CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00115388POPIUpdated Nov 24, 2014

Community-Based Trial of Screening for Chlamydia Trachomatis to Prevent Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

An interventional study of Screening for chlamydia using self-taken vaginal swabs in Pelvic Inflammatory Disease and Chlamydia Infections, sponsored by St George's, University of London. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to female participants aged 16 Years to 27 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-11-24.

Sponsored by St George's, University of London · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,531
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 27 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Chlamydial infection is a common, sexually transmitted disease which women can have without knowing. Untreated, it can lead to an infection of the womb and fallopian tubes called pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), which can cause infertility. There has been only one trial of chlamydia screening and this was in American women in 1992 and used outdated tests. We now need to see if screening using modern tests and self-taken swabs works in a high risk, young, multiethnic female population in the United Kingdom (UK).

The study is a randomised trial. It will involve asking women students in college bars to complete confidential questionnaires on sexual health and to provide self-administered vaginal swabs. We have successfully done this in a small pilot study. Participants will be told that the tests are for research purposes only and that if they think they may have been at risk of a sexually transmitted infection they should get checked at a clinic. If the trial shows that chlamydia screening using these new methods prevents PID, extending this community-based intervention nationwide could improve women's reproductive health and wellbeing and might prevent some women from becoming infertile

Read the detailed description

Background: Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is common and can lead to infertility, ectopic pregnancy or chronic pelvic pain.

Objectives: To see if screening and treatment of chlamydial infection reduces the incidence of PID over 12 months, and to investigate the natural history of chlamydial infection and the role of bacterial vaginosis (BV) in the development of chlamydia associated PID.

Design: Randomised trial over one year

Setting: Common rooms, bars and lecture theatres at universities and colleges in London, UK.

Participants: 2500 sexually active female students aged \<28 years will be asked to complete a questionnaire on sexual health and to provide a self-administered vaginal swab and smear with follow up after a year.

Intervention: Following randomisation, vaginal swabs from intervention women will be tested for chlamydia by PCR and those infected referred for treatment. Vaginal swabs from control women will be stored and analysed after a year. Vaginal smears will be Gram stained and analysed for BV.

Main outcome measure: Incidence of clinical PID over 12 months in intervention and control groups.

Possible cases of PID will be identified from questionnaires and record searches. Confirmation of the diagnosis will be done by detailed review of medical records by two independent researchers blind to whether the woman is in the intervention or control group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
  • Chlamydia Infections

Keywords

  • Pelvic inflammatory disease
  • Chlamydia trachomatis
  • Screening
03

In context

Chlamydia Infections

121 studies on the registry are indexed under Chlamydia Infections; 21 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,531 is above the median of 600 across 85 interventional studies indexed under Chlamydia Infections.

Browse Chlamydia Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

St George's, University of London is the lead sponsor of 105 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 27 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Sexually active

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Never been sexually active
  • Tested for chlamydia in past 3 months and no new sexual partner since then
  • Pregnant
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
2,531 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Deferred screening control group

    Samples from women in the control group were stored and tested at the end of the trial

    Procedure: Screening for chlamydia using self-taken vaginal swabs

Interventions

  • ProcedureScreening for chlamydia using self-taken vaginal swabs

    Women in the intervention group will be tested for chlamydia and those found to be infected will be referred for treatment and partner notification

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary outcome measure in the complete cohort: Incidence of clinical PID over 12 months in intervention and control groups.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary outcome measures after 12 months in women with chlamydial infection at baseline:

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Control group (untreated):

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Incidence of PID.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Percentage with spontaneous clearance of genital infection.

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Relative risk of PID in women with and without BV

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. 3. Intervention group (treated): Reinfection rate.

    Time frame: 1-3 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • St George's Hospital Medical School
    London, Sw17 ORE, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hay PE, Kerry SR, Normansell R, Horner PJ, Reid F, Kerry SM, Prime K, Williams E, Simms I, Aghaizu A, Jensen J, Oakeshott P. Which sexually active young female students are most at risk of pelvic inflammatory disease? A prospective study. Sex Transm Infect. 2016 Feb;92(1):63-6. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052063. Epub 2015 Jun 16. PubMed 26082320 ↗
  • Oakeshott P, Kerry S, Aghaizu A, Atherton H, Hay S, Taylor-Robinson D, Simms I, Hay P. Randomised controlled trial of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (prevention of pelvic infection) trial. BMJ. 2010 Apr 8;340:c1642. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1642. PubMed 20378636 ↗
  • Oakeshott P, Kerry S, Atherton H, Aghaizu A, Hay S, Taylor-Robinson D, Simms I, Hay P. Community-based trial of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (prevention of pelvic infection) trial. Trials. 2008 Dec 10;9:73. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-9-73. PubMed 19077198 ↗
  • Atherton H, Banks D, Harbit R, Long L, Chadd F, Hay P, Kerry S, Simms I, Oakeshott P. Recruitment of young women to a trial of chlamydia screening - as easy as it sounds? Trials. 2007 Dec 4;8:41. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-8-41. PubMed 18053199 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 24, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00115388
Lead sponsor
St George's, University of London
Responsible party
Dr Pippa Oakeshott (Professor of General Practice, St George's, University of London) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 22, 2005
Start date
Sep 2004
Primary completion
Dec 2008
Completion
Dec 2008
Last update
Nov 24, 2014

Study contacts

Pippa Oakeshott, MD FRCP
principal investigator · St George's, University of London
Phillip Hay, FRCP
study chair · St George's, University of London

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion