A Phase 3 interventional study of Somatropin (rDNA origin) in Turner Syndrome, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic and Pituitary Diseases, sponsored by Ipsen. Completed at 45 sites in 14 countries. Open to participants aged Up to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-09.
Sponsored by Ipsen · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
The main purpose of this study is to establish an optimal monitoring regimen in NutropinAq treated children, using newly developed capillary blood spot IGF-1 measurement technology.
119 studies on the registry are indexed under Turner Syndrome; 33 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 251 is above the median of 67 across 52 interventional studies indexed under Turner Syndrome.
Browse Turner Syndrome studies →Ipsen is the lead sponsor of 288 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.
Of its 26 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 21 (81%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients received daily subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of NutropinAq 10 milligrams (mg)/2 milliliters (mL) for 6 months. The therapeutic daily doses administered were as follows: * GHD patients: 0.025 - 0.035 mg/ kilogram (kg) bodyweight * TS patients: up to 0.05 mg/kg bodyweight * CRI patients: up to 0.05 mg/kg bodyweight Patients visited the study clinic for a baseline visit and for 2 other visits every 3 months (Weeks 12 and 24). Additional home assessments were made at Weeks 21, 22 and 23. The investigator determined the dose administered to each patient, and it was recommended to perform the injection in the evening.
Drug: Somatropin (rDNA origin)
Daily subcutaneous injections, 0,025 - 0,05 mg/kg/day for 6 months.
Insulin-Like Growth Factor I (IGF-I) Levels Measured Using the Timed Capillary Blood Spot Samples
Fingertip capillary blood was collected using filter paper cards for the assay of capillary blood spot IGF-I in line with the monitoring recommendations of the Lawson Wilkins Paediatric Endocrine Society (LWPES) for treatment with recombinant GH therapy in children. Capillary IGF-I assays were performed by the patient at home one day per week during Weeks 21, 22 and 23 only (same week day). The samples were scheduled in the evening prior to the injection of NutropinAq and between 7:00 and 9:00 the following morning. An extended window from 6:00 to 12:00 was allowed for defining protocol deviations. The number of capillary blood spot IGF-I measurements and the optimal timing of samples to assess the IGF-I status of NutropinAq treated patients was assessed. IGF-I measurements for the morning and evening sampling are presented.
Time frame: At Weeks 21, 22 and 23
Assessment of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Weekly Timing (Weeks 21-23) and Daily Timing (Morning and Evening)
The influence of daily and weekly timing on the IGF-I value as measured using the capillary blood spot method was analysed. A 3-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) was performed with patient, day and daily timing as factors after appropriate transformation to obtain normally distributed parameters. The interaction day\*time was tested and kept in the model only if p-value\<0.1. Parameter estimates from the statistical model are presented as least squares means for the categories of daily timing (Morning and Evening) and weekly timing (Week 21, Week 22 and Week 23). The values reported for Week 21, 22, and 23 represent the average IGF-I levels from the morning and evening samples at each week. The values reported for Evening represent the Evening IGF-I levels averaged across Weeks 21, 22, and 23, and similarly for the Morning values.
Time frame: At Weeks 21, 22 and 23
Assessment of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Sex and Prepubertal Status
The influence of sex and prepubertal status on the IGF-I value as measured using the capillary blood spot method was analysed. Parameter estimates from the statistical model are presented as least squares means for the categories of sex (male and female) and prepubertal status (pubertal and prepubertal). The values reported represent average IGF-I levels as determined from the 6 measurements taken (i.e. morning and evening samples at Weeks 21, 22 and 23).
