CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00228384Updated Jun 4, 2012Results posted

GORE VIABAHN ENDOPROSTHESIS Peripheral Vascular Disease Study

A Phase 4 interventional study of GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis and Bare Nitinol Stent in Peripheral Vascular Diseases, sponsored by W.L.Gore & Associates. Completed at 15 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-06-04.

Sponsored by W.L.Gore & Associates · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
148
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To evaluate the performance of the GORE VIABAHN® Endoprosthesis compared to a bare nitinol stent for the treatment of superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusive disease in long lesions.

Read the detailed description

This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized study with clinical and radiographic follow-up for three years post-procedure. Approximately one hundred fifty subjects will be enrolled and randomized into one of two study treatment groups.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Vascular Diseases

1,027 studies on the registry are indexed under Vascular Diseases; 167 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 148 is above the median of 78 across 639 interventional studies indexed under Vascular Diseases.

Browse Vascular Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

W.L.Gore & Associates is the lead sponsor of 95 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Lifestyle-limiting claudication or rest pain.
  • Subject (or their legal guardian) has read, understood and provided written informed consent.
  • At least 21 years of age.
  • Quality of life questionnaires completed.
  • Noninvasive lower extremity arterial studies within 45-days prior to study procedure.
  • If applicable, staged ipsilateral vascular procedure ≥ 14-days prior to study procedure.
  • If applicable, vascular treatment on non-study leg for bilateral claudication ≥ 14-days prior to study procedure.
  • Male, infertile female, or female of child bearing potential practicing an acceptable method of birth control with a negative pregnancy test.
  • Projected life expectancy of greater than three years.
  • The ability to comply with protocol.
  • Angiographic and Lesion Requirements meets protocol criteria.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Untreated flow-limiting aortoiliac occlusive disease.
  • Any previous stenting or surgery in the target vessel.
  • Subjects with arterial lesions requiring treatment with device diameters other than 6, 7, or 8 mm.
  • Severe ipsilateral common femoral/profunda disease requiring surgical intervention.
  • Femoral or popliteal aneurysm.
  • Non-atherosclerotic disease resulting in occlusion.
  • Tibial artery disease requiring treatment.
  • Prior ipsilateral femoral artery bypass.
  • Severe medical comorbidities.
  • Popliteal artery vascular access at any time during procedure.
  • Antegrade and retrograde vascular access on the same common femoral artery at the time of the SFA intervention.
  • Serum creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL within 45 days prior to study procedure.
  • Major distal amputation.
  • Septicemia.
  • Any previously known coagulation disorder.
  • Morbid obesity or operative scarring that precludes percutaneous approach (physician's discretion).
  • Contraindication to anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy.
  • Known allergies to stent/stent-graft components.
  • History of prior life-threatening reaction to contrast agent.
  • Currently participating in another clinical research trial.
  • Current peritoneal or hemodialysis.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
148 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Gore VIABAHN Endoprosthesis

    Device: GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis

  • Active comparator
    Bare Nitinol Stent (BNS)

    Device: Bare Nitinol Stent

Interventions

  • DeviceGORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis

    Implantation

    Also known as: VIABAHN

  • DeviceBare Nitinol Stent

    Implantation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy: Primary Patency at Three Years

    Primary patency is the Peak Systolic Velocity Ratio (PSVR) maintained at or below 2.0 without any repeat intervention. The PSVR is the ratio of the highest velocity (or pressure) of the blood moving through the stent divided by the velocity immediately outside the stent (the end of the stent nearest to the heart). Pressures are measured by ultrasound. These results include the percentage of subjects that maintained primary patency at or below 2.0 without any repeat intervention through the end of the study (three years).

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. Safety: Composite of Major Procedural (30-day) Adverse Events (AEs)

    Major procedural events include death, myocardial infarction, acute renal insufficiency, study limb amputation, and access site and treatment site complications requiring surgery or blood transfusion. The results for this outcome measure are the total percent of these events that occurred in each treatment arm within the first 30 days following stent implantations.

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Primary Assisted Patency

    Primary assisted patency is defined as when the subject had a repeat intervention to regain patency in order to salvage the stent prior to complete occlusion.

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. Secondary Patency

    Secondary patency is defined as maintaining patency in the target vessel after a repeat intervention to correct complete occlusion in the treated arterial segment.

    Time frame: 3 years

  3. Technical Success at Initial Procedure

    Technical success is defined as a composite of both a) restoration of superficial femoral artery (SFA) patency with \< 30% residual stenosis (narrowing) within the treated arterial segment as viewed on post-procedure completion angiography, and b) Final Hemodynamic Pressure Gradient ≤15mm Hg (mercury). A lower pressure gradient number indicates less resistance to blood flow; i.e., less stenosis or narrowing of the vessel under the pressure of the flow. The results show the percentage of study subjects that had technical success.

    Time frame: Time of implant procedure

  4. Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)

    This measure shows the percentage of subjects that had at least one repeat intervention performed during their enrollment in the clinical study.

    Time frame: 3 years

  5. Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

    This measure shows the percentage of subjects that had at least one repeat intervention in the target lesion during their enrollment in the clinical study.

    Time frame: 3 years

  6. Improvement in Rutherford Classification (Clinical Success)

    The Rutherford Classification is a system used to score Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD). The stages follow (higher numbers are worse): Stage 0 - Asymptomatic Stage 1 - Mild claudication Stage 2 - Moderate claudication Stage 3 - Severe claudication Stage 4 - Rest pain Stage 5 - Ischemic ulceration not exceeding ulcer of the digits of the foot Stage 6 - Severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene The percentage of people improving by at least one stage (moving frm higher number to lower number) is listed in the results.

    Time frame: 3 years

  7. Quality of Life Subject Self-assessments (Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire: ICQ) (Clinical Success)

    The ICQ is a series of 16 questions asking about leg pain and limitations to activities such as walking specific distances, doing daily activities, worrying about pain, resting during activities, and similar. Most questions specifically ask about only the two weeks prior to answering the completion of the questionnaire. Improvement in Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ) is a lower score (0 = best, 100 = worst). A decrease in mean score from baseline indicates an improvement in the patient's condition and an increase indicates a decline.

    Time frame: 3 years

  8. Quality of Life Subject Self-assessments (Short Form:36 (SF:36) - Mental Summary Score)) (Clinical Success)

    The SF-36 Health Survey (version 2) asks 36 questions to measure health and well-being from the patient's point of view. The subscale and total score ranges from 0 to 100 but is normalized so that a score of 50 is the population mean, with a standard deviation of 10. The SF:36 - Mental Summary Score Questionnaire score must improve in order to be considered for clinical success. An increase in the mean score from baseline indicates an improvement in the patient's condition and a decrease indicates a decline.

    Time frame: 3 years

  9. Quality of Life Subject Self-assessments (Short Form:36 (SF:36) - Physical Summary Score)) (Clinical Success)

    The SF-36 Health Survey (version 2) asks 36 questions to measure health and well-being from the patient's point of view. The subscale and total score ranges from 0 to 100 but is normalized so that a score of 50 is the population mean, with a standard deviation of 10. The SF:36 - Physical Summary Score Questionnaire score must improve in order to be considered for clinical success. An increase in the mean score from baseline indicates an improvement in the patient's condition and a decrease indicates a decline.

    Time frame: 3 years

  10. Change in Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI)

    This test is done by measuring blood pressure at the ankle and the arm while a person is at rest. The ABI is then calculated by dividing the systolic blood pressure at the ankle by the systolic blood pressures in the arm. A normal resting ABI is 0.9 to 1.3. A resting ABI of less than 0.9 is abnormal. An outcome of a higher mean ABI is considered a success.

    Time frame: 3 years

  11. Alternate Peak Systolic Velocity Ratio (PSVR) (Equal or Less Than 2.5)

    The PSVR is the ratio of the highest velocity (or pressure) of the blood moving through the stent divided by the velocity immediately outside the stent (the end of the stent nearest to the heart). Pressures are measured by ultrasound. These results include the percentage of subjects that had a PSVR of equal or less than 2.5.

    Time frame: 3 years

  12. Alternate Peak Systolic Velocity Ratio (Less Than or Equal to 3.0)

    The PSVR is the ratio of the highest velocity (or pressure) of the blood moving through the stent divided by the velocity immediately outside the stent (the end of the stent nearest to the heart). Pressures are measured by ultrasound. These results include the percentage of subjects that had a PSVR of equal or less than 3.0.

    Time frame: 3 years

  13. Occurrence of Stent Fracture

    The outcome of stent fracture measures the percentages of subjects that had stent fractures, as observed in their 1yr follow-up visit X-rays.

    Time frame: 1 year

  14. Occurrence of Stent Fracture

    The outcome of stent fracture measures the percentages of subjects that had stent fractures, as observed in their 2yr follow-up visit X-rays.

    Time frame: 2 years

  15. Occurrence of Stent Fracture

    The outcome of stent fracture measures the percentages of subjects that had stent fractures, as observed in their 3yr follow-up visit X-rays.

    Time frame: 3 years

07

Results

Posted May 28, 2012

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol Stent
Started7276
Baseline7276
30-day follow-up (safety outcome)6972
Three year follow-up (final)4347
Completed4347
Not completed2929
Withdrew: Death93
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up610
Withdrew: Surgical intervention (bypass)55
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject910
Withdrew: Physician decision01

Outcome measures

PrimaryEfficacy: Primary Patency at Three Years

Primary patency is the Peak Systolic Velocity Ratio (PSVR) maintained at or below 2.0 without any repeat intervention. The PSVR is the ratio of the highest velocity (or pressure) of the blood moving through the stent divided by the velocity immediately outside the stent (the end of the stent nearest to the heart). Pressures are measured by ultrasound. These results include the percentage of subjects that maintained primary patency at or below 2.0 without any repeat intervention through the end of the study (three years).

Time frame:
3 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Efficacy: Primary Patency at Three Years
percentage of subjectsGORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol Stent
Efficacy: Primary Patency at Three Years24.2 (12.2 to 38.5)25.9 (10.3 to 45.0)
PrimarySafety: Composite of Major Procedural (30-day) Adverse Events (AEs)

Major procedural events include death, myocardial infarction, acute renal insufficiency, study limb amputation, and access site and treatment site complications requiring surgery or blood transfusion. The results for this outcome measure are the total percent of these events that occurred in each treatment arm within the first 30 days following stent implantations.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Safety: Composite of Major Procedural (30-day) Adverse Events (AEs)
percentage of subjectsGORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol Stent
Safety: Composite of Major Procedural (30-day) Adverse Events (AEs)1.40
SecondaryPrimary Assisted Patency

Primary assisted patency is defined as when the subject had a repeat intervention to regain patency in order to salvage the stent prior to complete occlusion.

Time frame:
3 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Primary Assisted Patency
percentage of subjectsGORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol Stent
Primary Assisted Patency69.8 (53.5 to 81.3)88.8 (78.0 to 94.5)
SecondarySecondary Patency

Secondary patency is defined as maintaining patency in the target vessel after a repeat intervention to correct complete occlusion in the treated arterial segment.

Time frame:
3 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Secondary Patency
percentage of subjectsGORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol Stent
Secondary Patency79.5 (62.6 to 89.4)89.3 (77.7 to 95.1)
SecondaryTechnical Success at Initial Procedure

Technical success is defined as a composite of both a) restoration of superficial femoral artery (SFA) patency with \< 30% residual stenosis (narrowing) within the treated arterial segment as viewed on post-procedure completion angiography, and b) Final Hemodynamic Pressure Gradient ≤15mm Hg (mercury). A lower pressure gradient number indicates less resistance to blood flow; i.e., less stenosis or narrowing of the vessel under the pressure of the flow. The results show the percentage of study subjects that had technical success.

Time frame:
Time of implant procedure
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Technical Success at Initial Procedure
percentage of subjectsGORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol Stent
Technical Success at Initial Procedure97.385.7
SecondaryTarget Vessel Revascularization (TVR)

This measure shows the percentage of subjects that had at least one repeat intervention performed during their enrollment in the clinical study.

Time frame:
3 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)
percentage of participantsGORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol Stent
Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)37.535.5
SecondaryTarget Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

This measure shows the percentage of subjects that had at least one repeat intervention in the target lesion during their enrollment in the clinical study.

Time frame:
3 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
percentage of participantsGORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol Stent
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)34.734.2
SecondaryImprovement in Rutherford Classification (Clinical Success)

The Rutherford Classification is a system used to score Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD). The stages follow (higher numbers are worse): Stage 0 - Asymptomatic Stage 1 - Mild claudication Stage 2 - Moderate claudication Stage 3 - Severe claudication Stage 4 - Rest pain Stage 5 - Ischemic ulceration not exceeding ulcer of the digits of the foot Stage 6 - Severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene The percentage of people improving by at least one stage (moving frm higher number to lower number) is listed in the results.

Time frame:
3 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Improvement in Rutherford Classification (Clinical Success)
percentage of participantsGORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol Stent
Improvement in Rutherford Classification (Clinical Success)86.791.7
SecondaryQuality of Life Subject Self-assessments (Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire: ICQ) (Clinical Success)

The ICQ is a series of 16 questions asking about leg pain and limitations to activities such as walking specific distances, doing daily activities, worrying about pain, resting during activities, and similar. Most questions specifically ask about only the two weeks prior to answering the completion of the questionnaire. Improvement in Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ) is a lower score (0 = best, 100 = worst). A decrease in mean score from baseline indicates an improvement in the patient's condition and an increase indicates a decline.

Time frame:
3 years
Reported as:
Mean · Score
Quality of Life Subject Self-assessments (Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire: ICQ) (Clinical Success)
ScoreGORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol Stent
Baseline46.6 ± 20.150.1 ± 18.2
36month20.8 ± 19.622.9 ± 21.2
SecondaryQuality of Life Subject Self-assessments (Short Form:36 (SF:36) - Mental Summary Score)) (Clinical Success)

The SF-36 Health Survey (version 2) asks 36 questions to measure health and well-being from the patient's point of view. The subscale and total score ranges from 0 to 100 but is normalized so that a score of 50 is the population mean, with a standard deviation of 10. The SF:36 - Mental Summary Score Questionnaire score must improve in order to be considered for clinical success. An increase in the mean score from baseline indicates an improvement in the patient's condition and a decrease indicates a decline.

Time frame:
3 years
Reported as:
Mean · Score
Quality of Life Subject Self-assessments (Short Form:36 (SF:36) - Mental Summary Score)) (Clinical Success)
ScoreGORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol Stent
Baseline mean score50.3 ± 12.848.3 ± 11.6
36-month Mean54 ± 9.154 ± 8.6
SecondaryQuality of Life Subject Self-assessments (Short Form:36 (SF:36) - Physical Summary Score)) (Clinical Success)

The SF-36 Health Survey (version 2) asks 36 questions to measure health and well-being from the patient's point of view. The subscale and total score ranges from 0 to 100 but is normalized so that a score of 50 is the population mean, with a standard deviation of 10. The SF:36 - Physical Summary Score Questionnaire score must improve in order to be considered for clinical success. An increase in the mean score from baseline indicates an improvement in the patient's condition and a decrease indicates a decline.

Time frame:
3 years
Reported as:
Mean · Score
Quality of Life Subject Self-assessments (Short Form:36 (SF:36) - Physical Summary Score)) (Clinical Success)
ScoreGORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol Stent
Baseline Mean33.6 ± 9.932.9 ± 8.5
36-month Mean41.9 ± 11.738.7 ± 10.5
SecondaryChange in Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI)

This test is done by measuring blood pressure at the ankle and the arm while a person is at rest. The ABI is then calculated by dividing the systolic blood pressure at the ankle by the systolic blood pressures in the arm. A normal resting ABI is 0.9 to 1.3. A resting ABI of less than 0.9 is abnormal. An outcome of a higher mean ABI is considered a success.

Time frame:
3 years
Reported as:
Mean · ABI Value
Change in Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI)
ABI ValueGORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol Stent
Baseline Mean0.64 ± 0.150.67 ± 0.16
36-month Mean0.95 ± 0.180.97 ± 0.16
SecondaryAlternate Peak Systolic Velocity Ratio (PSVR) (Equal or Less Than 2.5)

The PSVR is the ratio of the highest velocity (or pressure) of the blood moving through the stent divided by the velocity immediately outside the stent (the end of the stent nearest to the heart). Pressures are measured by ultrasound. These results include the percentage of subjects that had a PSVR of equal or less than 2.5.

Time frame:
3 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Alternate Peak Systolic Velocity Ratio (PSVR) (Equal or Less Than 2.5)
percentage of subjectsGORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol Stent
Alternate Peak Systolic Velocity Ratio (PSVR) (Equal or Less Than 2.5)27.2 (14.1 to 42.0)28.6 (13.3 to 46.0)
SecondaryAlternate Peak Systolic Velocity Ratio (Less Than or Equal to 3.0)

The PSVR is the ratio of the highest velocity (or pressure) of the blood moving through the stent divided by the velocity immediately outside the stent (the end of the stent nearest to the heart). Pressures are measured by ultrasound. These results include the percentage of subjects that had a PSVR of equal or less than 3.0.

Time frame:
3 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Alternate Peak Systolic Velocity Ratio (Less Than or Equal to 3.0)
percentage of subjectsGORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol Stent
Alternate Peak Systolic Velocity Ratio (Less Than or Equal to 3.0)31.3 (17.4 to 46.2)29.2 (11.0 to 50.4)
SecondaryOccurrence of Stent Fracture

The outcome of stent fracture measures the percentages of subjects that had stent fractures, as observed in their 1yr follow-up visit X-rays.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of particpants
Occurrence of Stent Fracture
percentage of particpantsGORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol Stent
Occurrence of Stent Fracture2.132.7
SecondaryOccurrence of Stent Fracture

The outcome of stent fracture measures the percentages of subjects that had stent fractures, as observed in their 2yr follow-up visit X-rays.

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Occurrence of Stent Fracture
percentage of participantsGORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol Stent
Occurrence of Stent Fracture4.748.9
SecondaryOccurrence of Stent Fracture

The outcome of stent fracture measures the percentages of subjects that had stent fractures, as observed in their 3yr follow-up visit X-rays.

Time frame:
3 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Occurrence of Stent Fracture
percentage of participantsGORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol Stent
Occurrence of Stent Fracture2.650.0

Adverse events

Collected over Throughout three-year study. Non-serious events are listed at a 4.0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis—25/72 (34.7%)6/72 (8.3%)
Bare Nitinol Stent—24/76 (31.6%)4/76 (5.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 75
Most frequent serious events
EventGORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol Stent
Congestive heart failureCardiac disorders3/721/76
ClaudicationVascular disorders2/723/76
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders2/721/76
Incision site infectionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/720/76
Critical limb ischemiaVascular disorders1/722/76
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/721/76
Acute chest painCardiac disorders1/720/76
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders1/720/76
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders1/720/76
Cardiac tamponadeCardiac disorders1/720/76
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventGORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol Stent
ClaudicationVascular disorders4/724/76
Vessel puncture site hematomaGeneral disorders3/721/76

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)GORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol StentTotal
Median69 (45 to 90)63 (43 to 89)67 (43 to 90)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)GORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol StentTotal
Female272754
Male454994
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)GORE VIABAHN EndoprosthesisBare Nitinol StentTotal
United States7276148
08

Study locations

15 sites
  • Mayo Clinic Phoenix
    Phoenix, Arizona 85054, United States
  • Arkansas Heart
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72211, United States
  • Holy Cross Hospital
    Ft Lauderdale, Florida 33308, United States
  • Vascular Surgical Associate
    Austell, Georgia 30106, United States
  • Midwest Heart Foundation
    Lombard, Illinois 60148, United States
  • Midwest Institute for Minimally Invasive Therapy
    Melrose Park, Illinois 60160, United States
  • St Francis Medical Center
    Peoria, Illinois 61637, United States
  • St. Johns Hospital/Prairie Education Research
    Springfield, Illinois 62701, United States
  • Ochsner Clinic
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, United States
  • Washington University
    St Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • Midwest Cardiology Research Foundation
    Columbus, Ohio 43214, United States
  • Heritage Valley Health Systems
    Beaver, Pennsylvania 15009, United States
  • Allegheney General Hospital
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212, United States
  • St Luke's Medical Center
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53215, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Geraghty PJ, Mewissen MW, Jaff MR, Ansel GM; VIBRANT Investigators. Three-year results of the VIBRANT trial of VIABAHN endoprosthesis versus bare nitinol stent implantation for complex superficial femoral artery occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Aug;58(2):386-95.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.01.050. Epub 2013 May 13. PubMed 23676191 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 4, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00228384
Lead sponsor
W.L.Gore & Associates
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 28, 2005
Start date
Sep 2005
Primary completion
Jan 2011
Completion
Jan 2011
Results posted
May 28, 2012
Last update
Jun 4, 2012

Study contacts

Gary Ansel, MD
principal investigator · Midwest Cardiology
Patrick Geraghty, MD
principal investigator · Washington University School of Medicine
Mark Mewissen, MD
principal investigator · St. Luke's Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion