ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00234533OPTIMAUpdated Dec 9, 2019Results posted

Study to Define Optimal IGF-1 Monitoring in Children Treated With NutropinAq

A Phase 3 interventional study of Somatropin (rDNA origin) in Turner Syndrome, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic and Pituitary Diseases, sponsored by Ipsen. Completed at 45 sites in 14 countries. Open to participants aged Up to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-09.

Sponsored by Ipsen · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
251
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
Up to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main purpose of this study is to establish an optimal monitoring regimen in NutropinAq treated children, using newly developed capillary blood spot IGF-1 measurement technology.

02

Conditions studied

  • Turner Syndrome
  • Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
  • Pituitary Diseases
  • Dwarfism

Keywords

  • growth
  • child development
  • growth hormone
  • inadequate growth hormone secretion
  • growth failure
03

In context

Turner Syndrome

119 studies on the registry are indexed under Turner Syndrome; 33 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 251 is above the median of 67 across 52 interventional studies indexed under Turner Syndrome.

Browse Turner Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Ipsen is the lead sponsor of 288 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Of its 26 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 21 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children under 18 with growth failure associated with inadequate growth hormone secretion, or Turner syndrome or chronic renal insufficiency.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with closed epiphyses
  • Children with active neoplasm
  • Children with acute critical illness
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
251 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    NutropinAq 10 mg/2 mL (30 IU)

    Patients received daily subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of NutropinAq 10 milligrams (mg)/2 milliliters (mL) for 6 months. The therapeutic daily doses administered were as follows: * GHD patients: 0.025 - 0.035 mg/ kilogram (kg) bodyweight * TS patients: up to 0.05 mg/kg bodyweight * CRI patients: up to 0.05 mg/kg bodyweight Patients visited the study clinic for a baseline visit and for 2 other visits every 3 months (Weeks 12 and 24). Additional home assessments were made at Weeks 21, 22 and 23. The investigator determined the dose administered to each patient, and it was recommended to perform the injection in the evening.

    Drug: Somatropin (rDNA origin)

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Insulin-Like Growth Factor I (IGF-I) Levels Measured Using the Timed Capillary Blood Spot Samples

    Fingertip capillary blood was collected using filter paper cards for the assay of capillary blood spot IGF-I in line with the monitoring recommendations of the Lawson Wilkins Paediatric Endocrine Society (LWPES) for treatment with recombinant GH therapy in children. Capillary IGF-I assays were performed by the patient at home one day per week during Weeks 21, 22 and 23 only (same week day). The samples were scheduled in the evening prior to the injection of NutropinAq and between 7:00 and 9:00 the following morning. An extended window from 6:00 to 12:00 was allowed for defining protocol deviations. The number of capillary blood spot IGF-I measurements and the optimal timing of samples to assess the IGF-I status of NutropinAq treated patients was assessed. IGF-I measurements for the morning and evening sampling are presented.

    Time frame: At Weeks 21, 22 and 23

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessment of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Weekly Timing (Weeks 21-23) and Daily Timing (Morning and Evening)

    The influence of daily and weekly timing on the IGF-I value as measured using the capillary blood spot method was analysed. A 3-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) was performed with patient, day and daily timing as factors after appropriate transformation to obtain normally distributed parameters. The interaction day\*time was tested and kept in the model only if p-value\<0.1. Parameter estimates from the statistical model are presented as least squares means for the categories of daily timing (Morning and Evening) and weekly timing (Week 21, Week 22 and Week 23). The values reported for Week 21, 22, and 23 represent the average IGF-I levels from the morning and evening samples at each week. The values reported for Evening represent the Evening IGF-I levels averaged across Weeks 21, 22, and 23, and similarly for the Morning values.

    Time frame: At Weeks 21, 22 and 23

  2. Assessment of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Sex and Prepubertal Status

    The influence of sex and prepubertal status on the IGF-I value as measured using the capillary blood spot method was analysed. Parameter estimates from the statistical model are presented as least squares means for the categories of sex (male and female) and prepubertal status (pubertal and prepubertal). The values reported represent average IGF-I levels as determined from the 6 measurements taken (i.e. morning and evening samples at Weeks 21, 22 and 23).

    Time frame: At Weeks 21, 22 and 23

  3. Multivariate Linear Regression Analyses to Assess Factors Affecting the Variability of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Disease Condition and Location

    A multivariate linear regression analysis of factors on within-subject coefficient of variation (WCV) using a stepwise forward-backward elimination was used to determine the effect of individual factors on IGF-I values as measured using the capillary blood spot method (p=0.15 for a variable to enter and remain in the model). The WCV was computed from the series of 6 measurements (2 samplings in each of Weeks 21, 22 and 23). The influence of disease condition and country clusters on the IGF-I value were assessed. Country clusters: cluster 1: France; cluster 2: Spain, Greece, Romania and Italy; cluster 3: UK, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Slovakia, Austria and Finland ; cluster 4: Russia ; cluster 5: Ukraine. Parameter estimates from the statistical model presented as least squares means for categories of disease condition (GHD and TS) and location (Clusters 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) are presented.

    Time frame: Up to Week 24

  4. Multivariate Linear Regression Analyses to Assess Factors Affecting the Variability of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Time of Year, Calculated Age at Enrolment and Disease Condition

    A multivariate linear regression analysis of factors on WCV using a stepwise forward-backward elimination was used to determine the effect of individual factors on IGF-I values as measured using the capillary blood spot method (p=0.15 for a variable to enter and remain in the model). The WCV was computed from the series of 6 measurements (2 samplings in each of Weeks 21, 22 and 23). The influence of the time of the year (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quarters), calculated age at enrolment and disease condition on the IGF-I value were assessed. Parameter estimates from the statistical model are presented as least squares means for the categories of time of the year (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quarters), calculated age at enrolment and disease condition (GHD and TS).

    Time frame: Up to Week 24

  5. Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the IGF-I Levels as Measured by Capillary Blood Spot Method and Serum IGF-I Assay

    3 simultaneous IGF-I measurements were taken at Weeks 0 (baseline), 12 and 24 by serum and capillary assay to determine the precision profile of the capillary blood spot method versus the serum IGF-I assay. Change from baseline at Week 24 in the IGF-I measurements by capillary blood spot method and serum assay are presented.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

  6. Change From Baseline at Week 12 and Week 24 in Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3 (IGFBP3) Measurements

    The LWPES recommends that treatment for any indication with recombinant GH therapy in children be accompanied by regular monitoring of IGF-I and IGFBP3 concentrations. IGFBP3 binds circulating IGF-I and serum samples were taken at Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24) in order to measure IGFBP3. Change from baseline (Visit 1) at Visits 2 and 3 in IGFBP3 is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12 and Week 24

  7. Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Height

    The auxological parameter, height, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). Change from baseline in measured height at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

  8. Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Calculated Height SDS

    The auxological parameter, height, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). The French growth charts were used for the calculation of SDS parameters: the charts provide for each age range and sex a mean parameter and SD value, from which the SDS parameter can be derived assuming a normal distribution. For example: Height SDS = (height - reference mean height (age, sex)) / reference SD (age, sex). The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A positive change in SDS indicates an improvement in growth, therefore, a favorable outcome. Change from baseline in the calculated height SDS at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

  9. Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Weight

    The auxological parameter, weight, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). Change from baseline in measured weight at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

  10. Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Calculated Weight SDS

    The auxological parameter, weight, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). The French growth charts were used for the calculation of SDS parameters: the charts provide for each age range and sex a mean parameter and SD value, from which the SDS parameter can be derived assuming a normal distribution. For example: Weight SDS = (weight - reference mean weight (age, sex)) / reference SD (age, sex). The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A positive change in SDS indicates an improvement in weight, therefore, a favorable outcome. Change from baseline in the calculated weight SDS at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

  11. Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Annualised Growth Velocity

    The auxological parameter, annualised growth velocity, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). Change from baseline in the measured annualised growth velocity at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

  12. Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Annualised Growth Velocity SDS

    The auxological parameter, annualised growth velocity, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). The French growth charts were used for the calculation of SDS parameters: the charts provide for each age range and sex a mean parameter and SD value, from which the SDS parameter can be derived assuming a normal distribution. For example: Annualised GV SDS = (annualised GV - reference mean annualised GV (age, sex)) / reference SD (age, sex). The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A positive change in SDS indicates an improvement in growth velocity, therefore, a favorable outcome. Change from baseline in the annualised growth velocity SDS at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

  13. Percentage of Patients Rating the Overall Handling of the Administration Device, NutropinAq Pen, to Assess the Acceptability and Tolerance of NutropinAq and Its Pen

    The acceptability was evaluated by a questionnaire at Month 5. The users (parents and/or child) of NutropinAq pen and compliance aid booklet were asked to describe and rate the pen, cartridge, compliance aid booklet and their ease of use. The percentage of patients responding to each category for the assessment of the overall handling of the NutropinAq pen are presented. The categories are: Very easy, Easy, Moderately difficult, Difficult, Very difficult and Missing.

    Time frame: At Month 5

  14. Posology of NutropinAq at Baseline (Visit 1) Summarised as Mean Dose

    It was intended that the posology (mg/kg/day) of NutropinAq would remain constant throughout the study. The mean posology adopted at Visit 1 is presented.

    Time frame: Visit 1 (Baseline)

  15. Extent of Exposure to NutropinAq Throughout the Study

    The extent of treatment exposure throughout the study is presented as the mean number of daily injections performed.

    Time frame: Up to Week 24

07

Results

Posted Aug 9, 2018

Participant flow

251 children presenting growth failure associated with Growth Hormone Deficiency (GHD), Turner Syndrome (TS) or Chronic Renal Insufficiency (CRI) were screened (with informed consent) in 46 study centers across Europe. First patient enrolled: 7 June 2004; last subject completed: 22 July 2008

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Started251
Completed240
Not completed11
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject6
Withdrew: Adverse event2
Withdrew: Enrolled but not treated3

Outcome measures

PrimaryInsulin-Like Growth Factor I (IGF-I) Levels Measured Using the Timed Capillary Blood Spot Samples

Fingertip capillary blood was collected using filter paper cards for the assay of capillary blood spot IGF-I in line with the monitoring recommendations of the Lawson Wilkins Paediatric Endocrine Society (LWPES) for treatment with recombinant GH therapy in children. Capillary IGF-I assays were performed by the patient at home one day per week during Weeks 21, 22 and 23 only (same week day). The samples were scheduled in the evening prior to the injection of NutropinAq and between 7:00 and 9:00 the following morning. An extended window from 6:00 to 12:00 was allowed for defining protocol deviations. The number of capillary blood spot IGF-I measurements and the optimal timing of samples to assess the IGF-I status of NutropinAq treated patients was assessed. IGF-I measurements for the morning and evening sampling are presented.

Time frame:
At Weeks 21, 22 and 23
Reported as:
Mean · nanograms/milliliter (ng/mL)
Insulin-Like Growth Factor I (IGF-I) Levels Measured Using the Timed Capillary Blood Spot Samples
nanograms/milliliter (ng/mL)NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Week 21 Morning sampling223.54 ± 161.86
Week 21 Evening sampling212.97 ± 153.61
Week 22 Morning sampling238.02 ± 177.89
Week 22 Evening sampling226.90 ± 164.38
Week 23 Morning sampling241.58 ± 167.75
Week 23 Evening sampling235.47 ± 168.48
Statistical analysis
  • NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) · Icc: 0.90 · 95% CI 0.88 to 0.92An ICC ≥ 0.8 was considered satisfactory and indicative that a single sample would be representative of the overall IGF-I status.
  • NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) · Icc: 0.92 · 95% CI 0.90 to 0.93An ICC ≥ 0.8 was considered satisfactory and indicative that a single sample would be representative of the overall IGF-I status.
SecondaryAssessment of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Weekly Timing (Weeks 21-23) and Daily Timing (Morning and Evening)

The influence of daily and weekly timing on the IGF-I value as measured using the capillary blood spot method was analysed. A 3-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) was performed with patient, day and daily timing as factors after appropriate transformation to obtain normally distributed parameters. The interaction day\*time was tested and kept in the model only if p-value\<0.1. Parameter estimates from the statistical model are presented as least squares means for the categories of daily timing (Morning and Evening) and weekly timing (Week 21, Week 22 and Week 23). The values reported for Week 21, 22, and 23 represent the average IGF-I levels from the morning and evening samples at each week. The values reported for Evening represent the Evening IGF-I levels averaged across Weeks 21, 22, and 23, and similarly for the Morning values.

Time frame:
At Weeks 21, 22 and 23
Reported as:
Least squares mean · ng/mL
Assessment of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Weekly Timing (Weeks 21-23) and Daily Timing (Morning and Evening)
ng/mLNutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Week 21218.3 (203.0 to 233.5)
Week 22232.4 (217.1 to 247.8)
Week 23238.5 (223.2 to 253.9)
Evening225.1 (212.6 to 237.6)
Morning234.4 (221.8 to 246.9)
Statistical analysis
  • NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) · Fisher's f statistic (f) value: 1.79
  • NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) · F value: 1.06
SecondaryAssessment of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Sex and Prepubertal Status

The influence of sex and prepubertal status on the IGF-I value as measured using the capillary blood spot method was analysed. Parameter estimates from the statistical model are presented as least squares means for the categories of sex (male and female) and prepubertal status (pubertal and prepubertal). The values reported represent average IGF-I levels as determined from the 6 measurements taken (i.e. morning and evening samples at Weeks 21, 22 and 23).

Time frame:
At Weeks 21, 22 and 23
Reported as:
Least squares mean · ng/mL
Assessment of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Sex and Prepubertal Status
ng/mLNutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Female234.4 (224.7 to 244.4)
Male172.1 (162.7 to 181.9)
Pubertal238.9 (224.8 to 253.5)
Prepubertal168.4 (160.7 to 176.3)
Statistical analysis
  • NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) · F value: 83.97
  • NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) · F value: 68.35
SecondaryMultivariate Linear Regression Analyses to Assess Factors Affecting the Variability of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Disease Condition and Location

A multivariate linear regression analysis of factors on within-subject coefficient of variation (WCV) using a stepwise forward-backward elimination was used to determine the effect of individual factors on IGF-I values as measured using the capillary blood spot method (p=0.15 for a variable to enter and remain in the model). The WCV was computed from the series of 6 measurements (2 samplings in each of Weeks 21, 22 and 23). The influence of disease condition and country clusters on the IGF-I value were assessed. Country clusters: cluster 1: France; cluster 2: Spain, Greece, Romania and Italy; cluster 3: UK, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Slovakia, Austria and Finland ; cluster 4: Russia ; cluster 5: Ukraine. Parameter estimates from the statistical model presented as least squares means for categories of disease condition (GHD and TS) and location (Clusters 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) are presented.

Time frame:
Up to Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Regression coefficient
Multivariate Linear Regression Analyses to Assess Factors Affecting the Variability of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Disease Condition and Location
Regression coefficientNutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Disease condition: GHD0.058 ± 0.031
Disease condition: TS0.000 ± 0
Cluster 10.014 ± 0.045
Cluster 2-0.070 ± 0.048
Cluster 3-0.013 ± 0.046
Cluster 4-0.059 ± 0.040
Cluster 50.000 ± 0
Statistical analysis
  • NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) · F value: 10.73
  • NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) · F value: 2.20
SecondaryMultivariate Linear Regression Analyses to Assess Factors Affecting the Variability of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Time of Year, Calculated Age at Enrolment and Disease Condition

A multivariate linear regression analysis of factors on WCV using a stepwise forward-backward elimination was used to determine the effect of individual factors on IGF-I values as measured using the capillary blood spot method (p=0.15 for a variable to enter and remain in the model). The WCV was computed from the series of 6 measurements (2 samplings in each of Weeks 21, 22 and 23). The influence of the time of the year (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quarters), calculated age at enrolment and disease condition on the IGF-I value were assessed. Parameter estimates from the statistical model are presented as least squares means for the categories of time of the year (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quarters), calculated age at enrolment and disease condition (GHD and TS).

Time frame:
Up to Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Regression coefficient
Multivariate Linear Regression Analyses to Assess Factors Affecting the Variability of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Time of Year, Calculated Age at Enrolment and Disease Condition
Regression coefficientNutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
1st quarter0.118 ± 0.034
2nd quarter0.028 ± 0.033
3rd quarter0.029 ± 0.038
4th quarter0.000 ± 0
Calculated age at enrolment-0.007 ± 0.003
Disease condition: GHD0.051 ± 0.026
Disease condition: TS0.000 ± 0
Statistical analysis
  • NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) · F value: 3.65
  • NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) · F value: 7.38
  • NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) · F value: 3.86
SecondaryChange From Baseline at Week 24 in the IGF-I Levels as Measured by Capillary Blood Spot Method and Serum IGF-I Assay

3 simultaneous IGF-I measurements were taken at Weeks 0 (baseline), 12 and 24 by serum and capillary assay to determine the precision profile of the capillary blood spot method versus the serum IGF-I assay. Change from baseline at Week 24 in the IGF-I measurements by capillary blood spot method and serum assay are presented.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the IGF-I Levels as Measured by Capillary Blood Spot Method and Serum IGF-I Assay
ng/mLNutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
IGF-I Capillary blood spot method123.49 ± 127.40
Serum IGF-I assay215.41 ± 188.03
Statistical analysis
  • NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) · Mean difference: -164.79 · 95% CI -483.35 to -153.77
SecondaryChange From Baseline at Week 12 and Week 24 in Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3 (IGFBP3) Measurements

The LWPES recommends that treatment for any indication with recombinant GH therapy in children be accompanied by regular monitoring of IGF-I and IGFBP3 concentrations. IGFBP3 binds circulating IGF-I and serum samples were taken at Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24) in order to measure IGFBP3. Change from baseline (Visit 1) at Visits 2 and 3 in IGFBP3 is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 12 and Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Change From Baseline at Week 12 and Week 24 in Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3 (IGFBP3) Measurements
ng/mLNutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Change from baseline to Visit 21112.4 ± 1321.4
Change from baseline to Visit 31285.2 ± 1350.9
SecondaryChange From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Height

The auxological parameter, height, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). Change from baseline in measured height at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · cm
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Height
cmNutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Height4.73 ± 1.69
SecondaryChange From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Calculated Height SDS

The auxological parameter, height, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). The French growth charts were used for the calculation of SDS parameters: the charts provide for each age range and sex a mean parameter and SD value, from which the SDS parameter can be derived assuming a normal distribution. For example: Height SDS = (height - reference mean height (age, sex)) / reference SD (age, sex). The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A positive change in SDS indicates an improvement in growth, therefore, a favorable outcome. Change from baseline in the calculated height SDS at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · SD Score
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Calculated Height SDS
SD ScoreNutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Calculated Height SDS0.45 ± 0.37
SecondaryChange From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Weight

The auxological parameter, weight, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). Change from baseline in measured weight at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · kg
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Weight
kgNutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Weight2.01 ± 1.87
SecondaryChange From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Calculated Weight SDS

The auxological parameter, weight, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). The French growth charts were used for the calculation of SDS parameters: the charts provide for each age range and sex a mean parameter and SD value, from which the SDS parameter can be derived assuming a normal distribution. For example: Weight SDS = (weight - reference mean weight (age, sex)) / reference SD (age, sex). The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A positive change in SDS indicates an improvement in weight, therefore, a favorable outcome. Change from baseline in the calculated weight SDS at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · SD Score
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Calculated Weight SDS
SD ScoreNutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Calculated Weight SDS0.20 ± 0.56
SecondaryChange From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Annualised Growth Velocity

The auxological parameter, annualised growth velocity, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). Change from baseline in the measured annualised growth velocity at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · cm/year
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Annualised Growth Velocity
cm/yearNutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Annualised Growth Velocity5.20 ± 4.72
SecondaryChange From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Annualised Growth Velocity SDS

The auxological parameter, annualised growth velocity, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). The French growth charts were used for the calculation of SDS parameters: the charts provide for each age range and sex a mean parameter and SD value, from which the SDS parameter can be derived assuming a normal distribution. For example: Annualised GV SDS = (annualised GV - reference mean annualised GV (age, sex)) / reference SD (age, sex). The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A positive change in SDS indicates an improvement in growth velocity, therefore, a favorable outcome. Change from baseline in the annualised growth velocity SDS at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · SD Score
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Annualised Growth Velocity SDS
SD ScoreNutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Annualised Growth Velocity SDS5.10 ± 4.80
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Rating the Overall Handling of the Administration Device, NutropinAq Pen, to Assess the Acceptability and Tolerance of NutropinAq and Its Pen

The acceptability was evaluated by a questionnaire at Month 5. The users (parents and/or child) of NutropinAq pen and compliance aid booklet were asked to describe and rate the pen, cartridge, compliance aid booklet and their ease of use. The percentage of patients responding to each category for the assessment of the overall handling of the NutropinAq pen are presented. The categories are: Very easy, Easy, Moderately difficult, Difficult, Very difficult and Missing.

Time frame:
At Month 5
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Rating the Overall Handling of the Administration Device, NutropinAq Pen, to Assess the Acceptability and Tolerance of NutropinAq and Its Pen
Percentage of patientsNutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Very easy39.8
Easy52.5
Moderately difficult3.3
Difficult0
Very difficult0.4
Missing4.1
SecondaryPosology of NutropinAq at Baseline (Visit 1) Summarised as Mean Dose

It was intended that the posology (mg/kg/day) of NutropinAq would remain constant throughout the study. The mean posology adopted at Visit 1 is presented.

Time frame:
Visit 1 (Baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · mg/kg/day
Posology of NutropinAq at Baseline (Visit 1) Summarised as Mean Dose
mg/kg/dayNutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Posology of NutropinAq at Baseline (Visit 1) Summarised as Mean Dose0.0382 ± 0.0092
SecondaryExtent of Exposure to NutropinAq Throughout the Study

The extent of treatment exposure throughout the study is presented as the mean number of daily injections performed.

Time frame:
Up to Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · days
Extent of Exposure to NutropinAq Throughout the Study
daysNutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Extent of Exposure to NutropinAq Throughout the Study159.7 ± 35.8

Adverse events

Collected over From baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)0/248 (0%)6/248 (2.4%)81/248 (32.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventNutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
BronchopneumoniaInfections and infestations1/248
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations1/248
Pyelonephritis acuteInfections and infestations1/248
Accidental overdoseInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/248
Femur fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/248
Retinitis PigmentosaCongenital, familial and genetic disorders1/248
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/248
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 73
Most frequent other events
EventNutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
HeadacheNervous system disorders14/248
Insulin-like Growth Factor increasedInvestigations13/248
PyrexiaGeneral disorders9/248
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations7/248
RhinitisInfections and infestations6/248
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders5/248
Otitis mediaInfections and infestations5/248
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders4/248
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders4/248
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders3/248

Baseline characteristics

The Intention-to-Treat (ITT) Population consisted of all treated patients (enrolled patients who received at least one injection of treatment) and who provided any follow-up data.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Mean9.9 ± 3.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Female138
Male106
Birth height
Birth height(centimeters (cm))NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Mean48.49 ± 3.36
Birth weight
Birth weight(kg)NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Mean2.94 ± 0.60
Duration of gestation
Duration of gestation(weeks of amenorrhea)NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Mean38.7 ± 2.6
Genetic target height
Genetic target height(cm)NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Mean166.26 ± 8.16
Calculated genetic target height Standard Deviation Score (SDS)
Calculated genetic target height Standard Deviation Score (SDS)(Standard Deviations (SD))NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Mean-0.33 ± 0.95
Duration of previous Growth Hormone (GH) treatment
Duration of previous Growth Hormone (GH) treatment(years)NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU)
Mean1.68 ± 1.56

6 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

45 sites
  • Dienst Kindergeneeskunde
    Brussels, B-1090, Belgium
  • Dienst Kindergeneeskunde
    Edegem, B-2650, Belgium
  • Klinika Deti a Dorostu
    Prague, 100 34, Czechia
  • Aalborg Sygehus Nord, Borneafdelingen
    Aalborg, 9100, Denmark
  • Sygeh. i Ringkjobing Amt, Borneafdeling
    Herning, 7400, Denmark
  • Helsinki University Central Hospital
    Helsinki, Finland
  • CHU - Hôtel Dieu
    Angers, 49033, France
  • Cabinet Médical
    Bordeaux, 33000, France
  • CHU Grenoble
    Grenoble, 38043, France
  • Centre Hospitalier General
    Le Havre, 76083, France
  • CHU Timone Enfants
    Marseille, 13385, France
  • CHU de Montpellier
    Montpellier, 34295, France
  • Hôpital Archet 2
    Nice, 06202, France
  • Hôpital Saint-Vincent de Paul
    Paris, 75674, France
  • Groupe Hospitalier de Necker
    Paris, 75743, France
  • Hôpital Charles Nicolle
    Rouen, 76031, France
  • CHU Hautepierre
    Strasbourg, 67100, France
  • Centre Hospitalier de Bigorre
    Tarbes, 65013, France
  • Cabinet Médical
    Toulouse, 31000, France
  • Hôpital des Enfants
    Toulouse, 31059, France
  • Centre Pédiatrique Gatien de Clocheville
    Tours, 37044, France
  • Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR
    Leipzig, 04317, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
    Tübingen, 72076, Germany
  • General State Hospital of Nikaia
    Athens, 18454, Greece
  • PA Kyriakou Children's Hospital
    Athens, Greece
  • Azienda Policlinico - Università di Catania
    Catania, 78-95123, Italy
  • Ospedale Policlinico
    Chieti, 5-66013, Italy
  • Clinica Pediatrica II
    Florence, 13-50132, Italy
  • Il Università degli Studi di Napoli
    Naples, 4-80138, Italy
  • Clinica Pediatrica, Universita Federico II di Napoli
    Naples, Italy
  • Clinica Pediatrica
    Novara, 18-28100, Italy
  • Clinica Pediatrica
    Parma, 14-43100, Italy
  • Institutul de Endocrinologie C.I. Parhon
    Bucharest, Sector 1, Romania
  • Endocrinology Research Centre RAMS, Institute of Pediatric Endocrinology
    Moscow, Russia
  • Tushino Pediatric Hospital, RMAPE Department of Endocrinology for Childhood and Adolescent Age
    Moscow, Russia
  • Il Detska Klinika
    Bratislava, 833 40, Slovakia
  • Hospital de Nens de Barcelona
    Barcelona, 08009, Spain
  • Hospital General Universitario
    Elche, 03203, Spain
  • Hospital Gregorio Marañón
    Madrid, 28007, Spain
  • Hospital Parc Taulí
    Sabadell, 08208, Spain
  • Hospital Clínico Universitario
    Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
  • Scientific-Research Institute of Endocrinology, Academy of Medical Science of Ukraine
    Kiev, Ukraine
  • Ukrainian Scientific practical Centre of Endocrine surgery, Endocrine Organs and Tissues Transplantation
    Kiev, Ukraine
  • St George's Hospital
    London, England SW17 0QT, United Kingdom
  • University Hospital Wales
    Cardiff, Wales 14 4XW, United Kingdom
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jun 2004, a primary completion of Jul 2008 and a completion of Jul 2008. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Aug 2018, 10 years 1 month after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 5, 2005
First posted
Oct 7, 2005
Start
Jun 2004
Primary completionActual
Jul 2008
CompletionActual
Jul 2008
Results first posted
Aug 9, 2018
Last update
Dec 9, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 9, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00234533
Lead sponsor
Ipsen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 7, 2005
Start date
Jun 2004
Primary completion
Jul 2008
Completion
Jul 2008
Results posted
Aug 9, 2018
Last update
Dec 9, 2019

Study contacts

Ipsen Medical Director
study director · Ipsen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Human Growth Hormone

Start the discussion