Time frame: At Weeks 21, 22 and 23
Multivariate Linear Regression Analyses to Assess Factors Affecting the Variability of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Disease Condition and Location
A multivariate linear regression analysis of factors on within-subject coefficient of variation (WCV) using a stepwise forward-backward elimination was used to determine the effect of individual factors on IGF-I values as measured using the capillary blood spot method (p=0.15 for a variable to enter and remain in the model). The WCV was computed from the series of 6 measurements (2 samplings in each of Weeks 21, 22 and 23). The influence of disease condition and country clusters on the IGF-I value were assessed. Country clusters: cluster 1: France; cluster 2: Spain, Greece, Romania and Italy; cluster 3: UK, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Slovakia, Austria and Finland ; cluster 4: Russia ; cluster 5: Ukraine. Parameter estimates from the statistical model presented as least squares means for categories of disease condition (GHD and TS) and location (Clusters 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) are presented.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Multivariate Linear Regression Analyses to Assess Factors Affecting the Variability of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Time of Year, Calculated Age at Enrolment and Disease Condition
A multivariate linear regression analysis of factors on WCV using a stepwise forward-backward elimination was used to determine the effect of individual factors on IGF-I values as measured using the capillary blood spot method (p=0.15 for a variable to enter and remain in the model). The WCV was computed from the series of 6 measurements (2 samplings in each of Weeks 21, 22 and 23). The influence of the time of the year (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quarters), calculated age at enrolment and disease condition on the IGF-I value were assessed. Parameter estimates from the statistical model are presented as least squares means for the categories of time of the year (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quarters), calculated age at enrolment and disease condition (GHD and TS).
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the IGF-I Levels as Measured by Capillary Blood Spot Method and Serum IGF-I Assay
3 simultaneous IGF-I measurements were taken at Weeks 0 (baseline), 12 and 24 by serum and capillary assay to determine the precision profile of the capillary blood spot method versus the serum IGF-I assay. Change from baseline at Week 24 in the IGF-I measurements by capillary blood spot method and serum assay are presented.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 12 and Week 24 in Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3 (IGFBP3) Measurements
The LWPES recommends that treatment for any indication with recombinant GH therapy in children be accompanied by regular monitoring of IGF-I and IGFBP3 concentrations. IGFBP3 binds circulating IGF-I and serum samples were taken at Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24) in order to measure IGFBP3. Change from baseline (Visit 1) at Visits 2 and 3 in IGFBP3 is presented.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12 and Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Height
The auxological parameter, height, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). Change from baseline in measured height at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Calculated Height SDS
The auxological parameter, height, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). The French growth charts were used for the calculation of SDS parameters: the charts provide for each age range and sex a mean parameter and SD value, from which the SDS parameter can be derived assuming a normal distribution. For example: Height SDS = (height - reference mean height (age, sex)) / reference SD (age, sex). The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A positive change in SDS indicates an improvement in growth, therefore, a favorable outcome. Change from baseline in the calculated height SDS at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Weight
The auxological parameter, weight, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). Change from baseline in measured weight at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Calculated Weight SDS
The auxological parameter, weight, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). The French growth charts were used for the calculation of SDS parameters: the charts provide for each age range and sex a mean parameter and SD value, from which the SDS parameter can be derived assuming a normal distribution. For example: Weight SDS = (weight - reference mean weight (age, sex)) / reference SD (age, sex). The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A positive change in SDS indicates an improvement in weight, therefore, a favorable outcome. Change from baseline in the calculated weight SDS at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Annualised Growth Velocity
The auxological parameter, annualised growth velocity, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). Change from baseline in the measured annualised growth velocity at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Annualised Growth Velocity SDS
The auxological parameter, annualised growth velocity, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). The French growth charts were used for the calculation of SDS parameters: the charts provide for each age range and sex a mean parameter and SD value, from which the SDS parameter can be derived assuming a normal distribution. For example: Annualised GV SDS = (annualised GV - reference mean annualised GV (age, sex)) / reference SD (age, sex). The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A positive change in SDS indicates an improvement in growth velocity, therefore, a favorable outcome. Change from baseline in the annualised growth velocity SDS at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Percentage of Patients Rating the Overall Handling of the Administration Device, NutropinAq Pen, to Assess the Acceptability and Tolerance of NutropinAq and Its Pen
The acceptability was evaluated by a questionnaire at Month 5. The users (parents and/or child) of NutropinAq pen and compliance aid booklet were asked to describe and rate the pen, cartridge, compliance aid booklet and their ease of use. The percentage of patients responding to each category for the assessment of the overall handling of the NutropinAq pen are presented. The categories are: Very easy, Easy, Moderately difficult, Difficult, Very difficult and Missing.
Time frame: At Month 5
Posology of NutropinAq at Baseline (Visit 1) Summarised as Mean Dose
It was intended that the posology (mg/kg/day) of NutropinAq would remain constant throughout the study. The mean posology adopted at Visit 1 is presented.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Baseline)
Extent of Exposure to NutropinAq Throughout the Study
The extent of treatment exposure throughout the study is presented as the mean number of daily injections performed.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
251 children presenting growth failure associated with Growth Hormone Deficiency (GHD), Turner Syndrome (TS) or Chronic Renal Insufficiency (CRI) were screened (with informed consent) in 46 study centers across Europe. First patient enrolled: 7 June 2004; last subject completed: 22 July 2008
| Milestone | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Started | 251 |
| Completed | 240 |
| Not completed | 11 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 6 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 2 |
| Withdrew: Enrolled but not treated | 3 |
Fingertip capillary blood was collected using filter paper cards for the assay of capillary blood spot IGF-I in line with the monitoring recommendations of the Lawson Wilkins Paediatric Endocrine Society (LWPES) for treatment with recombinant GH therapy in children. Capillary IGF-I assays were performed by the patient at home one day per week during Weeks 21, 22 and 23 only (same week day). The samples were scheduled in the evening prior to the injection of NutropinAq and between 7:00 and 9:00 the following morning. An extended window from 6:00 to 12:00 was allowed for defining protocol deviations. The number of capillary blood spot IGF-I measurements and the optimal timing of samples to assess the IGF-I status of NutropinAq treated patients was assessed. IGF-I measurements for the morning and evening sampling are presented.
| nanograms/milliliter (ng/mL) | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Week 21 Morning sampling | 223.54 ± 161.86 |
| Week 21 Evening sampling | 212.97 ± 153.61 |
| Week 22 Morning sampling | 238.02 ± 177.89 |
| Week 22 Evening sampling | 226.90 ± 164.38 |
| Week 23 Morning sampling | 241.58 ± 167.75 |
| Week 23 Evening sampling | 235.47 ± 168.48 |
The influence of daily and weekly timing on the IGF-I value as measured using the capillary blood spot method was analysed. A 3-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) was performed with patient, day and daily timing as factors after appropriate transformation to obtain normally distributed parameters. The interaction day\*time was tested and kept in the model only if p-value\<0.1. Parameter estimates from the statistical model are presented as least squares means for the categories of daily timing (Morning and Evening) and weekly timing (Week 21, Week 22 and Week 23). The values reported for Week 21, 22, and 23 represent the average IGF-I levels from the morning and evening samples at each week. The values reported for Evening represent the Evening IGF-I levels averaged across Weeks 21, 22, and 23, and similarly for the Morning values.
| ng/mL | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Week 21 | 218.3 (203.0 to 233.5) |
| Week 22 | 232.4 (217.1 to 247.8) |
| Week 23 | 238.5 (223.2 to 253.9) |
| Evening | 225.1 (212.6 to 237.6) |
| Morning | 234.4 (221.8 to 246.9) |
The influence of sex and prepubertal status on the IGF-I value as measured using the capillary blood spot method was analysed. Parameter estimates from the statistical model are presented as least squares means for the categories of sex (male and female) and prepubertal status (pubertal and prepubertal). The values reported represent average IGF-I levels as determined from the 6 measurements taken (i.e. morning and evening samples at Weeks 21, 22 and 23).
| ng/mL | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Female | 234.4 (224.7 to 244.4) |
| Male | 172.1 (162.7 to 181.9) |
| Pubertal | 238.9 (224.8 to 253.5) |
| Prepubertal | 168.4 (160.7 to 176.3) |
A multivariate linear regression analysis of factors on within-subject coefficient of variation (WCV) using a stepwise forward-backward elimination was used to determine the effect of individual factors on IGF-I values as measured using the capillary blood spot method (p=0.15 for a variable to enter and remain in the model). The WCV was computed from the series of 6 measurements (2 samplings in each of Weeks 21, 22 and 23). The influence of disease condition and country clusters on the IGF-I value were assessed. Country clusters: cluster 1: France; cluster 2: Spain, Greece, Romania and Italy; cluster 3: UK, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Slovakia, Austria and Finland ; cluster 4: Russia ; cluster 5: Ukraine. Parameter estimates from the statistical model presented as least squares means for categories of disease condition (GHD and TS) and location (Clusters 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) are presented.
| Regression coefficient | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Disease condition: GHD | 0.058 ± 0.031 |
| Disease condition: TS | 0.000 ± 0 |
| Cluster 1 | 0.014 ± 0.045 |
| Cluster 2 | -0.070 ± 0.048 |
| Cluster 3 | -0.013 ± 0.046 |
| Cluster 4 | -0.059 ± 0.040 |
| Cluster 5 | 0.000 ± 0 |
A multivariate linear regression analysis of factors on WCV using a stepwise forward-backward elimination was used to determine the effect of individual factors on IGF-I values as measured using the capillary blood spot method (p=0.15 for a variable to enter and remain in the model). The WCV was computed from the series of 6 measurements (2 samplings in each of Weeks 21, 22 and 23). The influence of the time of the year (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quarters), calculated age at enrolment and disease condition on the IGF-I value were assessed. Parameter estimates from the statistical model are presented as least squares means for the categories of time of the year (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quarters), calculated age at enrolment and disease condition (GHD and TS).
| Regression coefficient | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| 1st quarter | 0.118 ± 0.034 |
| 2nd quarter | 0.028 ± 0.033 |
| 3rd quarter | 0.029 ± 0.038 |
| 4th quarter | 0.000 ± 0 |
| Calculated age at enrolment | -0.007 ± 0.003 |
| Disease condition: GHD | 0.051 ± 0.026 |
| Disease condition: TS | 0.000 ± 0 |
3 simultaneous IGF-I measurements were taken at Weeks 0 (baseline), 12 and 24 by serum and capillary assay to determine the precision profile of the capillary blood spot method versus the serum IGF-I assay. Change from baseline at Week 24 in the IGF-I measurements by capillary blood spot method and serum assay are presented.
| ng/mL | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| IGF-I Capillary blood spot method | 123.49 ± 127.40 |
| Serum IGF-I assay | 215.41 ± 188.03 |
The LWPES recommends that treatment for any indication with recombinant GH therapy in children be accompanied by regular monitoring of IGF-I and IGFBP3 concentrations. IGFBP3 binds circulating IGF-I and serum samples were taken at Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24) in order to measure IGFBP3. Change from baseline (Visit 1) at Visits 2 and 3 in IGFBP3 is presented.
| ng/mL | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Change from baseline to Visit 2 | 1112.4 ± 1321.4 |
| Change from baseline to Visit 3 | 1285.2 ± 1350.9 |
The auxological parameter, height, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). Change from baseline in measured height at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.
| cm | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Height | 4.73 ± 1.69 |
The auxological parameter, height, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). The French growth charts were used for the calculation of SDS parameters: the charts provide for each age range and sex a mean parameter and SD value, from which the SDS parameter can be derived assuming a normal distribution. For example: Height SDS = (height - reference mean height (age, sex)) / reference SD (age, sex). The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A positive change in SDS indicates an improvement in growth, therefore, a favorable outcome. Change from baseline in the calculated height SDS at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.
| SD Score | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Calculated Height SDS | 0.45 ± 0.37 |
The auxological parameter, weight, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). Change from baseline in measured weight at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.
| kg | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Weight | 2.01 ± 1.87 |
The auxological parameter, weight, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). The French growth charts were used for the calculation of SDS parameters: the charts provide for each age range and sex a mean parameter and SD value, from which the SDS parameter can be derived assuming a normal distribution. For example: Weight SDS = (weight - reference mean weight (age, sex)) / reference SD (age, sex). The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A positive change in SDS indicates an improvement in weight, therefore, a favorable outcome. Change from baseline in the calculated weight SDS at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.
| SD Score | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Calculated Weight SDS | 0.20 ± 0.56 |
The auxological parameter, annualised growth velocity, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). Change from baseline in the measured annualised growth velocity at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.
| cm/year | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Annualised Growth Velocity | 5.20 ± 4.72 |
The auxological parameter, annualised growth velocity, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). The French growth charts were used for the calculation of SDS parameters: the charts provide for each age range and sex a mean parameter and SD value, from which the SDS parameter can be derived assuming a normal distribution. For example: Annualised GV SDS = (annualised GV - reference mean annualised GV (age, sex)) / reference SD (age, sex). The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A positive change in SDS indicates an improvement in growth velocity, therefore, a favorable outcome. Change from baseline in the annualised growth velocity SDS at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.
| SD Score | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Annualised Growth Velocity SDS | 5.10 ± 4.80 |
The acceptability was evaluated by a questionnaire at Month 5. The users (parents and/or child) of NutropinAq pen and compliance aid booklet were asked to describe and rate the pen, cartridge, compliance aid booklet and their ease of use. The percentage of patients responding to each category for the assessment of the overall handling of the NutropinAq pen are presented. The categories are: Very easy, Easy, Moderately difficult, Difficult, Very difficult and Missing.
| Percentage of patients | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Very easy | 39.8 |
| Easy | 52.5 |
| Moderately difficult | 3.3 |
| Difficult | 0 |
| Very difficult | 0.4 |
| Missing | 4.1 |
It was intended that the posology (mg/kg/day) of NutropinAq would remain constant throughout the study. The mean posology adopted at Visit 1 is presented.
| mg/kg/day | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Posology of NutropinAq at Baseline (Visit 1) Summarised as Mean Dose | 0.0382 ± 0.0092 |
The extent of treatment exposure throughout the study is presented as the mean number of daily injections performed.
| days | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Extent of Exposure to NutropinAq Throughout the Study | 159.7 ± 35.8 |
Collected over From baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) | 0/248 (0%) | 6/248 (2.4%) | 81/248 (32.7%) |
| Event | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| BronchopneumoniaInfections and infestations | 1/248 |
| GastroenteritisInfections and infestations | 1/248 |
| Pyelonephritis acuteInfections and infestations | 1/248 |
| Accidental overdoseInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 1/248 |
| Femur fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 1/248 |
| Retinitis PigmentosaCongenital, familial and genetic disorders | 1/248 |
| Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 1/248 |
| Event | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| HeadacheNervous system disorders | 14/248 |
| Insulin-like Growth Factor increasedInvestigations | 13/248 |
| PyrexiaGeneral disorders | 9/248 |
| Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations | 7/248 |
| RhinitisInfections and infestations | 6/248 |
| VomitingGastrointestinal disorders | 5/248 |
| Otitis mediaInfections and infestations | 5/248 |
| Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders | 4/248 |
| Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders | 4/248 |
| DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders | 3/248 |
The Intention-to-Treat (ITT) Population consisted of all treated patients (enrolled patients who received at least one injection of treatment) and who provided any follow-up data.
| Age, Continuous(years) | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Mean | 9.9 ± 3.9 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Female | 138 |
| Male | 106 |
| Birth height(centimeters (cm)) | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Mean | 48.49 ± 3.36 |
| Birth weight(kg) | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Mean | 2.94 ± 0.60 |
| Duration of gestation(weeks of amenorrhea) | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Mean | 38.7 ± 2.6 |
| Genetic target height(cm) | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Mean | 166.26 ± 8.16 |
| Calculated genetic target height Standard Deviation Score (SDS)(Standard Deviations (SD)) | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Mean | -0.33 ± 0.95 |
| Duration of previous Growth Hormone (GH) treatment(years) | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 ml (30 IU) |
|---|---|
| Mean | 1.68 ± 1.56 |
6 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.
The record gives a start of Jun 2004, a primary completion of Jul 2008 and a completion of Jul 2008. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
Results were first posted in Aug 2018, 10 years 1 month after primary completion.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Human Growth Hormone