CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00243022Updated Apr 30, 2019Results posted

Dietary, Herbal and Alternative Medicine in Glioblastoma Multiforme

A Phase 2 interventional study of Boswellia serrata extract and cyanocobalamin in Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors and Cerebral Edema, sponsored by Ali Altunkaya. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-30.

Sponsored by Ali Altunkaya · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Slow accrual
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

RATIONALE: Giving the herb Boswellia serrata after surgery and radiation therapy may slow the growth of any remaining tumor cells. It is not yet known whether giving Boswellia serrata together with standard treatment is more effective than standard treatment alone in treating high-grade gliomas.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is the study of a combination of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) herbal supplement intervention as an adjuvant to standard treatment of patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGG). The central hypothesis of this application is that a herbal preparation that inhibits 5-LO activity, will produce measurable biologically meaningful decrease in 5-LO eicosanoid production and brain edema that will be associated with improved survival and quality of life in patients with HGG.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • To determine whether a herbal approach to decreasing 5-LO eicosanoid production reduces peritumoral brain edema in patients with HGG.

Secondary

  • To determine if this adjuvant approach improves the quality of life and progression free and overall survival of patients with HGG.

OUTLINE: This a randomized, controlled study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

  • Arm I (intervention): Patients receive oral Boswellia serrata herbal extract 4 times a day and oral cyanocobalamin (vitamin B-12) once a day for 6 months in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.
  • Arm II (control): Patients receive oral vitamin B-12 once a day for 6 months. All patients are encouraged to eat a regular balanced diet (as recommended by the American Cancer Society for cancer prevention) with limited consumption of red and processed meats.

Quality of life will be assessed at baseline and then at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 months.

After completion of study treatment, patients will be followed every 6 months.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 70 patients (35 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors
  • Cerebral Edema

Keywords

  • cerebral edema
  • adult glioblastoma
  • adult giant cell glioblastoma
  • adult gliosarcoma
  • adult anaplastic astrocytoma
  • adult anaplastic oligodendroglioma
03

In context

Glioblastoma

1,920 studies on the registry are indexed under Glioblastoma; 450 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 36 across 1,618 interventional studies indexed under Glioblastoma.

Browse Glioblastoma studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Ali Altunkaya as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients after surgical removal of histologically confirmed World Health Organization high-grade gliomas, including astrocytomas grade III (anaplastic astrocytoma), astrocytoma grade IV (glioblastoma multiforme, GBM), anaplastic oligodendroglioma and oligoastrocytoma
  • Karnofsky performance status of greater or equal 60
  • Patients who signed informed consent
  • Patients can be receiving standard or investigational chemotherapy , hormonal therapy, immunotherapy or biologic agents as the primary treatment for their tumor
  • Glucocorticoid therapy is allowed
  • Bone marrow function (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] >=1500/mm\^3 and platelet count >=75,000/mm\^3); in the event of plate count dropping below 50,000/ mm\^3 the Boswellia will be withdrawn until plate count reaches 75,000 mm\^3 and above
  • Liver function (bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase =\< 2 x normal and serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT] =\< 3 x normal)
  • Renal function (blood urea nitrogen [BUN] or creatinine =\< 1.5 x normal)
  • Patients suffering from mild to moderate asthma, liver and kidney disease; an assessment of the condition will be made to establish a baseline and monitor progress at 4 weekly intervals to start with for the first two months and thereafter at the usual study intervals of 4 and 6 months; if there is any significant deterioration in their condition the Boswellia will be withdrawn until these parameters are restored to their pre-treatment levels

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Any medical condition that could interfere with eating and oral administration of B. serrata
  • Patients already taking herbal preparations that contain 5-LO inhibitors
  • Any previous (within the past 3 years) or concurrent malignancies at other sites, with the exception of surgically cured carcinoma-in-situ of the cervix and non-melanoma skin cancer
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding
  • Active infection
  • Inability to be followed closely at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm I (intervention)

    Patients receive oral Boswellia serrata extract 4 times a day and oral cyanocobalamin (vitamin B 12) once a day for 6 months in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

    Drug: Boswellia serrata extract · Dietary Supplement: cyanocobalamin

  • Active comparator
    Arm II (control)

    Patients in the control arm receive oral cyanocobalamin (vitamin B 12) once a day for 6 months.

    Dietary Supplement: cyanocobalamin

Interventions

  • DrugBoswellia serrata extract

    given orally

  • Dietary supplementcyanocobalamin

    given orally

    Also known as: Vitamin B12

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Pooled Baseline in Peritumoral Brain Edema

    The relative change from baseline will be assessed longitudinally, however, the main comparison of interest is the relative change at the 4-month evaluation. For each patient change = edema at follow up - baseline edema

    Time frame: at 2 months

  2. Change From Baseline in Peritumoral Brain Edema

    The relative change from baseline will be assessed longitudinally, however, the main comparison of interest is the relative change at the 4-month evaluation.For each patient change = edema at follow up - baseline edema.

    Time frame: at 4 months

  3. Change From Baseline in Peritumoral Brain Edema

    The relative change from baseline will be assessed longitudinally, however, the main comparison of interest is the relative change at the 4-month evaluation. For each patient change = edema at follow up - baseline edema.

    Time frame: at 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life at 6 Months

    Quality of life as assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30)

    Time frame: At 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 months

  2. Time-to-tumor-progression: Percentage of Patients With Tumor Progression at 6 Months

    Percentage of participants with tumor progression (\>25% increase in tumor volume compared to time 0) will be measured from enrollment to documented progression or death whichever comes first. The method used to calculate the time to tumor progression was Kaplan Meier test method to define the 95% confidence levels.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Time-to-tumor-progression: Percentage of Patients With Tumor Progression at 1 Year

    Percentage of participants with tumor progression (\>25% increase in tumor volume compared to time 0) will be measured from enrollment to documented progression or death whichever comes first. The method used to calculate the time to tumor progression was Kaplan Meier test method to define the 95% confidence levels.

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Overall Survival: Percentage of Patients That Were Alive at 1 Year

    Overall survival will be measured from the date of enrollment to date of death or last contact. Survival will be evaluated by the Kaplan Meier method to evaluate the median survival and 1 year survival rates.

    Time frame: 1 year.

Other outcomes

  1. Food Intake as Assessed by the Block 98 Food Frequency Questionnaire and a 3-day Food Record

    The 3-day food diary will be used to assess the dietary intake and to increase eating awareness of patients.

    Time frame: At 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 months

07

Results

Posted Jul 30, 2013
Limitations and caveats
Certain outcome analysis not done due to low patient accrual.

Participant flow

Patients recruited from September 2004-September 2010 from local medical clinic.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneArm I (Intervention)Arm II (Control)
Started75
Completed54
Not completed21
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10
Withdrew: Death10
Withdrew: Difficult travel distance01

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Pooled Baseline in Peritumoral Brain Edema

The relative change from baseline will be assessed longitudinally, however, the main comparison of interest is the relative change at the 4-month evaluation. For each patient change = edema at follow up - baseline edema

Time frame:
at 2 months
Reported as:
Mean · cm^3
Change From Pooled Baseline in Peritumoral Brain Edema
cm^3Arm I (Intervention)Arm II (Control)
Change From Pooled Baseline in Peritumoral Brain Edema-3.87 ± 8.0-3.045 ± 2.14
Statistical analysis
  • Arm I (Intervention) vs Arm II (Control) · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.9
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Peritumoral Brain Edema

The relative change from baseline will be assessed longitudinally, however, the main comparison of interest is the relative change at the 4-month evaluation.For each patient change = edema at follow up - baseline edema.

Time frame:
at 4 months
Reported as:
Mean · cm^3
Change From Baseline in Peritumoral Brain Edema
cm^3Arm I (Intervention)Arm II (Control)
Change From Baseline in Peritumoral Brain Edema-2.7 ± 7.310.21 ± 14.06
Statistical analysis
  • Arm I (Intervention) vs Arm II (Control) · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.12
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Peritumoral Brain Edema

The relative change from baseline will be assessed longitudinally, however, the main comparison of interest is the relative change at the 4-month evaluation. For each patient change = edema at follow up - baseline edema.

Time frame:
at 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · cm^3
Change From Baseline in Peritumoral Brain Edema
cm^3Arm I (Intervention)Arm II (Control)
Change From Baseline in Peritumoral Brain Edema-3.7 ± 9.5-1.5 ± 2.9
Statistical analysis
  • Arm I (Intervention) vs Arm II (Control) · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.8
SecondaryQuality of Life at 6 Months

Quality of life as assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30)

Time frame:
At 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryTime-to-tumor-progression: Percentage of Patients With Tumor Progression at 6 Months

Percentage of participants with tumor progression (\>25% increase in tumor volume compared to time 0) will be measured from enrollment to documented progression or death whichever comes first. The method used to calculate the time to tumor progression was Kaplan Meier test method to define the 95% confidence levels.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Time-to-tumor-progression: Percentage of Patients With Tumor Progression at 6 Months
percentage of participantsArm I (Intervention)Arm II (Control)
Time-to-tumor-progression: Percentage of Patients With Tumor Progression at 6 Months43 (-13 to 99)100 (100 to 100)
SecondaryTime-to-tumor-progression: Percentage of Patients With Tumor Progression at 1 Year

Percentage of participants with tumor progression (\>25% increase in tumor volume compared to time 0) will be measured from enrollment to documented progression or death whichever comes first. The method used to calculate the time to tumor progression was Kaplan Meier test method to define the 95% confidence levels.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Time-to-tumor-progression: Percentage of Patients With Tumor Progression at 1 Year
percentage of participantsArm I (Intervention)Arm II (Control)
Time-to-tumor-progression: Percentage of Patients With Tumor Progression at 1 Year71 (32 to 111)80 (41 to 119)
SecondaryOverall Survival: Percentage of Patients That Were Alive at 1 Year

Overall survival will be measured from the date of enrollment to date of death or last contact. Survival will be evaluated by the Kaplan Meier method to evaluate the median survival and 1 year survival rates.

Time frame:
1 year.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of particpants
Overall Survival: Percentage of Patients That Were Alive at 1 Year
percentage of particpantsArm I (Intervention)Arm II (Control)
Overall Survival: Percentage of Patients That Were Alive at 1 Year57 (9 to 106)60 (5 to 115)
Other pre-specifiedFood Intake as Assessed by the Block 98 Food Frequency Questionnaire and a 3-day Food Record

The 3-day food diary will be used to assess the dietary intake and to increase eating awareness of patients.

Time frame:
At 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data was collected over a 4 year period while patients were on treatment. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Arm I (Intervention)—0/7 (0%)3/7 (42.9%)
Arm II (Control)—2/5 (40%)3/5 (60%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventArm I (Intervention)Arm II (Control)
SeizureNervous system disorders0/71/5
PsychosisPsychiatric disorders0/71/5
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 25
Most frequent other events
EventArm I (Intervention)Arm II (Control)
TirednessGeneral disorders2/72/5
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/72/5
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders2/70/5
Mood alteration-anxiety, agitationPsychiatric disorders2/71/5
Radiation DermatitisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/71/5
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders0/71/5
Neck painNervous system disorders0/71/5
HeartburnGastrointestinal disorders1/70/5
Skin RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/70/5
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/70/5

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)Arm I (Intervention)Arm II (Control)Total
30-39 years101
40-49 years336
50-59 years123
60-69 years101
70-79 years101
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Arm I (Intervention)Arm II (Control)Total
Female426
Male336
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Arm I (Intervention)Arm II (Control)Total
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino7512
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Arm I (Intervention)Arm II (Control)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian011
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White7411
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Arm I (Intervention)Arm II (Control)Total
United States7512
Baseline edema measure
Baseline edema measure(cm^3)Arm I (Intervention)Arm II (Control)Total
Mean10.8 ± 11.111.3 ± 8.111.1 ± 9.4
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 30, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00243022
Lead sponsor
Ali Altunkaya
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Responsible party
Ali Altunkaya (Principal Investigator, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 21, 2005
Start date
Sep 2004
Primary completion
Mar 2010
Completion
Mar 2011
Results posted
Jul 30, 2013
Last update
Apr 30, 2019

Study contacts

Glen Stevens, DO, PhD
principal investigator · The Cleveland Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion