CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00254852Updated Nov 21, 2013

Evaluation of Radiographic and Patient Outcomes Following Lumbar Spine Fusion Using Demineralized Bone Matrix (DBM) Mixed With Autograft

An interventional study of Posterior Lateral Fusion (PLF) and Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) in Stenosis, Spondylolisthesis and Degenerative Disc Disease, sponsored by Exactech. Terminated at 6 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-11-21.

Sponsored by Exactech · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Slow enrollment
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
94
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare Optecure™ as an autograft extender (treatment) to autograft alone (control) in patients undergoing 1 or 2 level fusion of the lumbar spine(one level is defined as two adjacent vertebrae), L2 and below.

The primary endpoint will be the assessment of fusion by evaluation of x-rays taken following surgery at each visit. The x-ray evaluation will be conducted by a radiologist who is blinded to the type of treatment each patient has received.

Subjects will be seen at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperative (post-op). Questionnaires and x-rays will be completed at each visit and a computed tomography (CT) scan will be taken at the 12 month visit(and used to aid in assessment of bridging bone, where appropriate).

Read the detailed description

Autograft (bone taken from one part of the body and placed in another site on the same individual) has long been considered the gold standard for lumbar spine fusion procedures. Unfortunately, there are complications involved with autograft harvest such as donor site morbidity, increased operating time, and limited supply. Therefore, the use of allograft (bone taken from one body and placed into another individual) as a graft extender has become an acceptable practice, especially in fusions of more than one level where larger quantities of graft material are needed.

In this study, comparisons will be made between patients who are randomized to having fusion with an allograft material (Optecure, Exactech, Inc.) mixed with an autograft to those patients who are randomized to having fusion with autograft alone.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stenosis
  • Spondylolisthesis
  • Degenerative Disc Disease

Keywords

  • Primary lumbar fusion
  • Demineralized Bone Matrix
  • DBM
  • Optecure
  • Allograft
  • Autograft
  • Lumbar fusion
  • Interbody fusion
  • Instrumented fusion
  • Non-instrumented fusion
  • Exactech
  • Spinal fusion
03

In context

Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

464 studies on the registry are indexed under Intervertebral Disc Degeneration; 98 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 94 is above the median of 60 across 261 interventional studies indexed under Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.

Browse Intervertebral Disc Degeneration studies →

Lead sponsor

Exactech is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient is indicated for primary lumbar fusion of 1 or 2 segments, L2 to S1
  • Patient is willing to be blindly randomized to treatment or control and remain blinded for 2 years of follow-up
  • Patient is at least twenty-one (21) years of age
  • Patient is expected to survive at least 2 years beyond surgery
  • Patient is willing to participate by complying with pre- and postoperative visit requirements, including: completion of questionnaires, functional performance tests, and radiographs/CT scan
  • Patient is willing and able to review and sign a study Informed Consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has a mental or physical condition that would invalidate evaluation results
  • Patient is pregnant
  • Patient is a prisoner
  • Patient has a systemic infection or infection at the proposed surgical site
  • Patient has osteopenia, osteoporosis, or osteomalacia to a degree that spinal instrumentation would be contraindicated
  • Patient has a disease of bone metabolism
  • Patient is undergoing chemotherapy or radiation treatment
  • Patient is currently involved in a study of another product for a similar purpose
  • Patient requires post-op management with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
94 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    O

    This treatment arm includes autograft harvested from local bone and / or the iliac crest, supplemented with a demineralized bone matrix (DBM) autograft extender, Optecure.

    Procedure: Posterior Lateral Fusion (PLF) · Procedure: Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) · Procedure: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) · Procedure: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) · Procedure: Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF)

  • Active comparator
    A

    This treatment arm includes autograft harvested from local bone and / or the iliac crest.

    Procedure: Posterior Lateral Fusion (PLF) · Procedure: Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) · Procedure: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) · Procedure: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) · Procedure: Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF)

Interventions

  • ProcedurePosterior Lateral Fusion (PLF)

    Posterior lateral fusion (PLF) of the lumbar spine

    Also known as: PLF

  • ProcedureAnterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF)

    Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF)

    Also known as: ALIF

  • ProcedureTransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)

    Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)

    Also known as: TLIF

  • ProcedurePosterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)

    Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)

    Also known as: PLIF

  • ProcedureExtreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF)

    Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF)

    Also known as: XLIF

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Radiographic evidence of fusion on x-rays taken at each post-op visit

    Time frame: Immediate post-op, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, 2-year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) completed at each visit

    Time frame: pre-operative, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, 2-year

  2. SF-12 patient health surveys completed at each visit

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, 2-year

  3. Perceived pain noted on visual analog scales (VAS) at each visit

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, 2-year

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • Memorial Orthopaedic Surgical Group
    Long Beach, California 90806, United States
  • University of California, San Diego
    San Diego, California 92103, United States
  • Slocum Dickson Medical Group
    New Hartford, New York 13413, United States
  • State University of New York, Upstate Medical University
    Syracuse, New York 13202, United States
  • NeuroSpine Solutions, P.C.
    Bristol, Tennessee 37620, United States
  • Madigan Army Medical Center
    Tacoma, Washington 98431, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 21, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00254852
Lead sponsor
Exactech
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 17, 2005
Start date
Oct 2005
Primary completion
Aug 2011
Completion
Aug 2011
Last update
Nov 21, 2013

Study contacts

Amir Fayyazi, MD
principal investigator · VSAS Orthopedics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Nov 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion