CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00189540Updated Oct 28, 2021Results posted

Study of Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) Via Plasmid Vector to Improve Perfusion in Critical Limb Ischemia Patients With Peripheral Ischemic Ulcers

A Phase 2 interventional study of HGF plasmid and Placebo in Arterial Occlusive Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease and Ischemia, sponsored by AnGes USA, Inc.. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-28.

Sponsored by AnGes USA, Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
27
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that AMG0001 treatment is safe and induces angiogenesis as detected by improved wound healing, reduction in amputation, improved pain at rest and hemodynamic measurement and to assess the effectiveness of the administrative method.

Read the detailed description

The primary goals of this study evaluating AMG0001 administration in CLI subjects will be to investigate the efficacy and safety of AMG0001. Specifically, the objectives are:

  1. Assess efficacy of a dosing regimen of 4.0mg/3 mL AMG0001, administered on Days 0, 14, and 28 as measured by reduction in total wound area at Month 3.
  2. Assess potential effects of angiogenesis associated with a dosing regimen of 4.0mg/3 mL AMG0001, administered on Days 0, 14, and 28 as measured by reduction in total wound area at Months 6 and 12, along with reduction in major amputations and improved pain at rest as measured on the VAS and hemodynamic measures (ABI/TBI) at Month 3 and Month 6.
  3. Assess overall safety of AMG0001 in the Critical Limb Ischemia subject population as determined by physical examination, blood and urine analyses, electrocardiogram, vital signs, and by evaluation of adverse experiences during and after the course of treatment.
02

Conditions studied

  • Arterial Occlusive Disease
  • Peripheral Vascular Disease
  • Ischemia
  • Ulcers

Keywords

  • Ischemic ulcers
  • Critical Limb Ischemia
03

In context

Vascular Diseases

1,027 studies on the registry are indexed under Vascular Diseases; 167 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 27 is below the median of 78 across 639 interventional studies indexed under Vascular Diseases.

Browse Vascular Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

AnGes USA, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subjects will have an appropriately sized peripheral ischemic ulcer(s).
  2. Subjects will have one or both of the following hemodynamic indicators of severe peripheral arterial occlusive disease:

    1. Ankle systolic pressure (in either the dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial arteries) of \< 70 mmHg
    2. Toe systolic pressure \< 50 mmHg
  3. The subject is a poor candidate for standard revascularization treatment options for peripheral arterial disease, based on inadequate bypass conduit, unfavorable anatomy, or poor operative risk.
  4. Subjects 40 years or older of either sex who have signed an informed consent form either directly or through a legally authorized representative.
  5. Subjects will be on a statin and an anti-platelet agent (e.g., clopidogrel, ticlopidine, aspirin, etc.) as part of their standard of care, unless contraindicated. Subjects for which these agents are contraindicated will have this restriction recorded in their case report form (CRF). Subjects must be stable on these medical regimens for at least 4 weeks prior to the start of treatment.
  6. If female, the subjects must be:

    1. at least one year post-menopausal, or
    2. surgically sterile, or
    3. if the subject is of child-bearing potential, she must have been practicing adequate contraception for at least 12 weeks prior to entering the study and have a negative urine pregnancy test result prior to study enrollment and agree to periodic pregnancy screening tests during the study.
    4. If female, the subject must not be breastfeeding for 30 days following administration of HGF.
  7. If subject is of reproductive potential, he or she must be using an accepted and effective (barrier) form of birth control during the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, have a vascular disease prognosis that indicates they would require a major amputation (at or above the ankle) within 4 weeks of start of treatment.
  2. Subjects with a diagnosis of Buerger's disease (thromboangiitis obliterans).
  3. Subjects with hemodynamically significant aorto-iliac occlusive disease.
  4. Subjects who have had a revascularization procedure within 12 weeks prior to treatment initiation that remains patent. Revascularization procedures that are evidenced to have failed (completely occluded) for >2 weeks prior to treatment initiation are acceptable.
  5. Subjects who require a change in their hypertension medication (other than dosage change) as part of their standard of care within 4 weeks prior to treatment initiation.
  6. Subjects with deep ulcerations with bone or tendon exposure, or clinical evidence of invasive infection (e.g., cellulitis, osteomyelitis, etc.) uncontrollable by antibiotics.
  7. Subjects currently receiving immuno-suppressive medication, chemo or radiation therapy.
  8. Evidence or history of malignant neoplasm (clinical, laboratory or imaging), except for fully resolved basal cell carcinoma of the skin. Patient's who had successful tumor resection or radio-chemotherapy of breast cancer more than 10 years prior to inclusion in the study, and with no recurrence, may be enrolled in the study. Patient's who had successful tumor resection or radio-chemotherapy of all other tumor types more than 5 years prior to inclusion in the study, and with no recurrence, may be enrolled in the study.
  9. Subjects who have proliferative diabetic retinopathy, severe non-proliferative retinopathy, recent (within 6 months) retinal vein occlusion, macular degeneration with choroidal neovascularization, macular edema on fundus evaluation by ophthalmologist, or intraocular surgery within 3 months.
  10. Subjects with end stage renal disease (ESRD) defined as significant renal dysfunction evidenced by a creatinine of > 2.5 mg/dL, or receiving chronic hemodialysis therapy.
  11. Any co-morbid condition likely to interfere with assessment of safety or efficacy endpoints, acute cardiovascular events (i.e. cerebrovascular accident [CVA], myocardial infarction [MI], etc.) within 12 weeks of treatment, or non-cardiovascular diseases that in the opinion of the investigator may result in \< 3 month subject mortality.
  12. A subject who has a history of hepatic cirrhosis, viral hepatitis, or HIV.
  13. Subjects with a clinically significant liver enzyme abnormality (i.e., AST or ALT more than two times the upper limit of normal and/or bilirubin more than 50% above the upper limit of normal).
  14. Subjects taking cilostazol (Pletal®) are eligible for inclusion, but the subject must have been taking the medication for at least 4 weeks prior to test material administration.
  15. Subject who received another investigational drug for peripheral arterial disease within 90 days of randomization, have previously received any gene transfer therapy or growth factor product not approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or received any investigational Drug Product in another clinical trial in the 30 days prior to administration of HGF.
  16. Unreliable or uncooperative subject or other severe concomitant disease(s), which the clinical investigator feels constitute(s) criteria for exclusion of a particular subject.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
27 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active Group

    4.0 mg AMG0001 via intramuscular injections on days 0, 14, and 28

    Genetic: HGF plasmid

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Group

    Placebo (saline) via intramuscular injections on days 0, 14, and 28

    Genetic: Placebo

Interventions

  • GeneticHGF plasmid

    Intramuscular injections into the index leg on days 0, 14, and 28

  • GeneticPlacebo

    Intramuscular injections into the index leg on days 0, 14, and 28

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Wound Healing (Change in Total Wound Area of All Ischemic Ulcers)

    Wound healing measured by change in mean total wound area of all ischemic ulcers at Month 3 and Month 6

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Where All Ulcers Healed

    This outcome is a percentage of participants where all of their baseline ulcers healed.

    Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6

  2. Change in Pain at Rest as Measured on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The mean VAS score where 0 = no pain; 10 = worst possible pain.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 3 and Month 6

  3. Number of Subjects Who Undergo a Major Amputation

    Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6

  4. Change in Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change in Ankle Brachial Index (ABI)

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

  5. Change in Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change in Toe Brachial Index (TBI)

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

07

Results

Posted Aug 19, 2011

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneActive GroupPlacebo Group
Started216
Completed145
Not completed71
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject30
Withdrew: Death41

Outcome measures

PrimaryWound Healing (Change in Total Wound Area of All Ischemic Ulcers)

Wound healing measured by change in mean total wound area of all ischemic ulcers at Month 3 and Month 6

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · total wound area (cm^2)
Wound Healing (Change in Total Wound Area of All Ischemic Ulcers)
total wound area (cm^2)Active GroupPlacebo Group
Baseline5.75 ± 1.813412.600 ± 9.4435
Month 315.766 ± 6.842112.200 ± 8.7022
Month 616.375 ± 7.133612.700 ± 9.7190
Statistical analysis
  • Active Group vs Placebo Group · ANCOVA · p = 0.35
  • Active Group vs Placebo Group · ANCOVA · p = 0.17
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Where All Ulcers Healed

This outcome is a percentage of participants where all of their baseline ulcers healed.

Time frame:
Month 3 and Month 6
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants Where All Ulcers Healed
Percentage of ParticipantsActive GroupPlacebo Group
Month 360
Month 6190
Month 12310
Statistical analysis
  • Active Group vs Placebo Group · Fisher Exact · p = 0.55
  • Active Group vs Placebo Group · Fisher Exact · p = 0.28
SecondaryChange in Pain at Rest as Measured on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

The mean VAS score where 0 = no pain; 10 = worst possible pain.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 3 and Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · cm
Change in Pain at Rest as Measured on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
cmActive GroupPlacebo Group
Baseline5.31 ± 0.606.04 ± 1.20
Month 34.26 ± 0.926.52 ± 1.5
Month 63.40 ± 0.996.66 ± 1.3
Statistical analysis
  • Active Group vs Placebo Group · ANCOVA · p = 0.2
  • Active Group vs Placebo Group · ANCOVA · p = 0.04
SecondaryNumber of Subjects Who Undergo a Major Amputation
Time frame:
Month 3 and Month 6
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects Who Undergo a Major Amputation
participantsActive GroupPlacebo Group
3 months30
6 months30
Statistical analysis
  • Active Group vs Placebo Group · Fisher Exact · p = 1.00
SecondaryChange in Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change in Ankle Brachial Index (ABI)
Time frame:
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · mm Hg / mm Hg
Change in Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change in Ankle Brachial Index (ABI)
mm Hg / mm HgActive GroupPlacebo Group
Baseline0.492 ± 0.06620.430 ± 0.0957
Month 30.476 ± 0.06570.448 ± 0.1248
Month 60.472 ± 0.08460.303 ± 0.1481
Statistical analysis
  • Active Group vs Placebo Group · ANCOVA · p = 0.77
  • Active Group vs Placebo Group · ANCOVA · p = 0.45
SecondaryChange in Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change in Toe Brachial Index (TBI)
Time frame:
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · mm Hg / mm Hg
Change in Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change in Toe Brachial Index (TBI)
mm Hg / mm HgActive GroupPlacebo Group
Baseline0.19 ± 0.040.28 ± 0.06
Month 30.22 ± 0.050.14 ± 0.06
Month 60.24 ± 0.060.11 ± 0.07
Statistical analysis
  • Active Group vs Placebo Group · ANCOVA · p = 0.06
  • Active Group vs Placebo Group · ANCOVA · p = 0.05

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Active Group—17/21 (81%)20/21 (95.2%)
Placebo Group—3/6 (50%)5/6 (83.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 26
Most frequent serious events
EventActive GroupPlacebo Group
Peripheral Arterial occlusive diseaseVascular disorders9/212/6
CellulitisInfections and infestations0/212/6
ArrhythmiaCardiac disorders0/211/6
CholecystitisHepatobiliary disorders0/211/6
PneumoniaInfections and infestations2/211/6
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders2/211/6
HypokalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/211/6
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders1/211/6
OsteomyelitisInfections and infestations3/210/6
Localised InfectionInfections and infestations2/210/6
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 65
Most frequent other events
EventActive GroupPlacebo Group
Peripheral arterial occlusive diseaseVascular disorders11/212/6
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders7/213/6
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/213/6
CellulitisInfections and infestations2/213/6
Ischaemic ulcerVascular disorders8/211/6
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders4/212/6
Confusional statePsychiatric disorders3/212/6
Renal impairmentRenal and urinary disorders0/212/6
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders5/211/6
Oedema PeripheralGeneral disorders5/211/6

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Active GroupPlacebo GroupTotal
Mean75.7 ± 2.4978.0 ± 1.8676.2 ± 1.97
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Active GroupPlacebo GroupTotal
Female8412
Male13215
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Baptist Clinical Research
    Pensacola, Florida 32501, United States
  • The Care Group, LLC
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46290, United States
  • Boston Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02118, United States
  • Dartmouth - Hitchcock Medical Center
    Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Powell RJ, Goodney P, Mendelsohn FO, Moen EK, Annex BH; HGF-0205 Trial Investigators. Safety and efficacy of patient specific intramuscular injection of HGF plasmid gene therapy on limb perfusion and wound healing in patients with ischemic lower extremity ulceration: results of the HGF-0205 trial. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Dec;52(6):1525-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.07.044. PubMed 21146749 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 28, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00189540
Lead sponsor
AnGes USA, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 19, 2005
Start date
Aug 2005
Primary completion
Jul 2008
Completion
Aug 2008
Results posted
Aug 19, 2011
Last update
Oct 28, 2021

Study contacts

Richard Powell, MD
principal investigator · Dartmouth

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion