CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00074802Updated Jun 14, 2017Results posted

Adding Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to Drug Treatment for Social Anxiety Disorder

A Phase 3 interventional study of Paroxetine and Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in Social Anxiety Disorder, sponsored by Temple University. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-06-14.

Sponsored by Temple University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will examine whether the addition of cognitive behavioral therapy can improve the efficacy of the medication paroxetine (Paxil®) in treating individuals with social anxiety disorder. Patients with social anxiety disorder will undergo a 12-week open trial with paroxetine. Those who complete the open trial having achieved only partial response will be randomized to receive cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in addition to paroxetine or to continue on paroxetine alone for an additional 16 weeks.

Read the detailed description

Social anxiety disorder is a prevalent and disabling condition for which effective long-term treatments need to be identified. Paroxetine is effective in treating the acute symptoms of social anxiety, but many patients achieve less than optimal response. CBT has also been effective in treating social anxiety disorder; thus,it may also be effective in augmenting paroxetine response. This study will examine the effects of paroxetine treatment alone and in combination with CBT among patients who achieve less than optimal response after an open trial with paroxetine.

Participants in this study will receive paroxetine for 12 weeks (Phase 1). After 12 weeks, participants who have completed this open trial but have achieved some but less than optimal response will move forward to Phase 2. To be eligible to move forward to Phase 2, patients must have achieved at least a 10% improvement in their open-trial Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale Scores (LSAS) but still have an LSAS score of 30 or greater. Patients meeting these criteria will be randomly assigned to either add weekly sessions of CBT to their treatment or to continue taking paroxetine alone for another 16 weeks. Social anxiety symptoms, rates of response and remission, fear of negative evaluation, disability and quality of life will be assessed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Social Anxiety Disorder

Keywords

  • Social Phobia
03

In context

Anxiety Disorders

4,868 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,390 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 150 is above the median of 80 across 4,174 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.

Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Temple University is the lead sponsor of 219 studies on the registry; 30 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (58%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth edition (DSM-IV) criteria for generalized social phobia
  • Willing and able to give written informed consent
  • English-speaking

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior or current diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, organic mental disorder, bipolar disorder, or antisocial, schizotypal, and schizoid personality disorders
  • Suicidal thoughts
  • History of failed paroxetine treatment of at least 6 weeks' duration at adequate doses or a history of failed outcome of a previous adequate trial of CBT
  • Clinically significant and/or unstable medical disease
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding. Women of childbearing potential will be required to sign a statement indicating their intention to avoid pregnancy during the study through the use of an effective method of contraception.
  • Alcohol or substance abuse or dependence within the past 3 months. Patients with a positive drug screen but no substance abuse disorder will be eligible for the study, provided they have not met criteria for abuse/dependence within the last 6 months and provide two clean urine samples 2 weeks apart.
  • Current or past history of seizure disorder (except febrile seizure in childhood)
  • Conditions that contraindicate the use of paroxetine
  • Inability to tolerate or unwillingness to accept a drug-free period of 4 weeks for monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) or fluoxetine and 2 weeks for other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), neuroleptics, antidepressants, benzodiazepines, mood stabilizers, buspirone, beta-adrenergic blockers, or other psychotropic drugs prior to beginning the study
  • Currently receiving psychotherapy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Paroxetine Continuation

    Participants who showed only partial response to paroxetine in Phase 1 will receive continued treatment with paroxetine for 16 additional weeks.

    Drug: Paroxetine

  • Experimental
    Paroxetine with CBT Augmentation

    Participants who showed only partial response to paroxetine in Phase 1 will receive continued treatment with paroxetine plus cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for 16 additional weeks.

    Drug: Paroxetine · Behavioral: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)

Interventions

  • DrugParoxetine

    Treatment with paroxetine will consist of an immediate release, flexible dosage of 20 to 50 mg per day.

    Also known as: Paxil

  • BehavioralCognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)

    CBT will consist of 16 weekly treatment sessions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS)

    The LSAS is a 24-item clinician-administered measure, which provides 0-3 ratings for anxiety and avoidance of social and performance situations. Anxiety and avoidance ratings are summed across items, yielding a range of scores from 0-144, with higher scores representing greater severity of social anxiety symptoms. We examined amount of change from week 12 to week 28 as the primary outcome. Change was calculated as Week 12 score minus Week 28 score, so a positive score equals greater positive change.

    Time frame: Change measured from Week 12 to Week 28

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (CGI-I)

    The CGI-I is a 7-point clinician-administered scale measuring improvement in symptoms over time. Lower numbers represent greater improvement. We examined responder status (i.e., percent of patients receiving an endpoint, Week 28, rating of 1 or 2) as well as remission status (i.e., percent of patients receiving an endpoint, Week 28, rating of 1) as secondary outcomes.

    Time frame: Responder and remitter status measured at Week 28

  2. Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS)

    The SIAS is a 20-item self-report measure of anxiety experienced while interacting in dyads or groups. Items are rated on a 0-4 scale, yielding a range of scores from 0-80, with higher scores representing greater anxiety. We examined amount of change at from week 12 to week 28 as a secondary outcome. Change was calculated as Week 12 score minus Week 28 score, so a positive score equals greater positive change.

    Time frame: Change measured from Week 12 to Week 28

  3. Social Phobia Scale (SPS)

    The SPS is a 20-item self-report measure of anxiety experienced when being observed by others. Items are rated on a 0-4 scale, yielding a range of scores from 0-80, with higher scores representing greater anxiety. We examined amount of change at from week 12 to week 28 as a secondary outcome. Change was calculated as Week 12 score minus Week 28 score, so a positive score equals greater positive change.

    Time frame: Change measured from Week 12 to Week 28

  4. Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (BFNE)

    The BFNE is a 12-item self-report measure of concern about negative evaluation by others. Items are rated on a 1-5 scale, yielding scores ranging from 12-60, with higher scores indicating greater fear of negative evaluation. We examined amount of change at from week 12 to week 28 as a secondary outcome. Change was calculated as Week 12 score minus Week 28 score, so a positive score equals greater positive change.

    Time frame: Change measured from Week 12 to Week 28

  5. Liebowitz Self-Report Disability Scale (LSRDS)

    The LSRDS is an 11-item self-report measure of the degree to which one's emotional problems limit one's ability to function in a variety of domains. Items are rated on a 0-3 scale of severity, and 10 of the 11 items (choosing either school or work as one area and omitting the other) are summed to produce a total score, ranging from 0-30. Higher scores represent greater disability. We examined amount of change at from week 12 to week 28 as a secondary outcome. Change was calculated as Week 12 score minus Week 28 score, so a positive score equals greater positive change.

    Time frame: Change measured from Week 12 to Week 28

  6. Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI)

    The QOLI is a 16-item self-report measure of life satisfaction. Each item is rated for importance (0-2) and satisfaction (-3 to +3), and these ratings are multiplied, summed, and divided by the number of non-zero entries to yield an average item score, which can range from -6 to +6. We examined amount of change at from week 12 to week 28 as a secondary outcome. Change was calculated as Week 12 score minus Week 28 score, so a positive score equals greater positive change.

    Time frame: Change measured from Week 12 to Week 28

07

Results

Posted Jun 14, 2017
Limitations and caveats
Limitations include the small size of the randomized sample and the lack of a placebo arm in the randomization phase of the study.

Participant flow

Recruitment began in 2003 at the Adult Anxiety Clinic of Temple University and the Anxiety Disorders Clinic of the New York State Psychiatric Institute. 150 patients with Generalized Social Anxiety Disorder were enrolled in Phase I of the study (open treatment with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneParoxetine ContinuationParoxetine With CBT Augmentation
Started2932
Completed2025
Not completed97

Outcome measures

PrimaryLiebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS)

The LSAS is a 24-item clinician-administered measure, which provides 0-3 ratings for anxiety and avoidance of social and performance situations. Anxiety and avoidance ratings are summed across items, yielding a range of scores from 0-144, with higher scores representing greater severity of social anxiety symptoms. We examined amount of change from week 12 to week 28 as the primary outcome. Change was calculated as Week 12 score minus Week 28 score, so a positive score equals greater positive change.

Time frame:
Change measured from Week 12 to Week 28
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS)
units on a scaleParoxetine ContinuationParoxetine With CBT Augmentation
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS)7.77 ± 22.497.84 ± 17.15
Statistical analysis
  • Paroxetine Continuation vs Paroxetine With CBT Augmentation · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .267 · Mean difference (net): -5.43 · 95% CI -15.05 to 4.19
SecondaryClinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (CGI-I)

The CGI-I is a 7-point clinician-administered scale measuring improvement in symptoms over time. Lower numbers represent greater improvement. We examined responder status (i.e., percent of patients receiving an endpoint, Week 28, rating of 1 or 2) as well as remission status (i.e., percent of patients receiving an endpoint, Week 28, rating of 1) as secondary outcomes.

Time frame:
Responder and remitter status measured at Week 28
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (CGI-I)
ParticipantsParoxetine ContinuationParoxetine With CBT Augmentation
Responder Status — Responder1728
Responder Status — Non-Responder124
Remitter Status — Responder311
Remitter Status — Non-Responder2621
Statistical analysis
  • Paroxetine Continuation vs Paroxetine With CBT Augmentation · Fisher Exact · p = .018 (Fisher's Exact Test used for analyses.)
  • Paroxetine Continuation vs Paroxetine With CBT Augmentation · Fisher Exact · p = .034 (Fisher's Exact Test used for analyses.)
SecondarySocial Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS)

The SIAS is a 20-item self-report measure of anxiety experienced while interacting in dyads or groups. Items are rated on a 0-4 scale, yielding a range of scores from 0-80, with higher scores representing greater anxiety. We examined amount of change at from week 12 to week 28 as a secondary outcome. Change was calculated as Week 12 score minus Week 28 score, so a positive score equals greater positive change.

Time frame:
Change measured from Week 12 to Week 28
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS)
units on a scaleParoxetine ContinuationParoxetine With CBT Augmentation
Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS)3.43 ± 9.585.67 ± 11.55
Statistical analysis
  • Paroxetine Continuation vs Paroxetine With CBT Augmentation · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .0005 · Mean difference (net): -3.21 · 95% CI -5.02 to -1.39
SecondarySocial Phobia Scale (SPS)

The SPS is a 20-item self-report measure of anxiety experienced when being observed by others. Items are rated on a 0-4 scale, yielding a range of scores from 0-80, with higher scores representing greater anxiety. We examined amount of change at from week 12 to week 28 as a secondary outcome. Change was calculated as Week 12 score minus Week 28 score, so a positive score equals greater positive change.

Time frame:
Change measured from Week 12 to Week 28
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Social Phobia Scale (SPS)
units on a scaleParoxetine ContinuationParoxetine With CBT Augmentation
Social Phobia Scale (SPS)2.75 ± 10.295.83 ± 8.59
Statistical analysis
  • Paroxetine Continuation vs Paroxetine With CBT Augmentation · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .0775 · Mean difference (net): -5.61 · 95% CI -11.84 to 0.62
SecondaryBrief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (BFNE)

The BFNE is a 12-item self-report measure of concern about negative evaluation by others. Items are rated on a 1-5 scale, yielding scores ranging from 12-60, with higher scores indicating greater fear of negative evaluation. We examined amount of change at from week 12 to week 28 as a secondary outcome. Change was calculated as Week 12 score minus Week 28 score, so a positive score equals greater positive change.

Time frame:
Change measured from Week 12 to Week 28
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (BFNE)
units on a scaleParoxetine ContinuationParoxetine With CBT Augmentation
Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (BFNE)1.13 ± 4.593.91 ± 5.69
Statistical analysis
  • Paroxetine Continuation vs Paroxetine With CBT Augmentation · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .0006 · Mean difference (net): -5.53 · 95% CI -8.70 to -2.35Paroxetine+CBT \> Paroxetine alone in BFNE change.
SecondaryLiebowitz Self-Report Disability Scale (LSRDS)

The LSRDS is an 11-item self-report measure of the degree to which one's emotional problems limit one's ability to function in a variety of domains. Items are rated on a 0-3 scale of severity, and 10 of the 11 items (choosing either school or work as one area and omitting the other) are summed to produce a total score, ranging from 0-30. Higher scores represent greater disability. We examined amount of change at from week 12 to week 28 as a secondary outcome. Change was calculated as Week 12 score minus Week 28 score, so a positive score equals greater positive change.

