µgPlacebo Lauriad®Total
Female16161345
Male404949138
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)Clonidine Lauriad® 50 µgClonidine Lauriad® 100 µgPlacebo Lauriad®Total
Caucasian536159173
Other2439
Black1001
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Clonidine Lauriad® 50 µgClonidine Lauriad® 100 µgPlacebo Lauriad®Total
Hungary1304
United States0246
France31273088
Switzerland0202
Germany10111031
Spain14201852
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Score
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Score(participants)Clonidine Lauriad® 50 µgClonidine Lauriad® 100 µgPlacebo Lauriad®Total
Score 0424142125
Score 114222056
Score 20202
Disease location
Disease location(participants)Clonidine Lauriad® 50 µgClonidine Lauriad® 100 µgPlacebo Lauriad®Total
Oral cavity26373093
Oropharynx19172157
Hypopharynx4228
Larynx46515
Oral cavity/oropharynx0112
Oral cavity/hypopharynx0112
Oral cavity/larynx1001
Oropharynx/hypopharynx2114
Oropharynx/larynx0011
Disease location in oral cavity or oropharynx
Disease location in oral cavity or oropharynx(participants)Clonidine Lauriad® 50 µgClonidine Lauriad® 100 µgPlacebo Lauriad®Total
Yes485755160
No88723

9 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

51 sites
  • 21st Century Oncology of Arizona
    Sun City, Arizona 85251, United States
  • Compassionate Cancer Care Medical Group
    Corona, California 92879, United States
  • City of Hope
    Duarte, California 91010, United States
  • California Cancer Associates for Researche and Excellence
    Fresno, California 93720, United States
  • Compassionate Cancer Care Medical Group
    Riverside, California 92501, United States
  • Central Coast Medical Oncology Corp.
    Santa Maria, California 93454, United States
  • Centura Health Research Center
    Denver, Colorado 80210, United States
  • University of Connectcut Health Center
    Farmington, Connecticut 06030, United States
  • AMPM Research Clinic
    Miami, Florida 33145, United States
  • Barbara Ann Karmonos Cancer Hospital
    Detroit, Michigan 48201, United States
  • Washington University School of medecine
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Billings Clinic Montana
    Billings, Montana 59101, United States
  • Winthrop University Hospital
    Mineola, New York 11501, United States
  • Montefiore Medical Center
    The Bronx, New York 10467, United States
  • Carolinas Medical Center- Carolinas Health Care System
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28203, United States
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States
  • Penn State Hershey Cancer Institut
    Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, United States
  • Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
  • Hospital Jean Minjoz
    Besançon, 25030, France
  • CHU Morvan
    Brest, 29000, France
  • Centre François Baclesse
    Caen, 14000, France
  • Clinique Pasteur
    Evreux, 27000, France
  • Centre Oscar Lambret
    Lille, 59000, France
  • Clinique Chénieux
    Limoges, 87000, France
  • Clinique Hartmann
    Neuilly-sur-Seine, 92200, France
  • CH Lyon Sud
    Pierre-Bénite, 69495, France
  • CHU La Milétrie
    Poitiers, 86000, France
  • CHP St gregoire
    Saint gregoire, 35760, France
  • Centre de Cancérologie Etienne-Dolet
    Saint-Nazaire, 44600, France
  • Hôpital Bretonneau
    Tours, 37000, France
  • Institut Gustave Roussy
    Villejuif, 94805, France
  • Universitatsklinikum Erlangen Strahlenklinik
    Erlangen, 91054, Germany
  • Universitatsklinikum Essen
    Essen, 45147, Germany
  • Universitatsklinikum Freiburg Klinik fur Strahlentherapie
    Freiburg, 79106, Germany
  • Universitatsklinikum Leipzig
    Leipzig, 04103, Germany
  • Paracelsius- Klinik
    Osnabruck, 49076, Germany
  • Bács-Kiskun Megyei Kórház Szegedi Tudományegyetem Általános Orvostudományi Kar Oktató Kórháza
    Kecskemét, Nyíri u. 38 6000, Hungary
  • Jósa András Oktatókórház Egészségügyi Szolgáltató Nonprofit Kft.
    Nyíregyháza, Szent István út 68 4400, Hungary
  • Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén Megyei Kórház és Egyetemi Oktató Kórház
    Miskolc,, Szentpéteri kapu 72-76 3526, Hungary
  • Szent Imre Kórház
    Budapest, Tétényi út 12-16. 1115, Hungary
  • Hospital Vall d'Hebron
    Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario de La princesa
    Madrid, 28006, Spain
  • Hospital Clinico San Carlos
    Madrid, 28040, Spain
  • Hospital 12 de octubre
    Madrid, 28041, Spain
  • Hospital Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda
    Madrid, 28222, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Ramon y cajal
    Madrid, Spain
  • Hospital Carlos Haya
    Malaga, 29010, Spain
  • Hospital Virgen de la Victoria
    Malaga, 29010, Spain
  • Hospital de Navarra
    Pamplona, Spain
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
    Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 28, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01385748
Lead sponsor
Valerio Therapeutics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 30, 2011
Start date
Apr 2010
Primary completion
Oct 2014
Completion
Dec 2014
Results posted
Aug 9, 2017
Last update
Nov 28, 2017

Study contacts

Bérangère Vasseur, MD
study director · Valerio Therapeutics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion