An interventional study of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Obstructive Sleep Apnea, sponsored by University of Saskatchewan. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2007-10-10.
Sponsored by University of Saskatchewan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is a common and underrecognised condition. The diagnosis of OSA is typically made after an in-lab polysomnography (PSG) which requires an overnight stay in a sleep laboratory. Many sleep laboratories have long waiting lists for PSG. There are a number of portable devices which may be useful in home diagnosis of OSA, however there is limited data on outcomes of OSA diagnosed and treated at home. In this study we propose to compare diagnostic accuracy of a home monitoring device with a PSG and outcomes of OSA therapy when implemented at home vs in the sleep laboratory.
We will randomise patients suspected to have OSA to either home evaluation and treatment (using a portable monitor and auto-CPAP) or in-lab evaluation with a PSG and manually-titrated CPAP. We will obtain sleep, sleepiness and quality of life questionnaires, vigilance testing and blood pressure at baseline and after 1, 2, 4 and 12 weeks of therapy. We will also assess and compare compliance with CPAP therapy in each arm of the study.
1,422 studies on the registry are indexed under Apnea; 159 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 50 is close to the median of 50 across 965 interventional studies indexed under Apnea.
Browse Apnea studies →University of Saskatchewan is the lead sponsor of 237 studies on the registry; 33 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Sleepiness score
Quality of life
Vigilance tests
Sleep quality
CPAP compliance
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2007. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Saskatchewan