ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00256984Updated Jul 16, 2018Results posted

Study of Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR) Surgery in Refractory Constipation Associated With Obstructive Defecation Syndrome (ODS)

A Phase 4 interventional study of Stapled Transanal Resection (STARR) with Transtar (PROXIMATE®) 33 mm Circular Stapler in Obstructive Defecation Syndrome, Chronic Constipation and Rectocele, sponsored by Ethicon Endo-Surgery. Completed at 7 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 21 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-07-16.

Sponsored by Ethicon Endo-Surgery (part of Johnson & Johnson) · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
75
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
21 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The primary purpose of this study is to determine how effective and how durable STARR (stapled transanal rectal resection) surgery is in relieving symptoms of intractable constipation associated with obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS).

Read the detailed description

Rectocele and rectal intussusception are frequent findings in women but are often asymptomatic apart from anatomical defects, which can be seen on vaginal examination. They can be associated, however, with refractory constipation that may be best described by the terms "Outlet Obstruction" or "Obstructive Defecation Syndrome (ODS)". ODS is characterized by a symptom complex, including the feeling of incomplete evacuation associated with the need to strain excessively and for external assistance (digital, mechanical or positional maneuvers, enemas or suppositories) to aid defecation. Abdominal or rectal pain is also a common complaint. Obstetric trauma is also recognized as a contributing factor. However, none of these symptoms/factors can be singled out to be pathognomonic for this problem. ODS has a prevalence of approximately 12% in the general population.

For individuals with ODS and related intussusception/rectocele, a variety of surgical techniques including abdominal, vaginal, transanal and perineal approaches have been devised. The impact of clinical studies to evaluate these techniques has been limited by variability of results and lack of comparators. Recently, a new surgical approach was developed by an Italian surgeon, A. Longo, and has been evaluated in several European centers. These early studies and observations indicate that this new procedure may in fact provide significantly better symptom resolution in ODS patients than other available treatments, and warrants further study. The procedure is referred to as "Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR)" and this study will assess its effectiveness in a United States population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obstructive Defecation Syndrome
  • Chronic Constipation
  • Rectocele
  • Intussusception

Keywords

  • Obstructive Defecation Syndrome
  • Colorectal Surgery
  • Defecography
  • Constipation
  • Rectocele
  • Intussusception
  • Quality of Life
03

In context

Rectocele

50 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectocele; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 75 is above the median of 62 across 37 interventional studies indexed under Rectocele.

Browse Rectocele studies →

Lead sponsor

Ethicon Endo-Surgery is the lead sponsor of 47 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Able to comprehend, understand, and speak the English language
  • Able to comprehend, follow, and sign an document (ICD)
  • Able to tolerate general or spinal anesthetic
  • Often experience excessive straining, sense of incomplete evacuation, and/or prolonged time for complete evacuation when attempting a bowel movement
  • Have experienced ODS symptoms for at least 12 months prior to enrollment
  • Have a minimum ODS score of 10
  • Have rectocele and/or rectal intussusception confirmed by defecography
  • Screened for colorectal neoplasia within 7 years of the screening visit (e.g., colonoscopy or barium enema)
  • Have an (ASA) score of no more than 3
  • Willing to comply with evaluation and management schedule through 5-year follow-up

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fecal incontinence to solid stool
  • Full-thickness prolapse
  • Perineal infection
  • Recto-vaginal fistula
  • Enterocele (at rest)
  • Any complex pelvic floor prolapse requiring a combined surgical approach
  • Prior sigmoid or anterior resection or prior rectal anastomosis
  • Presence of foreign material adjacent to the rectum (e.g., vaginal mesh)
  • Grade IV hemorrhoids
  • Pregnancy
  • Chronic narcotic use
  • Evidence of colorectal neoplasia, carcinoma, or inflammatory bowel disease
  • Physical or psychological condition which would impair study participation
  • Unable or unwilling to attend follow-up visits and examinations
  • Surgical procedure required concurrently with STARR
  • Prior pelvic radiotherapy
  • Failure to identify any anatomical or physiological abnormality in the evaluation
  • Significant rectal fibrosis
  • Anal stenosis precluding insertion of the stapling device
  • Participation in any other device or drug study 30 days prior to enrollment
  • Presence or history of , , and/or positive test
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
75 participants (actual)

Interventions

  • ProcedureStapled Transanal Resection (STARR) with Transtar (PROXIMATE®) 33 mm Circular Stapler
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Change (Reduction) in Total ODS Symptom Composite Score From Baseline to One Year Post Procedure

    The primary endpoint used to assess effectiveness of STARR for treatment of ODS was the percentage of change in total ODS symptom composite score (0=worst, 24=best) 1 year after completion of the procedure.

    Time frame: one year from Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Change in ODS Symptom Composite Score From Baseline at 1 Month Post Procedure

    Percentage of change in Obstructive Defecation Syndrome (ODS) symptom composite score from baseline at 1 month post procedure. This score is based on a series of questions designed to understand the extent ODS effects an individual's daily lifestyle (0 is worst score, 24 is best score). Sizing consistent with primary outcome; analysis was per-protocol.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month post procedure

  2. Maximum Change in Subject-reported Assessment of Symptom Severity and Frequency (PAC SYM).

    Assessed as patient-reported assessment of symptom severity and frequency (PAC-SYM)associated with constipation. Patient response options are absent, mild, moderate, severe, and very severe.12 questions relate to severity, 8 questions relate to frequency of symptoms. The lower the score, the less severe the symptoms. Sizing consistent with primary outcome; analysis was per-protocol.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  3. Percentage of Change in ODS Symptom Composite Score From Baseline at 6 Months (0 is Worst Score, 24 is Best Score)

    The primary endpoint used to assess effectiveness of STARR for treatment of ODS was the percentage of change in total ODS symptom composite score (0=worst, 24=best) 1 year after completion of the procedure.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months post procedure

  4. PAC QOL Patient Assessment of Constipation (Overall)

    PAC-QOL is Patient Assessment of Constipation, Quality of Life. The instrument consists of 28 questions on a 0-4 scale. A lower score indicates better quality of life. The score is a number without units.Change from baseline in patient assessment of constipation in quality of life as measured by the PAC QOL instrument score. The questions are designed to measure the impact constipation has had on daily life during the week prior to the subject visit. Sizing was consistent with the primary outcome; analysis was per-protocol

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 months

  5. SF-12 QOL Change From Baseline (Physical Component)at 12 Months

    The SF-12 is a validated 12 question quality-of-life questionnaire. The SF-12 extracts 12 items from the SF-36 questionnaire in two six-item subscales, PCS (physical functioning) and MCS (emotional functioning). The SF-12 scores can range from 10 (maximum impairment) to 70 (no impairment). For this study, the endpoint is the percentage of change from baseline over 12 months post procedure.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 Months

  6. SF-12 QOL Change (Mental Component) at 12 Months From Baseline

    SF 12 change from baseline, mental component. The SF-12 is a validated 12 question quality-of-life questionnaire. The SF-12 extracts 12 items from the SF-36 questionnaire in two six-item subscales, PCS (physical functioning) and MCS (emotional functioning). The SF-36 scores range from 0 (maximum impairment) to 100 (no impairment), the SF-12 scores range from 10 (maximum impairment) to 70 (no impairment). For this study, the endpoint is the percentage of change from baseline over 12 months post procedure.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 months

07

Results

Posted Apr 7, 2011

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR)
Started75
Completed59
Not completed16

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Change (Reduction) in Total ODS Symptom Composite Score From Baseline to One Year Post Procedure

The primary endpoint used to assess effectiveness of STARR for treatment of ODS was the percentage of change in total ODS symptom composite score (0=worst, 24=best) 1 year after completion of the procedure.

Time frame:
one year from Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of change
Percentage of Change (Reduction) in Total ODS Symptom Composite Score From Baseline to One Year Post Procedure
percentage of changeStapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR)
Percentage of Change (Reduction) in Total ODS Symptom Composite Score From Baseline to One Year Post Procedure60.8 ± 35.46
SecondaryPercentage of Change in ODS Symptom Composite Score From Baseline at 1 Month Post Procedure

Percentage of change in Obstructive Defecation Syndrome (ODS) symptom composite score from baseline at 1 month post procedure. This score is based on a series of questions designed to understand the extent ODS effects an individual's daily lifestyle (0 is worst score, 24 is best score). Sizing consistent with primary outcome; analysis was per-protocol.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1 month post procedure
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of change
Percentage of Change in ODS Symptom Composite Score From Baseline at 1 Month Post Procedure
percentage of changeStapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR)
Percentage of Change in ODS Symptom Composite Score From Baseline at 1 Month Post Procedure-50.7 ± 34.4
SecondaryMaximum Change in Subject-reported Assessment of Symptom Severity and Frequency (PAC SYM).

Assessed as patient-reported assessment of symptom severity and frequency (PAC-SYM)associated with constipation. Patient response options are absent, mild, moderate, severe, and very severe.12 questions relate to severity, 8 questions relate to frequency of symptoms. The lower the score, the less severe the symptoms. Sizing consistent with primary outcome; analysis was per-protocol.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Maximum Change in Subject-reported Assessment of Symptom Severity and Frequency (PAC SYM).
units on a scaleStapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR)
Maximum Change in Subject-reported Assessment of Symptom Severity and Frequency (PAC SYM).1.43 ± 0.72
SecondaryPercentage of Change in ODS Symptom Composite Score From Baseline at 6 Months (0 is Worst Score, 24 is Best Score)

The primary endpoint used to assess effectiveness of STARR for treatment of ODS was the percentage of change in total ODS symptom composite score (0=worst, 24=best) 1 year after completion of the procedure.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months post procedure
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of change
Percentage of Change in ODS Symptom Composite Score From Baseline at 6 Months (0 is Worst Score, 24 is Best Score)
percentage of changeStapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR)
Percentage of Change in ODS Symptom Composite Score From Baseline at 6 Months (0 is Worst Score, 24 is Best Score)-57.0 ± 34.4
SecondaryPAC QOL Patient Assessment of Constipation (Overall)

PAC-QOL is Patient Assessment of Constipation, Quality of Life. The instrument consists of 28 questions on a 0-4 scale. A lower score indicates better quality of life. The score is a number without units.Change from baseline in patient assessment of constipation in quality of life as measured by the PAC QOL instrument score. The questions are designed to measure the impact constipation has had on daily life during the week prior to the subject visit. Sizing was consistent with the primary outcome; analysis was per-protocol

Time frame:
Baseline, 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
PAC QOL Patient Assessment of Constipation (Overall)
units on a scaleStapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR)
PAC QOL Patient Assessment of Constipation (Overall)0.95 ± 0.996
SecondarySF-12 QOL Change From Baseline (Physical Component)at 12 Months

The SF-12 is a validated 12 question quality-of-life questionnaire. The SF-12 extracts 12 items from the SF-36 questionnaire in two six-item subscales, PCS (physical functioning) and MCS (emotional functioning). The SF-12 scores can range from 10 (maximum impairment) to 70 (no impairment). For this study, the endpoint is the percentage of change from baseline over 12 months post procedure.

Time frame:
Baseline, 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
SF-12 QOL Change From Baseline (Physical Component)at 12 Months
units on a scaleStapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR)
SF-12 QOL Change From Baseline (Physical Component)at 12 Months6.32 ± 9.106
SecondarySF-12 QOL Change (Mental Component) at 12 Months From Baseline

SF 12 change from baseline, mental component. The SF-12 is a validated 12 question quality-of-life questionnaire. The SF-12 extracts 12 items from the SF-36 questionnaire in two six-item subscales, PCS (physical functioning) and MCS (emotional functioning). The SF-36 scores range from 0 (maximum impairment) to 100 (no impairment), the SF-12 scores range from 10 (maximum impairment) to 70 (no impairment). For this study, the endpoint is the percentage of change from baseline over 12 months post procedure.

Time frame:
Baseline, 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
SF-12 QOL Change (Mental Component) at 12 Months From Baseline
units on a scaleStapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR)
SF-12 QOL Change (Mental Component) at 12 Months From Baseline4.83 ± 11.67

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Stapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR)—14/75 (18.7%)33/75 (44%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent serious events
EventStapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR)
Postprocedural haemorrhageInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/75
Urinary retentionRenal and urinary disorders2/75
Blood count abnormalInvestigations1/75
Breast cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/75
ColostomySurgical and medical procedures1/75
Diabetic ketoacidosisMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/75
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations1/75
Gastrointestinal injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/75
Haematoma infectionInfections and infestations1/75
Intestinal hypomotilityGastrointestinal disorders1/75
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventStapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR)
urinary retentionRenal and urinary disorders14/75
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders7/75
DizzinessNervous system disorders6/75
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders6/75

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Stapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR)
Median48 (23 to 80)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Stapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR)
Female75
Male0
ODS composite score
ODS composite score(units on a scale)Stapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR)
Mean6.19 ± 3.13
number of subjects in each age range having STARR procedure
number of subjects in each age range having STARR procedure(participants)Stapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR)
<=29 years4
Between 30 and 39 years9
Between 40 and 49 years26
Between 50 and 59 years18
Between 60 and 69 years11
>=70 years7
08

Study locations

7 sites
  • Colon and Rectal Clinic of Orlando
    Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
  • Lahey Clinic
    Burlington, Massachusetts 01805, United States
  • Colon & Rectal Surgery Associates Ltd.
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454, United States
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
  • The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • Medical University of Ohio, Department of Surgery
    Toledo, Ohio 43614, United States
  • Portland Medical Center
    Portland, Oregon 97205, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut. 1989 Dec;30(12):1737-49. doi: 10.1136/gut.30.12.1737. PubMed 2612988 ↗
  • Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L. The anatomic and functional variability of rectoceles in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999;10(2):96-9. doi: 10.1007/pl00004019. PubMed 10384970 ↗
  • Talley NJ, Weaver AL, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3rd. Functional constipation and outlet delay: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 1993 Sep;105(3):781-90. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90896-k. PubMed 8359649 ↗
  • Siproudhis L, Dautreme S, Ropert A, Briand H, Renet C, Beusnel C, Juguet F, Rabot AF, Bretagne JF, Gosselin M. Anismus and biofeedback: who benefits? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995 Jun;7(6):547-52. PubMed 7552638 ↗
  • van Dam JH, Hop WC, Schouten WR. Analysis of patients with poor outcome of rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Nov;43(11):1556-60. doi: 10.1007/BF02236738. PubMed 11089592 ↗
  • Fleshman JW, Fry RD, Kodner IJ. The surgical management of constipation. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol. 1992 Mar;6(1):145-62. doi: 10.1016/0950-3528(92)90024-9. PubMed 1586766 ↗
  • Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Veglia A, Petrolino M, De Fazio M, Sallustio P. Combined perineal and endorectal repair of rectocele by circular stapler: a novel surgical technique. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Nov;45(11):1549-52. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6465-9. PubMed 12432306 ↗
  • Dodi G, Pietroletti R, Milito G, Binda G, Pescatori M. Bleeding, incontinence, pain and constipation after STARR transanal double stapling rectotomy for obstructed defecation. Tech Coloproctol. 2003 Oct;7(3):148-53. doi: 10.1007/s10151-003-0026-4. PubMed 14628157 ↗
  • Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Stuto A, Bottini C, Caviglia A, Carriero A, Mascagni D, Mauri R, Sofo L, Landolfi V. Stapled transanal rectal resection for outlet obstruction: a prospective, multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Aug;47(8):1285-96; discussion 1296-7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0582-3. PubMed 15484341 ↗
  • Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Salamina G, Cesana BM, Bernasconi F, Roviaro G. New trends in the surgical treatment of outlet obstruction: clinical and functional results of two novel transanal stapled techniques from a randomised controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004 Jul;19(4):359-69. doi: 10.1007/s00384-003-0572-2. Epub 2004 Mar 13. PubMed 15024596 ↗
  • Pescatori M, Dodi G, Salafia C, Zbar AP. Rectovaginal fistula after double-stapled transanal rectotomy (STARR) for obstructed defaecation. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005 Jan;20(1):83-5. doi: 10.1007/s00384-004-0658-5. Epub 2004 Sep 2. No abstract available. PubMed 15349740 ↗
  • Grassi R, Romano S, Micera O, Fioroni C, Boller B. Radiographic findings of post-operative double stapled trans anal rectal resection (STARR) in patient with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). Eur J Radiol. 2005 Mar;53(3):410-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.12.012. PubMed 15741014 ↗
  • Mongardini M, Custureri F, Schillaci F, Cola A, Maturo A, Fanello G, Corelli S, Pappalardo G. [Prevention of post-operative pain and haemorrhage in PPH (Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids) and STARR (Stapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection). Preliminary results in 261 cases]. G Chir. 2005 Apr;26(4):157-61. Italian. PubMed 16035252 ↗
  • Binda GA, Pescatori M, Romano G. The dark side of double-stapled transanal rectal resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Sep;48(9):1830-1; author reply 1831-2. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0103-z. No abstract available. PubMed 15991070 ↗
  • Jayne DG, Finan PJ. Stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defaecation and evidence-based practice. Br J Surg. 2005 Jul;92(7):793-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5092. No abstract available. PubMed 15962257 ↗
  • Talley NJ, Phillips SF, Wiltgen CM, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3rd. Assessment of functional gastrointestinal disease: the bowel disease questionnaire. Mayo Clin Proc. 1990 Nov;65(11):1456-79. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)62169-7. PubMed 2232900 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2005 to primary completion in Mar 2008, 29 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2011, 3 years 1 month after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 18, 2005
First posted
Nov 22, 2005
StartActual
Oct 1, 2005
Primary completionActual
Mar 1, 2008
CompletionActual
Jun 1, 2008
Results first posted
Apr 7, 2011
Last update
Jul 16, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00256984
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 22, 2005
Start date
Oct 1, 2005
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2008
Completion
Jun 1, 2008
Results posted
Apr 7, 2011
Last update
Jul 16, 2018

Study contacts

Robin F Scamuffa, MS
study director · Ethicon Endo-Surgery
William Bernie, MD
study director · Ethicon Endo-Surgery
Anthony J Senagore, MD
principal investigator · Medical University of Ohio
Anders F Mellgren, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Minnesota

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion