A Phase 3 interventional study of Maca Root in Depression and Sexual Dysfunction, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-21.
Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to determine the dose of Maca Root effective for the treatment of antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction in patients with DSM-IV defined Major Depressive Disorder. We propose to carry out a dose-finding pilot study to determine the minimum effective dose of Maca Root. We hypothesize that patients who receive Maca Root will experience alleviation of their sexual dysfunction, and this effect will be more pronounced in those who receive higher doses of maca root.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Maca Root is effective for the treatment of antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction, and to further determine whether higher doses of Maca Root powder would be more effective than lower doses in reducing the symptoms of antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction. An additional aim of the study is to document the safety and tolerability of Maca Root, which could be particularly helpful in treating antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction in elderly and cardiac-impaired populations taking oral nitrates who may not be eligible for treatment with the current oral phosphodiesterase inhibitors.
Subjects will be randomized into two arms of 10 for this 12-week study. The study will be double blind with regard to doses received. Ten subjects will receive 1500mg/day of maca for the 12-week period and the other 10 subjects will receive 3000mg/day of maca per day for the 12-week study period. Patients will be seen every other week. There is no placebo arm.
At the final study visit, week 12, subjects will be evaluated to see if their sexual function has returned.
After careful review of the literature we have found that there are very few studies that have evaluated Maca Root in humans. However the one very relevant study completed by Gonzalez and colleagues looked at doses of 1500 and 3000mg in men and found there were increased sexual interests on both doses. Thus, since this is a dose-finding study we believe this dose is an appropriate place to begin.
Hypotheses A:
The response rate will be higher for the high-dose maca group compared to the low-dose group; and this response will be comparable to the 50-85% reported with sildenafil.
Hypothesis B:
There will be a statistically significant difference in the magnitude of response between the two testing conditions, as measured by a decrease in baseline sexual dysfunction scores. The reduction in sexual dysfunction scores will be greater in the high-dose maca group than in the low-dose maca group.
8,245 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,641 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 84 across 6,869 interventional studies indexed under Depression.
Browse Depression studies →Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,582 studies on the registry; 451 are open to participants now.
Of its 221 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 168 (76%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Subjects must currently be euthymic (HAM-D\< 10) and without significant anxiety symptoms (HAM-A\<10). These scales will rely on retrospective reporting from the participant.
Subjects must have had no sexual dysfunction prior to taking an antidepressant and there must be a clear temporal relationship between the sexual dysfunction and the antidepressant treatment. Sexual dysfunction occurring as a symptom of the depressive disorder for which the antidepressant treatment was initiated is not considered to be a pre-existing condition under this definition.
Subjects must meet at least one of the following criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients receiving 1500mg of maca root
Drug: Maca Root
Patients receiving 3000mg of maca root
Drug: Maca Root
Change in Massachusetts General Hospital Sexual Dysfunction Inventory Scores
Full title: Massachusetts General Hospital Sexual Dysfunction Inventory Minimum score for Men: 5 Minimum score for Women: 4 Maximum score for Men: 30 Maximum score for Women: 24 \*One item on the measure is for men only A score of a 5 (4 for women) indicates improvement in sexual function. A score of 10 (8 for women) indicates no change. A score higher than 10 (8 for women) indicates a level of sexual dysfunction.
Time frame: baseline to endpoint (8 weeks)
| Milestone | Maca Root 1500mg | Maca Root 3000mg |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 7 | 9 |
| Completed | 6 | 4 |
| Not completed | 1 | 5 |
Full title: Massachusetts General Hospital Sexual Dysfunction Inventory Minimum score for Men: 5 Minimum score for Women: 4 Maximum score for Men: 30 Maximum score for Women: 24 \*One item on the measure is for men only A score of a 5 (4 for women) indicates improvement in sexual function. A score of 10 (8 for women) indicates no change. A score higher than 10 (8 for women) indicates a level of sexual dysfunction.
| score on a scale | Maca Root 1500mg | Maca Root 3000mg |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Massachusetts General Hospital Sexual Dysfunction Inventory Scores | .249 ± 2.39 | .017 ± 1.15 |
Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maca Root 1500mg | — | 0/7 (0%) | 5/7 (71.4%) |
| Maca Root 3000mg | — | 0/9 (0%) | 7/9 (77.8%) |
| Event | Maca Root 1500mg | Maca Root 3000mg |
|---|---|---|
| GI UpsetGastrointestinal disorders | 2/7 | 3/9 |
| HeadacheGeneral disorders | 0/7 | 2/9 |
| IrritabilityGeneral disorders | 1/7 | 1/9 |
| Sleep issuesGeneral disorders | 1/7 | 0/9 |
| Fibromyalgia ExacerbationGeneral disorders | 1/7 | 0/9 |
| Urinary FrequencyGeneral disorders | 0/7 | 1/9 |
| Thicker Menstrual DischargeGeneral disorders | 0/7 | 1/9 |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Maca Root 1500mg | Maca Root 3000mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 7 | 9 | 16 |
| >=65 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Maca Root 1500mg | Maca Root 3000mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 39 ± 12 | 34 ± 15 | 36 ± 13 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Maca Root 1500mg | Maca Root 3000mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 6 | 8 | 14 |
| Male | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Maca Root 1500mg | Maca Root 3000mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 7 | 9 | 16 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Maca Root 1500mg | Maca Root 3000mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| White | 6 | 8 | 14 |
| More than one race | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Maca Root 1500mg | Maca Root 3000mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 9 | 16 |
Ran from Dec 2007 to primary completion in Jun 2010, 30 months.
Results were first posted in Aug 2019, 9 years 2 months after primary completion.
Of 60 non-industry phase 3 interventional studies under Depression, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 53. This study's 30 months is close to that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 152 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 42.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Lepidium meyenii root
Massachusetts General Hospital →