CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00267748Updated Sep 5, 2011Results posted

Sunitinib Malate Schedule 4/2 vs. Sunitinib Malate Continuous Dosing As First-Line Therapy For Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer (RCC)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Sunitinib Malate Continuous Daily Dosing and Sunitinib Malate Schedule 4/2 in Carcinoma, Renal Cell, sponsored by Pfizer. Completed at 159 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-09-05.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
317
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This trial has two parts. The purpose of the first part of the trial is to determine the doses of 2 drugs, sunitinib malate and interferon alfa-2b, that can be given safely in combination. This part is currently closed to enrollment.

The purpose of the second part of the trial is to see if sunitinib malate given on a 4/2 schedule (4 weeks on treatment, 2 weeks off treatment cycle) is any better at delaying progression of renal cell cancer than sunitinib malate given on a continuous dosing schedule. The trial will also determine the number of patients whose cancer responds to the treatments, whether life of patients can be extended, what the side effects are of the treatments, how bothersome disease or treatment-related symptoms are to patients, and whether tests can be found that will predict which patients may or may not respond to these treatments in the future.

02

Conditions studied

  • Carcinoma, Renal Cell
03

In context

Carcinoma, Renal Cell

1,965 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Renal Cell; 378 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 317 is above the median of 42 across 1,480 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Renal Cell.

Browse Carcinoma, Renal Cell studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,244 studies on the registry; 139 are open to participants now.

Of its 582 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 381 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Advanced renal cell carcinoma of clear cell origin or a component of clear cell histology.
  • Measurable disease

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior systemic therapy of any kind for advanced renal cell cancer
  • History of brain metastases
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
317 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    C

    Drug: Sunitinib Malate Continuous Daily Dosing

  • Experimental
    A

    Drug: Sunitinib Malate Schedule 4/2

Interventions

  • DrugSunitinib Malate Continuous Daily Dosing

    Sunitinib malate starting dose 37.5 mg daily continuous daily regimen.

  • DrugSunitinib Malate Schedule 4/2

    Sunitinib malate starting dose 50 mg per day for four weeks, followed by a two week off-drug period. This six week cycle is repeated.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Tumor Progression (TTP) Assessed Using Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) Prognostic Factors Model

    MSKCC Prognostic Factor Model assessed as low(0),intermediate(1-2) or high(=\>3) based on number of criteria present such as Karnofsky performance status \< 80 %, Lactate dehydrogenase \> 1.5 \* Upper limit of Normal,Hemoglobin \< lower limit of normal, serum calcium \> 10 mg/dL;Time from first diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma to start of systemic therapy of \< 1 year.TTP was time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer.TTP was calculated as (first event date minus date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.44.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)

    Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Confirmed responses are those that persist on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR are defined as the disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR are those with atleast 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years

  2. Duration of Response (DR)

    Time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 30.44. DR was calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years

  3. Overall Survival (OS) Assessed Using MSKCC Prognostic Factors Model

    MSKCC Prognostic Factor Model assessed as low (0), intermediate (1-2) or high (=\>3) based upon number of criteria present. Criteria as follows: Karnofsky performance status \< 80 %, Lactate dehydrogenase \> 1.5 \* Upper limit of Normal, Hemoglobin \< lower limit of normal for local lab, Corrected serum calcium \> 10 mg/dL; Time from first diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma to start of systemic therapy of \< 1 year. OS was defined as time from date of start of treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS, in months, was calculated as (event date -start of treatment date + 1)/30.44.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years

Other outcomes

  1. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)

    FACT-G is core questionnaire of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system to evaluate quality of life (QoL) in cancer population.FACT-G consisted of 27 questions grouped in 4 domains of general Health-Related QoL(HRQoL):Physical Well-being(PWB),Social/Family Well-Being (SWB),Emotional Well-Being (EWB) and Functional Well-Being (FWB);each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) so that FACT-G ranged between 0-108.Since questions could be reversed coded, as appropriate, before calculating FACT-G,0 and 108 could be considered worst and best health states.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years

  2. FACT-Kidney Symptom Index for Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS)

    FKSI-DRS is a subset of FKSI which is a questionnaire for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy -Kidney Symptom Index used to assess QoL/participant-reported outcomes for participants diagnosed with renal cell cancer. The FKSI contained 15 questions and the FKSI-DRS consisted of 9 questions each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) so that FKSI-DRS ranged between 0-36. Since the questions could be reversed coded, as appropriate, before calculating FKSI-DRS, 0 and 36 could be considered the worst and best health states based on the 9 questions comprising FKSI-DRS.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years

07

Results

Posted Sep 5, 2011

Participant flow

Non-randomized Period
Participant flow — Non-randomized Period
MilestoneSunitinib 37.5 mg + Interferon Alpha-2bSunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)Sunitinib 37.5 mg
Started2500
Completed200
Not completed2300
Withdrew: Progressive disease1000
Withdrew: Adverse event800
Withdrew: Death100
Withdrew: Participant not willing to participate100
Withdrew: Other300
Randomized Period
Participant flow — Randomized Period
MilestoneSunitinib 37.5 mg + Interferon Alpha-2bSunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)Sunitinib 37.5 mg
Started0146146
Treated0146143
Completed01914
Not completed0127132
Withdrew: Death023
Withdrew: Adverse event02325
Withdrew: Global deterioration of health status067
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up010
Withdrew: Objective progression or relapse07786
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject092
Withdrew: Other096
Withdrew: Randomized but not treated003

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime to Tumor Progression (TTP) Assessed Using Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) Prognostic Factors Model

MSKCC Prognostic Factor Model assessed as low(0),intermediate(1-2) or high(=\>3) based on number of criteria present such as Karnofsky performance status \< 80 %, Lactate dehydrogenase \> 1.5 \* Upper limit of Normal,Hemoglobin \< lower limit of normal, serum calcium \> 10 mg/dL;Time from first diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma to start of systemic therapy of \< 1 year.TTP was time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer.TTP was calculated as (first event date minus date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.44.

Time frame:
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years
Reported as:
Median · Months
Time to Tumor Progression (TTP) Assessed Using Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) Prognostic Factors Model
MonthsSunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)Sunitinib 37.5 mg
Stratified analysis : High Risk (=>3)3.1 (0.5 to 10.4)4.4 (1.4 to 7.1)
Stratified analysis : Intermediate Risk (1-2)8.0 (5.1 to 11.1)7.1 (5.5 to 10.0)
Stratified analysis : Low Risk (0)20.7 (9.9 to 25.2)8.4 (7.0 to 21.0)
Overall unstratified analysis9.9 (7.0 to 13.4)7.1 (6.8 to 9.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) vs Sunitinib 37.5 mg · Log Rank · p = 0.860 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.089 · 95% CI 0.423 to 2.803
  • Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) vs Sunitinib 37.5 mg · Log Rank · p = 0.583 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.902 · 95% CI 0.623 to 1.306
  • Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) vs Sunitinib 37.5 mg · Log Rank · p = 0.075 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.556 · 95% CI 0.288 to 1.074
  • Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) vs Sunitinib 37.5 mg · Log Rank · p = 0.220 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.827 · 95% CI 0.609 to 1.124
  • Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) vs Sunitinib 37.5 mg · Log Rank · p = 0.090 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.773 · 95% CI 0.572 to 1.044
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)

Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Confirmed responses are those that persist on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR are defined as the disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR are those with atleast 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.

Time frame:
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)
Percentage of participantsSunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)Sunitinib 37.5 mg
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)32.2 (24.7 to 40.4)28.1 (21.0 to 36.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) vs Sunitinib 37.5 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.444 · Mean difference (net): 4.110 · 95% CI -6.4 to 14.6
SecondaryDuration of Response (DR)

Time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 30.44. DR was calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response.

Time frame:
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years
Reported as:
Median · Months
Duration of Response (DR)
MonthsSunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)Sunitinib 37.5 mg
Duration of Response (DR)12.5 (1.9 to 23.4)8.7 (1.2 to 22.4)
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS) Assessed Using MSKCC Prognostic Factors Model

MSKCC Prognostic Factor Model assessed as low (0), intermediate (1-2) or high (=\>3) based upon number of criteria present. Criteria as follows: Karnofsky performance status \< 80 %, Lactate dehydrogenase \> 1.5 \* Upper limit of Normal, Hemoglobin \< lower limit of normal for local lab, Corrected serum calcium \> 10 mg/dL; Time from first diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma to start of systemic therapy of \< 1 year. OS was defined as time from date of start of treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS, in months, was calculated as (event date -start of treatment date + 1)/30.44.

Time frame:
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years
Reported as:
Median · Months
Overall Survival (OS) Assessed Using MSKCC Prognostic Factors Model
MonthsSunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)Sunitinib 37.5 mg
High Risk (equal or more than 3)3.5 (1.1 to 21.2)6.1 (3.6 to 15.1)
Intermediate Risk (1-2)19.3 (14.0 to 24.7)21.8 (14.5 to NA)
Low Risk (0)NA (24.4 to NA)28.9 (28.9 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) vs Sunitinib 37.5 mg · Log Rank · p = 0.866 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.071 · 95% CI 0.481 to 2.387
  • Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) vs Sunitinib 37.5 mg · Log Rank · p = 0.439 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.169 · 95% CI 0.785 to 1.741
  • Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) vs Sunitinib 37.5 mg · Log Rank · p = 0.614 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.238 · 95% CI 0.538 to 2.851
  • Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) vs Sunitinib 37.5 mg · Log Rank · p = 0.365 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.162 · 95% CI 0.838 to 1.612
Other pre-specifiedFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)

FACT-G is core questionnaire of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system to evaluate quality of life (QoL) in cancer population.FACT-G consisted of 27 questions grouped in 4 domains of general Health-Related QoL(HRQoL):Physical Well-being(PWB),Social/Family Well-Being (SWB),Emotional Well-Being (EWB) and Functional Well-Being (FWB);each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) so that FACT-G ranged between 0-108.Since questions could be reversed coded, as appropriate, before calculating FACT-G,0 and 108 could be considered worst and best health states.

Time frame:
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)
Units on a scaleSunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)Sunitinib 37.5 mg
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)78.0 ± 15.977.0 ± 17.1
Statistical analysis
  • Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) vs Sunitinib 37.5 mg · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.6737
Other pre-specifiedFACT-Kidney Symptom Index for Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS)

FKSI-DRS is a subset of FKSI which is a questionnaire for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy -Kidney Symptom Index used to assess QoL/participant-reported outcomes for participants diagnosed with renal cell cancer. The FKSI contained 15 questions and the FKSI-DRS consisted of 9 questions each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) so that FKSI-DRS ranged between 0-36. Since the questions could be reversed coded, as appropriate, before calculating FKSI-DRS, 0 and 36 could be considered the worst and best health states based on the 9 questions comprising FKSI-DRS.

Time frame:
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years
Reported as:
Mean · Units on scale
FACT-Kidney Symptom Index for Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS)
Units on scaleSunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)Sunitinib 37.5 mg
FACT-Kidney Symptom Index for Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS)28.3 ± 5.627.2 ± 5.9
Statistical analysis
  • Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) vs Sunitinib 37.5 mg · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.1967

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sunitinib 37.5 mg + Interferon Alpha-2b—7/25 (28%)25/25 (100%)
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)—50/146 (34.2%)144/146 (98.6%)
Sunitinib 37.5 mg—54/143 (37.8%)142/143 (99.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 106
Most frequent serious events
EventSunitinib 37.5 mg + Interferon Alpha-2bSunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)Sunitinib 37.5 mg
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/256/14612/143
Disease progressionGeneral disorders0/257/14611/143
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/253/1462/143
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders1/250/1460/143
Gastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders1/253/1463/143
CholecystitisHepatobiliary disorders1/251/1462/143
Haemoglobin decreasedInvestigations1/250/1460/143
HypercalcaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/252/1460/143
HypocalcaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/250/1460/143
HypoglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/250/1462/143
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 83
Most frequent other events
EventSunitinib 37.5 mg + Interferon Alpha-2bSunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)Sunitinib 37.5 mg
FatigueGeneral disorders25/2594/146100/143
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders20/2585/14698/143
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders14/2591/14676/143
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders14/2524/14619/143
StomatitisGastrointestinal disorders13/2532/14633/143
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders11/2546/14659/143
DyspepsiaGastrointestinal disorders10/2537/14636/143
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders10/2529/14626/143
DysgeusiaNervous system disorders7/2555/14649/143
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders9/2535/14628/143

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(Years)Sunitinib 37.5 mg + Interferon Alpha-2bSunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)Sunitinib 37.5 mgTotal
Mean62.4 ± 7.260.4 ± 9.864.3 ± 9.762.4 ± 9.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Sunitinib 37.5 mg + Interferon Alpha-2bSunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)Sunitinib 37.5 mgTotal
Female54557107
Male2010189210
08

Study locations

159 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Hot Springs, Arkansas 71913, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Anaheim, California 92807, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Baldwin Park, California 91706, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Bellflower, California 90706, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Duarte, California 91010, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Fontana, California 92335, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Irvine, California 92618, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Los Angeles, California 90027, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Los Angeles, California 90034, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Panorama City, California 91402, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Riverside, California 92505, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    San Diego, California 92108, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    San Diego, California 92120, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Woodland Hills, California 91365, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Aurora, Colorado 80012, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Boulder, Colorado 80303, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Boulder, Colorado 80304, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80909, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Denver, Colorado 80218, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Denver, Colorado 80220, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Lakewood, Colorado 80228, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Littleton, Colorado 80120, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Lone Tree, Colorado 80124, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Longmont, Colorado 80501, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Parker, Colorado 80138, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Pueblo, Colorado 81008, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Thorton, Colorado 80260, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Norwich, Connecticut 06360, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Newark, Delaware 19713, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Newark, Delaware 19718, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Wilmington, Delaware 19899, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Boca Raton, Florida 33486, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Delray Beach, Florida 33484, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Lakeland, Florida 33805, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Columbus, Georgia 31902, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Columbus, Georgia 31904, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Boise, Idaho 83712, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Elkhart, Indiana 46514, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Jefferson, Indiana 47130, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Kokomo, Indiana 46902-3803, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    La Porte, Indiana 46350, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    LaPorte, Indiana 46350-5533, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    LaPorte, Indiana 46350, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Michigan City, Indiana 46360, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Plymouth, Indiana 46563, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    South Bend, Indiana 46601, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    South Bend, Indiana 46617, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52402, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Lexington, Kentucky 40536-0293, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Lexington, Kentucky 40536, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Louisville, Kentucky 40207, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Louisville, Kentucky 40217, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Shelbyville, Kentucky 40065, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70809, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Covington, Louisiana 70433, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Gretna, Louisiana 70056, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Marrero, Louisiana 70072, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Metairie, Louisiana 70006, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70115, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Shreveport, Louisiana 71103, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Baltimore, Maryland 21237, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Bethesda, Maryland 20817, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Holland, Michigan 49424, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Niles, Michigan 49120, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Saint Joseph, Michigan 49085, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    St. Joseph, Michigan 49085-2112, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    St. Joseph, Michigan 49085-2158, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    St. Joseph, Michigan 49085, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    St. Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Washington, Missouri 63090, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Henderson, Nevada 89052, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89128, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89135, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89148, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89169, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-0001, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Farmington, New Mexico 87401-5631, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Albany, New York 12206, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Albany, New York 12208, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Amsterdam, New York 12010, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Brockport, New York 14420, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Canadaigua, New York 14424, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Geneva, New York 14456, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Hudson, New York 12534, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Latham, New York 12110, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    New York, New York 10022, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Rexford, New York 12148, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Rochester, New York 14623, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Rochester, New York 14626, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Troy, New York 12180, United States

Showing the first 100 of 159 sites.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • de Velasco G, McKay RR, Lin X, Moreira RB, Simantov R, Choueiri TK. Comprehensive Analysis of Survival Outcomes in Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated in Clinical Trials. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Dec;15(6):652-660.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 21. PubMed 28410911 ↗
  • Grunwald V, Lin X, Kalanovic D, Simantov R. Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):1006-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 May 26. PubMed 27238653 ↗
  • Grunwald V, McKay RR, Krajewski KM, Kalanovic D, Lin X, Perkins JJ, Simantov R, Choueiri TK. Depth of remission is a prognostic factor for survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):952-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.036. Epub 2015 Jan 7. PubMed 25577718 ↗
  • Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Hudes GR, Figlin RA, Martini JF, English PA, Huang X, Valota O, Williams JA. Investigation of novel circulating proteins, germ line single-nucleotide polymorphisms, and molecular tumor markers as potential efficacy biomarkers of first-line sunitinib therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014 Oct;74(4):739-50. doi: 10.1007/s00280-014-2539-0. Epub 2014 Aug 7. PubMed 25100134 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 5, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00267748
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
First posted
Dec 21, 2005
Start date
Dec 2005
Primary completion
Jun 2010
Completion
Jun 2010
Results posted
Sep 5, 2011
Last update
Sep 5, 2011

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion