An interventional study of CAS with cerebral protection and CAS without cerebral protection in Carotid Artery Stenosis, sponsored by University of Pittsburgh. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-01-07.
Sponsored by University of Pittsburgh · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate carotid artery stenting (CAS) with and without cerebral protection (CP) to determine if CP improves safety and effectiveness of CAS.
This study is a single center, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of CAS with and without CP. The study population will be comprised of subjects with atherosclerotic, post endarterectomy restenotic or other obstructive lesions in native carotid arteries. Other carotid artery pathology not amenable to surgical repair (for example carotid artery dissection) will also be considered. Subjects at high risk for complications from standard CEA will be the target population for this study. High risk status will be confirmed by two physicians, one of whom is a vascular surgeon. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects will be enrolled. This will ensure that the proportion of symptomatic subjects is the same in the two arms of the study. "Symptomatic" is defined in the exclusion criteria. The expected duration of this clinical trial is 3 years.
In this study there are there are two arms that a subject may be randomized to:
Group1: CAS with the use of the RX ACCUNET Group 2: CAS without the use of the RX ACCUNET This study has been designed to test whether the addition of CP enhances the safety and effectiveness of CAS.
339 studies on the registry are indexed under Carotid Stenosis; 81 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 52 is below the median of 106 across 182 interventional studies indexed under Carotid Stenosis.
Browse Carotid Stenosis studies →University of Pittsburgh is the lead sponsor of 1,385 studies on the registry; 167 are open to participants now.
Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (50%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
To participate in this study, the subject MUST have all of the following for inclusion in the study:
Increased anesthetic risk as documented by an anesthesiologist.
Subjects can be either clinically symptomatic or asymptomatic (less than 80 years of age). Symptomatic subjects will have experienced an event within the previous 120 days in the ipsilateral carotid artery distribution. The event will be classified as either 1) one or more TIAs, characterized by distinct focal neurologic dysfunction or monocular blindness with clearing of signs and symptoms within 24 hours, or 2) one or more completed strokes (as defined by this protocol) with persistence of symptoms or signs for more than 24 hours (the most recent event is used as the qualifying event).
**Patients with major non-hemorrhagic strokes will be included if their clinical status has been stable for 5 days (based on an exam performed by a neurologist participating as a Co-Investigator in this trial).
<!-- -->
Computed Tomographic Angiography (CTA) performed at UPMC Presbyterian or Shadyside hospitals.
However, if two of the non-invasive studies listed above report a stenosis of >70%, AND the pre-deployment angiogram reveals a 50 -70% stenosis, the patient will be randomized and entered into the trial as the angiogram can on occasion underestimate the stenosis.
Exclusion Criteria:
To participate in this study, the subject may NOT HAVE any of the following at enrollment to the study:
Device: CAS with cerebral protection
Device: CAS without cerebral protection
Primary Endpoint
Safety: The 30-day composite of stroke or death,
Effectiveness: The percentage of subjects who show evidence of new ischemic injury on diffusion MRI imaging, as well as the amount of infarcted tissue
Secondary Endpoints
Successful stent deployment at the target lesion,
Successful CP device deployment and retrieval,
Successful resolution of the stenosis (<30% residual stenosis) determined by angiography immediately post-stent placement,
Access site vascular complications, defined as need for surgical repair or blood transfusion,
Restenosis (>50% diameter reduction) rates both in-stent or of the adjacent artery determined by carotid ultrasound imaging at 1 year post-procedure,
Ipsilateral neurologic deficits on neurologic assessments at 24 hours and 30 days post-procedure.
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Pittsburgh