An interventional study of Daptomycin 6mg/kg/day in Fasciitis, Necrotizing, Severe Necrotizing Skin and Soft Tissue Infections and Fournier's Gangrene, sponsored by University of Maryland, Baltimore. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-27.
Sponsored by University of Maryland, Baltimore · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Daptomycin is a new antimicrobial agent which has activity against resistant Gram positive cocci including MRSA. The phase 3 clinical trials for skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) with Staphylococci and Streptococci have already demonstrated that daptomycin was noninferior to the comparator agent (vancomycin or beta-lactams) (10). Although this clinical trial did not include any patients with clostridial infection, there is in vitro data to support the activity of daptomycin against a variety of clostridial species(11) ( Clostridium perfringens) Therefore, for this trial we will include patients with clostridial infections with this species. Additionally, the patients in the SSTI study were not as ill as the proposed study population. Therefore for treatment of such severe infections, we would like to use a higher dose of daptomycin (6mg/kg/dose). The reasons for using a higher dose of daptomycin in this subgroup are as follows:
Therefore for optimal treatment of necrotizing fasciitis, it is justifiable that we should use the higher dose of daptomycin.
Objective:
To evaluate the clinical and microbiological efficacy and safety of higher dose daptomycin therapy in the treatment of patients with severe necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections.
Type of Study:
Open label, single center study.
At the shock trauma center, the management of patients with NSTI is conducted in the following fashion: All new patients with NSTI are admitted to the trauma center through the 12-bed shock trauma admitting area. Full hemodynamic resuscitation is undertaken. The on-call soft-tissue and infection team is mobilized. Standard investigations, radiographic evaluations, and laboratory tests, including gram stain and culture specimens, are obtained. The University of Maryland Medical Systems/shock trauma laboratory is utilized for hematology, biochemical, and bacteriologic studies. Aggressive empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy is instituted. The standard antibiotic therapy for NSTI's at shock trauma includes the following:
Gram negative rods: Piperacillin/Tazobactam or quinolones or aztreonam /
The patient is taken to the shock trauma operating room for debulking of infected tissue (excision and debridement) and reculturing. Postoperatively, the patient is moved to a critical or intensive care unit for further management and monitoring. When the patient is stable, HBO is begun within 12 hours of arrival. Once the patient is enrolled in the study the following procedures will be followed:
Antibiotic Therapy:
Once the patient is consented, the antibiotic therapy will be started. The combination regimen will include the following drugs in standard approved dosing.
Gram positive bacteria: Daptomycin For all patients the recommended dose of Daptomycin will be 6 mgm/kg/day administered over 30 minutes. A pharmacokinetic study performed in obese patients demonstrated that daptomycin could be dosed based on total body weight. No adjustment in daptomycin dose should be required based solely on obesity (12). Any patient who develops a decrease in renal function during the study to the point where his/her creatinine clearance (CrCl) falls below 30 mL/min would have their dose adjusted to 6 mg/kg every 48 hours, the interval recommended by the package insert. This includes patients who go on to require conventional hemodialysis. Since there are no data available on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of daptomycin in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and therefore no recommendation for dosage adjustment, these patients would be removed from the study and initiated on a standard of care regimen . Treatment duration will be 7-14 days.
At various intervals, the following information will be collected or procedures will be followed: (See attached study schedule) Baseline
At various intervals, the following procedures will be followed:.
The End points of the study are as follows:
Clinical Response at the end of treatment (7-14 days) and test of cure (3-28 days) post end of treatment):
Unable to Evaluate: Unable to determine response; e.g., no evaluation performed at the time point, or administration of non-study antibiotics effective against a study pathogen.
* Clinically significant signs and symptoms are:
Microbiological Response at End of Treatment and Test of Cure Visit:
Patients will also be monitored for 3 - 28 days post therapy.
Analysis Because of the small sample size (25 patients) stated above, this study will serve as a preliminary study to obtain data to evaluate the presence of positive trends in terms of outcome in the patients treated with Daptomycin. If favorable, this would warrant a larger prospective controlled study in which a larger sample size would allow for a more robust statistical analysis. Variables in the initial analysis will include antibiotic days, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay and mortality.
28 studies on the registry are indexed under Fasciitis, Necrotizing; 8 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 74 across 12 interventional studies indexed under Fasciitis, Necrotizing.
Browse Fasciitis, Necrotizing studies →University of Maryland, Baltimore is the lead sponsor of 700 studies on the registry; 132 are open to participants now.
Of its 92 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 66 (72%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
Inclusion criteria :
A) At least three of the following clinical signs and symptoms of local infection should be present:
B) At least 1 of the two systemic conditions should be present:
Positive gram stain or wound culture obtained within 3 calendar days prior to the first dose of Daptomycin.
Exclusion criteria:
Criteria for withdrawal from the study:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
Creatinine clearance (CrCl)
How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ULN (upper limit of normal)
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
It was a single arm study with higher dose of daptomycin used for patients with severe skin and soft tissue infections.
Drug: Daptomycin 6mg/kg/day
Drug page: Daptomycin
Clinical Response to High Dose Daptomycin Therapy at End of Treatment (EOT)
Clinical response was assessed by measuring impact of therapy on certain wound parameters. Specifically Erythema, Induration/Swelling, Suppuration, were recorded visually and WBC Counts were considered improved if \<12,000/cu mm. The clinical response was documented as: 1. CURE (resolution of clinical signs and symptoms and no additional need for gram-positive antibiotic therapy. 2. IMPROVED (partial resolution of clinical signs and symptoms (although patient's clinical status had not completely returned to preinfection baseline but infectious process had been controlled , no additional gram-positive antibiotic therapy was needed; 3. FAILURE (no response, worsening of clinical signs and symptoms of infection; or additional gram-positive antibiotic therapy was needed ); 4. UNABLE TO EVALUATE (unable to determine response; e.g., no evaluation performed at specified time points, or administration of non-study antibiotics effective against study pathogen).
Time frame: The clinical response was measured at the end of treatment (7-14 days)
Clinical Response to High Dose Daptomycin Therapy at Test of Cure (TOC)
Clinical response was assessed by measuring impact of therapy on certain wound parameters. Specifically Erythema, Induration/Swelling, Suppuration, were recorded visually and WBC Counts were considered improved if \<12,000/cu mm. The clinical response was documented as: 1. CURE (resolution of clinical signs and symptoms and no additional need for gram-positive antibiotic therapy. 2. IMPROVED (partial resolution of clinical signs and symptoms (although patient's clinical status had not completely returned to preinfection baseline but infectious process had been controlled , no additional gram-positive antibiotic therapy was needed; 3. FAILURE (no response, worsening of clinical signs and symptoms of infection; or additional gram-positive antibiotic therapy was needed ); 4. UNABLE TO EVALUATE (unable to determine response; e.g., no evaluation performed at specified time points, or administration of non-study antibiotics effective against study pathogen).
Time frame: The clinical response was measured at Test of Cure (3-28 days post end of treatment)
Microbiological Response to High Dose Daptomycin Therapy at End of Treatment (EOT) and Test of Cure (TOC)
Bacterial cultures were obtained in all patients and repeated if the patient had a second surgical intervention. The microbiological responses were documented as follows: 1. DOCUMENTED ERADICATED: the baseline infecting pathogen was absent at end of treatment as determined by a negative culture. 2. PRESUMED ERADICATED: The baseline infection was presumed absent at the end of treatment as determined that there was "nothing to culture". 3. DOCUMENTED PERSISTENT: The baseline infecting pathogen was present at the end of treatment.
Time frame: The microbiologicall response will be measured at the end of treatment (7-14 days) and Test of Cure (TOC) (3-28 days)
Patients were enrolled from an academic inpatient center which sees about 200 severe soft tissue patients every year. Subjects were enrolled from (2005-2008).
| Milestone | Single ARM Study |
|---|---|
| Started | 25 |
| Completed | 18 |
| Not completed | 7 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 2 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 2 |
| Withdrew: Death | 1 |
| Withdrew: Protocol violation | 2 |
Clinical response was assessed by measuring impact of therapy on certain wound parameters. Specifically Erythema, Induration/Swelling, Suppuration, were recorded visually and WBC Counts were considered improved if \<12,000/cu mm. The clinical response was documented as: 1. CURE (resolution of clinical signs and symptoms and no additional need for gram-positive antibiotic therapy. 2. IMPROVED (partial resolution of clinical signs and symptoms (although patient's clinical status had not completely returned to preinfection baseline but infectious process had been controlled , no additional gram-positive antibiotic therapy was needed; 3. FAILURE (no response, worsening of clinical signs and symptoms of infection; or additional gram-positive antibiotic therapy was needed ); 4. UNABLE TO EVALUATE (unable to determine response; e.g., no evaluation performed at specified time points, or administration of non-study antibiotics effective against study pathogen).
| Participants | Single ARM Study |
|---|---|
| Erythema-EOT — Cure | 16 |
| Erythema-EOT — Improved | 0 |
| Erythema-EOT — Failure | 2 |
| Erythema-EOT — Unable to Evaluate | 0 |
| Induration EOT — Cure | 17 |
| Induration EOT — Improved | 0 |
| Induration EOT — Failure | 1 |
| Induration EOT — Unable to Evaluate | 0 |
| Suppuration-EOT — Cure | 13 |
| Suppuration-EOT — Improved | 0 |
| Suppuration-EOT — Failure | 5 |
| Suppuration-EOT — Unable to Evaluate | 0 |
| WBC Counts EOT — Cure | 18 |
| WBC Counts EOT — Improved | 0 |
| WBC Counts EOT — Failure | 0 |
| WBC Counts EOT — Unable to Evaluate | 0 |
Clinical response was assessed by measuring impact of therapy on certain wound parameters. Specifically Erythema, Induration/Swelling, Suppuration, were recorded visually and WBC Counts were considered improved if \<12,000/cu mm. The clinical response was documented as: 1. CURE (resolution of clinical signs and symptoms and no additional need for gram-positive antibiotic therapy. 2. IMPROVED (partial resolution of clinical signs and symptoms (although patient's clinical status had not completely returned to preinfection baseline but infectious process had been controlled , no additional gram-positive antibiotic therapy was needed; 3. FAILURE (no response, worsening of clinical signs and symptoms of infection; or additional gram-positive antibiotic therapy was needed ); 4. UNABLE TO EVALUATE (unable to determine response; e.g., no evaluation performed at specified time points, or administration of non-study antibiotics effective against study pathogen).
| Participants | Single ARM Study |
|---|---|
| Erythema-TOC — Cure | 18 |
| Erythema-TOC — Improved | 0 |
| Erythema-TOC — Failure | 0 |
| Erythema-TOC — Unable to Evaluate | 0 |
| Induration TOC — Cure | 18 |
| Induration TOC — Improved | 0 |
| Induration TOC — Failure | 0 |
| Induration TOC — Unable to Evaluate | 0 |
| Suppuration — Cure | 18 |
| Suppuration — Improved | 0 |
| Suppuration — Failure | 0 |
| Suppuration — Unable to Evaluate | 0 |
| WBC Counts-TOC — Cure | 18 |
| WBC Counts-TOC — Improved | 0 |
| WBC Counts-TOC — Failure | 0 |
| WBC Counts-TOC — Unable to Evaluate | 0 |
Bacterial cultures were obtained in all patients and repeated if the patient had a second surgical intervention. The microbiological responses were documented as follows: 1. DOCUMENTED ERADICATED: the baseline infecting pathogen was absent at end of treatment as determined by a negative culture. 2. PRESUMED ERADICATED: The baseline infection was presumed absent at the end of treatment as determined that there was "nothing to culture". 3. DOCUMENTED PERSISTENT: The baseline infecting pathogen was present at the end of treatment.
| Participants | Single ARM Study |
|---|---|
| End of Therapy — Documented Eradicated | 0 |
| End of Therapy — Presumed Eradicated | 23 |
| End of Therapy — Documented Persistent | 0 |
| Test of Cure — Documented Eradicated | 0 |
| Test of Cure — Presumed Eradicated | 18 |
| Test of Cure — Documented Persistent | 0 |
Collected over From initiation of study until Test of Cure (defined as 3-28 days from end of treatment, which was an average duration of 9.4 days of therapy, with a range between 7 and 14 days). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single ARM Study | 1/25 (4%) | 1/25 (4%) | 9/25 (36%) |
| Event | Single ARM Study |
|---|---|
| Gram Negative Rod BacteremiaInfections and infestations | 1/25 |
| Event | Single ARM Study |
|---|---|
| AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 3/25 |
| Vaginal Yeast InfectionInfections and infestations | 2/25 |
| C. difficle infectionInfections and infestations | 1/25 |
| RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 1/25 |
| SwellingMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 1/25 |
| High CPKGeneral disorders | 1/25 |
Patients with severe necrotrotizing skin infections requiring surgical debridement, as well as antimicrobial therapy.
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Single ARM Study |
|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 23 |
| >=65 years | 2 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Single ARM Study |
|---|---|
| Female | 7 |
| Male | 18 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Single ARM Study |
|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 |
| Asian | 0 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 |
| Black or African American | 13 |
| White | 12 |
| More than one race | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Single ARM Study |
|---|---|
| United States | 25 |
| WBC Counts,Fever and Wound Appearance.(participants) | Single ARM Study |
|---|---|
| Number | 25 |
The record gives a start of Jun 2005, a primary completion of May 2008 and a completion of May 2008. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
Results were first posted in Mar 2021, 12 years 10 months after primary completion.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Daptomycin
University of Maryland, Baltimore →