CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00188968Updated May 2, 2007

Randomized Trial of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure or Synchronized Nasal Ventilation in Premature Infants.

A Phase 3 interventional study of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Synchronized Nasal Positive Pressure Ventilation in Apnea, Infant, Premature and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, sponsored by University of Manitoba. Completed at 2 sites in Canada. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2007-05-02.

Sponsored by University of Manitoba · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Very premature infants uniformly do not have mature functioning lungs to breathe well nor mature regulation mechanisms to breathe regularly. Assistance with a mechanical respirator is common. However, prolonged use of a respirator can itself cause long-term complications. Furthermore, commonly used drugs to improve the regularity of breathing may have long-term consequence only recently recognized. This study will compare two different types of assistance using a nasally applied breathing assist device. The aim is to see which type of assistance is best at avoiding the need for both prolonged respirator use and drugs to regulate breathing.

Read the detailed description

Early extubation of premature infants may limit the deleterious effects of positive pressure ventilation. The primary cause of failure of extubation (and the need for reintubation) is apnea of prematurity. Standard treatment for improving extubation success and decreasing apnea of prematurity is with the use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP), use of methylxanthines, or both. Recent literature suggests that methylxanthines may have significant effect on long-term neurodevelopmental outcome.

This primary objective of this study is to investigate the effect of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (sNIPPV) combined with standard nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) versus standard nCPAP alone, on the need for reintubation and the need of methylxanthine therapy in premature infants. The study period for the primary objective will be the first 7 days immediately after the initial extubation of premature infants with birth weights 500-1250 grams. A secondary objective is to identify any differences in duration of time free of endotracheal intubation and duration of time free of methylxanthine use between the two treatment modalities as measured from the first extubation attempt.

The study is a randomized, controlled trial using a new CPAP machine (Infant Flow advance™) that will be able to provide nCPAP with and without sNIPPV. Because of the mechanics of the sNIPPV mode, blinding of the study is not possible. The study is pragmatic in design allowing the medical staff to make clinical decisions on ventilatory management based on the routinely used criteria thus evaluating the study interventions in the everyday clinical environment. Analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Apnea
  • Infant, Premature
  • Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

Keywords

  • Xanthines
  • Reintubation
  • Nasal Intermittent Ventilation
  • Nasal continous positive airway pressure
03

In context

Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

339 studies on the registry are indexed under Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia; 80 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 48 is below the median of 70 across 228 interventional studies indexed under Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.

Browse Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Manitoba is the lead sponsor of 542 studies on the registry; 87 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (42%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Premature infants with birth weight 500-1250 grams
  • first attempt at extubation

Exclusion Criteria:(clinical suspicion or documented diagnosis of:

  • neuromuscular disease
  • chromosomal abnormality
  • or any congenital anomalies that would affect ability to be extubated from mechanical ventilation via endotracheal tube (i.e. congenital cardiac anomalies, choanal atresia).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
48 participants (actual)

Interventions

  • ProcedureNasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
  • ProcedureSynchronized Nasal Positive Pressure Ventilation
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Need for methylxanthine treatment OR the need for re-intubation in the first 7 days after the initial extubation in preterm infants intubated for treatment of respiratory distress.

    Time frame: 7 days immediately after first extubation attempt

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of time to methylxanthine treatment.

    Time frame: During first 7 days and during hospitalization

  2. Duration of supplemental oxygen use

    Time frame: During hospitalization

  3. Incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (both 28 days of age, and 36 weeks PCA)

    Time frame: 28 days of age, 36 weeks PCA

  4. Frequency of apneas during the initial 7 days post-extubation.

    Time frame: Initial 7 days post-extubation

  5. Complications of therapy (air leak syndromes, gastric and intestinal distension).

    Time frame: During Hospitalization

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Health Sciences Centre
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3A 1R9, Canada
  • St. Boniface General Hospital
    Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 2, 2007, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00188968
Lead sponsor
University of Manitoba
Collaborators
Health Sciences Centre Foundation, Manitoba
First posted
Sep 16, 2005
Start date
Nov 2004
Completion
Feb 2007
Last update
May 2, 2007

Study contacts

Aaron Chiu, MD
principal investigator · University of Manitoba
Ruben Alvaro, MD
principal investigator · University of Mantioba

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2007. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion