A Phase 2 interventional study of Fludarabine Phosphate and Total-Body Irradiation in Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm, Unclassifiable, Previously Treated Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, sponsored by Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center. Completed at 11 sites in 3 countries. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-30.
Sponsored by Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
Among 14 studies testing tacrolimus in Blast Crisis — none open to participants now, none under way, none of them phase 3. Tacrolimus · Blast Crisis.
Among the 14 studies testing tacrolimus in Blast Crisis, this one has the largest enrollment of the 11 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 4 that started in 2004, is one of 9 in phase 2, and was the 5th registered.
361 studies on the registry are indexed under Blast Crisis; 16 are open to participants now.
Browse Blast Crisis studies →None of the 14 studies testing tacrolimus in Blast Crisis is open now. The open studies under Blast Crisis, anywhere →
Tacrolimus: first FDA approval 1994 (PROGRAF), first EMA approval 2002. What it is approved for, and how studies give it, is on its page →
Of the 14 Blast Crisis studies recruiting now, 9 (64%) set no upper age limit and 2 (14%) stop at 75 or younger; 6 take children under 18; none take healthy volunteers.
This study: all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
14 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
A study in two phases is counted once above. Listed by phase, each with its combined phases: Phase 1 5 · Phase 2 12
First in 2000; this study’s year is marked. 4 started in 2004.
By drug class, each counting the studies that test any of its medicines:
This study's enrollment of 210 is above the median of 36 across 264 interventional studies indexed under Blast Crisis.
Median enrollment 36 across the 11 interventional studies. Of the 14 that completed or were terminated, 7 (50%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
None of the 14 has an industry lead sponsor. The 7 most frequent:
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 547 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.
Of its 59 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 46 (78%) have results posted.
41 studies in Blast Crisis by Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center: 1 open now, 1 under way, none of them phase 3. Of 40 finished, 15 (38%) have results posted.
Among the 41 studies in Blast Crisis by Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, this one is the 3rd largest by enrollment of the 28 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 5 that started in 2004, is one of 23 in phase 2, and was the 21st registered.
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center’s Blast Crisis studies by the year they started, since 1990.
None of the studies under way reaches primary completion within a year.
Among the 14 studies testing tacrolimus in Blast Crisis, from their registry updates:
Nothing recorded among them since 2026-09-25.
Among Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center’s 41 in Blast Crisis:
Nothing recorded among them since 2026-09-25.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
This randomized phase II trial studies how well giving tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with or without sirolimus works in preventing acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients undergoing donor stem cell transplant for hematologic cancer. Giving low doses of chemotherapy, such as fludarabine phosphate, and total-body-irradiation before a donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant helps stop the growth of cancer cells. It also stops the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. The donated stem cells may replace the patient's immune system and help destroy any remaining cancer cells (graft-versus-tumor effect). Sometimes the transplanted cells from a donor can also make an immune response against the body's normal cells. Giving MMF and tacrolimus with or without sirolimus after transplant may stop this from happening.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine which of 3 GVHD prophylaxis regimens results in reduction of acute grades II-IV GVHD to =\< 40%.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Reduce the incidence of non-relapse mortality from infections and GVHD before day 200 to =\< 15%.
II. Reduce the utilization of high-dose corticosteroids compared to protocols 1463, 1641, and 1668.
III. Compare survival and progression-free survival to that achieved under protocols 1463, 1641, and 1668.
OUTLINE:
CONDITIONING: All patients receive fludarabine phosphate intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes on days -4 to -2 and undergo total-body irradiation on day 0.
TRANSPLANTATION: All patients undergo allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation on day 0.
IMMUNOSUPPRESSION: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.
ARM I: Patients receive tacrolimus IV or orally (PO) every 12 hours on days -3 to 180 with taper beginning on day 100 in the absence of GVHD. Patients also receive MMF PO every 8 hours on days 0-29 and then every 12 hours on days 30-96 with taper beginning on day 40 in the absence of GVHD.
ARM II: Patients receive tacrolimus IV or PO every 12 hours on days -3 to 150 with taper beginning on day 100 in the absence of GVHD. Patients also receive MMF PO every 8 hours on days 0-29 and then every 12 hours on days 30-180 with taper beginning on day 150 in the absence of GVHD.
ARM III: Patients receive tacrolimus and MMF as in arm II. Patients also receive sirolimus PO once daily on days -3 to 80.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 6 months and then every year thereafter.
361 studies on the registry are indexed under Blast Crisis; 16 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 210 is above the median of 36 across 264 interventional studies indexed under Blast Crisis.
Browse Blast Crisis studies →Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 547 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.
Of its 59 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 46 (78%) have results posted.
Compared within Blast Crisis, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Myeloproliferative Disorders. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
The following diseases will be permitted although other diagnoses can be considered if approved by PCC or the participating institutions' patient review committees and the principal investigators:
CLL must have either
DONOR: FHCRC matching allowed will be Grades 1.0 to 2.1: unrelated donors who are prospectively:
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
Stem cell (bone marrow) transplants. Allogeneic uses cells from a donor; autologous uses your own cells, collected earlier and given back.
Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.
From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.
Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.
Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.
Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
Cancer (malignancy)
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Allogeneic and autologous transplant
Stem cell (bone marrow) transplants. Allogeneic uses cells from a donor; autologous uses your own cells, collected earlier and given back.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Relapsed and refractory
Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraception
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)
The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
FEV1
From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)
Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.
Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Bilirubin
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Karnofsky performance status (KPS)
A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.
Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
HIV
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Patients receive tacrolimus IV or PO every 12 hours on days -3 to 180 with taper beginning on day 100 in the absence of GVHD. Patients also receive MMF PO every 8 hours on days 0-29 and then every 12 hours on days 30-96 with taper beginning on day 40 in the absence of GVHD.
Drug: Fludarabine Phosphate · Radiation: Total-Body Irradiation · Procedure: Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation · Procedure: Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation · Drug: Tacrolimus · Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil
Patients receive tacrolimus IV or PO every 12 hours on days -3 to 150 with taper beginning on day 100 in the absence of GVHD. Patients also receive MMF PO every 8 hours on days 0-29 and then every 12 hours on days 30-180 with taper beginning on day 150 in the absence of GVHD.
Drug: Fludarabine Phosphate · Radiation: Total-Body Irradiation · Procedure: Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation · Procedure: Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation · Drug: Tacrolimus · Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil
Patients receive tacrolimus and MMF as in arm II. Patients also receive sirolimus PO once daily on days -3 to 80.
Drug: Fludarabine Phosphate · Radiation: Total-Body Irradiation · Procedure: Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation · Procedure: Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation · Drug: Tacrolimus · Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil · Drug: Sirolimus
Given IV
Also known as: 2-F-ara-AMP, Beneflur, SH T 586
Undergo total-body irradiation
Also known as: TBI, Total Body Irradiation, Whole-Body Irradiation
Undergo allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
Also known as: PBPC transplantation, Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Transplantation, Peripheral Stem Cell Support, Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation
Undergo allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
Also known as: HSC, HSCT
Given IV or PO
Also known as: Advagraf, FK 506
Given PO
Also known as: Cellcept, MMF
Given PO
Also known as: AY 22989, RAPA, SILA 9268A, WY-090217
Number of Participants With Grades II-IV Acute GVHD
Number of patients with grades II-IV acute GVHD aGVHD Stages Skin: 1. a maculopapular eruption involving \< 25% BSA 2. a maculopapular eruption involving 25 - 50% BSA 3. generalized erythroderma 4. generalized erythroderma w/ bullous formation and often w/ desquamation Liver: 1. bilirubin 2.0 - 3.0 mg/100 mL 2. bilirubin 3 - 5.9 mg/100 mL 3. bilirubin 6 - 14.9 mg/100 mL 4. bilirubin \> 15 mg/100 mL Gut: Diarrhea is graded 1 - 4 in severity. Nausea and vomiting and/or anorexia caused by GVHD is assigned as 1 in severity. The severity of gut involvement is assigned to the most severe involvement noted. Patients w/ visible bloody diarrhea are at least stage 2 gut and grade 3 overall. aGVHD Grades Grade II: Stage 1 - 2 skin w/ no gut/liver involvement Grade III: Stage 2 - 4 gut involvement and/or stage 2 - 4 liver involvement Grade IV: Pattern and severity of GVHD similar to grade 3 w/ extreme constitutional symptoms or death
Time frame: 150 days after transplant
Number of Non-Relapse Mortalities
Percentage of NRM as estimated by cumulative incidence methods with competing risks. Cumulative incidence methods are the standard way to estimate incidence of an endpoint in the presence of competing risks and censoring (ref)" Here is the reference. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE: Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Statistics in Medicine 18:695-706, 1999. PMID 10204198
Time frame: 200 days after transplant
Number of Participants Utilizing High-Dose Corticosteroids
Number of patients utilizing high-dose corticosteroids (as a surrogate marker for reduction of acute GVHD), estimated by cumulative incidence methods. Cumulative incidence methods are the standard way to estimate incidence of an endpoint in the presence of competing risks and censoring (ref)" Here is the reference. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE: Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Statistics in Medicine 18:695-706, 1999. PMID 10204198
Time frame: 150 days after transplant
Number of Participants Surviving Overall
Number of patients surviving, estimated by cumulative incidence methods Cumulative incidence methods are the standard way to estimate incidence of an endpoint in the presence of competing risks and censoring (ref)" Here is the reference. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE: Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Statistics in Medicine 18:695-706, 1999. PMID 10204198
Time frame: 1 Year post-transplant
Number of Participants Surviving Without Progression
Number of patients with progression-free survival, estimated by cumulative incidence methods Cumulative incidence methods are the standard way to estimate incidence of an endpoint in the presence of competing risks and censoring (ref)" Here is the reference. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE: Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Statistics in Medicine 18:695-706, 1999. PMID 10204198
Time frame: 2 Years post-transplant
| Milestone | Arm I (MMF and Tacrolimus) | Arm II (MMF and Tacrolimus Alternate Schedule) | Arm III (MMF, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 70 | 71 | 69 |
| Completed | 70 | 71 | 69 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of patients with grades II-IV acute GVHD aGVHD Stages Skin: 1. a maculopapular eruption involving \< 25% BSA 2. a maculopapular eruption involving 25 - 50% BSA 3. generalized erythroderma 4. generalized erythroderma w/ bullous formation and often w/ desquamation Liver: 1. bilirubin 2.0 - 3.0 mg/100 mL 2. bilirubin 3 - 5.9 mg/100 mL 3. bilirubin 6 - 14.9 mg/100 mL 4. bilirubin \> 15 mg/100 mL Gut: Diarrhea is graded 1 - 4 in severity. Nausea and vomiting and/or anorexia caused by GVHD is assigned as 1 in severity. The severity of gut involvement is assigned to the most severe involvement noted. Patients w/ visible bloody diarrhea are at least stage 2 gut and grade 3 overall. aGVHD Grades Grade II: Stage 1 - 2 skin w/ no gut/liver involvement Grade III: Stage 2 - 4 gut involvement and/or stage 2 - 4 liver involvement Grade IV: Pattern and severity of GVHD similar to grade 3 w/ extreme constitutional symptoms or death
| Participants | Arm I (MMF and Tacrolimus) | Arm II (MMF and Tacrolimus Alternate Schedule) | Arm III (MMF, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Grades II-IV Acute GVHD | 44 | 34 | 32 |
Percentage of NRM as estimated by cumulative incidence methods with competing risks. Cumulative incidence methods are the standard way to estimate incidence of an endpoint in the presence of competing risks and censoring (ref)" Here is the reference. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE: Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Statistics in Medicine 18:695-706, 1999. PMID 10204198
| Participants | Arm I (MMF and Tacrolimus) | Arm II (MMF and Tacrolimus Alternate Schedule) | Arm III (MMF, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Non-Relapse Mortalities | 3 | 6 | 2 |
Number of patients utilizing high-dose corticosteroids (as a surrogate marker for reduction of acute GVHD), estimated by cumulative incidence methods. Cumulative incidence methods are the standard way to estimate incidence of an endpoint in the presence of competing risks and censoring (ref)" Here is the reference. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE: Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Statistics in Medicine 18:695-706, 1999. PMID 10204198
| Participants | Arm I (MMF and Tacrolimus) | Arm II (MMF and Tacrolimus Alternate Schedule) | Arm III (MMF, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Utilizing High-Dose Corticosteroids | 38 | 35 | 22 |
Number of patients surviving, estimated by cumulative incidence methods Cumulative incidence methods are the standard way to estimate incidence of an endpoint in the presence of competing risks and censoring (ref)" Here is the reference. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE: Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Statistics in Medicine 18:695-706, 1999. PMID 10204198
| Participants | Arm I (MMF and Tacrolimus) | Arm II (MMF and Tacrolimus Alternate Schedule) | Arm III (MMF, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Surviving Overall | 48 | 47 | 40 |
Number of patients with progression-free survival, estimated by cumulative incidence methods Cumulative incidence methods are the standard way to estimate incidence of an endpoint in the presence of competing risks and censoring (ref)" Here is the reference. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE: Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Statistics in Medicine 18:695-706, 1999. PMID 10204198
| Participants | Arm I (MMF and Tacrolimus) | Arm II (MMF and Tacrolimus Alternate Schedule) | Arm III (MMF, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Surviving Without Progression | 28 | 27 | 26 |
Collected over AEs: From the start of conditioning to 100 Days post-transplant SAEs: From the start of conditioning to 200 Days post-transplant All-Cause Mortality: Conditioning through 1 Year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm I (MMF and Tacrolimus) | 21/69 (30.4%) | 9/69 (13%) | 25/69 (36.2%) |
| Arm II (MMF and Tacrolimus Alternate Schedule) | 24/71 (33.8%) | 8/71 (11.3%) | 22/71 (31%) |
| Arm III (MMF, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus) | 28/68 (41.2%) | 7/68 (10.3%) | 25/68 (36.8%) |
| Event | Arm I (MMF and Tacrolimus) | Arm II (MMF and Tacrolimus Alternate Schedule) | Arm III (MMF, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Respiratory infectionInfections and infestations | 1/69 | 3/71 | 0/68 |
| GVHDImmune system disorders | 0/69 | 0/71 | 2/68 |
| ThrombosisVascular disorders | 2/69 | 1/71 | 0/68 |
| SepsisInfections and infestations | 1/69 | 1/71 | 1/68 |
| GvHD w/ infectionImmune system disorders | 1/69 | 1/71 | 1/68 |
| Multi-organ failureGeneral disorders | 0/69 | 1/71 | 1/68 |
| HypertensionCardiac disorders | 0/69 | 0/71 | 1/68 |
| Renal insufficiencyRenal and urinary disorders | 0/69 | 0/71 | 1/68 |
| Severe hemoptysisInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 1/69 | 0/71 | 0/68 |
| CNS cerebrovascular ischemiaVascular disorders | 1/69 | 0/71 | 0/68 |
| Event | Arm I (MMF and Tacrolimus) | Arm II (MMF and Tacrolimus Alternate Schedule) | Arm III (MMF, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HypoxiaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 5/69 | 8/71 | 4/68 |
| DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders | 5/69 | 1/71 | 4/68 |
| Creatinine increasedInvestigations | 1/69 | 1/71 | 4/68 |
| NauseaGastrointestinal disorders | 1/69 | 1/71 | 3/68 |
| FeverGeneral disorders | 0/69 | 3/71 | 0/68 |
| Neutrophil count decreasedInvestigations | 1/69 | 3/71 | 0/68 |
| HeadacheNervous system disorders | 0/69 | 1/71 | 2/68 |
| Pleural effusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 0/69 | 1/71 | 2/68 |
| SyncopeNervous system disorders | 2/69 | 0/71 | 2/68 |
| Thromboembolic eventVascular disorders | 1/69 | 1/71 | 2/68 |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Arm I (MMF and Tacrolimus) | Arm II (MMF and Tacrolimus Alternate Schedule) | Arm III (MMF, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 57 | 50 | 49 | 156 |
| >=65 years | 13 | 20 | 19 | 52 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Arm I (MMF and Tacrolimus) | Arm II (MMF and Tacrolimus Alternate Schedule) | Arm III (MMF, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 60 (26 to 74) | 60 (13 to 72) | 60 (15 to 75) | 60 (13 to 75) |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Arm I (MMF and Tacrolimus) | Arm II (MMF and Tacrolimus Alternate Schedule) | Arm III (MMF, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 29 | 30 | 23 | 82 |
| Male | 41 | 41 | 46 | 128 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Arm I (MMF and Tacrolimus) | Arm II (MMF and Tacrolimus Alternate Schedule) | Arm III (MMF, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 59 | 59 | 58 | 176 |
| Denmark | 5 | 5 | 5 | 15 |
| Germany | 6 | 7 | 6 | 19 |
The record gives a start of Nov 2004, a primary completion of May 2011 and a completion of May 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
Results were first posted in Sep 2015, 4 years 4 months after primary completion.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drugs tested here: Tacrolimus · Mycophenolic Acid
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center →