ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00125853Updated Dec 12, 2019Results posted

The Effect of Nebivolol on Insulin Sensitivity

An interventional study of Nebivolol and Atenolol in Hypertension, sponsored by Imperial College London. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-12.

Sponsored by Imperial College London · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to conduct a randomised trial to compare the insulin sensitivity, 24 hour blood pressure profile, and tolerability of nebivolol plus a thiazide-like diuretic versus atenolol plus a thiazide-like diuretic.

Read the detailed description

Retrospective studies of treated hypertensive cohorts have strongly implicated beta blocker therapy as increasing the risk of developing new-onset diabetes. This has led to the latest British Hypertension Society guidelines advising caution when using beta blockers particularly in combination with thiazide-like diuretics. However the National Institute of Clinical Excellence recommends beta-blocker + thiazide combinations as the treatment of choice in patients who are not at increased risk of developing diabetes. Nebivolol is a newer class of beta blocker. Some studies in diabetic hypertensive patients have suggested that nebivolol does not impair insulin sensitivity. The aim of this study is to compare the effect on insulin sensitivity of nebivolol versus atenolol, both in combination with a thiazide-like diuretic, in a group of non-diabetic hypertensive patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertension

Keywords

  • blood pressure
  • insulin sensitivity
  • beta blockers
  • randomised double blind crossover trial
03

In context

Hypertension

6,834 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertension; 971 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 54 is below the median of 90 across 5,095 interventional studies indexed under Hypertension.

Browse Hypertension studies →

Lead sponsor

Imperial College London is the lead sponsor of 842 studies on the registry; 180 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males or females aged 18 or above
  • Blood pressure that meets any of the three following criteria:
  • BP should be \<140/85 mmHg on a maximum of two anti-hypertensive drugs

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindications to beta-blockade
  • contraindications to thiazide use
  • if there was a history of asthma, diabetes, heart failure, bradycardia, atrial fibrillation, AV conduction disturbances
  • concurrent treatment with verapamil \& dilitiazem
  • childbearing women
  • compelling indication for treatment with a beta blocker
  • any condition that will interfere with the treatment or the patient's ability to complete the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
54 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    atenolol 25mg daily

    atenolol 25mg daily

    Drug: Atenolol

  • Active comparator
    nebivolol 2.5mg daily

    nebivolol 2.5mg daily

    Drug: Nebivolol

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Insulin Sensitivity Index (ISI)

    Patients were asked to fast for a minimum of 12 hours prior to each oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Venous blood was withdrawn for insulin and glucose analysis, 15 minutes and immediately prior to, and 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes following an oral glucose load. For each OGTT, the Insulin Sensitivity Index (ISI) was calculated using the standard method for oral glucose tolerance testing. For each OGTT, the Insulin Sensitivity Index (ISI) was calculated using the standard method for oral glucose tolerance testing.

    Time frame: Baseline, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120m following oral glucose load, at baseline and at the end of each phase(8 weeks treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. 24 Hour Systolic Blood Pressure

    The 24-h Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) was recorded at the beginning and end of each beta-blocker treatment period. BP was automatically recorded for 24 h at 30 min intervals. The time periods from 0700h to 2200h and from 2200h to 0700h were defined as daytime and night-time, respectively.

    Time frame: Before and after 8 weeks of treatment

  2. Total Cholesterol

    Fasting blood samples were taken at the beginning and end of each treatment period.

    Time frame: Before and after 8 weeks of treatment

  3. HbA1c

    Fasting blood samples were taken at the beginning and end of each treatment period.

    Time frame: Before and after 8 weeks of treatment

  4. BMI

    Body weights and heights were taken at the beginning and end of each treatment period.

    Time frame: Before and after 8 weeks of treatment

07

Results

Posted Dec 12, 2019

Participant flow

Wash-out (4 Weeks)
Participant flow — Wash-out (4 Weeks)
MilestoneFirst is Atenolol Followed by Nebivolol (AN)First is Nebivolol Followed by Atenolol (NA)
Started2727
Completed2727
Not completed00
First Intervention (8 Weeks)
Participant flow — First Intervention (8 Weeks)
MilestoneFirst is Atenolol Followed by Nebivolol (AN)First is Nebivolol Followed by Atenolol (NA)
Started2727
Completed2727
Not completed00
Wash-out (4 Weeks)
Participant flow — Wash-out (4 Weeks)
MilestoneFirst is Atenolol Followed by Nebivolol (AN)First is Nebivolol Followed by Atenolol (NA)
Started2727
Completed2420
Not completed37
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up37
Second Intervention (8 Weeks)
Participant flow — Second Intervention (8 Weeks)
MilestoneFirst is Atenolol Followed by Nebivolol (AN)First is Nebivolol Followed by Atenolol (NA)
Started2420
Completed2420
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryInsulin Sensitivity Index (ISI)

Patients were asked to fast for a minimum of 12 hours prior to each oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Venous blood was withdrawn for insulin and glucose analysis, 15 minutes and immediately prior to, and 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes following an oral glucose load. For each OGTT, the Insulin Sensitivity Index (ISI) was calculated using the standard method for oral glucose tolerance testing. For each OGTT, the Insulin Sensitivity Index (ISI) was calculated using the standard method for oral glucose tolerance testing.

Time frame:
Baseline, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120m following oral glucose load, at baseline and at the end of each phase(8 weeks treatment
Reported as:
Mean · factor
Insulin Sensitivity Index (ISI)
factorAtenololNebivolol
Before82.36 (50.8 to 116.9)80.70 (52.6 to 114.7)
After75.47 (50.6 to 144.9)81.54 (50.9 to 114.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Atenolol vs Nebivolol · Linear Mixed effect Modelling, adjusted · p = 0.60
Secondary24 Hour Systolic Blood Pressure

The 24-h Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) was recorded at the beginning and end of each beta-blocker treatment period. BP was automatically recorded for 24 h at 30 min intervals. The time periods from 0700h to 2200h and from 2200h to 0700h were defined as daytime and night-time, respectively.

Time frame:
Before and after 8 weeks of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
24 Hour Systolic Blood Pressure
mmHgAtenololNebivolol
SBP before128.4 ± 9.7130.4 ± 9.5
SBP after117.2 ± 9.2121.2 ± 8.2
Statistical analysis
  • Atenolol vs Nebivolol · Linear Mixed effect Model, adjusted for · p = 0.06
SecondaryTotal Cholesterol

Fasting blood samples were taken at the beginning and end of each treatment period.

Time frame:
Before and after 8 weeks of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Total Cholesterol
mmol/LAtenololNebivolol
Before5.0 ± 1.05.1 ± 0.9
After4.9 ± 1.05.1 ± 0.9
Statistical analysis
  • Atenolol vs Nebivolol · Linear Mixed effect Modelling, adjusted · p = 0.51
SecondaryHbA1c

Fasting blood samples were taken at the beginning and end of each treatment period.

Time frame:
Before and after 8 weeks of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
HbA1c
percentage of glycosylated hemoglobinAtenololNebivolol
Before5.7 ± 0.85.7 ± 0.8
After5.7 ± 0.45.7 ± 0.3
Statistical analysis
  • Atenolol vs Nebivolol · Linear Mixed effect Modelling, adjusted · p = 0.48
SecondaryBMI

Body weights and heights were taken at the beginning and end of each treatment period.

Time frame:
Before and after 8 weeks of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · kg/m^2
BMI
kg/m^2AtenololNebivolol
Before28.1 ± 4.628.2 ± 4.7
After28.0 ± 4.428.3 ± 4.7
Statistical analysis
  • Atenolol vs Nebivolol · Linear Mixed effect Modelling, adjusted · p = 0.09

Adverse events

Collected over 32 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Atenolol 25mg Daily0/54 (0%)0/54 (0%)0/54 (0%)
Nebivolol 2.5mg Daily0/54 (0%)0/54 (0%)0/54 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)All Participants
Mean61.1 ± 11
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Participants
Female29
Male25
BMI
BMI(kg/m^2)All Participants
Mean27.2 ± 6.7
Current Smoker
Current Smoker(Participants)All Participants
Count of participants14
Ex-smoker
Ex-smoker(Participants)All Participants
Count of participants14
Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)(mmHg)All Participants
Mean129.4 ± 13.2
Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)(mmHg)All Participants
Mean81.3 ± 9.0
Heart Rate
Heart Rate(bpm)All Participants
Mean71.1 ± 8.9

2 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Imperial College London
    Paddington, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2006 to primary completion in Jan 2009, 30 months.

Results were first posted in Dec 2019, 10 years 11 months after primary completion.

Of 1,339 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hypertension, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 42. This study's 30 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,433 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 29, 2005
First posted
Aug 2, 2005
StartActual
Jul 2006
Primary completionActual
Jan 2009
CompletionActual
Jan 2009
Results first posted
Dec 12, 2019
Last update
Dec 12, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 12, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00125853
Collaborators
Foundation for Circulatory Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 2, 2005
Start date
Jul 2006
Primary completion
Jan 2009
Completion
Jan 2009
Results posted
Dec 12, 2019
Last update
Dec 12, 2019

Study contacts

Neil R Poulter
principal investigator · Imperial College London

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Atenolol

Start the discussion