An observational study in Male Infertility, Testicular Diseases and Urologic and Male Genital Diseases, sponsored by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS). Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to male participants aged 21 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-04-15.
Sponsored by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) · Observational
Our data indicate that environmental exposure to the heavy metal lead are more widespread than currently appreciated and that such exposures are associated with the production of human male subfertility. Lead's effects are observed in male partners of infertile couples attending an IVF clinical, in men acting as semen donors in an artificial insemination program and in men representative of the general public. Our goal is to identify the mechanism(s) underlying lead's anti-fertility action.
Our goal is to understand how environmental and occupational exposures to heavy and transition metal ions injure the human male reproductive tract.
The American Urological Association and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine report that \~15% of couples (i.e., more than 6.1 million people in the U.S.) experience infertility at some time. The male is responsible for infertility of 20% of these couples and contributes to the infertility of another 30-40%. However, the cause(s) of male infertility in many cases is unknown. Our data suggest that lead exposures (in the air, in food and in drinking water) underlie a significant fraction of "unexplained" male infertility. We found that blood and seminal plasma lead levels were elevated in 22% of normospermic males from couples seeking infertility treatment, in 29% of semen donors participating in an artificial insemination program and in 23% of unselected semen donors answering an advertisement for research participation. These elevated lead levels were associated with decreased sperm fertility potential in IVF, in artificial insemination and in pregnancy by coitus. The negative effects of lead on sperm function was correlated with expression of specific forms of sperm ion channels (metal binding proteins that allow lead to enter cells), suggesting that such proteins serve as markers for susceptibility or resistance to the reproductive toxic effects of lead. Further, in cases in which human male lead levels changed markedly over time, there were corresponding changes in sperm ion channel, sperm function and sperm fertility potential. These changes were linked to changes in calcium modulated processes in human testis biopsies obtained from infertility patients and could be mimicked in testes of rats experimentally fed lead.
In the current study, we plan to identify changes in gene expression important to the production of the infertile state by comparing the genes expressed in the testis of control and lead exposed rats which are resistant or susceptible to lead. These findings will help to explain how lead exposure kill cells within the testis. We will then determine whether the same changes occur in human testis biopsies and ejaculated sperm from infertile males with high body burdens of lead. The expected outcome of this study is the identification of a possible mechanism explaining male infertility associated with low sperm counts or idiopathic male infertility, tools for diagnosis of male infertility and the hope for rationale treatment.
282 studies on the registry are indexed under Infertility, Male; 65 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 182 across 87 observational studies indexed under Infertility, Male.
Browse Infertility, Male studies →National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) is the lead sponsor of 183 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.
Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.
Biopsy and archival tissue
A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.
Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) →