Time frame:
Change measured from Week 12 to Week 28
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Liebowitz Self-Report Disability Scale (LSRDS)
units on a scaleParoxetine ContinuationParoxetine With CBT Augmentation
Liebowitz Self-Report Disability Scale (LSRDS)1.25 ± 3.30-0.02 ± 2.72
Statistical analysis
  • Paroxetine Continuation vs Paroxetine With CBT Augmentation · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .871 · Mean difference (net): 0.20 · 95% CI -2.16 to 2.55
SecondaryQuality of Life Inventory (QOLI)

The QOLI is a 16-item self-report measure of life satisfaction. Each item is rated for importance (0-2) and satisfaction (-3 to +3), and these ratings are multiplied, summed, and divided by the number of non-zero entries to yield an average item score, which can range from -6 to +6. We examined amount of change at from week 12 to week 28 as a secondary outcome. Change was calculated as Week 12 score minus Week 28 score, so a positive score equals greater positive change.

Time frame:
Change measured from Week 12 to Week 28
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI)
units on a scaleParoxetine ContinuationParoxetine With CBT Augmentation
Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI)0.25 ± 1.24-0.35 ± 1.72
Statistical analysis
  • Paroxetine Continuation vs Paroxetine With CBT Augmentation · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .949 · Median difference (net): 0.41 · 95% CI -11.95 to 12.76

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from the beginning of the open trial phase of the study and throughout the randomized phase in which patients received paroxetine with or without CBT. Data presented in the Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and AE tables refer to events occurring during the randomized phase (Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Paroxetine Continuation0/29 (0%)1/29 (3.4%)29/29 (100%)
Paroxetine With CBT Augmentation0/32 (0%)0/32 (0%)29/32 (90.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventParoxetine ContinuationParoxetine With CBT Augmentation
Heavy menstrual bleedingReproductive system and breast disorders1/290/32
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 29
Most frequent other events
EventParoxetine ContinuationParoxetine With CBT Augmentation
AnorgasmiaGeneral disorders20/2918/32
Weight GainGeneral disorders19/2918/32
Decreased LibidoGeneral disorders16/2918/32
SomnolenceGeneral disorders16/2917/32
ConstipationGeneral disorders15/295/32
LightheadednessGeneral disorders15/299/32
FatigueGeneral disorders14/2915/32
NervousnessGeneral disorders14/2911/32
Dry MouthGeneral disorders13/298/32
SweatingGeneral disorders12/294/32

Baseline characteristics

Patients included here were the subset of enrollees completing the open trial as partial responders.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Paroxetine ContinuationParoxetine With CBT AugmentationTotal
Mean35.38 ± 12.3032.22 ± 9.7333.72 ± 11.05
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Paroxetine ContinuationParoxetine With CBT AugmentationTotal
Female10818
Male192443
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Paroxetine ContinuationParoxetine With CBT AugmentationTotal
Hispanic or Latino347
Not Hispanic or Latino262854
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Paroxetine ContinuationParoxetine With CBT AugmentationTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian3811
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American8412
White131528
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported5510
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale(units on a scale)Paroxetine ContinuationParoxetine With CBT AugmentationTotal
Mean49.45 ± 19.2344.63 ± 13.6046.92 ± 16.55
Social Interaction Anxiety Scale
Social Interaction Anxiety Scale(units on a scale)Paroxetine ContinuationParoxetine With CBT AugmentationTotal
Mean39.30 ± 11.0835.43 ± 12.3537.19 ± 11.85
Social Phobia Scale
Social Phobia Scale(units on a scale)Paroxetine ContinuationParoxetine With CBT AugmentationTotal
Mean20.04 ± 11.8717.43 ± 10.8518.62 ± 11.29
Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale
Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale(units on a scale)Paroxetine ContinuationParoxetine With CBT AugmentationTotal
Mean26.20 ± 7.3421.83 ± 6.4123.82 ± 7.13

2 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

2 sites
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute Anxiety Disorders Clinic
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Adult Anxiety Clinic of Temple University
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122-6085, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 14, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00074802
Lead sponsor
Temple University
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 22, 2003
Start date
Dec 2003
Primary completion
May 2008
Completion
May 2008
Results posted
Jun 14, 2017
Last update
Jun 14, 2017

Study contacts

Richard Heimberg, PhD
principal investigator · Adult Anxiety Clinic of Temple University
Michael Liebowitz, MD
principal investigator · New York State Psychiatric Institute Anxiety Disorders Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion