CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00262860Updated May 9, 2016Results posted

Bortezomib and Gemcitabine Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin's Lymphoma

A Phase 2 interventional study of bortezomib and gemcitabine hydrochloride in Lymphoma, sponsored by University of Rochester. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 120 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-05-09.

Sponsored by University of Rochester · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 120 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

RATIONALE: Bortezomib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine hydrochloride, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving bortezomib together with gemcitabine hydrochloride may kill more cancer cells.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well giving bortezomib together with gemcitabine hydrochloride works in treating patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Determine the overall response rate (partial and complete response) in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with bortezomib and gemcitabine hydrochloride.

Secondary

  • Determine the safety and toxic effects of this regimen in these patients.
  • Determine the time to progression in patients treated with this regimen.
  • Correlate NF-kB inhibition and proteasome activity with response in patients treated with this regimen.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, pilot study.

Patients receive bortezomib IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 and gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8. Treatment repeats every 21 days for up to 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for 2 years and then annually thereafter.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 24 patients will be accrued for this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lymphoma

Keywords

  • recurrent adult Hodgkin lymphoma
03

In context

Lymphoma

5,578 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphoma; 825 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 40 across 4,508 interventional studies indexed under Lymphoma.

Browse Lymphoma studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Rochester is the lead sponsor of 715 studies on the registry; 116 are open to participants now.

Of its 56 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 44 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 120 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed Hodgkin's lymphoma

    • Recurrent or refractory disease after prior standard combination chemotherapy
  • Measurable disease, defined as ≥ 1 unidimensionally measurable lesion > 1 cm by physical exam or imaging studies
  • No history of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
  • No history of other hematological malignancy

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Performance status

  • ECOG 0-2

Life expectancy

  • Not specified

Hematopoietic

  • Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm\^3
  • Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,000/mm\^3

Hepatic

  • Bilirubin ≤ 2 times upper limit of normal (ULN) (unless due to Gilbert's disease or involvement by Hodgkin's lymphoma)
  • AST ≤ 3 times ULN (unless due to involvement by Hodgkin's lymphoma)

Renal

  • Creatinine clearance ≥ 30 mL/min

Cardiovascular

  • Ejection fraction ≥ 40% by MUGA or echocardiogram (in patients with a history of cardiac disease)

Pulmonary

  • Must not require supplemental oxygen therapy

Immunologic

  • No known HIV infection
  • No uncontrolled bacterial, viral, or fungal infection

Other

  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception
  • No other malignancy requiring therapy
  • No peripheral neuropathy ≥ grade 2 within the past 14 days
  • No hypersensitivity to boron
  • No hypersensitivity to mannitol

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy

  • More than 30 days since prior monoclonal antibody therapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma
  • More than 6 months since prior autologous stem cell transplantation
  • No prior allogeneic stem cell transplantation
  • No concurrent sargramostim (GM-CSF)
  • No concurrent pegfilgrastim or filgrastim (G-CSF)
  • No concurrent interleukin-11(oprelvekin)

Chemotherapy

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • More than 30 days since prior chemotherapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma
  • No prior treatment with gemcitabine hydrochloride

Endocrine therapy

  • More than 30 days since prior corticosteroid therapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma
  • No concurrent corticosteroid therapy

Radiotherapy

  • More than 30 days since prior radiotherapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma

Other

  • No prior treatment with bortezomib
  • More than 14 days since prior investigational drugs
  • No other concurrent investigational agents
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bortezomib, Gemcitabine Hdrochloride

    Drug: bortezomib · Drug: gemcitabine hydrochloride

Interventions

  • Drugbortezomib
  • Druggemcitabine hydrochloride
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Response Rate After 2 Courses of Therapy

    Response was evaluated after two cycles of therapy using the 1999 Cheson response criteria. All responses were based on CT scans. The criteria that were developed include anatomic definitions of response, with normal lymph node size after treatment of 1.5 cm in the longest transverse diameter by computer-assisted tomography scan. A designation of complete response/unconfirmed was adopted to include patients with a greater than 75% reduction in tumor size after therapy but with a residual mass, to include patients-especially those with large-cell NHL-who may not have residual disease. For patients who had FDG-PET imaging, metabolic response was defined as a decrease in the standardized uptake value in target lesions (regions of abnormal FDG uptake on pretreatment FDG-PET images) to below three on posttreatment FDG-PET imaging). All PET scans were reviewed and interpreted by a single radiologist (SV).

    Time frame: 21 Days/course for up to 2 courses

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Proteasome Activity Compared to Baseline (Cycle 1)

    Peripheral blood (40 ml) was collected on cycle 1, day 1 of prebortezomib at baseline and 2 hrs post-bortezomib treatment. The samples were refrigerated at 4C and processed within 36 h of collection. Frozen cell lysates were thawed and the proteasome activity in 10 microliters was determined using a spectroflourometric 20S proteasome assay kit. Samples were run in triplicate on two separate days. The percent change between baseline and 2 hrs (day1, cycle 1) was calculated.

    Time frame: baseline to 2 hours

  2. Change in Proteasome Activity Compared to Baseline (Cycle 2)

    Peripheral blood (40 ml) was collected at baseline and 1-2 weeks after cycle 2, day 11 post-bortezomib treatment. The samples were refrigerated at 4C and processed within 36 h of collection. Frozen cell lysates were thawed and the proteasome activity in 10 microliters was determined using a spectroflourometric 20S proteasome assay kit. Samples were run in triplicate on two separate days. The percent change between baseline and 2 hrs (day1, cycle 1) was calculated.

    Time frame: baseline and 1-2 weeks after cycle 2, day 11

07

Results

Posted Mar 28, 2016
Limitations and caveats
Trial was stopped early by the Data Safety Monitoring Committee due to unexpected toxicity with no improvement in the response rate compared with gemcitabine alone. Trial was prespecified to be stopped early if these criteria were met.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBortezomib, Gemcitabine Hydrochloride
Started18
Completed16
Not completed2
Withdrew: Adverse event2

Outcome measures

PrimaryResponse Rate After 2 Courses of Therapy

Response was evaluated after two cycles of therapy using the 1999 Cheson response criteria. All responses were based on CT scans. The criteria that were developed include anatomic definitions of response, with normal lymph node size after treatment of 1.5 cm in the longest transverse diameter by computer-assisted tomography scan. A designation of complete response/unconfirmed was adopted to include patients with a greater than 75% reduction in tumor size after therapy but with a residual mass, to include patients-especially those with large-cell NHL-who may not have residual disease. For patients who had FDG-PET imaging, metabolic response was defined as a decrease in the standardized uptake value in target lesions (regions of abnormal FDG uptake on pretreatment FDG-PET images) to below three on posttreatment FDG-PET imaging). All PET scans were reviewed and interpreted by a single radiologist (SV).

Time frame:
21 Days/course for up to 2 courses
Reported as:
Number · participants
Response Rate After 2 Courses of Therapy
participantsBortezomib, Gemcitabine Hydrochloride
Response Rate After 2 Courses of Therapy4
SecondaryChange in Proteasome Activity Compared to Baseline (Cycle 1)

Peripheral blood (40 ml) was collected on cycle 1, day 1 of prebortezomib at baseline and 2 hrs post-bortezomib treatment. The samples were refrigerated at 4C and processed within 36 h of collection. Frozen cell lysates were thawed and the proteasome activity in 10 microliters was determined using a spectroflourometric 20S proteasome assay kit. Samples were run in triplicate on two separate days. The percent change between baseline and 2 hrs (day1, cycle 1) was calculated.

Time frame:
baseline to 2 hours
Reported as:
Median · Percentage of change in proteosome activ
Change in Proteasome Activity Compared to Baseline (Cycle 1)
Percentage of change in proteosome activBortezomib, Gemcitabine Hydrochloride
Change in Proteasome Activity Compared to Baseline (Cycle 1)-50 (-77 to 39)
SecondaryChange in Proteasome Activity Compared to Baseline (Cycle 2)

Peripheral blood (40 ml) was collected at baseline and 1-2 weeks after cycle 2, day 11 post-bortezomib treatment. The samples were refrigerated at 4C and processed within 36 h of collection. Frozen cell lysates were thawed and the proteasome activity in 10 microliters was determined using a spectroflourometric 20S proteasome assay kit. Samples were run in triplicate on two separate days. The percent change between baseline and 2 hrs (day1, cycle 1) was calculated.

Time frame:
baseline and 1-2 weeks after cycle 2, day 11
Reported as:
Median · percentage of change in proteosome activ
Change in Proteasome Activity Compared to Baseline (Cycle 2)
percentage of change in proteosome activBortezomib, Gemcitabine Hydrochloride
Change in Proteasome Activity Compared to Baseline (Cycle 2)-57 (-92 to 223)

Adverse events

Collected over days 1 and 8 of each cycle of therapy, up to 2 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Bortezomib, Gemcitabine Hydrochloride—5/18 (27.8%)18/18 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent serious events
EventBortezomib, Gemcitabine Hydrochloride
neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders5/18
leukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/18
elevated transaminasesHepatobiliary disorders3/18
thrombocytompeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/18
hyperglycemiaVascular disorders1/18
abdominal pain/crampsGeneral disorders1/18
lymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/18
headache/migraineNervous system disorders1/18
sepsisInfections and infestations1/18
DVT near lineVascular disorders1/18
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventBortezomib, Gemcitabine Hydrochloride
thrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders8/18
anemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders8/18
leukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders7/18
painGeneral disorders7/18
hypocalcemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders6/18
neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders5/18
elevated transaminasesHepatobiliary disorders4/18
hyperglycemiaEndocrine disorders3/18
abdominal pain/crampsGastrointestinal disorders2/18

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Bortezomib, Gemcitabine Hydrochloride
Median36 (19 to 62)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Bortezomib, Gemcitabine Hydrochloride
Female10
Male8
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)Bortezomib, Gemcitabine Hydrochloride
White16
Black2
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Bortezomib, Gemcitabine Hydrochloride
United States18
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center at Dana Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • James P. Wilmot Cancer Center at University of Rochester Medical Center
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Mendler JH, Kelly J, Voci S, Marquis D, Rich L, Rossi RM, Bernstein SH, Jordan CT, Liesveld J, Fisher RI, Friedberg JW. Bortezomib and gemcitabine in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2008 Oct;19(10):1759-64. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn365. Epub 2008 May 25. PubMed 18504251 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 9, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00262860
Lead sponsor
University of Rochester
Responsible party
Jonathan Friedberg (Professor, University of Rochester) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 7, 2005
Start date
Apr 2005
Primary completion
May 2008
Results posted
Mar 28, 2016
Last update
May 9, 2016

Study contacts

Jonathan W. Friedberg, MD
principal investigator · James P. Wilmot Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion