ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00118716Updated Feb 5, 2019Results posted

A Study Measuring Asthma Control In Pediatric And Adolescent Subjects Whose Asthma Is Worsened By Activity Or Exercise

A Phase 4 interventional study of Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol and Fluticasone Propionate in Bronchospasm and Activity/Exercise Induced Bronchospasm, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Completed at 50 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-05.

Sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2003, registered Jul 2005).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
248
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

During this study, your child will need to attend up to 5 office visits and maintain regular telephone contact with the clinic. Certain office visits will include physical exams, medical history review, exercise challenge test (walking/running on a treadmill), electrocardiogram (ECG) tests, and lung function tests. All study related medications and medical examinations are provided at no cost. All study drugs are currently available by prescription to patients 4 years and older.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bronchospasm
  • Activity/Exercise Induced Bronchospasm

Keywords

  • asthma
  • bronchospasm
03

In context

Bronchial Spasm

44 studies on the registry are indexed under Bronchial Spasm; 4 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 248 is above the median of 70 across 29 interventional studies indexed under Bronchial Spasm.

Browse Bronchial Spasm studies →

Lead sponsor

GlaxoSmithKline is the lead sponsor of 3,650 studies on the registry; 118 are open to participants now.

Of its 264 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 241 (91%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with persistent asthma for 3 months or longer.
  • Experienced worsened asthma symptoms during physical activity.
  • Using an inhaled for the previous 4 weeks or longer (such as Aerobid, Azmacort, Flovent, Pulmicort, QVAR, and Vanceril).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Used systemic as either liquids, pills, or injections to treat asthma within the previous 3 months.
  • Have only intermittent, seasonal, or exercise-induced asthma, and not persistent asthma.
  • Admitted to a hospital within the previous 6 months due to asthma symptoms.
  • Any poorly controlled medical conditions that may make study participation unsafe or inappropriate in the opinion of the study physician (such as cystic fibrosis, congenital heart disease, insulin dependent diabetes, glaucoma, drug allergies, etc.)
  • The study physician will evaluate other medical criteria.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Enrollment
248 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    FSC 100/50 mcg BID

    Participants received FSC 100/50 microgram (mcg) one inhalation as a combination product via DISKUS, twice daily in morning after awakening and in evening for up to 28 days

    Drug: Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol

  • Experimental
    FP 100 mcg BID

    Participants received FP 100 mcg one inhalation via DISKUS, twice daily in morning after awakening and in evening for up to 28 days.

    Drug: Fluticasone Propionate

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximal Percent Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Following Exercise Challenge at Week 4

    FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Maximal percent change in FEV1 following exercise challenge was defined as the percent change from pre-exercise baseline FEV1 to the minimum FEV1 collected within one hour following exercise challenge. Maximal percent change in FEV1 following exercise challenge was mean maximal percent change from pre-exercise baseline compared between treatment groups at Treatment Week 4. FEV1 was measured 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 minutes post-exercise. The minimum FEV1 measured across these time points, regardless of any missing time points, will be used for the calculation of maximal percent change.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Secondary outcomes

  1. Four-hour Serial Post-dose FEV1 Area Under the Curve (AUC) on Treatment Day 1

    FEV1 AUC is mean AUC compared between treatment groups at Treatment Day 1. Baseline was defined as the pre-dose FEV1 measure from treatment Day 1. FEV1 AUC was calculated as the area of a trapezoid (calculated as the sum of the bases (top + bottom) divided by 2, then multiplied by width) above the baseline FEV1 area. For participants not completing a serial FEV1 measurement, the last observed post-dose FEV1 measurement was carried forward.

    Time frame: Immediately prior to dosing (0 time point), 30 minutes post-dose and 1, 2, 3, 4 hour post-dose on Day 1

  2. Change From Baseline in Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (AM PEF)

    PEF is defined as the maximum airflow during a forced expiration beginning with the lungs fully inflated. PEF was measured by the participants using a hand-held electronic peak flow meter each morning prior to the dose of study medication and any rescue albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol use. Each participant was instructed to perform triplicate PEF measurements in the morning. Change from baseline was calculated as the endpoint value minus the baseline value. For AM PEF, baseline was defined as the average of the AM PEF values recorded on the day of Visit 2 (7-14 \[+ or -4\] days after Visit1) plus the 6 preceding days since AM PEF was measured in the morning.

    Time frame: Baseline and Up to Week 4

  3. Change From Baseline in Evening (PM) PEF

    PEF is defined as the maximum airflow during a forced expiration beginning with the lungs fully inflated. PEF was measured by the participants using a hand-held electronic peak flow meter each evening prior to the dose of study medication after the symptom measurement and any rescue albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol use. Each participant was instructed to perform triplicate PEF measurements in the evening. Change from baseline was calculated as the endpoint value minus the baseline value. Baseline was defined as the average of the values from the 7 days preceding Visit 2 (7-14 \[+ or -4\] days after Visit1) since these measures were derived from data collected in the evening.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to Week 4

  4. Percent of Rescue-free Days

    A rescue-free day was defined as a day when no supplemental albuterol was taken (i.e., 0 puffs recorded for both AM and PM assessments of albuterol use in the daily diary). Percent of rescue-free days was calculated as the number of rescue-free days, divided by the total number of days in the treatment period, multiplied by 100 for each participant.

    Time frame: Up to Week 4

  5. Percent of Symptom-free Days

    A symptom-free day was defined as a day with no symptoms (i.e., a score of 0, indicating no asthma symptoms during the day or previous night, recorded in the daily diary). Percent of symptom-free days was calculated as the number of symptom-free days, divided by the total number of days in the treatment period, multiplied by 100 for each participant.

    Time frame: Up to Week 4

  6. Change From Baseline in Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ)

    PAQLQ measures functional problems that are most troublesome to children with asthma. PAQLQ has 23 questions in 3 domains (activity limitation=5, emotional function=8, symptoms=10). Participants responded to each question on a 7-point scale (7= not bothered at all and 1= extremely bothered). The overall PAQLQ score is the mean of all 23 responses (minimum score 1= 5+8+10/23 and maximum score 7= 35+56+70/23) and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains (minimum: 5/5, 8/8, 10/10 and maximum: 35/5, 56/8, 70/10). Minimum possible value is 1 (maximum impairment); maximum possible value is 7 (no impairment). Endpoint was defined from the last questionnaire collected during the double-blind treatment period or discontinuation visit (up to Week 4).

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and up to Week 4

07

Results

Posted Feb 5, 2019

Participant flow

The study was conducted from 23 December 2003 to 23 April 2006 across 51 sites in the United States (US) and a total of 248 participants were randomized.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFSC 100/50 mcg BIDFP 100 mcg BID
Started124124
Completed111102
Not completed1322
Withdrew: Adverse event27
Withdrew: Protocol violation54
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01
Withdrew: Exacerbation22
Withdrew: Discontinued by sponsor11
Withdrew: Non-compliance13
Withdrew: Misrandomized11
Withdrew: Expired drug use12
Withdrew: Investigator discretion01

Outcome measures

PrimaryMaximal Percent Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Following Exercise Challenge at Week 4

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Maximal percent change in FEV1 following exercise challenge was defined as the percent change from pre-exercise baseline FEV1 to the minimum FEV1 collected within one hour following exercise challenge. Maximal percent change in FEV1 following exercise challenge was mean maximal percent change from pre-exercise baseline compared between treatment groups at Treatment Week 4. FEV1 was measured 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 minutes post-exercise. The minimum FEV1 measured across these time points, regardless of any missing time points, will be used for the calculation of maximal percent change.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · Percent change
Maximal Percent Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Following Exercise Challenge at Week 4
Percent changeFSC 100/50mcg BIDFP 100mcg BID
Maximal Percent Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Following Exercise Challenge at Week 4-9.5 ± 0.83-12.7 ± 1.06
Statistical analysis
  • FSC 100/50mcg BID vs FP 100mcg BID · ANCOVA · p = 0.021 (LS Mean Difference, SE, CI, and p-value were from an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, investigator, age stratum, and baseline value.) · Mean difference (net): 3.0 · 95% CI 0.5 to 5.6LS Mean Diff was calculated as FSC 100/50mcg BID-FP 100mcg BID.
SecondaryFour-hour Serial Post-dose FEV1 Area Under the Curve (AUC) on Treatment Day 1

FEV1 AUC is mean AUC compared between treatment groups at Treatment Day 1. Baseline was defined as the pre-dose FEV1 measure from treatment Day 1. FEV1 AUC was calculated as the area of a trapezoid (calculated as the sum of the bases (top + bottom) divided by 2, then multiplied by width) above the baseline FEV1 area. For participants not completing a serial FEV1 measurement, the last observed post-dose FEV1 measurement was carried forward.

Time frame:
Immediately prior to dosing (0 time point), 30 minutes post-dose and 1, 2, 3, 4 hour post-dose on Day 1
Reported as:
Mean · Liters*hour
Four-hour Serial Post-dose FEV1 Area Under the Curve (AUC) on Treatment Day 1
Liters*hourFSC 100/50mcg BIDFP 100mcg BID
Four-hour Serial Post-dose FEV1 Area Under the Curve (AUC) on Treatment Day 10.70 ± 0.0670.30 ± 0.059
Statistical analysis
  • FSC 100/50mcg BID vs FP 100mcg BID · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (LS Mean Diff, SE, CI, and p-value were from an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, investigator, age stratum, and baseline value.) · Mean difference (net): 0.41 · 95% CI 0.24 to 0.58LS Mean Diff was calculated as FSC 100/50mcg BID-FP 100mcg BID.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (AM PEF)

PEF is defined as the maximum airflow during a forced expiration beginning with the lungs fully inflated. PEF was measured by the participants using a hand-held electronic peak flow meter each morning prior to the dose of study medication and any rescue albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol use. Each participant was instructed to perform triplicate PEF measurements in the morning. Change from baseline was calculated as the endpoint value minus the baseline value. For AM PEF, baseline was defined as the average of the AM PEF values recorded on the day of Visit 2 (7-14 \[+ or -4\] days after Visit1) plus the 6 preceding days since AM PEF was measured in the morning.

Time frame:
Baseline and Up to Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · Liters/minute (L/min)
Change From Baseline in Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (AM PEF)
Liters/minute (L/min)FSC 100/50mcg BIDFP 100mcg BID
Change From Baseline in Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (AM PEF)16.3 ± 2.999.1 ± 3.86
Statistical analysis
  • FSC 100/50mcg BID vs FP 100mcg BID · ANCOVA · p = 0.097 (LS Mean Diff, SE, CI, and p-values were from an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, investigator, age stratum, and baseline value.) · Mean difference (net): 8.1 · 95% CI -1.5 to 17.6LS Mean Diffs were calculated as FSC 100/50mcg BID-FP 100mcg BID.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Evening (PM) PEF

PEF is defined as the maximum airflow during a forced expiration beginning with the lungs fully inflated. PEF was measured by the participants using a hand-held electronic peak flow meter each evening prior to the dose of study medication after the symptom measurement and any rescue albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol use. Each participant was instructed to perform triplicate PEF measurements in the evening. Change from baseline was calculated as the endpoint value minus the baseline value. Baseline was defined as the average of the values from the 7 days preceding Visit 2 (7-14 \[+ or -4\] days after Visit1) since these measures were derived from data collected in the evening.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · L/min
Change From Baseline in Evening (PM) PEF
L/minFSC 100/50mcg BIDFP 100mcg BID
Change From Baseline in Evening (PM) PEF10.8 ± 2.967.6 ± 3.03
Statistical analysis
  • FSC 100/50mcg BID vs FP 100mcg BID · ANCOVA · p = 0.396 (LS Mean Diff, SE, CI, and p-values were from an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, investigator, age stratum, and baseline value.) · Mean difference (net): 3.7 · 95% CI -4.8 to 12.1LS Mean Diffs were calculated as FSC 100/50mcg BID-FP 100mcg BID.
SecondaryPercent of Rescue-free Days

A rescue-free day was defined as a day when no supplemental albuterol was taken (i.e., 0 puffs recorded for both AM and PM assessments of albuterol use in the daily diary). Percent of rescue-free days was calculated as the number of rescue-free days, divided by the total number of days in the treatment period, multiplied by 100 for each participant.

Time frame:
Up to Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of days
Percent of Rescue-free Days
Percentage of daysFSC 100/50mcg BIDFP 100mcg BID
Percent of Rescue-free Days59.4 ± 3.2154.7 ± 3.40
SecondaryPercent of Symptom-free Days

A symptom-free day was defined as a day with no symptoms (i.e., a score of 0, indicating no asthma symptoms during the day or previous night, recorded in the daily diary). Percent of symptom-free days was calculated as the number of symptom-free days, divided by the total number of days in the treatment period, multiplied by 100 for each participant.

Time frame:
Up to Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of days
Percent of Symptom-free Days
Percentage of daysFSC 100/50mcg BIDFP 100mcg BID
Percent of Symptom-free Days27.3 ± 3.1028.6 ± 3.04
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ)

PAQLQ measures functional problems that are most troublesome to children with asthma. PAQLQ has 23 questions in 3 domains (activity limitation=5, emotional function=8, symptoms=10). Participants responded to each question on a 7-point scale (7= not bothered at all and 1= extremely bothered). The overall PAQLQ score is the mean of all 23 responses (minimum score 1= 5+8+10/23 and maximum score 7= 35+56+70/23) and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains (minimum: 5/5, 8/8, 10/10 and maximum: 35/5, 56/8, 70/10). Minimum possible value is 1 (maximum impairment); maximum possible value is 7 (no impairment). Endpoint was defined from the last questionnaire collected during the double-blind treatment period or discontinuation visit (up to Week 4).

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0) and up to Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ)
Scores on a scaleFSC 100/50mcg BIDFP 100mcg BID
Activity limitation week 20.78 ± 0.0920.63 ± 0.100
Activity limitation week 40.93 ± 0.1130.75 ± 0.116
Activity limitation endpoint0.89 ± 0.1040.67 ± 0.105
Emotional function Week 20.44 ± 0.0660.48 ± 0.089
Emotional function Week 40.56 ± 0.0960.47 ± 0.097
Emotional function endpoint0.53 ± 0.0900.42 ± 0.088
Symptoms Week 20.39 ± 0.0850.49 ± 0.081
Symptoms Week 40.52 ± 0.1010.55 ± 0.109
Symptoms Endpoint0.48 ± 0.0940.51 ± 0.101
Overall score Week 20.49 ± 0.0680.52 ± 0.074
Overall score Week 40.62 ± 0.0910.57 ± 0.092
Overall score Endpoint0.59 ± 0.0840.51 ± 0.084
Statistical analysis
  • FSC 100/50mcg BID vs FP 100mcg BID · ANCOVA · p = 0.168 (LS Mean Diff, SE, CI, and p-values were from an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, investigator, age stratum, and baseline value.) · Mean difference (net): 0.18 · 95% CI -0.08 to 0.43
  • FSC 100/50mcg BID vs FP 100mcg BID · ANCOVA · p = 0.465 (LS Mean Diff, SE, CI, and p-values were from an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, investigator, age stratum, and baseline value.) · Mean difference (net): 0.11 · 95% CI -0.18 to 0.40
  • FSC 100/50mcg BID vs FP 100mcg BID · ANCOVA · p = 0.222 (LS Mean Diff, SE, CI, and p-values are from an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, investigator, age stratum, and baseline value.) · Mean difference (net): 0.16 · 95% CI -0.10 to 0.42
  • FSC 100/50mcg BID vs FP 100mcg BID · ANCOVA · p = 0.294 (LS Mean Diff, SE, CI, and p-values were from an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, investigator, age stratum, and baseline value.) · Mean difference (net): -0.10 · 95% CI -0.29 to 0.09
  • FSC 100/50mcg BID vs FP 100mcg BID · ANCOVA · p = 0.828 (LS Mean Diff, SE, CI, and p-values were from an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, investigator, age stratum, and baseline value.) · Mean difference (net): -0.02 · 95% CI -0.24 to 0.19
  • FSC 100/50mcg BID vs FP 100mcg BID · ANCOVA · p = 0.903 (LS Mean Diff, SE, CI, and p-values were from an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, investigator, age stratum, and baseline value.) · Mean difference (net): 0.01 · 95% CI -0.19 to 0.22
  • FSC 100/50mcg BID vs FP 100mcg BID · ANCOVA · p = 0.464 · Mean difference (net): -0.08 · 95% CI -0.30 to 0.14LS Mean Diff, SE, CI, and p-values were from an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, investigator, age stratum, and baseline value.
  • FSC 100/50mcg BID vs FP 100mcg BID · ANCOVA · p = 0.551 (LS Mean Diff, SE, CI, and p-values were from an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, investigator, age stratum, and baseline value.) · Mean difference (net): -0.07 · 95% CI -0.32 to 0.17
  • FSC 100/50mcg BID vs FP 100mcg BID · ANCOVA · p = 0.633 (LS Mean Diff, SE, CI, and p-values were from an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, investigator, age stratum, and baseline value.) · Mean difference (net): -0.06 · 95% CI -0.30 to 0.18
  • FSC 100/50mcg BID vs FP 100mcg BID · ANCOVA · p = 0.700 (LS Mean Diff, SE, CI, and p-values are from an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, investigator, age stratum, and baseline value.) · Mean difference (net): -0.04 · 95% CI -0.22 to 0.15
  • FSC 100/50mcg BID vs FP 100mcg BID · ANCOVA · p = 0.860 (LS Mean Diff, SE, CI, and p-values were from an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, investigator, age stratum, and baseline value.) · Mean difference (net): -0.02 · 95% CI -0.23 to 0.20
  • FSC 100/50mcg BID vs FP 100mcg BID · ANCOVA · p = 0.919 (LS Mean Diff, SE, CI, and p-values were from an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, investigator, age stratum, and baseline value.) · Mean difference (net): 0.01 · 95% CI -0.19 to 0.21

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events and serious adverse events were collected from Visit 1 (Screening) until completion of the study (Up to 58 days). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
FSC 100/50mcg BID0/124 (0%)0/124 (0%)37/124 (29.8%)
FP 100mcg BID0/124 (0%)0/124 (0%)35/124 (28.2%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 48
Most frequent other events
EventFSC 100/50mcg BIDFP 100mcg BID
HeadacheNervous system disorders4/1246/124
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations4/1242/124
UrticariaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/1244/124
Pharyngolaryngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/1241/124
Rhinitis allergicRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1243/124
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders3/1242/124
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations2/1241/124
BronchitisInfections and infestations0/1242/124
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations2/1240/124
Viral upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations0/1242/124

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)FSC 100/50mcg BIDFP 100mcg BIDTotal
Mean11.1 ± 3.3311.0 ± 3.5711.1 ± 3.45
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)FSC 100/50mcg BIDFP 100mcg BIDTotal
Female495099
Male7574149
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)FSC 100/50mcg BIDFP 100mcg BIDTotal
American Hispanic12820
Arabic/North African213
Black262955
East & South East Asian022
Japanese101
South Asian112
White/Caucasian8181162
Other123
08

Study locations

50 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Huntington Beach, California 92647, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Orange, California 92868, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Palmdale, California 93551, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Paramount, California 90723, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    San Diego, California 92120, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Torrance, California 90503, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Walnut Creek, California 94598, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Centennial, Colorado 80112, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Englewood, Colorado 80112, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Lakewood, Colorado 80401, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Miami, Florida 33156, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Miami, Florida 33176, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Tallahassee, Florida 32308, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Lilburn, Georgia 30047, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hoffman Estates, Illinois 60195, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Metairie, Louisiana 70001, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Metairie, Louisiana 70006, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Baltimore, Maryland 21236, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Glen Burnie, Maryland 21061, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    North Dartmouth, Massachusetts 02747, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Papillion, Nebraska 68046, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Skillman, New Jersey 08558, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Summit, New Jersey 07901, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Commack, New York 11725, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Utica, New York 13502, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Canton, Ohio 44718, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45231, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Dayton, Ohio 45404, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Gresham, Oregon 97030, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Medford, Oregon 97504, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Portland, Oregon 97213, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Erie, Pennsylvania 16508, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033-0850, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19135, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Charleston, South Carolina 29406, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Mount Pleasant, South Carolina 29464, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Orangeburg, South Carolina 29118, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Dyersburg, Tennessee 38024, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37922, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Dallas, Texas 75204, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Houston, Texas 77074, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Murray, Utah 84107, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Richmond, Virginia 23298, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Greenfield, Wisconsin 53228, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Madison, Wisconsin 53792, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Pearlman D, Qaqundah P, Matz J, Yancey SW, Stempel DA, Ortega HG. Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol and exercise-induced asthma in children with persistent asthma. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009 May;44(5):429-35. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20962. PubMed 19382218 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Dec 2003 to primary completion in Apr 2006, 27 months.

Results were first posted in Feb 2019, 12 years 10 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 1, 2005
First posted
Jul 12, 2005
StartActual
Dec 23, 2003
Primary completionActual
Apr 1, 2006
CompletionActual
Apr 23, 2006
Results first posted
Feb 5, 2019
Last update
Feb 5, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 5, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00118716
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 12, 2005
Start date
Dec 23, 2003
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2006
Completion
Apr 23, 2006
Results posted
Feb 5, 2019
Last update
Feb 5, 2019

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · GlaxoSmithKline

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Fluticasone · Salmeterol Xinafoate

Start the discussion