A Phase 3 interventional study of Brief Strategic Family Therapy (BSFT) and Treatment as Usual in Substance Abuse, sponsored by University of Miami. Completed at 8 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-07-07.
Sponsored by University of Miami · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to compare Brief Strategic Family Therapy (BSFT) for Adolescent Drug Abusers to treatment as usual (TAU).
An additional follow up assessment, funded by an American Recovery \& Reinvestment Act (ARRA) grant, was completed 5 years post randomization in order to examine the long term effects of outpatient treatments for illicit drug using adolescents.
Adolescent drug abuse continues to be one of the most pressing public health issues in the United States-our nation's teenagers continue to use illicit drugs at a worrisome rate. Broad reviews of the treatment outcome literature indicate that family interventions in general, and Brief Strategic Family Therapy (BSFT) in particular, are effective with drug using youth. This study is designed to compare BSFT to treatment as usual (TAU). The researchers believe that BSFT will be much more effective than TAU in reducing adolescent drug use. They will also examine which of these treatment approaches does a better job of engaging adolescents and family members in treatment, decreasing problem behaviors, decreasing sexually risky behaviors, increasing pro-social activities (e.g., school, work), and improving the functioning of the family.
With the addition of the extended follow up, we have the opportunity to examine the sustainability of study outcomes into early adulthood, filling a gap in the treatment research literature about the long-term effects of adolescent substance abuse treatment. The follow up study examined the long term effectiveness of BSFT compared to TAU in the rates of substance use, number of arrests and externalizing behaviors, in youth who received study treatments at the time when they were adolescents.
2,124 studies on the registry are indexed under Substance-Related Disorders; 393 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 480 is above the median of 108 across 1,727 interventional studies indexed under Substance-Related Disorders.
Browse Substance-Related Disorders studies →University of Miami is the lead sponsor of 820 studies on the registry; 161 are open to participants now.
Of its 111 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 93 (84%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Main Study:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Follow Up Study:
Inclusion Criteria:
BSFT is a family therapy approach that consists of 12 to 16 sessions (each 1 to 1.5 hours long) over a 4-month period during the Main Study, and up to 8 "booster" sessions. Interventions are delivered to adolescents and relevant family members in non-restrictive community settings (e.g., clinics, homes, school).
Behavioral: Brief Strategic Family Therapy (BSFT)
TAU varies depending on site, however each will offer services that include at least 1 therapy session (individual or group therapy) per week during the Main Study, as well as participation in ancillary services (e.g., case management, self help groups, etc.) over a four month period.
Behavioral: Treatment as Usual
BSFT is a family therapy approach that consists of 12 to 16 sessions (each 1 to 1.5 hours long) over a 4-month period during the Main Study, and up to 8 "booster" sessions. Interventions are delivered to adolescents and relevant family members in non-restrictive community settings (e.g., clinics, homes, school).
Also known as: BSFT
TAU varies depending on site, however each will offer services that include at least 1 therapy session (individual or group therapy) per week during the Main Study, as well as participation in ancillary services (e.g., case management, self help groups, etc.) over a four month period.
Also known as: TAU
Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
Time frame: Number of self reported drug use days from 28 days prior to baseline
Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
Time frame: Number of self reported drug use days from day 1-28
Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
Time frame: Number of self reported drug use days in days 29-56
Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
Time frame: Number of self reported drug use days from day 57-84
Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
Time frame: Number of self reported drug use days from day 85-112
Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
Time frame: Number of self reported drug use days from day 113-140
Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
Time frame: Number of self reported drug use days from day 141 - 168
Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
Time frame: Number of self reported drug use days from day 169-196
Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
Time frame: Number of self reported drug use days from day 197-224
Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
Time frame: Number of self reported drug use days from day 225-252
Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
Time frame: Number of self reported drug use days from day 253-280
Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
Time frame: Number of self reported drug use from days 281-308
Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
Time frame: Number of self reported drug use days from day 309-336
Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
Time frame: Number of self reported drug use days from day 337-364
Follow Up Study, Drug Use
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. For the Follow Up Study, the TLFB was used to identify drug use in the 90 day period that preceded the assessment. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use over the past 90 days. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use.The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 90 days.
Time frame: Number of self reported drug use days 90 days prior assessment
Follow Up Study, Drug Use
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. For the Follow Up Study, the TLFB was used to identify drug use in the 90 day period that preceded the assessment. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use over the past 90 days. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use.The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 90 days.
Time frame: Number of self reported drug use days 90 days prior to assessment
Main Study, Externalizing Behaviors at Baseline
For the Main study, an equally weighted composite of the following standardized scales was used to assess externalizing behaviors: 'Total Delinquency' from the National Youth Survey; 'Oppositional Defiant Disorder' and 'Conduct Problems' from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Predictive Scales, 'Externalizing Scale' from the Youth Self-Report. This composite was then transformed to a z-score using the mean and standard deviation of the baseline in the entire sample. Adolescent externalizing behaviors were assessed at 4-, 8-, and 12-months post randomization.This hypothesis analyzed using hierarchical linear models. Scores ranged from -1.6 to 3.0. The higher the score, the more externalizing behavior.
Time frame: Baseline
Main Study, Externalizing Behavior at 4 Months Post Randomization
For the Main study, an equally weighted composite of the following standardized scales was used to assess externalizing behaviors: 'Total Delinquency' from the National Youth Survey; 'Oppositional Defiant Disorder' and 'Conduct Problems' from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Predictive Scales, 'Externalizing Scale' from the Youth Self-Report. This composite was then transformed to a z-score using the mean and standard deviation of the baseline in the entire sample. Adolescent externalizing behaviors were assessed at 4-, 8-, and 12-months post randomization.This hypothesis analyzed using hierarchical linear models. Scores ranged from -1.6 to 3.8. The higher the score, the more externalizing behavior.
Time frame: 4 months post randomization
Main Study, Externalizing Behavior at 8 Months Post Randomization
For the Main study, an equally weighted composite of the following standardized scales was used to assess externalizing behaviors: 'Total Delinquency' from the National Youth Survey; 'Oppositional Defiant Disorder' and 'Conduct Problems' from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Predictive Scales, 'Externalizing Scale' from the Youth Self-Report. This composite was then transformed to a z-score using the mean and standard deviation of the baseline in the entire sample. Adolescent externalizing behaviors were assessed at 4-, 8-, and 12-months post randomization.This hypothesis analyzed using hierarchical linear models. Scores ranged from -1.6 to 3.5. The higher the score, the more externalizing behavior.
Time frame: 8 months post randomization
Main Study, Externalizing Behavior at 12 Months Post Randomization
For the Main study, an equally weighted composite of the following standardized scales was used to assess externalizing behaviors: 'Total Delinquency' from the National Youth Survey; 'Oppositional Defiant Disorder' and 'Conduct Problems' from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Predictive Scales, 'Externalizing Scale' from the Youth Self-Report. This composite was then transformed to a z-score using the mean and standard deviation of the baseline in the entire sample. Adolescent externalizing behaviors were assessed at 4-, 8-, and 12-months post randomization.This hypothesis analyzed using hierarchical linear models. Scores ranged from -1.6 to 3.4. The higher the score, the more externalizing behavior.
Time frame: 12 months post randomization
Follow Up Study, Externalizing Behavior
For the follow up study, externalizing behavior for the 90 days prior to the follow up was assessed using the externalizing composite of the Adult Self Report (ASR). The ASR is a 123 item self report scale designed for 18 to 59 year-old to describe their own functioning. Items are on a 3 point likert type scale (0= not true, 1=somewhat true, 2=very true or often true). The externalizing scale is comprised by the aggressive, rule braking and intrusive syndromes. The problem syndromes have been normed by sex and age (18 to 35, or 36 to 59), using a nationally representative sample. Scores were square-root transformed to more closely approximate a normal distribution. Scores ranged from 0 to 7.2. The higher the score, the more externalizing behavior. Participants were also asked to self report arrests in the past year . Externalizing was analyzed using regression
Time frame: 90 days prior to assessment
Main Study, Level of Family Functioning at Baseline
The four components of the 'Parenting Practices Inventory' used to create a composite for use in this analysis. The four component scales from the Parenting Practices Inventory are 'Positive Parenting', 'Discipline Effectiveness,' 'Avoidance of Discipline' and 'Monitoring' scales from the Pittsburgh Youth Survey. the family functioning composite was standardized by the full sample standard deviation at baseline. Scores ranged from -3.0 to 1.8. The higher the score, the better outcome of family functioning.
Time frame: Baseline
Main Study, Level of Family Functioning at 4 Months Post Randomization
The four components of the 'Parenting Practices Inventory' used to create a composite for use in this analysis. The four component scales from the Parenting Practices Inventory are 'Positive Parenting', 'Discipline Effectiveness,' 'Avoidance of Discipline' and 'Monitoring' scales from the Pittsburgh Youth Survey. the family functioning composite was standardized by the full sample standard deviation at baseline. Scores ranged from -2.9 to 1.8. The higher the score, the better outcome of family functioning.
Time frame: 4 months post randomization
Main Study, Level of Family Functioning at 8 Months Post Randomization
The four components of the 'Parenting Practices Inventory' used to create a composite for use in this analysis. The four component scales from the Parenting Practices Inventory are 'Positive Parenting', 'Discipline Effectiveness,' 'Avoidance of Discipline' and 'Monitoring' scales from the Pittsburgh Youth Survey. the family functioning composite was standardized by the full sample standard deviation at baseline.Scores ranged from -2.8 to 2.0. The higher the score, the better outcome of family functioning.
Time frame: 8 months post randomization
Main Study, Level of Family Functioning at 12 Months Post Randomization
The four components of the 'Parenting Practices Inventory' used to create a composite for use in this analysis. The four component scales from the Parenting Practices Inventory are 'Positive Parenting', 'Discipline Effectiveness,' 'Avoidance of Discipline' and 'Monitoring' scales from the Pittsburgh Youth Survey. the family functioning composite was standardized by the full sample standard deviation at baseline.Scores ranged from -2.6 to 2.0. The higher the score, the better outcome of family functioning.
Time frame: 12 months post randomization
Follow Up Study, Level of Family Functioning
For the follow up study, family functioning was measured by a composite of the Cohesion and Conflict scales of the Family Environment Scale. Scores ranged from 1.0 to 18.0. The higher the value, the better the level of family functioning outcome.
Time frame: 90 days prior assessment
Main Study, Risky Sexual Behaviors at Baseline
For the Main Study, the total score of the 'HIV/Sex Risk Behaviors' measure was used as the outcome. Scores ranged from -0.5 to 8.7. The higher the score, the more risky sexual behavior.
Time frame: Baseline
Main Study, Risky Sexual Behaviors at 4 Months Post Randomization
For the Main Study, the total score of the 'HIV/Sex Risk Behaviors' measure was used as the outcome. Scores ranged from -0.5 to 10.4. The higher the score, the more risky sexual behavior.
Time frame: 4 months post randomization
Main Study, Risky Sexual Behaviors at 8 Months Post Randomization
For the Main Study, the total score of the 'HIV/Sex Risk Behaviors' measure was used as the outcome. Scores ranged from -0.5 to 6.8. The higher the score, the more risky sexual behavior.
Time frame: 8 months post randomization
Main Study, Risky Sexual Behaviors at 12 Months Post Randomization
For the Main Study, the total score of the 'HIV/Sex Risk Behaviors' measure was used as the outcome. Scores ranged from -0.5 to 6.7. The higher the score, the more risky sexual behavior.
Time frame: 12 months post randomization
Follow Up Study, Risky Sexual Behaviors
For the Follow Up Study, sexual risk behavior was measured by examining the number of unprotected sexual acts and the number of partners and number of sex acts that included substance use the in the 90 day period that preceded the assessment; a latent factor using structural equation modeling will be used created from the Behavioral Risk Assessment. Scores ranged from -0.5 to 11.7. The higher the score, the more risky sexual behavior.
Time frame: 90 days prior assessment
Main Study: Adolescents who self-reported illicit drug use in the 30-days before baseline assessment or had to be referred from an institution for the treatment of drug abuse. Extended Follow Up Study: Participants from the Main Study who agreed to be contacted in the future, regardless of Main completion, were recruited to complete the assessment.
| Milestone | BSFT | Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 245 | 235 |
| Completed | 154 | 148 |
| Not completed | 91 | 87 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 91 | 87 |
| Milestone | BSFT | Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 199 | 179 |
| Completed | 140 | 121 |
| Not completed | 59 | 58 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 59 | 58 |
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
| days of drug use 28 days prior baseline | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use | 3 (1 to 11) | 3 (0 to 9) |
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
| days of drug use from day 1-28 | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use | 1 (0 to 6) | 2 (0 to 8) |
For the Main study, an equally weighted composite of the following standardized scales was used to assess externalizing behaviors: 'Total Delinquency' from the National Youth Survey; 'Oppositional Defiant Disorder' and 'Conduct Problems' from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Predictive Scales, 'Externalizing Scale' from the Youth Self-Report. This composite was then transformed to a z-score using the mean and standard deviation of the baseline in the entire sample. Adolescent externalizing behaviors were assessed at 4-, 8-, and 12-months post randomization.This hypothesis analyzed using hierarchical linear models. Scores ranged from -1.6 to 3.0. The higher the score, the more externalizing behavior.
| units on a scale | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Externalizing Behaviors at Baseline | -.004 ± 1.01 | .004 ± 1.03 |
For the Main study, an equally weighted composite of the following standardized scales was used to assess externalizing behaviors: 'Total Delinquency' from the National Youth Survey; 'Oppositional Defiant Disorder' and 'Conduct Problems' from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Predictive Scales, 'Externalizing Scale' from the Youth Self-Report. This composite was then transformed to a z-score using the mean and standard deviation of the baseline in the entire sample. Adolescent externalizing behaviors were assessed at 4-, 8-, and 12-months post randomization.This hypothesis analyzed using hierarchical linear models. Scores ranged from -1.6 to 3.8. The higher the score, the more externalizing behavior.
| units on a scale | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Externalizing Behavior at 4 Months Post Randomization | -.36 ± .89 | -.21 ± 1.07 |
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
| days of drug use in days 29-56 | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use | 2 (0 to 7) | 1 (0 to 8.5) |
For the Main study, an equally weighted composite of the following standardized scales was used to assess externalizing behaviors: 'Total Delinquency' from the National Youth Survey; 'Oppositional Defiant Disorder' and 'Conduct Problems' from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Predictive Scales, 'Externalizing Scale' from the Youth Self-Report. This composite was then transformed to a z-score using the mean and standard deviation of the baseline in the entire sample. Adolescent externalizing behaviors were assessed at 4-, 8-, and 12-months post randomization.This hypothesis analyzed using hierarchical linear models. Scores ranged from -1.6 to 3.5. The higher the score, the more externalizing behavior.
| units on a scale | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Externalizing Behavior at 8 Months Post Randomization | -.45 ± .81 | -.39 ± .99 |
For the Main study, an equally weighted composite of the following standardized scales was used to assess externalizing behaviors: 'Total Delinquency' from the National Youth Survey; 'Oppositional Defiant Disorder' and 'Conduct Problems' from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Predictive Scales, 'Externalizing Scale' from the Youth Self-Report. This composite was then transformed to a z-score using the mean and standard deviation of the baseline in the entire sample. Adolescent externalizing behaviors were assessed at 4-, 8-, and 12-months post randomization.This hypothesis analyzed using hierarchical linear models. Scores ranged from -1.6 to 3.4. The higher the score, the more externalizing behavior.
| units on a scale | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Externalizing Behavior at 12 Months Post Randomization | -.45 ± .93 | -.52 ± .87 |
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
| days of drug use from day 57-84 | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use | 1 (0 to 6.5) | 1 (0 to 7) |
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
| days of drug use from day 85-112 | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use | 1 (0 to 7) | 2 (0 to 7) |
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
| days of drug use from days 113-140 | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use | 1 (0 to 6) | 1 (0 to 6) |
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
| days of drug use from day 141-168 | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use | 1 (0 to 8) | 1.5 (0 to 8) |
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
| days of drug use from day 169-196 | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use | 1 (0 to 7) | 1 (0 to 9) |
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
| days of drug use from day 197-224 | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use | 1 (0 to 10) | 1 (0 to 8) |
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
| days of drug use from day 225-252 | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use | 2 (0 to 9) | 2 (0 to 8) |
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
| days of drug use from day 253-280 | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use | 2 (0 to 8) | 2 (0 to 8) |
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
| days of drug use from day 281-308 | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use | 2 (0 to 10) | 2 (0 to 10) |
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
| days of drug use from day 309-336 | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use | 2 (0 to 10) | 3 (0 to 10) |
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. At baseline, TLFB identified drug use in the 28-day period that preceded the baseline assessment. At all other time points the TLFB was used to collect data on daily use from the prior assessment to the current assessment. Thus, the TLFB was used to collect 365 continuous days of data on daily drug use after randomization. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use. The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 28 days.
| days of drug use from day 337-364 | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Adolescent Drug Use | 2 (0 to 9) | 3.5 (0 to 11) |
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. For the Follow Up Study, the TLFB was used to identify drug use in the 90 day period that preceded the assessment. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use over the past 90 days. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use.The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 90 days.
| days of drug use 90 days prior assessmen | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Follow Up Study, Drug Use | 19.5 (5 to 81) | 25 (6 to 82) |
Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) measured drug use. For the Follow Up Study, the TLFB was used to identify drug use in the 90 day period that preceded the assessment. TLFB interview uses a calendar and other memory prompts to stimulate recall to obtain retrospective reports of daily substance use over the past 90 days. Urine drug screens were conducted using Sure Step 10 urine drug screens and urine cups, which included temperature controlled monitoring and detection of adulterants. Urine drug screens were administered immediately prior to the administration of the TLFB to improve the chances of accurate reporting of days of use.The higher the median number, the more drug use; minimum median of drug use 0 days and maximum median of 90 days.
| days of drug use 90 days prior assessmen | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Follow Up Study, Drug Use | 8 (2 to 28) | 10 (2 to 28) |
For the follow up study, externalizing behavior for the 90 days prior to the follow up was assessed using the externalizing composite of the Adult Self Report (ASR). The ASR is a 123 item self report scale designed for 18 to 59 year-old to describe their own functioning. Items are on a 3 point likert type scale (0= not true, 1=somewhat true, 2=very true or often true). The externalizing scale is comprised by the aggressive, rule braking and intrusive syndromes. The problem syndromes have been normed by sex and age (18 to 35, or 36 to 59), using a nationally representative sample. Scores were square-root transformed to more closely approximate a normal distribution. Scores ranged from 0 to 7.2. The higher the score, the more externalizing behavior. Participants were also asked to self report arrests in the past year . Externalizing was analyzed using regression
| units on a scale | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Follow Up Study, Externalizing Behavior | 3.1 ± 1.5 | 3.5 ± 1.5 |
The four components of the 'Parenting Practices Inventory' used to create a composite for use in this analysis. The four component scales from the Parenting Practices Inventory are 'Positive Parenting', 'Discipline Effectiveness,' 'Avoidance of Discipline' and 'Monitoring' scales from the Pittsburgh Youth Survey. the family functioning composite was standardized by the full sample standard deviation at baseline. Scores ranged from -3.0 to 1.8. The higher the score, the better outcome of family functioning.
| units on a scale | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Level of Family Functioning at Baseline | -0.03 ± 1.01 | 0.04 ± 0.99 |
The four components of the 'Parenting Practices Inventory' used to create a composite for use in this analysis. The four component scales from the Parenting Practices Inventory are 'Positive Parenting', 'Discipline Effectiveness,' 'Avoidance of Discipline' and 'Monitoring' scales from the Pittsburgh Youth Survey. the family functioning composite was standardized by the full sample standard deviation at baseline. Scores ranged from -2.9 to 1.8. The higher the score, the better outcome of family functioning.
| units on a scale | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Level of Family Functioning at 4 Months Post Randomization | 0.15 ± 1.02 | 0.21 ± 0.94 |
The four components of the 'Parenting Practices Inventory' used to create a composite for use in this analysis. The four component scales from the Parenting Practices Inventory are 'Positive Parenting', 'Discipline Effectiveness,' 'Avoidance of Discipline' and 'Monitoring' scales from the Pittsburgh Youth Survey. the family functioning composite was standardized by the full sample standard deviation at baseline.Scores ranged from -2.8 to 2.0. The higher the score, the better outcome of family functioning.
| units on a scale | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Level of Family Functioning at 8 Months Post Randomization | 0.31 ± 0.96 | 0.25 ± 0.97 |
The four components of the 'Parenting Practices Inventory' used to create a composite for use in this analysis. The four component scales from the Parenting Practices Inventory are 'Positive Parenting', 'Discipline Effectiveness,' 'Avoidance of Discipline' and 'Monitoring' scales from the Pittsburgh Youth Survey. the family functioning composite was standardized by the full sample standard deviation at baseline.Scores ranged from -2.6 to 2.0. The higher the score, the better outcome of family functioning.
| units on a scale | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Level of Family Functioning at 12 Months Post Randomization | 0.35 ± 0.96 | 0.14 ± 0.99 |
For the follow up study, family functioning was measured by a composite of the Cohesion and Conflict scales of the Family Environment Scale. Scores ranged from 1.0 to 18.0. The higher the value, the better the level of family functioning outcome.
| units on a scale | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Follow Up Study, Level of Family Functioning | 13.2 ± 4.2 | 12.4 ± 4.0 |
For the Main Study, the total score of the 'HIV/Sex Risk Behaviors' measure was used as the outcome. Scores ranged from -0.5 to 8.7. The higher the score, the more risky sexual behavior.
| units on a scale | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Risky Sexual Behaviors at Baseline | .95 ± .14 | 1.00 ± .12 |
For the Main Study, the total score of the 'HIV/Sex Risk Behaviors' measure was used as the outcome. Scores ranged from -0.5 to 10.4. The higher the score, the more risky sexual behavior.
| units on a scale | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Risky Sexual Behaviors at 4 Months Post Randomization | .89 ± .12 | 1.18 ± .12 |
For the Main Study, the total score of the 'HIV/Sex Risk Behaviors' measure was used as the outcome. Scores ranged from -0.5 to 6.8. The higher the score, the more risky sexual behavior.
| units on a scale | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Risky Sexual Behaviors at 8 Months Post Randomization | 1.01 ± .12 | 1.32 ± .12 |
For the Main Study, the total score of the 'HIV/Sex Risk Behaviors' measure was used as the outcome. Scores ranged from -0.5 to 6.7. The higher the score, the more risky sexual behavior.
| units on a scale | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Main Study, Risky Sexual Behaviors at 12 Months Post Randomization | 1.30 ± .14 | 1.44 ± .12 |
For the Follow Up Study, sexual risk behavior was measured by examining the number of unprotected sexual acts and the number of partners and number of sex acts that included substance use the in the 90 day period that preceded the assessment; a latent factor using structural equation modeling will be used created from the Behavioral Risk Assessment. Scores ranged from -0.5 to 11.7. The higher the score, the more risky sexual behavior.
| units on a scale | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| Follow Up Study, Risky Sexual Behaviors | 2.06 ± .06 | 2.20 ± .10 |
Collected over 12 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| BSFT | — | 16/245 (6.5%) | 144/245 (58.8%) |
| Treatment as Usual | — | 16/235 (6.8%) | 133/235 (56.6%) |
| Event | BSFT | Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| HospitalizationSocial circumstances | 8/245 | 8/235 |
| Suicidal BehaviorSocial circumstances | 8/245 | 5/235 |
| Homicidal BehaviorSocial circumstances | 3/245 | 4/235 |
| Physical/ Sexual AbuseSocial circumstances | 2/245 | 2/235 |
| DeathSocial circumstances | 0/245 | 1/235 |
| Other Unexpected SAESocial circumstances | 0/245 | 1/235 |
| Event | BSFT | Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|
| ArrestSocial circumstances | 85/245 | 79/235 |
| School suspensionSocial circumstances | 72/245 | 71/235 |
| RunawaySocial circumstances | 34/245 | 45/235 |
| ViolenceSocial circumstances | 31/245 | 23/235 |
| Other Unexpected Adverse EventSocial circumstances | 12/245 | 3/235 |
| Kicked out of homeSocial circumstances | 6/245 | 4/235 |
Main Study
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 245 | 235 | 480 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| >=65 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Age, Categorical(participants in follow up study) | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 140 | 121 | 261 |
| >=65 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 50 | 53 | 103 |
| Male | 195 | 182 | 377 |
| Gender(participants in follow up study) | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 26 | 27 | 53 |
| Male | 114 | 94 | 208 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 107 | 106 | 213 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 133 | 125 | 258 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(participants in follow up study) | BSFT | TAU- Treatment as Usual | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 62 | 53 | 115 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 78 | 68 | 146 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Miami