A Phase 4 interventional study of Botulinum toxin, type B in Focal Dystonia, sponsored by Columbia University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 25 Years to 69 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-05-09.
Sponsored by Columbia University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
This study uses a computerized method of musical instrument digital interface (MIDI) quantification of performance before and after treatment with botulinum toxin type B (Myobloc ®, Solstice Neurosciences). Myobloc is a purified and diluted form of botulinum toxin used medically to relax unwanted muscle spasms and movements. The aim of the study is to determine the feasibility of quantifying change in performance following treatment.
Dystonia represents a group of clinical disorders characterized by various combinations of sustained involuntary muscle contractions, abnormal postures and movements, tremors and pain. Dystonia can occur at rest but is more likely to appear during voluntary activity.
Focal dystonia affects one body area and includes blepharospasm, oromandibular dystonia, spasmodic dysphonia, torticollis, and limb dystonia. Focal dystonia typically presents as task-specific muscle spasms or "occupational cramps" in which learned or repetitive motor tasks (such as writing or playing a musical instrument) trigger muscle spasms and interfere with performance while other actions remain normal. Writer's cramp is the most common form of idiopathic limb dystonia [1-3] where involuntary muscle activity and abnormal postures affect the arms and hands, but virtually any part of the body may be affected, even the lips when playing a woodwind or brass instrument [4]. Patients may develop two focal dystonias but rarely does focal dystonia progress to more generalized forms.
As originally defined by Oppenheim [5], dystonia refers to the slow, sustained, writhing, contorting movements of dystonia musculorum deformans. Dystonic movements, however, are often rapid [6] and this can be a cause for misdiagnosis. Electromyography (EMG) may be helpful in corroborating dystonia, but is not essential for diagnostic purposes. Nerve conduction studies, short and long loop reflexes and analysis of motor units are normal [7, 8]. Ballistic movements, which are normally tri-phasic in pattern with alternating agonist-antagonist bursts, may show disrupted patterns with co-contraction of agonist and antagonist muscles and excessively long EMG bursts in dystonia [3].
Dystonic spasms are intriguing in that they may be suppressed (or triggered) by sensory input such as postural change, tactile stimuli, alternative movements or even thought processes [9]. Studies are revealing that the involuntary muscle spasms may be due, at least in part, to abnormal sensory processing of spindle afferent information [10-12]. This may help explain the nature of these sensory "tricks" as well as why the effect of treatment using botulinum toxin usually outlasts the weakness it creates.
Though the pathophysiology of musicians' dystonia has yet to be determined fully, the motor learning associated with playing a musical instrument probably results in both functional and structural changes in the brain [13]. This plastic reorganization, including the rapid unmasking of existing neural circuitry and the establishment of new connections, is probably fundamental to the accomplishment of skillful playing, but also may result in focal, task-specific dystonia. When musicians get dystonia, their playing abilities can become severely compromised, to the point where they may not be able to perform professionally, and possibly not even teach. While botulinum toxin injections can be highly successful in allowing musicians to perform again, there are no objective methods to evaluate improvement.
Subtle dystonic abnormalities in motor control, therefore, particularly when they involve the arms, are difficult to ascertain with a high level of certainty. There are no truly objective measures of arm dystonia, and this is problematic because arm involvement can present so mildly as to go unnoticed by the examiner [14]. Furthermore, patients may not complain of mild finger or thumb cramping, arm twisting or shoulder elevation that could signify the presence of dystonia.
Clinical rating scales, even those that have been validated, do not detect subtle motor dysfunction or small changes after treatment [15] and certainly cannot determine improvement in musical performance. Metabolic imaging studies using positron emission tomography (PET) studies are emerging as helpful ancillary tests, but these are invasive and expensive. Furthermore, while PET studies have implicated that primary dystonia may be associated with relative hypermetabolism in the putamen [16], there have been conflicting reports [17]. Another major difficulty in the study of musician's dystonias has been lack of objective, quantifiable methods to assess degrees of dystonia severity or measure of treatment effects. Subjective and objective clinical rating scales with varying degrees of sophistication. Some subjective methods that have been used include subjective quantification usually using percentage improvement, also different various subjective rating scales using surveys.
This study tests a novel method devised for quantifying change in musical performance based on musical instrument digital interface (MIDI) data that will be able to directly rate or score changes in musical output. MIDI data include information on the note played, the time of onset, note duration, and note loudness. Note duration and loudness will be used in this study. It will be a quantitative, objective computerized evaluation that compares the patients' fine motor skills before and after treatment with Myobloc ®. It will be one of the first quantitative analyses of musical ability of its kind and could significantly impact the way musicians determine the efficacy of botulinum toxin treatment.
REFERENCES
319 studies on the registry are indexed under Dystonia; 56 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 16 is below the median of 32 across 181 interventional studies indexed under Dystonia.
Browse Dystonia studies →Columbia University is the lead sponsor of 1,103 studies on the registry; 193 are open to participants now.
Of its 172 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 142 (83%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Diluted botulinum toxin (500 Units/0.1 ml) is injected to the affected muscle(s) through a hollow core needle using electromyographic guidance. Dosage according to muscle(s) and symptom severity. Injection occurs at first visit only, after neurological evaluation.
Drug: Botulinum toxin, type B
Diluted botulinum toxin (500 Units/0.1 ml) is injected to the affected muscle(s) through a hollow core needle using electromyographic guidance. Dosage according to muscle(s) and symptom severity. Injection occurs at first visit only, after neurological evaluation.
Also known as: Myobloc
Note Errors (Related to Errors in Duration)
Note errors (related to errors in duration in msec) were obtained as measures of difference between the affected and unaffected hands--taking the musical instrument digital interface (MIDI) note output from four musical sequences of 8 to 16 notes played. It was calculated by averaging the sequences for each hand, and deriving the square root of the mean of the square of the differences (root mean square error, in msec) in MIDI.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks post-injection
Note Errors (Related to Errors in Loudness)
Note errors (related to errors in loudness) were obtained as a measure of difference between the affected and unaffected hands--taking the musical instrument digital interface (MIDI) note loudness data (decibels) from four musical sequences of 8 to 16 notes. It was calculated by averaging sequences for each hand and taking the square root of the mean of the square of the differences (root mean square error, in decibels) in MIDI notes.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks post-injection
Subjective Assessment Ratings of Change
Each subject assessed his or her music playing performance change subjectively from -100 percent (fully worse) to 100 percent (fully better).
Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks after injection
The dates of recruitment for this study were from April 2003 to May 2008. Both male and female subjects were included. Each subject must have been diagnosed with a focal, task-specific dystonia which was clinically determined to be the result of a high level of musical skill and intensive performance history to be included in the study.
| Milestone | Botulinum Toxin, Type B |
|---|---|
| Started | 16 |
| Completed | 16 |
| Not completed | 0 |
Note errors (related to errors in duration in msec) were obtained as measures of difference between the affected and unaffected hands--taking the musical instrument digital interface (MIDI) note output from four musical sequences of 8 to 16 notes played. It was calculated by averaging the sequences for each hand, and deriving the square root of the mean of the square of the differences (root mean square error, in msec) in MIDI.
| msec | Note Errors (Related to Errors in Duration), Baseline | Note Errors (Related to Errors in Duration), Post-injection |
|---|---|---|
| Note Errors (Related to Errors in Duration) | 8.20 ± 8.49 | 5.79 ± 4.00 |
Note errors (related to errors in loudness) were obtained as a measure of difference between the affected and unaffected hands--taking the musical instrument digital interface (MIDI) note loudness data (decibels) from four musical sequences of 8 to 16 notes. It was calculated by averaging sequences for each hand and taking the square root of the mean of the square of the differences (root mean square error, in decibels) in MIDI notes.
| decibels | Note Errors, Baseline | Note Errors, Post-injection |
|---|---|---|
| Note Errors (Related to Errors in Loudness) | 10.06 ± 1.28 | 8.43 ± 1.63 |
Each subject assessed his or her music playing performance change subjectively from -100 percent (fully worse) to 100 percent (fully better).
| percentage change | Post-injection Subjective Change |
|---|---|
| Subjective Assessment Ratings of Change | 30 ± 29.3 |
Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Botulinum Toxin, Type B | — | 0/16 (0%) | 0/16 (0%) |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Botulinum Toxin, Type B |
|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 14 |
| >=65 years | 2 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Botulinum Toxin, Type B |
|---|---|
| Mean | 49.375 ± 13.93 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Botulinum Toxin, Type B |
|---|---|
| Female | 2 |
| Male | 14 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Botulinum Toxin, Type B |
|---|---|
| United States | 16 |
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Columbia University