CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00153972Updated Dec 18, 2012

Dopamine Turnover Rate as Surrogate Parameter for Diagnosis of Early Parkinson's Disease

A Phase 4 interventional study of Cabergoline and Levodopa in Parkinson's Disease, sponsored by Technische Universität Dresden. Completed at 2 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-12-18.

Sponsored by Technische Universität Dresden · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
39
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study is designed to measure the difference of dopamine turnover rate measured by Fluoro-Dopa-PET in the putamen between patients with Parkinson's disease treated with cabergoline and levodopa for 3 months.

The study protocol includes an initial Fluoro-Dopa-PET scan before treatment and after three months double-blind treatment with cabergoline or levodopa.

The hypothesis for this study is that the dopamine turnover rate is a more sensitive marker for the early diagnosis of Parkinson's disease compared to the standard Fluoro-Dopa-PET measuring only the Fluoro-Dopa uptake into the striatum.

For the interventional part of the study, the hypothesis is that levodopa has larger effects on striatal dopamine turnover compared to dopamine agonists by providing more dopamine precursor. Enhancement of compensatory mechanisms for dopamine loss in early PD such as increased dopamine turnover could have several beneficial implications such as improvement or prolongation of symptomatic treatment responses, but might also produce therapeutic problems such as the development of levodopa-induced motor complications.

Read the detailed description

The study is designed to measure the difference of dopamine turnover rate measured by Fluoro-Dopa-PET in the putamen between patients with Parkinson's disease treated with cabergoline and levodopa for 3 months.

The hypothesis for this study is that the dopamine turnover rate is a more sensitive marker for the early diagnosis of Parkinson's disease compared to the standard Fluoro-Dopa-PET measuring only the Fluoro-Dopa uptake into the striatum. The specific aim of the study was to estimate normal ranges and test-retest measures for various parameters characterising dopamine metabolism from a prolonged 18F-dopa positron emission tomography (PET) measurement using a reference tissue model and compare their value for the detection of early PD.

For the interventional part of the study, the hypothesis is that levodopa has larger effects on striatal dopamine turnover compared to dopamine agonists by providing more dopamine precursor. Enhancement of compensatory mechanisms for dopamine loss in early PD such as increased dopamine turnover could have several beneficial implications such as improvement or prolongation of symptomatic treatment responses, but might also produce therapeutic problems such as the development of levodopa-induced motor complications. The specific aim is to evaluate the effects of levodopa and the dopamine D2 agonist cabergoline on striatal dopamine turnover estimated as the inverse of the effective dopamine distribution volume ratio (EDVR) measured by 18F-dopa PET in de-novo PD.

The study protocol includes an initial Fluoro-Dopa-PET scan before treatment and after three months double-blind treatment with cabergoline or levodopa. This study is an investigator-blinded, randomized mono-center controlled phase IV study.

The main inclusion criteria are:

  • Early (de novo) Parkinson's disease (Hoen \& Yahr I and II), according to the UK brain bank criteria

The main exclusion criteria are:

  • Current or past dopaminergic treatment
  • Atypical parkinsonian syndromes
  • Treatment with neuroleptics (present and past)

Methods:

  • Fluoro-dopa-PET for measuring the dopamine turnover rate
  • clinical investigations including parkinsonian rating scales (e.g. UPDRS, PDQ-39, etc.)
  • olfactory tests

Study medication:

  • Cabergoline (1 to 3 mg once per day)
  • Levodopa/carbidopa (50 until 300 mg levodopa per day in one to three dosages)
02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson's Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Parkinson's disease
  • Fluoro-Dopa-PET
  • Dopamine agonists
  • Cabergoline
  • Surrogate marker
  • Dopamine turnover
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,487 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,082 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 39 is close to the median of 40 across 3,294 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Technische Universität Dresden is the lead sponsor of 237 studies on the registry; 45 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Early (de novo) Parkinson's disease (Hoen \& Yahr I and II), according to the UK brain bank criteria

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or past dopaminergic treatment
  • Atypical parkinsonian syndromes
  • Treatment with neuroleptics (present and past)
  • Pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
39 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Levodopa

    Levodopa 300 mg per day orally.

    Drug: Cabergoline · Drug: Levodopa

  • Active comparator
    Cabergoline

    Cabergoline 3 mg per day orally.

    Drug: Cabergoline · Drug: Levodopa

Interventions

  • DrugCabergoline
  • DrugLevodopa
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference of dopamine turnover rate measured by Fluoro-Dopa-PET in the putamen between patients with Parkinson's disease treated with cabergoline and levodopa for 3 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes of clinical outcome measured with parkinsonian rating scales (UPDRS, PDQ-39, ESS, olfactory function)

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Department of Neurology at the Technical University of Dresden
    Dresden, Saxony 01307, Germany
  • Department of Nuclear Medicine at the Technical University of Dresden
    Dresden, Saxony 01307, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Oehme L, Perick M, Beuthien-Baumann B, Wolz M, Storch A, Lohle M, Herting B, Langner J, van den Hoff J, Reichmann H, Kotzerke J. Comparison of dopamine turnover, dopamine influx constant and activity ratio of striatum and occipital brain with (1)(8)F-dopa brain PET in normal controls and patients with Parkinson's disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 Aug;38(8):1550-9. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1819-8. Epub 2011 May 7. PubMed 21553090 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 18, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00153972
Lead sponsor
Technische Universität Dresden
Collaborators
Pfizer
Responsible party
Alexander Storch (Professor, Technische Universität Dresden) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 12, 2005
Start date
Feb 2005
Primary completion
Sep 2008
Completion
Jan 2009
Last update
Dec 18, 2012

Study contacts

Heinz Reichmann, MD
principal investigator · Technical University of Dresden

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion