CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00258726Updated Aug 27, 2010

Immune Responses to Two Dose Varivax +/- MMR-II

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of MMR-II and Pro-Quad in Measles, Mumps and Rubella, sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Months to 12 Months, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-08-27.

Sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
105
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Months to 12 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will test the safety and how well the body's immune system responds to a live, but weakened varicella (chickenpox) vaccine, known as Varivax, given with and without ProQuad, another measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella virus vaccine (MMR-II). One hundred five healthy children will be enrolled in the study when they are 12 months old. All subjects will be vaccinated at 12 months of age and some subjects will receive a second vaccination at 18 months of age. All subjects will participate for 1 year. This study is a single-site, two-year trial with post-licensure vaccines.

Read the detailed description

This clinical trial is a phase I/II exploratory immunogenicity and safety study of live attenuated Varicella (Varivax), Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR-II), or combination Varicella/Measles, Mumps/Rubella (Pro-Quad) vaccines administered to healthy children at 12 and 18 months of age. A total of 105 healthy children, 12 months old at the time of study entry, will be recruited from the Palo Alto Medical Foundation clinics in Palo Alto, Fremont and Los Altos, California. The study is designed to focus on time of primary Varivax immunization and immunologic benefits of a two-dose vaccine regimen compared to a single Varivax dose. In addition, the investigators will evaluate the use of Varivax with and without concomitant administration of the MMR-II, further measuring immunologic responses to a two-dose MMR-II regimen. The first study objective is to determine the immunogenicity of one dose of Varivax administered at 12 versus 18 months of age. Participants will receive either MMR vaccine and Varivax, or ProQuad depending on availability of the vaccines. Immunogenicity to be measured as humoral responses utilizing plaque reduction neutralization (PRN) assay for measles and gpELISA for varicella antibodies, and T cell immunity determined by flow cytometric T cell assays. The second study objective is to determine the immunogenicity of administering two doses of Varivax and MMR-II to children at 12 and 18 months of age compared with children receiving one dose of MMR-II at 12 months and one dose of Varivax at 12 or 18 months of age. Participants will receive either MMR vaccine and Varivax, or ProQuad depending on availability of the vaccines. The third study objective is to determine the safety of administering two doses of Varivax and MMR-II to children at 12 and 18 months of age. Participants will receive either MMR vaccine and Varivax, or ProQuad depending on availability of the vaccine. Study personnel with documentation of all adverse events and serious adverse events will monitor safety using parental memory aids and telephone follow-up. The investigators hypothesize that infants receiving Varivax or ProQuad at 12 months of age will have comparable humoral immune responses to infants receiving the vaccine at 18 months of age, but that T cell immunity will be higher in those vaccinated at 18 months of age. In addition, infants receiving 2 doses of Varivax or ProQuad will have higher humoral and cell mediated immune responses compared with children receiving only one dose of Varivax or ProQuad. This hypothesis would explain the post-licensure observations that breakthrough disease is higher in those vaccinated at 12 versus 15 months of age and in children who received one vaccination compared with two. The investigators predict that there will be no differences in the humoral immune responses when measles is given concomitantly with Varivax compared to Varivax alone, but the immunosuppressive effects of the measles virus can influence effects on T cell immunity. It is expected that two doses of Varivax or Proquad will be well tolerated and that there will be fewer systemic adverse reactions after the second dose. The Varivax package insert reports that the incidence of injection site redness and swelling was slightly higher post dose 2, but the incidence of systemic clinical complaints was lower post dose 2. The incidence of adverse experiences both locally and systemically following a second dose of ProQuad was equal to or less than those reactions seen after the first dose. The investigators will evaluate the incidence of injection site reactogenicity to confirm these findings.

02

Conditions studied

  • Measles
  • Mumps
  • Rubella
  • Varicella

Keywords

  • Measels, Mumps, Varicella, Rubella, vaccine, children
03

In context

Measles

120 studies on the registry are indexed under Measles; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 105 is below the median of 540 across 93 interventional studies indexed under Measles.

Browse Measles studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) is the lead sponsor of 2,401 studies on the registry; 179 are open to participants now.

Of its 396 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 294 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Months to 12 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Healthy infants 12 months (+ 4 weeks) of age.
  2. Free of obvious health problems as established by medical history and clinical examination before entering into the study. This includes all chronic health problems and immunodeficiencies.
  3. Parent/legal guardian has provided signed, written informed consent.
  4. Parent/legal guardian expected to be available for entire study.
  5. Parent/legal guardian can be reached by telephone.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Former premature infants (\<36 weeks).
  2. Birth weight \< 2500 grams.
  3. Significant underlying chronic illness.
  4. Immunodeficiency disease or use of immunosuppressive therapy by the participant.
  5. Any other condition that in the clinical judgment of the investigator might interfere with vaccine evaluation.
  6. Allergy to any components of the vaccine, including anaphylaxis or anaphylaxoid reaction to neomycin or eggs for MMR-II, and/or hypersensitivity to gelatin and anaphylaxis or anaphylaxoid reaction to neomycin for Varivax.
  7. Plans for participation in another clinical trial with an investigational drug or vaccine for the duration of this study.
  8. Blood products within 3 months prior to initial enrollment.
  9. Previous receipt of MMR and Varivax or ProQuad.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
105 participants

Interventions

  • BiologicalMMR-II
  • BiologicalPro-Quad
  • BiologicalVarivax
06

Study locations

1 site
  • Stanford University
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
07

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 27, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00258726
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
First posted
Nov 28, 2005
Start date
Oct 2005
Primary completion
Jul 2007
Completion
Jul 2007
Last update
Aug 27, 2010
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion