ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00208728Updated Nov 27, 2013

Cardiopulmonary Circuits in the Pediatric Population

An interventional study of PC/SMART cardiopulmonary bypass circuit and PMEA modified cardiopulmonary bypass circuit in Pediatric and Cardiac Surgery, sponsored by Emory University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-11-27.

Sponsored by Emory University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

During open-heart surgery, blood flow is supported by a heart-lung machine that both pumps the blood and gives it oxygen. A problem associated with a heart-lung machine is the damage to some of the blood caused by protein in the blood cell sticking to the sides of the heart-lung machine tubing. This breakdown of the blood cell affects the platelets, which help the blood to clot. Use of the un-treated circuit will be phased out within the next few years, as newer technology is available. The use of coated tubing has been shown to decrease problems with post-operative bleeding in the adult population. No studies have been done on the pediatric population. We plan to perform a prospective, randomized study using the un-treated circuits used now, the " Smart" circuit tubing manufactured by Cobe Cardiovascular Inc., Arvada, CO and the PMEA circuit manufactured by Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan. Randomization will be performed by the perfusionist (the person that runs the heart-lung machine) in charge of the case. No one else will be aware of which circuit is being used. There will be no changes in the operation of the heart-lung machine, anesthesia or the surgery because of this study.

Blood testing that is standard of care and some additional tests will be performed on a small amount of blood drawn from. the patient via arterial lines. Additional blood sticks will not be required to obtain this sample.

Read the detailed description

The goal of this study is to compare the PC/SMART and PMEA treated circuits against each other and the current clinical standard (untreated) circuit with regard to blood component damage during CPB.

Specific Aims SA1: To determine if the surface modified circuits decrease platelet activation, platelet sequestration, and fibrinolysis during pediatric cardiac surgery using CPB.

Hypothesis 1: Use of a surface modified circuit will attenuate the CPB related decrease in platelet count, diminish platelet dysfunction as measured by thromboelastography (TEG), and decrease fibrinolysis as measured by fibrin-split product levels and TEG.

SA2: To determine whether the use of surface modified circuits during pediatric cardiac surgery results in a clinically relevant decrease in post-operative coagulopathy as measured by post-operative bleeding and blood product use.

Hypothesis 2: The use of surface modified circuits will result in improved function of the coagulation system yielding less post-operative bleeding and thus fewer blood product transfusions.

Methods The study will be a prospective, randomized trial in which a total of 90 patients (5-10 kgs) undergoing first time cardiac surgery using CPB at Egleston Hospital will be randomized into 3 groups. Group 1 will be the control group for whom the current standard unmodified CPB circuit will be used. Group 2 will undergo surgery using the PC/SMART modified CPB circuit (Cobe Cardiovascular Inc, Arvada, CO). Group 3 will undergo surgery using the PMEA modified circuit (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

Hypothesis 1 will be tested using the following assays:

Total platelet count Hematocrit Prothrombin time (PT) Activated thromboplastin time (aPTT) Fibrin split-product level D-dimer level thromboglobulin level (ELISA assay) Thromboelastography (TEG) using heparinase (to eliminate heparin effect) both with and without REOPRO (a GPIIb/IIIa platelet inhibitor) to measure the relative contributions of platelet function and fibrinogen activity to clot formation

Performed at the following time-points:

T1 = after induction of anesthesia, prior to CPB T2 = 5 minutes after the initiation of CPB T3 = at the end of re-warming (end of CPB) T4 = post-bypass (five minutes after protamine administration) T5 = within 24 hours after surgery (TEG will not be collected at this time)

Hypothesis 2 will be tested by quantifying chest-tube drainage and blood product administration (red blood cells, platelets, fresh frozen plasma, and cryoprecipitate) over the first 12 hours after weaning off of CPB.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pediatric
  • Cardiac Surgery

Keywords

  • pediatric
  • congenital heart disease
  • cardiac surgery
03

In context

Heart Defects, Congenital

1,031 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Defects, Congenital; 262 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 90 is above the median of 60 across 531 interventional studies indexed under Heart Defects, Congenital.

Browse Heart Defects, Congenital studies →

Lead sponsor

Emory University is the lead sponsor of 1,405 studies on the registry; 233 are open to participants now.

Of its 233 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 176 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients electively scheduled for first time cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass
  • weight between 5 kg and 10 kg
  • signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients requiring emergent cardiac surgery
  • patients who have undergone prior cardiothoracic surgery
  • documented coagulation disorders
  • use of anticoagulant drugs or anti-platelet agents within 48 hours of surgery
  • patients who require more than 4 hours of CPB or require a return to CPB
  • informed consent not obtained.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
90 participants

Interventions

  • DevicePC/SMART cardiopulmonary bypass circuit
  • DevicePMEA modified cardiopulmonary bypass circuit
  • DeviceStandard of care uncoated cardiopulmonary bypass circuit
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Decrease in platelet activation, platelet sequestration and fibrinolysis.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Decrease in post-operative coagulopathy as measured by bleeding and blood product use.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Edmunds LH Jr. Blood-surface interactions during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Card Surg. 1993 May;8(3):404-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.1993.tb00384.x. PubMed 8507971 ↗
  • Defraigne JO, Pincemail J, Dekoster G, Larbuisson R, Dujardin M, Blaffart F, David JL, Limet R. SMA circuits reduce platelet consumption and platelet factor release during cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Dec;70(6):2075-81. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01838-5. PubMed 11156123 ↗
  • Gunaydin S, Farsak B, Kocakulak M, Sari T, Yorgancioglu C, Zorlutuna Y. Clinical performance and biocompatibility of poly(2-methoxyethylacrylate)-coated extracorporeal circuits. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Sep;74(3):819-24. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03796-7. PubMed 12238845 ↗
  • Gu YJ, Boonstra PW, Rijnsburger AA, Haan J, van Oeveren W. Cardiopulmonary bypass circuit treated with surface-modifying additives: a clinical evaluation of blood compatibility. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 May;65(5):1342-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00223-9. PubMed 9594864 ↗
  • Butler J, Rocker GM, Westaby S. Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993 Feb;55(2):552-9. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(93)91048-r. PubMed 8431082 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 27, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00208728
Lead sponsor
Emory University
Responsible party
Brian Kogon (Principal Investigator, Emory University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 21, 2005
Start date
May 2003
Completion
Jun 2005
Last update
Nov 27, 2013

Study contacts

Paul Kirshbom, MD
principal investigator · Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion